Does quantitative EMG differ myotonic dystrophy type 2 and type 1?

Clinical score for early diagnosis of myotonic dystrophy type 2

INTRODUCTION

Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is a rare, multisystemic, autosomal dominant disease with highly variable clinical presentation. DM2 is considered to be highly underdiagnosed.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine which symptoms, signs, and diagnostic findings in patients referred to neurological outpatient units are the most indicative to arouse suspicion of DM2. We tried to make a useful and easy-to-administer clinical scoring system for early diagnosis of DM2-DM2 early diagnosis score (DM2-EDS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred ninety-one patients with a clinical suspicion of DM2 were included: 69 were genetically confirmed to have DM2, and 222 patients were DM2 negative. Relevant history, neurological, and paraclinical data were obtained from the electronic medical records.

RESULTS

The following parameters appeared as significant predictors of DM2 diagnosis: cataracts (beta = 0.410, p < 0.001), myotonia on needle EMG (beta = 0.298, p < 0.001), hand tremor (beta = 0.211, p = 0.001), positive family history (beta = 0.171, p = 0.012), and calf hypertrophy (beta = 0.120, p = 0.043). In the final DM2-EDS, based on the beta values, symptoms were associated with the following values: cataracts (present 3.4, absent 0), myotonia (present 2.5, absent 0), tremor (present 1.7, absent 0), family history (positive 1.4, negative 0), and calf hypertrophy (present 1.0, absent 0). A cut-off value on DM2-EDS of 3.25 of maximum 10 points had a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 81% to diagnose DM2.

CONCLUSION

Significant predictors of DM2 diagnosis in the neurology outpatient unit were identified. We made an easy-to-administer DM2-EDS score for early diagnosis of DM2.

Myotonic Muscular Dystrophy Type 2 in CT, USA: A Single-Center Experience With 50 Patients

ABSTRACT

Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is an autosomal dominant disorder due to a (CCTG)n repeat expansion in intron 1 of the CNBP gene. In this article, we report the clinicopathologic findings in 50 patients seen at a single site over a 27 year period. DM2 was the fifth most common type of muscular dystrophy seen at our center with a 5-fold lower frequency as compared to DM1. Age of symptom onset ranged from 15 to 72 years, and the mean duration between symptom onset and diagnosis was 7.4 years. Weakness referable to the proximal lower extremities was the presenting symptom in 62% of patients. The degree of generalized weakness varied from severe in 30% to no weakness in 20% of patients. Clinical myotonia was noted in 18% and myotonic discharges on electromyography in 97% of patients. Pain symptoms were uncommon in our cohort. A significant correlation was noted between limb weakness and degree of muscle pathologic changes. There was no correlation between CCTG repeat size and other clinicopathologic findings. Six patients (12%) had cardiac abnormalities including one who developed progressive nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy ultimately leading to cardiac transplantation. In 21 patients followed for 2 or more years, we noted a mean rate of decline in total Medical Research Council score of about 1% per year.

Electromechanical delays during a fatiguing exercise and recovery in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1

PURPOSE

The partitioning of the electromechanical delay by an electromyographic (EMG), mechanomyographic (MMG) and force combined approach can provide further insight into the electrochemical and mechanical processes involved with skeletal muscle contraction and relaxation. The aim of the study was to monitor by this combined approach the changes in delays' electrochemical and mechanical components throughout a fatiguing task and during recovery in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1), who present at the skeletal muscle level fibres rearrangement, muscle weakness and myotonia, especially in the distal muscles.

METHODS

After assessing maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), 14 male patients with DM1 and 14 healthy controls (HC) performed a fatiguing exercise at 50% MVC until exhaustion. EMG, MMG, and force signals were recorded from tibialis anterior and vastus lateralis muscles. The electromechanical delay during contraction (Delay_TOT) and relaxation (R-Delay_TOT) components, EMG and MMG root mean square (RMS) and mean frequency (MF) were calculated off-line.

RESULTS

The fatiguing exercise duration was similar in both groups. In patients with DM1, delays components were significantly longer compared to HC, especially in the distal muscle during relaxation. Delays components recovered quickly from the fatiguing exercise in HC than in patients with DM1 in both muscles.

CONCLUSIONS

The alterations in delays observed in DM1 during the fatiguing exercise may indicate that also the lengthening of the electrochemical and mechanical processes during contraction and relaxation could play a role in explaining exercise intolerance in this pathology.