Ozone reactor combined with ultrafiltration membrane: A new tertiary wastewater treatment system for reuse purpose

Environmental and economic assessment of urban wastewater reclamation from ultrafiltration membrane-based tertiary treatment: Effect of seasonal dynamic

This study aimed to assess the environmental and economic performance of an ultrafiltration (UF) tertiary treatment of effluent from an urban wastewater treatment facility. Data from a UF demonstration plant composed of commercially available equipment, including industrial hollow-fiber membranes was used to project a full-scale facility. The results from the demonstration plant recommended different ranges of transmembrane fluxes and sparging air demands under summer and winter conditions to prevent excessive fouling. The energy balance of the full-scale facility would be 0.308 ± 0.112 kWh·m-3 in summer and 0.140 ± 0.040 kWh·m-3 in winter, with blowers' being the main consumers (86-93 %). CAPEX accounted for €0.030 ± 0.002·m-3 in summer and €0.027 ± 0.002·m-3 in winter and membrane acquisition represented 66-69 % of the investment cost. Energy expenditure was the major OPEX cost (66-79 %), with a total operating cost of €0.077 ± 0.023·m-3 and €0.042 ± 0.008·m-3 in summer and winter, respectively. The final average value obtained for the TAC was €0.107 m-3 in summer and €0.068 m-3 in winter. The environmental assessment confirmed optimizing energy consumption and membrane requirements as the main factors influencing environmental sustainability. Specifically, summer and winter emissions of 0.079-0.175 and 0.043-0.079 kgCO2eq·m-3 (Global warming potential); 8.1 · 10-4-1.7 · 10-3 and 4.8 · 10-3-8.1 · 10-3 m3·m-3 (water consumption); 0.019-0.041 and 0.010-0.019 kg oileq·m-3 (fossil fuel scarcity); and 1.4 · 10-4-2.9 · 10-4 and 7.7 · 10-4-1.4 · 10-4 kg Cueq·m-3 (mineral resource scarcity) were calculated, respectively. The obtained permeate quality complied with the most stringent Spanish and EU regulations.

Catalytic Ozonation of Pharmaceuticals Using CeO2-CeTiOx-Doped Crossflow Ultrafiltration Ceramic Membranes

The removal of persistent organic micropollutants (OMPs) from secondary effluent in wastewater treatment plants is critical for meeting water reuse standards. Traditional treatment methods often fail to adequately degrade these contaminants. This study explored the efficacy of a hybrid ozonation membrane filtration (HOMF) process using CeO2 and CeTiOx-doped ceramic crossflow ultrafiltration ceramic membranes for the degradation of OMPs. Hollow ceramic membranes (CM) with a 300 kDa molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) were modified to serve as substrates for catalytic nanosized metal oxides in a crossflow and inside-out operational configuration. Three types of depositions were tested: a single layer of CeO2, a single layer of CeTiOx, and a combined layer of CeO2 + CeTiOx. These catalytic nanoparticles were distributed uniformly using a solution-based method supported by vacuum infiltration to ensure high-throughput deposition. The results demonstrated successful infiltration of the metal oxides, although the yield permeability and transmembrane flow varied, following this order: pristine > CeTiOx > CeO2 > CeO2 + CeTiOx. Four OMPs were examined: two easily degraded by ozone (carbamazepine and diclofenac) and two recalcitrant (ibuprofen and pCBA). The highest OMP degradation was observed in demineralized water, particularly with the CeO2 + CeTiOx modification, suggesting O3 decomposition to hydroxyl radicals. The increased resistance in the modified membranes contributed to the adsorption phenomena. The degradation efficiency decreased in secondary effluent due to competition with the organic and inorganic load, highlighting the challenges in complex water matrices.

How to choose the best tertiary treatment for pulp and paper wastewater? Life cycle assessment and economic analysis as guidance tools

