Severe amlodipine intoxication treated by hyperinsulinemia euglycemia therapy

Antidotes in Clinical Toxicology-Critical Review

Poisoning and overdose are very important aspects in medicine and toxicology. Chemical weapons pose a threat to civilians, and emergency medicine principles must be followed when dealing with patients who have been poisoned or overdosed. Antidotes have been used for centuries and modern research has led to the development of new antidotes that can accelerate the elimination of toxins from the body. Although some antidotes have become less relevant due to modern intensive care techniques, they can still save lives or reduce the severity of toxicity. The availability of antidotes is crucial, especially in developing countries where intensive care facilities may be limited. This article aims to provide information on specific antidotes, their recommended uses, and potential risks and new uses. In the case of poisoning, supportive therapies are most often used; however, in many cases, the administration of an appropriate antidote saves the patient's life. In this review, we reviewed the literature on selected antidotes used in the treatment of poisonings. We also characterised the antidotes (bio)chemically. We described the cases in which they are used together with the dosage recommendations. We also analysed the mechanisms of action. In addition, we described alternative methods of using a given substance as a drug, an example of which is N-acetylcysteine, which can be used in the treatment of COVID-19. This article was written as part of the implementation of the project of the Polish Ministry of Education and Science, "Toxicovigilance, poisoning prevention, and first aid in poisoning with xenobiotics of current clinical importance in Poland", grant number SKN/SP/570184/2023.

Amlodipine Overdose: Is High Dose Insulin Ready for Prime Time

Overdose of amlodipine, a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (CCB), is distinguished from other CCBs due to longer plasma half-life of 30 to 58 h. As current management strategies of CCB overdose are diverse and institution dependent, this retrospective observational study aimed to compare treatment and outcomes data extracted from published case reports of amlodipine overdose with a cohort of patients diagnosed with amlodipine overdose at an urban tertiary medical center. Particular attention was paid to the use of high dose insulin euglycemic therapy (HIET) in treatment of amlodipine overdose. Data was extracted from actual adult patients hospitalized for amlodipine overdose at an urban tertiary medical center up to 2018, and from case reports of amlodipine overdose published between 1997 and 2020. We found a tendency towards earlier and more frequent initiation of HIET over time in management of amlodipine overdose, facilitating hospital discharge. Given the lack of randomized controlled trials comparing vasopressors, HIET, or other therapies, optimal treatment for amlodipine overdose has yet to be definitively established. Based on currently available evidence, a reasonable approach to management of the hemodynamically unstable patient presenting with amlodipine overdose includes vasopressors and inotropes with earlier initiation of HIET.

Once was not enough: A case report of the concomitant intoxication of amlodipine (calcium channel blocker) and clonazepam (benzodiazepine)

We report a case of concurrent ingestion of Clonazepam and Amlodipine in a 25-year-old man, in a second attempt to take his life, which resulted in unconsciousness, hypotension, and hypokalemia. The clinical and/or biochemical presentation varied from the individual pattern when ingested. In the scarcity of consensus recommendations, supportive treatment helped.

[Amlodipine assay conditions and stability in biological material]

The objective of the study is to determine amlodipine assay conditions and stability in biological material. Thin layer chromatography (TLC), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and UV-spectrophotometry were used for identification. Amlodipine was recovered from biomaterial by double (30 min each) infusing with acetone at the ratio of recovery solution and sample 2:1 (w/w). The purification was carried out by extraction and chromatography in a semi-preparative column with reverse-phase packing material Silasorb C-18 using acetone/water eluent (8:2). Amlodipine assay was performed by TLC [Sorbfil plates, butanol/acetone (5:5) as a mobile phase], GC-MS (HP-5 ms Ultra inert column (30 m×0.25×0.25 μm) with stationary phase of 5% phenyl-95% dimethyl polysiloxane), UV-spectrophotometry (95% ethanol as a solvent). The proposed assay method for amlodipine in biomaterial (liver tissue) is validated for linearity, selectivity, accuracy and precision. The amlodipine stability in model mixtures with liver tissue was studied. It was shown that the analyte stability in biological material decreases with increasing temperature. Amlodipine is stable at -25 °C, 0-2 °C, 8-10 °C, 18-22 °C, and 36 °C for 120, 112, 105, 91, and 77 days, respectively.

