Are Plain Radiographs Sufficient to Exclude Cervical Spine Injuries in Low-Risk Adults?

Feasibility analysis of high pitch cervical spine CT in uncooperative patients with acute cervical spine trauma: An initial experience

Cervical computed tomography (CT) often suffers from examination failure in uncooperative patients with acute cervical spinal trauma. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using high-pitch cervical CT (HP-CT) in such populations. A total of 95 patients with acute neck/head-neck trauma who underwent HP-CT (n = 29) or standard cervical CT (SD-CT, n = 66) from October 2020 to June 2021 were included in this study. Differences in patient characteristics between the HP-CT group and the SD-CT group were firstly compared. Then, the objective image quality based on the mean score of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)/contrast noise ratio (CNR) was evaluated, while double-blind five-point scoring was adopted for the subjective evaluation. Finally, radiation doses in HP-CT and SD-CT were compared. Furthermore, the Student t test and/or Mann-Whitney U test were performed to analyze differences in patient characteristics, image quality, and radiation dose between the two regimes. A total of 17 cases of cervical spine fractures were found in 95 patients, including 6 cases in the HP-CT group and 11 cases in the SD-CT group. The average age of patients who received HP-CT was higher than that of those who received SD-CT, and the scan time using HP-CT was shorter than that SD-CT. The differences were statistically significant (both, P < .05). In addition, there was no significant difference between HP-CT and SD-CT in terms of sex, body mass index, field of view (FOV), and scan length (all P > .05). The SNR/CNR at the middle and upper neck was not significantly different between HP-CT and SD-CT (all P > .05). However, the SNR/CNR at the lower neck in HP-CT was lower than that in SD-CT (all P < .05). There was no significant difference in the subjective scores between HP-CT and SD-CT images in both the soft tissue and bone window (P = .129 and 0.649, respectively). The radiation dose in HP-CT was lower than that in SD-CT (all P < .05). With a scan time reduction of 73%, radiation dose reduction of 10%, and similar image quality, high-pitch cervical CT was of feasibility to evaluate cervical spine injury in uncooperative patients with acute cervical spine trauma.

Highly reduced-dose CT of the lumbar spine in a human cadaver model

Purpose

Feasibility of a highly reduced-dose lumbar spine CT protocol using iterative reconstruction (IR) in a human cadaver model.

Materials and methods

The lumbar spine of 20 human cadavers was repeatedly examined using three different reduced-dose protocols (RDCT) with decreasing reference tube current-exposure time products (RDCT-1: 50 mAs; RDCT-2: 30 mAs; RDCT-3: 10 mAs) at a constant tube voltage of 140 kV. A clinical standard-dose protocol (SDCT) served as the reference (reference tube current–exposure time product: 70 mAs; tube voltage: 140 kV). Images were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP) and two increasing levels of IR: IRL4 and IRL6. A five-point scale was used by two observers to assess the diagnostic quality of anatomical structures (cortical and trabecular bone, intervertebral foramina, pedicles and intervertebral joints, spinous and transverse processes). Objective image noise (OIN) was measured. Results were interpreted using a linear mixed-effects regression model.

Results

RDCT-2 with IRL6 (1.2 ± 0.5mSv) was the lowest reduced-dose protocol which provided diagnostically acceptable and equivalent image quality compared to the SDCT (2.3 ± 1.1mSV) with FBP (p > 0.05). All RDCT protocols achieved a significant reduction of the mean (±SD) effective radiation doses (RDCT-1: 1.7±0.9mSv; RDCT-2: 1.2±0.5mSv; RDCT-3: 0.4±0.2mSv; p < 0.05) compared to SDCT. OIN was lower in all RDCT protocols with the application of IRL4 and IRL6, compared to the SDCT with FBP (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Highly reduced-dose lumbar spine CT providing diagnostically acceptable image quality is feasible using IR in this cadaver model and may be transferred into a clinical setting.

Management of whiplash-associated disorder in the Italian emergency department: the feasibility of an evidence-based continuous professional development course provided by physiotherapists

PURPOSE

The management of whiplash and associated disorders (WAD) in the Italian Health System is still empirical and influenced by a single professional's expertise. Therefore, the purpose of our study is to describe a structured management changes in an Italian emergency department (ED) after an evidence based continuous professional development (CPD) course.

