Arbitrary and semantic associations in subjective memory impairment and amnestic mild cognitive impairment among Taiwanese individuals: A cross-sectional study

Cogstate Brief Battery performance in assessing cognitive impairment in Taiwan: A prospective, multi-center study

BACKGROUND

Early detection and accessible monitoring of dementia are crucial for timely intervention. However, traditional neuropsychological assessments are resource-intensive, and with the growing aging population, scheduling delays increased. The Cogstate Brief Battery (CBB) offers a promising, rapid screening tool, though its validation in Mandarin-speaking populations has been limited.

METHODS

This prospective, multi-center study assessed the validity of the CBB in distinguishing between mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia compared to healthy controls (HC) in Taiwan. Participants from three tertiary medical centers underwent comprehensive cognitive evaluation using the CBB, including the Learning/Working Memory Brain Performance Index (Lrn/WM BPI), Attention/Psychomotor Brain Performance Index (Attn/Psychomotor BPI), combined BPI, and Brain Age.

RESULTS

Of 192 participants (mean age 68.7 ± 8.2 years, mean education level 11.0 ± 3.9 years, 59.9% female), the CBB showed strong discriminatory power across groups. The combined BPI demonstrated the highest AUC (0.95) for distinguishing dementia from HC, followed by 0.92 for Lrn/WM BPI, 0.91 for Brain Age difference, and 0.88 for Attn/Psychomotor BPI. A combined BPI cut-off score of 41.25 effectively differentiated between HC and cognitive impairment groups.

CONCLUSION

This first validation of the CBB in Mandarin-speaking populations highlights its utility as a reliable screening tool for early cognitive impairment detection. Its use could enhance timely diagnoses, helping to streamline clinical pathways and improve patient outcomes, addressing a critical gap in dementia care in Taiwan's healthcare system.

Development of a Revised Version of Subjective Memory Complaints Questionnaire in Taiwan: A Preliminary Study

OBJECTIVES

Research has suggested that subjective memory complaints (SMC) are predictive of cognitive decline in cases of Alzheimer's disease; however, multidimensional characteristics of SMC make it difficult to formulate causal links. The Subjective Memory Complaints Questionnaire (SMCQ) has proven effective in capturing the nature of SMC. In this study, we developed a revised version of SMCQ (SMCQ-R) with corresponding normative data for application in Taiwan.

METHODS

This study recruited 100 cognitively normal participants (> 45 years) stratified according to demographic characteristics. Assessments were performed to evaluate test-retest reliability, criterion-related validity, and construct validity of SMCQ-R. SMCQ-R scores of 20 matched patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) were also compared with those of normal participants to test construct validity.

RESULTS

Reliability of SMCQ-R was satisfactory (0.81-0.95). Factor analysis revealed a three-factor structure: everyday memory problems (EMP), recent severe memory problems (RSMP), and long-term memory problems (LTMP). EMP and RSMP scores were negatively associated with objective cognitive function (r = -.20 to .39). Depressive symptoms were positively associated with all factors (r = .23-.33). Age was positively associated with total (b = 0.09, p < .05) and EMP scores (b = 0.06, p < .01). MCI patients obtained higher scores (p < .05) on all subscales. SMCQ-R scores discriminated between normal and MCI individuals (area under the curve = 0.77). This study established a norm based on scores adjusted to control for effects of age.

CONCLUSIONS

SMCQ-R has sound psychometric properties and could potentially be used as a tool to assess SMC in clinical settings.

Neuropsychological impairment in primary malignant brain tumor patients with awake craniotomy: a hospital-based registration study

PURPOSE

Neuroplasticity is an ability to maintain neural circuit function when facing damages. It is one of the reasons that making brain tumors notorious. Therefore, we evaluated the characteristics of patients with primary brain tumors, compared neuropsychological deficits between patients who had awake craniotomy with left- or right-sided tumors, and analyzed the association between white matter tracts and neuropsychological deficits in patients with right-sided tumors.

METHODS

Using the registration dataset of Chang Gung Memory Hospital between 2014 and 2020, this study included a total of 698 adult patients who received craniotomy for primary brain tumors (538 of conventional craniotomy; 160 of awake craniotomy). Neuropsychological assessments were arranged in patients as preoperative evaluation for awake craniotomies.

RESULTS

A lower proportion of right-sided tumors was noted in patient who had awake craniotomy than those who had conventional craniotomy (33.8% and 51.5%, p < 0.001). In awake craniotomy, 88.7% of patients with left-sided tumors and 77.8% of patients with right-sided tumors had neuropsychological impairment. Patients with left-sided tumors had worse preoperative performance compared to those with right-sided tumors in global function (36.2% and 8.0%, p < 0.001), language domain (57.6% and 22.2%, p < 0.001), and attention (36.0% and 18.5%, p = 0.02). Furthermore, in those with right-sided low-grade gliomas, patients involving pathway of superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) I had a higher risk of deficits than those without involvement in verbal memory (p = 0.001, Odd ratio = 11.2, 95% CI = 1.8 ~ 71.4) and visual memory (p = 0.048, Odd ratio = 10.5, 95% CI = 1.0 ~ 111).

CONCLUSION

In awake craniotomy, patients with left-sided brain tumors had worse cognitive function than those with right-sided tumors in terms of global function, language, and attention. 77% of patients with right-sided tumors had neuropsychological impairment. Therefore, a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation and awake craniotomy are necessary for patients with brain tumors.

Boundary extension as a tool for detection of cognitive change among individuals with mild cognitive impairment: A preliminary study

OBJECTIVES

Recent neuropathological research suggests that recognition memory supported by familiarity rather than recollection may be the earliest cognitive change in course of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Nonetheless, the findings on the issue of familiarity capacity in the prodromal AD remain inconsistent. Boundary extension (BE), in which the view recollected by the subject covers a wider angle than was actually observed, is a form of false memory. Given that BE occurs implicitly and automatically, it may be a candidate for assessing familiarity functioning in cases of AD. This was the issue explored in the current study.

METHODS

One-hundred and six participants comprising a younger adult group (YA, n = 40), a healthy older adult group (OA, n = 40), and a group of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n = 26) underwent testing for BE and neuropsychological functions. Parts of OA and MCI underwent analysis for plasma tau levels. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was used to assess memory associated with familiarity and recollection among participants.

RESULTS

The OA and MCI groups could be differentiated by the degree of familiarity associated with BE, wherein the latter group displayed minimal familiarity. Among OAs, familiarity was positively associated with education level. We observed a correlation between plasma tau levels and various neuropsychological functions. Most of the associations between plasma tau levels and neuropsychological functions were mediated by education level.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that BE could detect early decline in familiarity and assess preserved cognitive functions in aging.