Postmortem fatal and non-fatal concentrations of amlodipine

Amlodipine is a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker widely used in the treatment of high blood pressure and coronary heart disease. Intoxication can lead to reflex tachycardia following massive hypotension and death. The objective of this work was to study the post-mortem concentrations of amlodipine in 62 patients in order to determine whether the use of the reference concentrations from the living patients was applicable in postmortem setting, and to define more precisely the fatal and non-fatal postmortem concentrations of amlodipine. The amlodipine concentrations were measured in femoral whole blood by LC-MS/MS validated method. When sufficient information was available, the data were classified into 2 different groups, based on the conclusions of the autopsy and toxicological results: G1: non-toxic death and G2: fatal poisoning involving amlodipine alone or as part of a multidrug poisoning. The median concentration of amlodipine [1st quartile - 3rd quartile] of the whole population (n = 62) was 81 [42-134] ng/mL. Twenty-two cases were classified as G1 and thirteen as G2. The observed median [1st quartile - 3rd quartile] concentration of amlodipine was 66 [40.5-79.5] ng/mL in G1 and 240 [170-404] ng/mL in G2. The median concentrations observed in "non-toxic" deaths (66 ng/mL) were three times higher than those usually observed in living patients. Amlodipine distribution ratio between plasma and whole blood concentrations seems insufficient to explain this difference and postmortem redistribution from organs should be considered, and could suggest the same redistribution pattern for other drugs belonging to the same family.

[Forensic chemical study of Amlodipine]

Is to develop a method for determining amlodipine in the tissues of organs and blood, applicable in the practice of forensic chemical analysis. TLC, normal pressure column chromatography, HPLC and GC-MS were considered as methods of analysis. Amlodipine was isolated from the biomaterial by insisting twice with acetone for 30 min using a 2: 1 mass-isolating and biomatrix agent. The purification of recovered analyte was done in a column (150×10 mm) of a 30 µm Silasorb S-18 sorbent, eluting with an acetone - water solvent mixture (8:2). Preliminary identification was carried out in a thin layer of sorbent on «Sorbfil» plates, which was confirmed by HPLC and GC-MS methods. Determination by GC-MS was carried out in a column with a stationary phase of 5% phenyl-95% dimethylpolysiloxane. The fragmentation of molecules was an electron impact with an energy of 70 eV. Methods for the determination of amlodipine using GC-MS in biomatrix have been developed, which meet the criteria of linearity, selectivity, correctness, precision and stability. The limits of detection and quantitative determination of amlodipine in organ tissues (liver) are 0.14 and 0.24 μg/g, in blood - 0.12 and 0.20 μg/g, respectively. The methods were applied in the examination of a case of amlodipine poisoning and made it possible to determine the analyte in some organs and blood of the corpse.

Unresponsive shock due to amlodipine overdose: An unexpected cause

Amlodipine is a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker which is widely used as an antihypertensive drug. Amlodipine overdose have been infrequently reported with occurrence of serious complications and even death in a few cases. We report an interesting case of a young lady who presented with refractory shock with acute kidney injury, which did not respond to therapy despite optimal fluid replacement and vasopressor support. The etiology of shock could not be ascertained and the patient was questioned again to elucidate the missing clue in the history. It was finally revealed that the patient had consumed 900 mg of amlodipine in a suicide bid, for her poor performance in academics. The targeted therapy in the form of IV calcium and hyperinsulinemia-euglycemia therapy (HIET) was started and the patient dramatically improved with shock reversal and improvement in renal function.

Are vasopressors useful in toxin-induced cardiogenic shock?

