1
|
Nishizawa T, Schuler J, Bethwell C, Glemnitz M, Semm M, Suškevičs M, Hämäläinen L, Sepp K, Värnik R, Uthes S, Aurbacher J, Zander P. Modelling Alternative Economic Incentive Schemes for Semi-Natural Grassland Conservation in Estonia. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2024; 74:757-774. [PMID: 39090440 PMCID: PMC11393159 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-024-02011-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
Semi-natural grasslands (SNGLs) in Estonia are threatened by abandonment. This threat is leading to concerns about the degradation of biodiversity within grassland communities. Despite the high relevance of economic incentives in this context, how such incentives influence land managers' decision-making regarding the agricultural use of SNGLs has not been investigated. To obtain its socio-ecological implications for policy-making, we developed regionally specific agricultural scenarios (compensation payments, livestock capacity, hey export, and bioenergy production) and an interdisciplinary modelling approach that made it possible to simulate agricultural land use changes through land managers' responses to varied economic conditions. Through this approach, we found that some economic factors hampered the use of SNGLs: the moderate profitability of beef production, labour shortages, and the relatively high profitability of mulching. We observed a positive relationship between SNGLs and habitat suitability for breeding and feeding birds. However, due to the high maintenance costs of SNGLs, the modelling results indicated that increasing the use of SNGLs through public budgets caused crowding-out effects, i.e., the deteriorating market integration of regional agriculture. This study emphasises the need for policy measures aimed at cost-effective, labour-efficient management practices for SNGLs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takamasa Nishizawa
- Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany.
| | - Johannes Schuler
- Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany
| | - Claudia Bethwell
- Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany
- Geography Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Glemnitz
- Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany
| | - Maaria Semm
- Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Chair of Environmental Protection and Landscape Management, Kreutzwaldi 5, 51006, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Monika Suškevičs
- Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Chair of Environmental Protection and Landscape Management, Kreutzwaldi 5, 51006, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Laura Hämäläinen
- Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agriculture and Environment, Chair of Rural Economics, Kreutzwaldi 1, 51006, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Kalev Sepp
- Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Chair of Environmental Protection and Landscape Management, Kreutzwaldi 5, 51006, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Rando Värnik
- Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agriculture and Environment, Chair of Rural Economics, Kreutzwaldi 1, 51006, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Sandra Uthes
- Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany
| | - Joachim Aurbacher
- Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Institute of Farm and Agribusiness Management, Giessen, Germany
| | - Peter Zander
- Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Assessing Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Options for Farm Performance Using Bio-Economic Models in Southwestern France. SUSTAINABILITY 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/su12187528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Regional impact studies are needed to explore possible adaptation options to climate change. We estimated impacts and adaptation options for future scenarios that feature different assumptions regarding climate, cropping pattern and access to irrigation with two bio-economic farm models. Farm profit, soil organic matter balance and labor input are used as indicators of farm performance. The difference between the baseline and the alternative configurations computed by models is referred as adaptation potential, indicative of the adaptation options including the corresponding changes in cropping patterns. Our results show that as long as there is sufficient access to irrigation water, there is little incentive to change current practices, as farming is at the economic optimum, has a positive soil organic matter balance and labor requirements can be met. Conversely, if irrigation is no longer possible, drastic impacts occur, causing a need to sustainably adjust on-going farm practices. Adaptation through changed crop selection reduced losses to some extent. We conclude that the use of bio-economic models can assist in evaluating the qualitative findings of participatory studies by quantitatively assessing possible climate change impacts and adaptation measures. Strong impacts of climate change, however, cannot be offset by changes in cropping patterns and need further adaptation measures.
Collapse
|