Stacked conservation practices reduce nitrogen loss: A paired watershed study

Fertilization intensities at the buffer zones of ponds regulate nitrogen and phosphorus pollution in an agricultural watershed

The sudden increase in water nutrients caused by environmental factors have always been a focus of attention for ecologists. Fertilizer inputs with spatio-temporal characteristics are the main contributors to water pollution in agricultural watersheds. However, there are few studies on the thresholds of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) fertilization rates that affect the abrupt deterioration of water quality. This study aims to investigate 28 ponds in Central China in 2019 to reveal the relationships of basal and topdressing fertilization intensities in surrounding agricultural land with pond water N and P concentrations, including total N (TN), nitrate (NO3--N), ammonium (NH4+-N), total P (TP), and dissolved P (DP). Abrupt change analysis was used to determine the thresholds of fertilization intensities causing sharp increases in the pond water N and P concentrations. Generally, the observed pond water N and P concentrations during the high-runoff period were higher than those during the low-runoff period. The TN, NO3--N, TP, DP concentrations showed stronger positive correlations with topdressing intensities, while the NH4+-N concentrations exhibited a higher positive correlation with basal intensities. On the other hand, the NO3--N concentrations had a significant positive correlation with the topdressing N, basal N, and catchment slope interactions. Significant negative correlations were observed between all water quality parameters and pond area. Spatial scale analysis indicated that fertilization practices at the 50 m and 100 m buffer zone scales exhibited greater independent effects on the variations in the N and P concentrations than those at the catchment scale. The thresholds analysis results of fertilization intensities indicated that pond water N concentrations increased sharply when topdressing and basal N intensities exceeded 163 and 115 kg/ha at the 100 and 50 m buffer zone scales, respectively. Similarly, pond water P concentrations rose significantly when topdressing and basal P intensities exceeded 117 and 78 kg/ha at the 50 m buffer zone scale, respectively. These findings suggest that fertilization management should incorporate thresholds and spatio-temporal scales to effectively mitigate pond water pollution.

Our national nutrient reduction needs: Applying a conservation prioritization framework to US agricultural lands

Targeted conservation approaches seek to focus resources on areas where they can deliver the greatest benefits and are recognized as key to reducing nonpoint source nutrients from agricultural landscapes into sensitive receiving waters. Moreover, there is growing recognition of the importance and complementarity of in-field and edge-of-field conservation for reaching nutrient reduction goals. Here we provide a generic prioritization that can help with spatial targeting and applied it across the conterminous US (CONUS). The prioritization begins with identifying areas with high agricultural nutrient surplus, i.e., where the most nitrogen (N) and/or phosphorus (P) inputs are left on the landscape after crop harvest. Subwatersheds with high surplus included 52% and 50% of CONUS subwatersheds for N and P, respectively, and were located predominantly in the Midwest for N, in the South for P, and in California for both N and P. Then we identified the most suitable conservation strategies using a hierarchy of metrics including nutrient use efficiency (proportion of new nutrient inputs removed by crop harvest), tile drainage, existing buffers for agricultural run-off, and wetland restoration potential. In-field nutrient input reduction emerged as a priority because nutrient use efficiency fell below a high but achievable goal of 0.7 (30% of nutrients applied are not utilized) in 45% and 44% of CONUS subwatersheds for N and P, respectively. In many parts of the southern and western US, in-field conservation (i.e., reducing inputs + preventing nutrients from leaving fields) alone was likely the optimal strategy as agriculture was already well-buffered. However, stacking in-field conservation with additional edge-of-field buffering would be important to conservation strategies in 35% and 29% of CONUS subwatersheds for N and P, respectively. Nutrient use efficiencies were often high enough in the Midwest that proposed strategies focused more on preventing nutrients from leaving fields, managing tile effluent, and buffering agricultural fields. Almost all major river basins would benefit from a variety of nutrient reduction conservation strategies, underscoring the potential of targeted approaches to help limit excess nutrients in surface and ground waters.