OBJECTIVE

Overdoses with cardio-depressive medications can result in toxin-induced cardiogenic shock (TICS), a life-threatening condition characterized by severe hypotension and ineffective tissue perfusion. Vasopressors are often employed in the treatment of shock to increase heart rate and blood pressure. We sought to conduct a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the effectiveness of vasopressors in improving hemodynamic function and survival in the treatment of TICS.

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, TOXLINE, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts.

STUDY SELECTION

We included studies evaluating the use of vasopressors in humans or animals with TICS. We limited human study types to randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, observational studies, and case reports.

DATA EXTRACTION

Our search yielded 913 citations and 144 of these met our inclusion criteria. 130 were human case reports and 14 were animal studies.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Human case report data showed vasopressors were ineffective more often than they were partially or fully effective. In the majority of animal studies, vasopressor treatment failed to improve hemodynamic parameters and resulted in decreased survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Human case reports and controlled animal experiments lead to different conclusions about vasopressors in TICS. Most animal studies indicate that vasopressors impair hemodynamic function and increase mortality. In contrast, human case reports suggest that vasopressors are often ineffective but not necessarily harmful.

Noncardiogenic Pulmonary Edema after Amlodipine Overdose without Refractory Hypotension and Bradycardia

Amlodipine overdose can be life-threatening when manifesting as noncardiogenic pulmonary edema. Treatment remains challenging. We describe a case of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema without refractory hypotension and bradycardia after ingestion of 500 milligram amlodipine with suicidal intent. Mechanical ventilation, dexamethasone, atrovent HFA (ipratropium), pulmicort inhalation, and antibiotic therapy were used for the management. Length of hospital stay was 11 days. The patient was discharged with full recovery.

Treatment for calcium channel blocker poisoning: a systematic review

CONTEXT

Calcium channel blocker poisoning is a common and sometimes life-threatening ingestion.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reported effects of treatments for calcium channel blocker poisoning. The primary outcomes of interest were mortality and hemodynamic parameters. The secondary outcomes included length of stay in hospital, length of stay in intensive care unit, duration of vasopressor use, functional outcomes, and serum calcium channel blocker concentrations.

METHODS

Medline/Ovid, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, TOXLINE, International pharmaceutical abstracts, Google Scholar, and the gray literature up to December 31, 2013 were searched without time restriction to identify all types of studies that examined effects of various treatments for calcium channel blocker poisoning for the outcomes of interest. The search strategy included the following Keywords: [calcium channel blockers OR calcium channel antagonist OR calcium channel blocking agent OR (amlodipine or bencyclane or bepridil or cinnarizine or felodipine or fendiline or flunarizine or gallopamil or isradipine or lidoflazine or mibefradil or nicardipine or nifedipine or nimodipine or nisoldipine or nitrendipine or prenylamine or verapamil or diltiazem)] AND [overdose OR medication errors OR poisoning OR intoxication OR toxicity OR adverse effect]. Two reviewers independently selected studies and a group of reviewers abstracted all relevant data using a pilot-tested form. A second group analyzed the risk of bias and overall quality using the STROBE (STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology) checklist and the Thomas tool for observational studies, the Institute of Health Economics tool for Quality of Case Series, the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments) guidelines, and the modified NRCNA (National Research Council for the National Academies) list for animal studies. Qualitative synthesis was used to summarize the evidence. Of 15,577 citations identified in the initial search, 216 were selected for analysis, including 117 case reports. The kappa on the quality analysis tools was greater than 0.80 for all study types.