Pulp and paper wastewater (P&P WW) often requires tertiary treatment to remove refractory compounds not eliminated by conventional biological treatment, ensuring compliance with high-quality effluent discharge or reuse standards. This study employs a life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology to compare alternative tertiary treatment technologies for P&P WW and rank them accordingly. The evaluated technologies in the scenarios include inorganic (S1) and organic (S2) coagulation-flocculation, ozonation (O3) (S3), O3+granular activated carbon (GAC) (S4), and ultrafiltration (UF)+reverse osmosis (RO) (S5). The analysis focuses on a P&P wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in Northeastern Italy. The LCA is complemented by an economic analysis considering each technology's capital and operating costs, as well as potential revenues from internal effluent reuse. Results indicate that S4 (O3+GAC) outranks all the other scenarios in terms of both environmental performance and economic viability, primarily due to the advantages associated with effluent reuse. S5 (UF+RO), which also involves reuse, is limited by the high energy consumption of UF+RO, resulting in increased environmental impacts and costs. The physicochemical scenario S2 (Chem Or), currently utilized in the WWTP under study, remains the best-performing technology in the absence of effluent reuse. In contrast, S3 (O3 alone) exhibits the poorest environmental and economic outcomes due to substantial energy requirements for O3 generation and the inability to reuse the treated effluent directly. Lastly, a sensitivity analysis underscores the strong influence of chemical dosages in S1 and S2 on environmental and economic impacts, which is more significant than the impact of water reuse percentages in S4 and S5. The high electricity cost observed during 2022 negatively affects the energy-intensive scenarios (S3-S5), making coagulation-flocculation (S1-S2) even more convenient.

Controlling ultrafiltration membrane fouling in surface water treatment via combined pretreatment of O3 and PAC: Mechanism investigation on impacts of technological sequence

In this research, the effects of combined powdered activated carbon (PAC)-ozone (O3) pretreatment on ultrafiltration (UF) performance were comprehensively examined and compared with the conventional O3-PAC pretreatment. The performance of pretreatments on mitigating membrane fouling caused by Songhua River water (SHR) was evaluated by specific flux, membrane fouling resistance distribution, and membrane fouling index. Moreover, the degradation of natural organic matter in SHR was investigated by UV absorbance at 254 nm (UV254), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and fluorescent organic matter. Results showed that the 100PAC-5O3 process was the most effective in improving the specific flux, with 82.89 % and 58.17 % reductions in the reversible fouling resistance and irreversible fouling resistance respectively. Additionally, the irreversible membrane fouling index was reduced by 20 % relative to 5O3-100PAC. The PAC-O3 process also exhibited superior performance in the degradation of UV254, DOC, three fluorescent components, and three micropollutants in the SHR system compared to O3-PAC pretreatment. The O3 stage played a major role in mitigating membrane fouling, while PAC pretreatment enhanced the oxidation in the subsequent O3 stage during the PAC-O3 process. Furthermore, the Extended Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek theory and pore blocking-cake layer filtration model fitting analysis were employed to explain the mechanisms of membrane fouling mitigation and fouling patterns transformation. It was found that PAC-O3 significantly increased the repulsive interactions between the foulants and the membrane, which restrained the formation of the cake layer filtration stage. Overall, this study evidenced the potential of PAC-O3 pretreatment in surface water treatment applications, providing new insights into the mechanism of controlling membrane fouling and improving the permeate quality.

Production of forest seedlings using sewage sludge and automated irrigation with ozonated cattle wastewater

The large volume of effluents generated by intensive cattle production can become an environmental problem, requiring solutions that combine treatment and disposal of reuse water. The quality of cattle wastewater (CWW) treated by ozonation, the water requirement and its effect on the growth of seedlings of Dalbergia nigra cultivated with sewage sludge were determined under different light conditions. The study was carried out in a split plot scheme with 2 shading levels (0%—C₁, and 49.4% attenuation—C₂) and 3 types of irrigation water (control–T₁, 1 h ozonation–T₂, and 2 h–T₃), with 4 repetitions. Direct sowing was realized into 280 cm³ tubes which were irrigated by drip irrigation with automatic management. The height and collar diameter were measured every 21 days, and at the end of the nursery phase, and the Dickson quality index (DQI) and irrigation water productivity (WPir) were determined. In addition, seedlings were transplanted in a forest restauration area (FRA) of Atlantic Forest, with height and diameter monitoring for 200 days. With ozonation, there was an increase in pH and a reduction in electrical conductivity, total solids and turbidity in the CWW, allowing its use for irrigation of forest seedlings. The maximum volumes of water applied were 2.096 and 1.921 L plant^-1, with water supply T₂ and T₁, respectively, and coverages C₁ and C₂. In these conditions, the seedlings reached DQI of 0.47 and 0.17, and WPir of 2.35 and 1.48 g L^-1, respectively. The initial vegetative growth of the seedlings planted in the FRA was benefited by the nutrients provided by the CWW treated. Therefore, the use of sewage sludge and CWW treated has the potential to produce forest seedlings, reducing the release of waste and effluents into the environment.