Lumbar position sense with extreme lumbar angle

Lumbar joint position sense measurement of patients with low back pain

Lumbar position sense can be assessed by measurement instruments including the goniometer, isokinetic dynamometry, and electronic motion monitoring equipment, which have demonstrated relatively high reliability. This literature provides a comprehensive overview of influencing factors of lumbar position sense measurement, including repositioning method, fatigue degree, and posture during the reposition. It highlights the significant role of muscle proprioception, which contributes to greater accuracy in active reposition compared to passive reposition. The differences in lumbar position sense with different measurement positions may be explained by the presence of mechanoreceptors in the load-bearing structures of the lumbar spine, especially in the facet joint capsules. These mechanoreceptors play a crucial role in providing sensory feedback and proprioceptive information pertaining to the position and movement of the lumbar spine. Individuals with low back pain (LBP) demonstrate alterations in lumbar position sense compared to those without LBP. The auto motor sensory feedback transmission mechanism of patients with non-specific LBP was more unstable than that of healthy people. These findings suggest that lumbar position sense may play a potential role in the development and perpetuation of LBP. At present, the commonly used clinical assessment methods for determining position sense include both active and passive repositioning. However, neither method exhibits high sensitivity and specificity, leading to the poor comparability of relevant studies and posing challenges for clinical application.

Is There a Relationship Between Lumbar Proprioception and Low Back Pain? A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the relationship between lumbar proprioception and low back pain (LBP).

DATA SOURCES

Four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus) and reference lists of relevant articles were searched from inception to March-April 2014.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies compared lumbar proprioception in patients with LBP with controls or prospectively evaluated the relationship between proprioception and LBP. Two reviewers independently screened articles and determined inclusion through consensus.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data extraction and methodologic quality assessment were independently performed using standardized checklists.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Twenty-two studies (1203 participants) were included. Studies measured lumbar proprioception via active or passive joint repositioning sense (JRS) or threshold to detection of passive motion (TTDPM). Data from 17 studies were pooled for meta-analyses to compare patients with controls. Otherwise, descriptive syntheses were performed. Data were analyzed according to measurement method and LBP subgroup. Active JRS was worse in patients compared with controls when measured in sitting (standard mean difference, .97; 95% confidence interval [CI], .31-1.64). There were no differences between groups measured via active JRS in standing (standard mean difference, .41; 95% CI, -.07 to .89) or passive JRS in sitting (standard mean difference, .38; 95% CI, -.83 to 1.58). Patients in the O'Sullivan flexion impairment subgroup had worse proprioception than the total LBP cohort. The TTDPM was significantly worse in patients than controls. One prospective study found no link between lumbar proprioception and LBP.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with LBP have impaired lumbar proprioception compared with controls when measured actively in sitting positions (particularly those in the O'Sullivan flexion impairment subgroup) or via TTDPM. Clinicians should consider the relationship between sitting and proprioception in LBP and subgroup patients to guide management. Further studies focusing on subgroups, longitudinal assessment, and improving proprioception measurement are needed.

Injury and lumbar reposition sense in cricket pace bowlers in neutral and pace bowling specific body positions

BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT

The cricket pace bowling action consists of a complex sequence of forceful actions, involving practiced, particular movements of the lumbar spine. The nature and repetition of the pace bowling action is known to be associated with a high incidence of low back injuries.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to establish whether lumbar proprioception (as measured by joint position sense) in the neutral lumbar spine position as well as lumbar positions corresponding to those at front foot placement and ball release positions of the cricket pace bowling action were related to previous injury and injury sustained during the cricket season under review. Injuries specifically sustained during the bowling action and those specific to the low back were explicitly investigated.

STUDY SETTING

Longitudinal study with participants tested at the start and monitored over the duration of a cricket season.

PARTICIPANT SAMPLE

Seventeen male cricket pace bowlers between the ages of 18 and 26 years participated in this study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Physiological outcome measures were used. Lumbar position sense was established using electrogoniometry.

METHODS

Lumbar reposition error was measured in three positions (neutral lumbar spine, front foot placement, and ball release bowling positions). In each position, lumbar orientation was determined in the sagittal (flexion-extension) and coronal (left-right lateral flexion) planes. Wilcoxon matched-pairs ranks and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to establish the relationship between variables.

RESULTS

Reposition error was associated with general injuries sustained in the past and during the cricket season under review, low back injuries, as well as injuries sustained during the bowling action (p<.05).

CONCLUSION

Lumbar position sense, as a measure of proprioception, was related to injury in general, injuries sustained during the bowling action, and, especially, low back injury sustained in the past. Low back injury prevention methods are particularly needed because of the high load nature of the pace bowling action. If the proprioception of the lumbar spine is improved in pace bowlers, their risk of lumbar injury can potentially be reduced.

Lumbar repositioning error in sitting: healthy controls versus people with sitting-related non-specific chronic low back pain (flexion pattern)

Studies examining repositioning error (RE) in non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) demonstrate contradictory results, with most studies not correlating RE deficits with measures of pain, disability or fear. This study examined if RE deficits exist among a subgroup of patients with NSCLBP whose symptoms are provoked by flexion, and how such deficits relate to measures of pain, disability, fear-avoidance and kinesiophobia. 15 patients with NSCLBP were matched (age, gender, and body mass index) with 15 painfree participants. Lumbo-pelvic RE, pain, functional disability, fear-avoidance and kinesiophobia were evaluated. Participants were asked to reproduce a target position (neutral lumbo-pelvic posture) after 5 s of slump sitting. RE in each group was compared by evaluating constant error (CE), absolute error (AE) and variable error (VE). Both AE (p = 0.002) and CE (p = 0.006) were significantly larger in the NSCLBP group, unlike VE (p = 0.165) which did not differ between the groups. There were significant, moderate correlations in the NSCLBP group between AE and functional disability (r = 0.601, p = 0.018), and between CE and fear-avoidance (r = -0.577, p = 0.0024), but all other correlations were weak (r < 0.337, rs < 0.377) or non-significant (p > 0.05). The results demonstrate increased lumbo-pelvic RE in a subgroup of NSCLBP patients, with the selected subgroup undershooting the target position. Overall, RE was only weakly to moderately correlated with measures of pain, disability or fear. The deficits observed are consistent with findings of altered motor control in patients with NSCLBP. The mechanisms underlying these RE deficits, and the most effective method of addressing these deficits, require further study.