Refracture risk and all-cause mortality after vertebral fragility fractures: Anti-osteoporotic medications matter

Mortality, bone density and grip strength: lessons from the past and hope for the future?

Objectives

Therapeutic advances in the management of osteoporosis and sarcopenia have occurred at different rates over the last 2 decades. Here we examine associations between grip strength and BMD with subsequent all-cause and cause-specific mortality in a UK community-dwelling cohort.

Methods

Data from 495 men and 414 women from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study were analysed. Grip strength was assessed by grip dynamometry, femoral neck BMD was ascertained using DXA and deaths were recorded from baseline (1998-2004) until 31 December 2018. Grip strength and BMD in relation to mortality outcomes (all-cause, cardiovascular-related, cancer-related and mortality due to other causes) were examined using Cox regression with adjustment for age and sex.

Results

The mean baseline age of participants was 64.3 years (s.d. 2.5) and 65.9 years (s.d. 2.6) in men and women, respectively. Lower grip strength was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.30 (95% CI 1.06, 1.58), P = 0.010] and cardiovascular-related mortality [HR 1.75 (95% CI 1.20, 2.55), P = 0.004]. In contrast, BMD was not associated with any of the mortality outcomes (P > 0.1 for all associations).

Conclusion

We report strong relationships between grip strength and mortality compared with BMD. We hypothesize that this may reflect better recognition and treatment of low BMD in this cohort.

Prognostic significance of occult vertebral fracture in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

The prognostic impact of occult vertebral fracture (OVF) in patients with malignancies is a new cutting edge in cancer research. This study was performed to analyze the prognostic impact of OVF after surgery for pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

This study involved 200 patients who underwent surgical treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. OVF was diagnosed by quantitative measurement using preoperative sagittal computed tomography image reconstruction from the 11th thoracic vertebra to the 5th lumbar vertebra.

RESULTS

OVF was diagnosed in 65 (32.5 %) patients. The multivariate analyses showed that male sex (p = 0.01), osteopenia (p < 0.01), OVF (p < 0.01), a carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level of ≥400 U/mL (p < 0.01), advanced stage of cancer (p < 0.01), and non-adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.02) were independent risk factors for overall survival. An age of ≥74 years (p < 0.01) and obstructive jaundice (p = 0.03) were independent risk factors for OVF. Furthermore, the combination of OVF and osteopenia further worsened disease-free survival and overall survival compared with osteopenia or OVF alone (p < 0.01; respectively).

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of preoperative OVF might be a useful prognostic indicator for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Asia-Pacific consensus on long-term and sequential therapy for osteoporosis

Objectives

This study aimed to present the Asia-Pacific consensus on long-term and sequential therapy for osteoporosis, offering evidence-based recommendations for the effective management of this chronic condition. The primary focus is on achieving optimal fracture prevention through a comprehensive, individualized approach.

Methods

A panel of experts convened to develop consensus statements by synthesizing the current literature and leveraging clinical expertise. The review encompassed long-term anti-osteoporosis medication goals, first-line treatments for individuals at very high fracture risk, and the strategic integration of anabolic and antiresorptive agents in sequential therapy approaches.

Results

The panelists reached a consensus on 12 statements. Key recommendations included advocating for anabolic agents as the first-line treatment for individuals at very high fracture risk and transitioning to antiresorptive agents following the completion of anabolic therapy. Anabolic therapy remains an option for individuals experiencing new fractures or persistent high fracture risk despite antiresorptive treatment. In cases of inadequate response, the consensus recommended considering a switch to more potent medications. The consensus also addressed the management of medication-related complications, proposing alternatives instead of discontinuation of treatment.

Conclusions

This consensus provides a comprehensive, cost-effective strategy for fracture prevention with an emphasis on shared decision-making and the incorporation of country-specific case management systems, such as fracture liaison services. It serves as a valuable guide for healthcare professionals in the Asia-Pacific region, contributing to the ongoing evolution of osteoporosis management.

The Effect of Denosumab in Elderly Patients Regarding Bone Density and Fracture Risk

BACKGROUND

With an aging population, the importance of treating and diagnosing osteoporosis is increasing. Osteoporosis, previously known as a resorptive change primarily related to endocrinological mechanisms, is also being approached as a phenomenon of senile change. Denosumab is gaining popularity among osteoporosis medications due to its ability to increase bone mineral density (BMD) and the economic benefit arising from the 6-month cycle. In line with previous literature, this study aimed to examine the BMD-augmenting effect of denosumab through which it reduces fracture risk in individuals aged over 80 years.

METHODS

We reviewed patients who received denosumab between 2018 and 2022 with a minimum clinical observation period of 12 months. BMD was measured every 12 months, and patients were classified per their period of denosumab use. Fracture risk was evaluated using the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) and fracture incidence during the observation period were assessed.

RESULTS

Among 155 patients, a significant increase in BMD was observed at 3 sites: the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip (p<0.001, p<0.001, and p=0.001, respectively). The patients were divided according to the length of clinical follow-up they received, and similar results were found in all subgroups. Fracture risk assessment was performed using FRAX and the incidence of fracture events during follow-up. FRAX significantly decreased in all subgroups except those who received 24 months of follow-up (p=0.003, p=0.41, p=0.001 in the 12, 24, and ≥36 months groups, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Denosumab use resulted in long-term BMD increase and reduced fracture risk in individuals aged 80 and above.