RESULTS

The only observational study in humans examined high-dose insulin and extracorporeal life support. The risk of bias across studies was high for all interventions and moderate to high for extracorporeal life support. High-dose insulin. High-dose insulin (bolus of 1 unit/kg followed by an infusion of 0.5-2.0 units/kg/h) was associated with improved hemodynamic parameters and lower mortality, at the risks of hypoglycemia and hypokalemia (low quality of evidence). Extracorporeal life support. Extracorporeal life support was associated with improved survival in patients with severe shock or cardiac arrest at the cost of limb ischemia, thrombosis, and bleeding (low quality of evidence). Calcium, dopamine, and norepinephrine. These agents improved hemodynamic parameters and survival without documented severe side effects (very low quality of evidence). 4-Aminopyridine. Use of 4-aminopyridine was associated with improved hemodynamic parameters and survival in animal studies, at the risk of seizures. Lipid emulsion therapy. Lipid emulsion was associated with improved hemodynamic parameters and survival in animal models of intravenous verapamil poisoning, but not in models of oral verapamil poisoning. Other studies. Studies on decontamination, atropine, glucagon, pacemakers, levosimendan, and plasma exchange reported variable results, and the methodologies used limit their interpretation. No trial was documented in humans poisoned with calcium channel blockers for Bay K8644, CGP 28932, digoxin, cyclodextrin, liposomes, bicarbonate, carnitine, fructose 1,6-diphosphate, PK 11195, or triiodothyronine. Case reports were only found for charcoal hemoperfusion, dialysis, intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella device and methylene blue.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment for calcium channel blocker poisoning is supported by low-quality evidence drawn from a heterogeneous and heavily biased literature. High-dose insulin and extracorporeal life support were the interventions supported by the strongest evidence, although the evidence is of low quality.

Amlodipine poisoning revisited: Acidosis, acute kidney injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome

We report the case of an 18-year-old girl presenting with shock following ingestion of 85 mg of amlodipine and 850 mg of atenolol with suicidal intent. Subsequently, the patient developed severe metabolic acidosis, acute kidney injury, and acute respiratory distress syndrome, which were managed conservatively. The patient ultimately made a full recovery. Given the popularity of amlodipine and atenolol as antihypertensive drugs in this part of the world, it is likely that more such cases will be encountered in the future. Physicians should be aware of the severe complications that can develop with amlodipine overdose.

Amlodipine overdose

We describe the case of a 24-year-old woman who intentionally ingested between 400 and 600 mg of amlodipine along with a large number of simvastatin and trazodone tablets.

Management of calcium channel antagonist overdose with hyperinsulinemia-euglycemia therapy: case series and review of the literature

Calcium channel antagonists (CCAs) are commonly involved in drug overdoses. Standard approaches to the management of CCA overdoses, including fluid resuscitation, gut decontamination, administration of calcium, glucagon, and atropine, as well as supportive care, are often ineffective. We report on two patients who improved after addition of hyperinsulinemia-euglycemia (HIE) therapy. We conclude with a literature review on hyperinsulinemia-euglycemia therapy with an exploration of the physiology behind its potential use.

Successful treatment of refractory hypotension, noncardiogenic pulmonary edema and acute kidney injury after an overdose of amlodipine

Treatment of patients with amlodipine overdose remains challenging. We describe a case of successful treatment of refractory hypotension, noncardiogenic pulmonary edema and acute kidney injury after an intoxication with 250 mg of amlodipine. Marked improvement in all hemodynamic parameters was noted with combination of fluids, inotropes, low-dose calcium, low dose insulin, mechanical ventilation and hemodialysis. All available information on overdose of amlodipine is limited to case reports and series. Prospective trial on the use of these agents is required to define its role as the first-line treatment in amlodipine, a calcium channel blockers overdose.

Amlodipine poisioning complicated with acute non-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema

Amlodipine poisoning is an uncommon presentation with potentially life threatening complications. As there are few cases of severe poisoning documented, management guidelines are limited. The authors present the case of a 22-year-old female who presented to hospital 6 h after ingesting 280 mg of amlodipine. She was treated with aggressive fluid resuscitation and calcium gluconate infusion. She went on to develop acute non-cardiogenic pulmonary odema for which she needed a frusemide infusion. She stayed in hospital for 5 days and was discharged after a psychiatric review with no long-term complications. The authors discuss the other management options available for patients presenting with amlodipine overdose.