[The influence of ocular surface diseases in the management of glaucoma]

[Ocular surface disease in glaucoma patients: Expert opinion and management algorithm in Algeria]

INTRODUCTION

The main goal of treatment for any glaucoma patient is to reduce the intraocular pressure. Unfortunately, the long-term use of glaucoma medications causes deleterious effects on the ocular surface, leading to impaired quality of life and failed glaucoma surgery. In addition, adverse effects of medications are a barrier to adherence and compliance, and this directly affects efficacy. It is therefore essential to regularly assess the ocular surface of glaucoma patients in order to detect any signs of damage early and act accordingly. Although the TFOS DEWS 2 now offers a strategy for diagnosing ocular surface pathologies, some examinations are unfortunately not feasible in Algeria due to lack of time and/or knowledge on the part of some ophthalmologists or are simply inaccessible to others.

METHODS

Algerian experts (members of the ACOS club) met for the purpose of proposing an algorithm for the management of Algerian glaucoma patients, based on the recommendations of the DEWS, their own practice and the results of a preliminary national survey of ophthalmologists.

RESULTS

The proposed algorithm allows evaluation of the ocular surface of the glaucoma patient in current practice by any Algerian ophthalmologist.

CONCLUSION

Management of glaucoma patients should include a systematic examination of the ocular surface. The choice of treatment should be determined by the ocular surface condition of the glaucoma patient.

Signs and Symptoms of Ocular Surface Disease: The Reasons for Patient Dissatisfaction with Glaucoma Treatments

Ocular Surface Disease (OSD) and hyperemia are the most common adverse events of topical ocular medications. While active compounds may cause allergic reactions or irritation, preservatives, which are intended to prevent bacterial growth, are toxic as well. Therefore, the most recent glaucoma medications no longer contain preservatives. Despite this, local tolerability may still impact treatment compliance and patient quality of life. We conducted an observational, multi-center, international, cross-sectional study in 793 treated and stabilized glaucoma patients to assess patient satisfaction and local tolerability of their treatment. The vast majority (93.7%) of patients was satisfied or very satisfied with their treatment in terms of tolerability and only 6.3% were dissatisfied. However, ophthalmological examination showed a high frequency of ocular signs: conjunctival hyperemia (32%), OSD (42.5%) and positive conjunctival fluorescein staining (10.3%). Additionally, patients reported symptoms upon instillation (31.4%) and between instillations (57.3%); 25.1% of patients were using tear substitutes. All signs and symptoms were significantly (p<0.001) associated with patient dissatisfaction. A logistic regression model indicated that dissatisfaction was higher in patients with symptoms upon instillation and in those using tear substitutes (OR: 3.03 and 4.63, respectively). The mean patient tolerability score to treatment was 82.7±16.1 on a 100-point visual analogue scale. In conclusion, even if patients may be highly satisfied with their current treatment, most of them present ocular signs and symptoms. A treatment change should be considered in case of clinical signs or patient-reported symptoms.

Eyelid Disorders in Ophthalmology Practice: Results from a Large International Epidemiological Study in Eleven Countries

Purpose

Anecdotal evidence suggests that eyelid disorders are common, although estimates of prevalence vary. The current study determines the prevalence of eyelid disorders, meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and related diseases (specifically ocular surface disease) in a population of patients presenting for routine ophthalmologic consultations.

Methods

This cross-sectional epidemiologic survey evaluated patients presenting for routine ophthalmic visits. During the consultation an ophthalmologist completed a questionnaire, and each patient underwent an ophthalmic examination and completed a quality of life questionnaire.

Results

Three hundred forty-nine ophthalmologists, recruited from 11 countries, provided data on 6525 patients. Patients were predominantly females (61.6%). The mean age of the study population was 57.0 ± 17.6 years. Eyelid disorders were diagnosed in 5109 (78.3%) patients and were statistically associated with: atopic dermatitis, seborrheic dermatitis, dry eye, age-related macular degeneration, diabetes, cataract, allergy and MGD (P < 0.05, all associations). Eyelid abnormalities were identified in 59.6% of patients; conjunctival or corneal abnormalities were observed in 64.9% and 28.1% of patients, respectively. MGD was diagnosed in 54.3% patients and was statistically significantly associated with the presence of eyelid disorders and eyelid margin abnormalities (P < 0.001, both comparisons). Dry eye was diagnosed in 61.8% of patients. Concurrent dry eye and MGD were present in 67.6% of patients. Most patients reported some degree of impaired vision and daily/work activities related to dry eye. Impact on contact lens usage, emotions and quality of sleep was also reported. The effects on daily life were associated with the presence of MGD.

