Qualité de vie après LASIK : partie II. Qualité de vie et satisfaction d’une population de patients opérée par LASIK

Patient satisfaction and self-reported dry eye symptoms in hyperopic patients treated with femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis

Purpose

To study self-reported patient satisfaction and dry eye symptoms in hyperopic correction with femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).

Patients and methods

Ninety-eight eyes (53 patients) were treated with FS-LASIK for hyperopia. Patients’ self-reported dry eye symptoms and satisfaction with near and far vision were graded on the visual analog scale (VAS) preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively.

Results

Ninety-one percent of the eyes with the plano target (54 eyes) achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better. Predictability, defined as spherical equivalent refraction within ±0.5 D of target, was 88% of all eyes. None of the eyes lost two or more Snellen lines of corrected distance visual acuity. There was no significant change in the self-reported dry eye sensation (VAS score from 2.7±2.0 to 2.8±2.0; P=0.66). In 44 monovision patients, satisfaction with both far vision (from 71.2±19.8 to 89.2±8.7; P<0.0001) and near vision (from 51.7±26.2 to 89.3±13.2; P<0.0001) increased significantly. In nine emmetropic patients, satisfaction with neither far vision nor near vision was significantly improved, although there was a clear tendency (from 73.7±23.7 to 86.9±15.3; P=0.22, and from 58.9±29.1 to 81.6±17.4; P=0.11, respectively). In the monovision patient group, far vision satisfaction decreased when dry eye symptoms increased. Monovision patients, as predicted, were more satisfied with their near vision, when postoperative spherical equivalent from target was on the myopic side.

Conclusion

FS-LASIK correction of hyperopia significantly improved patient satisfaction with both near and far vision in monovision patients. Hyperopic patients had no significant changes in postoperative dry eye symptoms compared to preoperative values.

Vision-Specific Quality of Life: Laser-Assisted in situ Keratomileusis Versus Overnight Contact Lens Wear

OBJECTIVES

To compare the visual-related quality of life in myopic subjects with different refractive treatments such as continuous wear of silicone-hydrogel contact lenses (CL), corneal refractive therapy (CRT), and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

METHODS

The National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument (NEI RQL-42) questionnaire was administered to 96 subjects with a mean age of 30.0±7.9 years. There were 72 myopic subjects with a mean spherical equivalent of -2.74±0.98 D (-5.50 to -1.25 D). Subjects were corrected with LASIK (n=24), Paragon CRT orthokeratology lenses (n=24), and lotrafilcon A silicone-hydrogel CL under continuous wear (n=24). The NEI RQL-42 survey was used to compare differences between groups as well as with an emmetropic group (n=24).

RESULTS

After 1 year of treatment, significant differences were found among all groups in the subscales glare (P=0.017), symptoms (P=0.016), dependence on correction (P<0.001), and worry (P<0.001). The mean difference compared with emmetropes were -5.5% (P=0.063) for LASIK patients, -2.0% (P=0.212) for orthokeratology subjects, and +1.6% (P=0.934) for the silicone-hydrogel CL group.

CONCLUSIONS

Myopic subjects analyzed in this study reported better vision-related quality of life when they were corrected with continuous wear silicone-hydrogel lenses. The average score reached by CRT was similar to emmetropes, which showed the main disadvantage in worry subscale. The patients who underwent LASIK had the lowest valuation, highlighting the decreases in scores of diurnal fluctuations, glare, and especially in expectations and worry subscales, due to the first and second subscales, but especially to the false expectations created about treatment.

Laser Vision Correction in Treating Myopia

Myopia is a generally benign refractive error with an increasing prevalence worldwide. It can be corrected temporarily with glasses and contact lenses and permanently with laser vision correction. The 2 main procedures currently being performed for myopia correction are photorefractive keratectomy and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis. Each technique has its advantages, but they appear to yield similar visual outcomes 1 year after surgery. Laser vision correction for myopia was considered a paradigm shift because healthy eyes could now undergo a surgical procedure to permanently and safely correct the error by altering the center of the cornea, which was previously off limits because of the potential for loss of transparency. Customized ablation using wavefront aberrometry and its optimized profiles were created to correct higher-order aberrations and give more vision quality to patients. Topography-guided ablation, initially used for complex retreatments, shows potential to make vision even better than glasses and contact lenses in a recent study on previously untreated eyes. One major concern is to identify corneas that are at risk of developing ectasia after the procedure. Topographic and tomographic screening indices have been implemented clinically, but there is still much to learn about corneal biomechanics. A more recently developed procedure for myopia correction is small-incision lenticule extraction, in which a lenticule is created in the cornea's stroma with a femtosecond laser and extracted through a small corneal incision. Long-term outcomes and new complication risks need to be better understood as this procedure develops.

[Evaluation of vision quality after laser vision correction in healthcare professionals]

PURPOSE

Healthcare professionals require good quality of vision. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the satisfaction and vision quality after laser vision correction in healthcare professionals.

METHODS

This is a monocentric retrospective study. An online 25-question survey was sent to ametropic physicians, surgeons and nurses who underwent corneal refractive surgery with laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) between July 2012 and February 2016. Questionnaire responses were recorded anonymously by the internet survey site. These patients' pre- and postoperative data were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 2491 laser vision corrections were performed during this time frame. One hundred and fifty-eight patients were healthcare providers; 131 received the survey, and 111 responded. Ninety-nine were surgeons, 60 were medical physicians, and 32 were nurses. Ninety-one percent reported that they were satisfied with their postoperative vision quality, 63.9% even reported an improvement in their quality of vision compared with their corrected preoperative vision, 92.8% reported that they would have the procedure again, and 94.6% would recommend the procedure to a family member or a patient. Visual outcomes showed high levels of efficacy and predictability.

CONCLUSION

While healthcare professionals require good quality of vision, those who had undergone laser vision correction reported the same satisfaction as the general population and would recommend the procedure to their family, friends and patients.