Bevacizumab and atezolizumab as first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A Taiwanese subgroup analysis on efficacy and safety

Carry-over effect of immunotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Combination immunotherapy is the current standard for treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The response elicited by upfront immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) might influence the efficacy of salvage therapy, a phenomenon known as the carry-over effect. This effect is thought to stem from immune memory and sustained immune activation, providing extended protection against tumor progression and resulting in a durable response even after discontinuation of ICI. This study aimed to investigate the carry-over effect of first-line ICI therapy in patients with advanced HCC.

METHODS

Patients who received first-line ICI therapy for advanced HCC from December 2017 to December 2021 were included if they exhibited disease progression and received second-line systemic therapy. We analyzed the associations between clinical benefit (classified as complete, partial response and stable disease) of first-line ICI therapy, post-progression survival (PPS) and second-line progression-free survival (PFS). We used a historical cohort of patients receiving first-line multikinase inhibitor (MKI) for comparison.

RESULTS

A total of 137 patients were analyzed. We included 60 patients who received first-line ICI therapy, of which clinical benefit was detected in 46 (76.7%). Compared with patients without clinical benefit of first-line ICI therapy, patients with clinical benefit exhibited significantly longer PPS (median: 14.6 vs. 4.9 months, P = 0.024) and second-line PFS (median: 3.6 vs. 1.6 months, P = 0.027). In multivariate analysis, clinical benefit of first-line ICI therapy remained an independent predictor of PPS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.295, P = 0.005] and second-line PFS (HR: 0.484, P = 0.047). Conversely, clinical benefit was not associated with PPS among patients receiving first-line MKI therapy in both univariate and multivariate analysis in historical MKI cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical benefit of first-line ICI therapy was associated with PPS and second-line PFS in patients with advanced HCC, suggestive of the carry-over effect of ICI.

Survival in patients receiving reduced dose intensity of bevacizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

IMBrave 150 established atezolizumab and bevacizumab as the new standard for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment. However, the trial reported significant adverse events leading to bevacizumab dose interruptions or discontinuations. This retrospective, real-world analysis evaluated the effect of reduced bevacizumab dose intensity on clinical outcomes in 354 patients receiving first-line combination immunotherapy for advanced HCC. To minimize immortal time bias, only those on therapy for over 3 months were included. Of 219 patients included in the landmark analysis, 52 received a reduced dose intensity of bevacizumab. The median relative dose intensity (RDTI) of bevacizumab was 75% (range 9.1-96.9%). There was no significant difference in progression-free survival (11.2 vs. 14.8 months, p = 0.5) or overall survival (20.4 vs. 26.8 months, p = 0.1) between those receiving 100% vs. reduced RDTI. Exploratory analysis showed that even doses under 75% had no survival impact. Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred more frequently with RDTI (30.7% vs. 15.5%). Reduced bevacizumab doses do not impact survival.

Prompt initiation of durvalumab and tremelimumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic active hepatitis B: a phase 2 clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is an etiology of HCC, but clinical trials using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) usually exclude patients with chronic active hepatitis B (serum HBV viral load > 2000 IU/mL). This study examined the safety and efficacy of concurrently administering the ICI and anti-HBV medications in this patient population.

METHODS

In this single-arm phase 2 clinical trial, we enrolled patients with advanced HCC and untreated chronic active hepatitis B. Patients received 1500 mg of durvalumab every 4 weeks alone or in combination with 300 mg of tremelimumab on day 1 (the STRIDE regimen). Anti-HBV treatment with entecavir was simultaneously initiated. The primary endpoint was the rate of HBV reactivation.

RESULTS

We enrolled 30 patients, whose mean baseline HBV viral load was 770,986 IU/mL. No patients experienced HBV reactivation or HBV-associated hepatitis. Hepatitis flare was noted in 8 (26.7%) patients, but none of them were associated with HBV reactivation. The objective tumor response rate was 10% and 25% for the durvalumab treatment alone and the STRIDE regimen, respectively.

CONCLUSION

For patients with chronic active hepatitis B, ICI therapy could be promptly initiated as long as anti-HBV medications were administered simultaneously.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04294498.

Dose-Reduction of Bevacizumab in Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab Therapy Extends Treatment duration with Disease Control in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Atezolizumab (ATZ) and bevacizumab (BEV) combination therapy is widely used in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, combination therapy is typically interrupted or discontinued owing to BEV-related adverse events. In this study, we examined the effects of BEV dose-reduction on the treatment of unresectable HCC using propensity score matching (PSM).