METHODS

A CPD course was organized by Orthopedic Manipulative Physical Therapists (OMPT) for personnel of ED in the hospital Girolamo Fracastoro (San Bonifacio, Verona, Italy), based on latest scientific evidence. Data regarding the number of X-Rays, computed tomography (CT) scan, orthopaedic referrals, neck collars and WAD IV (i.e., severe diagnosis) before and after the course were compared.

RESULTS

3066 cases of WAD have been analyzed in 2016 and 2185 in 2017/2018. The number of X-Rays dropped down from 15.1% to 13.5%; the CT scans increased from 1.3% to 1.9%; the WAD IV diagnosis increased from 0.7% to 1.6%; the orthopaedic referrals dropped from 1.5% to 1.1%; the collars prescription dropped from 8.8% to 2.5%.

CONCLUSION

An updated framework increased the efficiency of ED's maintaining the same level of safety (i.e., WAD IV diagnosis). Given that, it can also be argued that, in line with other countries, the implementation of an OMPT role within the ED multidisciplinary team is advised also in Italy.Implications for rehabilitationPhysiotherapists were commissioned to organize a management change of patients in an Italian Emergency Department clinical setting for the management of whiplash;Guidelines and other appropriate clinical rules facilitate the delivery of an evidence-based and more appropriate management and care plan;An inter-disciplinary continuous professional development course has the potential to positively influence patients' journey and to optimize the use of departmental resources;The involvement of other health professionals (e.g., Physiotherapists) within the Italian Emergency Department organizational chart might lead to further improvement of service provided.

Evaluation of clinical criteria to determine the need for cervical spine imaging in victims of blunt assault

The purpose of this study is to evaluate effectiveness of clinical criteria, specifically the NEXUS Criteria, in determining the need for cervical spine imaging in victims of blunt assault to head and face. CT results from victims of blunt assault to the head and face were compared with presenting clinical findings. The presence or absence of cervical spine injury was correlated with positive NEXUS criteria to determine if the clinical criteria appropriately risk stratified patients in this population. Incidence of c-spine injury was 1.09% (7/641). For clinically significant injury, the incidence dropped to 0.16% (1/641). PPV of NEXUS criteria in blunt assault to the head and face for any injury in our study was 1.4% (95% CI: 0.6%-2.6%) compared to 2.7% (95% CI: 2.6%-2.8%) in the NEXUS validity study. PPV of NEXUS criteria in blunt assault to the head and face for significant injury in our study was 0.2% (95% CI: 0%-0.9%) compared to 1.9% (95% CI: 1.8%-2.0%) in the NEXUS validity study. The findings demonstrate a statistically significant difference between the PPV of NEXUS criteria in victims of blunt assault to the head and face when compared to all blunt trauma in the NEXUS validity study. This suggests that the clinical criteria do not adequately stratify this low risk population, leading to imaging over-utilization. Limited use of cervical spine imaging in victims of blunt assault will decrease radiation exposure and healthcare costs and will strengthen the validity of clinical risk stratification for more high-risk groups.

Emergency department evaluation and treatment of cervical spine injuries

Most spinal cord injuries involve the cervical spine, highlighting the importance of recognition and proper management by emergency physicians. Initial cervical spine injury management should follow the ABCDE (airway, breathing, circulation, disability, exposure) procedure detailed by Advanced Trauma Life Support. NEXUS (National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study) criteria and Canadian C-spine Rule are clinical decision-making tools providing guidelines of when to obtain imaging. Computed tomography scans are the preferred initial imaging modality. Consider administering intravenous methylprednisolone after discussion with the neurosurgical consultant in patients who present with spinal cord injuries within 8 hours.

[Spinal trauma: first aid from cross-sectional imaging]

The diagnosis of the traumatized spine is one of the key issues for trauma radiologists. The cross-sectional imaging procedures, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the essential methods in spinal trauma radiology. These modalities are of great help in accurately assessing injury patterns and extent and in providing indications of patient outcome. In contrast to cross-sectional imaging, radiography has a role in the evaluation of minor spinal trauma only. It is generally accepted that trauma radiologists do not use typical classifications to evaluate the spine partly because such an ideal classification system does not yet exist. Not least because of this classification difficulty, eponyms and synonyms are widely used to describe traumatology of the spine as a high level of specific information is included in these various terms. The members of the trauma team should be aware of the strengths and limitations of the methods used in the assessment of the spine. This article provides a brief outline of fundamental knowledge about the diagnosis of spinal trauma.