Conclusion

In conclusion, eyelid disorders were highly prevalent in this ‘real-world’ population of patients from ophthalmology clinics. Routine ophthalmologic consultations provide an opportunity to improve patient quality of life and to modify topical therapy in patients who may be predisposed to eyelid disorders.

Glaucoma therapy: preservative-free for all?

Preservatives used in topical glaucoma medications have a plethora of well-described toxic effects on the ocular surface. Such ocular toxicity is manifest clinically as ocular surface disease (OSD) and has been confirmed in epidemiologic, prospective clinical trials and studies in which patients are switched from preservative-added to preservative-free topical therapy. Such toxicity has implications not only for tolerability, but also for adherence and persistence with therapy that is known to be poor in glaucoma. Glaucoma medication is now widely available in preservative-free formulations, and the question arises as to which patients should receive preservative-free glaucoma therapy in preference to preservative-added medication. A case can be made for several subpopulations of patients who might particularly benefit from preservative-free medication: patients with existing OSD, older patients, younger adult patients, female patients, pediatric and juvenile patients, patients who work in air-conditioned environments or who use electronic screens frequently, patients with medical risk factors for OSD, patients in whom trabecular surgery may become indicated in the future, contact lens users, perhaps patients with Asian ethnicity and patients with severe or treatment-refractory glaucoma. Whilst arguments could be made for selecting patients for preservative-free medication on the basis of their existing risk of OSD, collectively, these patients form a significant proportion of the glaucoma patient population as a whole and, in the absence of any cost premium or positive indication for preservative-added medication, preservative-free glaucoma medication for all patients seems an appropriate strategy.

Patient satisfaction with glaucoma therapy: reality or myth?

While safe and effective treatments for glaucoma exist, their effectiveness is compromised by poor compliance. Patients who have problems with their topical glaucoma medication are acknowledged to be at higher risk for poor compliance, frequent medication switching, and surgery. Patient satisfaction with therapy and its associated benefits have until recently taken second place to efficacy. The present study is a transverse cross-sectional epidemiological survey among glaucoma patients receiving therapy with prostaglandin analogs. The primary objective was to determine and characterize patient satisfaction with glaucoma therapy, and the secondary objective was to identify factors that may contribute to poor patient satisfaction. Ophthalmologists in the Netherlands included 199 patients and 164 were analyzed. Patients were predominantly elderly with early, primary, open angle glaucoma. Eighty-nine percent of them stated they were satisfied or very satisfied with their treatment. However, signs of ocular surface disorder on ophthalmological examination were evident in 44% of patients, corneal fluorescein staining was positive in 28% of patients, and 38% of patients were using tear substitutes. The prevalence of blepharitis/meibomian gland dysfunction and dry eye was more than twice as high after the commencement of therapy compared with before therapy. Univariate analysis revealed that patient dissatisfaction with their glaucoma therapy was statistically significantly (P<0.001) associated with the presence of ocular surface disease, hyperemia, ocular signs, symptoms upon and between instillation, and the use of tear substitutes. Apparently, patients in the present study are satisfied with their treatment; 89% expressed satisfaction compared with only 11% who professed dissatisfaction. The results suggest that even if local adverse events and ocular surface disease, in particular, contribute to glaucoma patient dissatisfaction, only a minority of patients expressed such dissatisfaction. At the time of the study, most (94%) of the patients included were receiving preserved preparations. Further studies should evaluate the influence of preservative on patient satisfaction.

Trabectome surgery for primary and secondary open angle glaucomas

Purpose

In most forms of open angle glaucoma, the trabecular meshwork is the main barrier for aqueous humor outflow, causing elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). The Trabectome is a minimal invasive device for the surgical treatment of open angle glaucoma, particularly eliminating the juxtacanalicular meshwork. This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness and complication profile among different glaucoma subgroups.