METHOD

Overall, 119 patients with HCC who were treated with ATZ + BEV between November 2020 and October 2022 were enrolled retrospectively at our institute. The therapeutic effects and safety of BEV dose-reduction and non-dose reduction after PSM were compared. Decision-tree analysis was used to investigate treatment duration in the patients.

RESULTS

Significant differences were not observed between the two groups after PSM. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) assessed by modified RECIST did not differ significantly between the two groups (BEV non-dose-reduction/dose-reduction: ORR; 46/34%, DCR; 80/91%). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) also did not differ significantly between the two groups (BEV non-dose-reduction/dose-reduction: PFS; 5.6/8.6 months, OS; 18.6/15.5 months). The median duration of treatment in the BEV dose-reduction group was significantly longer than that in the non-dose-reduction group (BEV non-dose-reduction/dose-reduction: 4.8/9.1 months, p = 0.038). Decision-tree analysis revealed that dose-reduction of BEV was the first distinguish factor for the extension of treatment duration with ATZ + BEV.

CONCLUSION

BEV dose-reduction can be effectively used in maintaining the treatment duration of ATZ + BEV while maintaining therapeutic effects and safety in real-world clinical practice.

The current status and future of targeted-immune combination for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers and the third leading cause of death worldwide. surgery, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), systemic therapy, local ablation therapy, radiotherapy, and targeted drug therapy with agents such as sorafenib. However, the tumor microenvironment of liver cancer has a strong immunosuppressive effect. Therefore, new treatments for liver cancer are still necessary. Immune checkpoint molecules, such as programmed death-1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), along with high levels of immunosuppressive cytokines, induce T cell inhibition and are key mechanisms of immune escape in HCC. Recently, immunotherapy based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as monotherapy or in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, anti-angiogenesis drugs, chemotherapy agents, and topical therapies has offered great promise in the treatment of liver cancer. In this review, we discuss the latest advances in ICIs combined with targeted drugs (targeted-immune combination) and other targeted-immune combination regimens for the treatment of patients with advanced HCC (aHCC) or unresectable HCC (uHCC), and provide an outlook on future prospects. The literature reviewed spans the last five years and includes studies identified using keywords such as "hepatocellular carcinoma," "immune checkpoint inhibitors," "targeted therapy," "combination therapy," and "immunotherapy".

Cyclin dependent kinase 9 inhibition reduced programmed death-ligand 1 expression and improved treatment efficacy in hepatocellular carcinoma

The anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody is a standard therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Tumor expression of PD-L1 can be induced upon stimulus. Because cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (CDK9) inhibition reduces the expression of inducible proteins, we explored the influence of CDK9 inhibition on PD-L1 expression in HCC cells. We found that PD-L1 expression was low in HCC cells; however, IFN-γ treatment increased this expression. CDK9 inhibitors AZD4573 and atuveciclib reduced the IFN-γ induced PD-L1 expression in a dose-dependent manner. CDK9 knockdown yielded similar results, but CDK9 overexpression reversed the influence of the CDK9 inhibitors. In the orthotopic mouse model, mice treated with a CDK9 inhibitor and an anti-PD-L1 antibody had significantly smaller tumors and exhibited longer survival than mice treated with either agent. In conclusion, CDK9 inhibition could reduce the expression of PD-L1 in HCC cells. Using both CDK9 inhibitors and anti-PD-L1 antibodies is more effective than using either agent alone.

Objective Response and Progression-Free Survival Contribute to Prolong Overall Survival in Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) is a standard treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) due to its good antitumor and survival prolongation effects. Post-progression survival (PPS) has been reported to be a great contributor in the treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors for unresectable HCC. This study aimed to clarify the significance of progression-free survival (PFS) or PPS of Atez/Bev treatment for HCC.

METHODS

We analyzed the correlations of PFS and PPS with overall survival (OS) in studies of HCC patients treated with Atez/Bev and evaluated the contribution to OS in Atez/Bev treatment with patients at our institutions as clinical practice.

RESULTS

Analysis of 18 studies involving 3,752 patients treated with Atez/Bev found that PPS had a stronger correlation with OS (R2 = 0.872, p < 0.001) than did PFS (R2 = 0.605, p = 0.001). Analysis of 80 patients with unresectable HCC treated with Atez/Bev found that presence of antitumor responses during Atez/Bev was the most significant contributor to OS, and post-progression treatment after Atez/Bev also significantly contribute to OS.

CONCLUSION

The presence of antitumor response with tumor shrinkage during Atez/Bev treatment contributes to good OS through its durable response. Atez/Bev treatment could be considered as first-line treatment for unresectable HCC. However, there is a need for optimal biomarkers for good antitumor response.