Methods

Single center prospective observational study. There were 557 consecutive eyes of 487 patients included in this study. Trabectome surgery was performed either alone or in combination with cataract surgery. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were documented systematically. Main outcome measures were IOP reduction over time and the preoperative and postoperative number of IOP-lowering medications. Due to subgroup sizes, only data from eyes with primary open angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma were processed for statistical analysis.

Results

For the 261 eyes classified as primary open angle glaucoma, preoperative IOP was 24 ± 5.5 mmHg (mean ± SD) under 2.1 ± 1.3 IOP-lowering medications. After a mean follow-up of 204 ± 238 days, IOP was reduced to 18 ± 6.1 mmHg, and medication was reduced to 1.2 ± 1.1. For the 173 eyes classified as pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, after a mean follow-up of 200 ± 278 days, IOP was reduced from 25 ± 5.9 mmHg to 18 ± 8.2 mmHg, and medication was reduced from 2.0 ± 1.2 to 1.1 ± 1.1. A Cox proportional hazards model hinted forward superiority of the combined surgery cases (Trabectome + Phaco + intraocular lens) in comparison to Trabectome surgery only in phakic or pseudophakic eyes. No serious complications were observed.

Conclusions

Minimal invasive glaucoma surgery with the Trabectome seems to be safe and effective. The subgroup analysis of different kinds of open angle glaucomas presented in this study may help in first-line patient selection. The lack of ocular surface alterations makes it a valuable addition to glaucoma surgery.

[Minimally invasive iridocorneal angle surgery]

The classical filtration surgery with trabeculectomy or drainage of chamber fluid with episcleral implants is the most effective method for permanent reduction of intraocular pressure to lower and normal levels. Even though both operative procedures are well-established the high efficiency of the method causes potentially dangerous intraoperative as well as interoperative complications with a frequency which cannot be ignored. In the past this led to a search for low complication alternatives with non-penetrating glaucoma surgery (NPGS) and the search is still continuing. Trabecular meshwork surgery in particular with continuous development of new operation techniques steered the focus to a complication-poor and minimally invasive, gonioscopic glaucoma surgery.

[Corneal sensitivity in patients treated medically for glaucoma or ocular hypertension]

PURPOSE

To evaluate the corneal sensitivity in patients treated with intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medications.

INTRODUCTION

Chronic administration of anti-glaucoma drops is associated with numerous tissue changes on the ocular surface. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of these medications and their preservative, benzalkonium chloride (BAK), on corneal sensitivity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine patients treated for glaucoma or ocular hypertension (OHT) and nine untreated patients were included in this study. Treated patients were divided into three groups according to the daily number of preserved eyedrops (0, 1 and ≥2). Corneal sensitivity was assessed using the Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer. All patients underwent a complete examination of the ocular surface including Schirmer testing, tear film breakup time (BUT) and corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining. The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire was used to evaluate symptoms.

RESULTS

Corneal sensitivity was 58.8±2.8mm, 56.2±5.2mm, 50.3±12.5mm and 44.3±13.6mm in untreated patients, in patients treated with none, one and two or more instillations of preserved eyedrops, respectively. Corneal sensitivity in patients treated with preserved eyedrops was significantly lower as compared to untreated patients (P<0.001) and patients treated with preservative-free eyedrops (P=0.012). Corneal sensitivity of patients treated with intraocular pressure-lowering medications was negatively correlated to the number of instillations of preserved eyedrops (r=-0.390 ; P<0.001) as well as to the duration of treatment (R=-0.357 ; P=0.001). BUT and fluorescein staining were significantly altered in treated patients compared to the untreated control group ; however, no significant difference was observed between the treated groups. There was no significant difference for OSDI or Schirmer testing between the various groups.

CONCLUSION

Chronic administration of BAK-containing anti-glaucoma eyedrops appears to alter corneal sensitivity. These results could explain the absence of correlation between clinical signs and symptoms sometimes observed in patients treated for glaucoma or OHT.