[Preliminary study of the quality of life of glaucoma patients in the district of Sousse (Tunisia): Sociodemographic and clinical associations]

Multiple medications and quality of life of Nigerians with primary open angle glaucoma

PURPOSE

To determine the impact of multiple medications on the quality of life of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) patients on medical treatment at Guinness Eye Centre Onitsha, Nigeria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult patients diagnosed with POAG who were undergoing medical therapy were selected through systematic sampling. They were asked to provide information on socio-demographic background, the number and types of glaucoma medications they were using and any adverse effects encountered while using these medications. The patients' quality of life was assessed by utilizing the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) and all patients completed ocular examination. Data analysis was with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-one patients, aged 40-83 years, mean 59.1 ± 11.1 were studied; there were 79(46.2%) males and 92(53.8%) females. One hundred and nine (63.7%) patients were on multiple medications. Side effects of treatment increased with increasing number of medications. The mean quality of life score in monotherapy group and double therapy group were 89.3 ± 15.8 and 80.2 ± 21.1 respectively; while that in ≥ triple therapy group was 78.9 ± 18.8. This decrease in mean quality of life score with increasing number of medications was statistically significant in bivariate analysis (P < 0.01), however, multiple regression analysis showed that the number of medications did not significantly affect the quality of life scores after adjusting for confounding variables(p = 0.881).

CONCLUSION

Among the patients studied, use of multiple medications, unlike visual acuity (VA) and severity of glaucoma, was not an independent predictor of quality of life.

Association of an Objective Structural and Functional Reference Standard for Glaucoma with Quality of Life Outcomes

PURPOSE

To compare self-reported quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes of patients diagnosed as normal, glaucoma suspect, and glaucoma based on an objective reference standard for glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

1884 eyes of 1019 patients were included in the study.

METHODS

The data was sourced from the Duke Glaucoma Registry. Eyes were classified according to the presence and topographic correspondence of functional and structural damage, as assessed by parameters from standard automated perimetry (SAP) and spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT). The objective diagnosis of the worse eye was used to define patient-level diagnosis. To assess QoL in the diagnostic groups, 14 unidimensional vision-related items of the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) were used to assess QoL in the diagnostic groups. Association between NEI VFQ-25 Rasch-calibrated scores and diagnostic groups was assessed through multivariable regression that controlled for confounding demographic and socioeconomic variables such as age, sex, race, income, marriage status, insurance status, and highest education level.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

NEI VFQ-25 Rasch scores compared with objective criteria diagnosis based on SAP mean deviation (MD) and SD-OCT retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness.

RESULTS

Overall, eyes classified as normal, glaucoma suspect, and glaucoma had decreasing mean scores in SAP MD (0.2 ± 1.0 dB, -0.9 ± 2.4 dB, -6.2 ± 7.0 dB, respectively; P < 0.001) and SD-OCT RNFL thickness (97.8 ± 9.5 μm, 89.0 ± 13.1 μm, 64.5 ± 12.8 μm, respectively; P < 0.001). The mean Rasch-calibrated NEI VFQ-25 score was significantly different among normal, suspect, and glaucoma groups (82.9 ± 13.0, 78.2 ± 14.8, and 72.6 ± 16.2, respectively; P < 0.001). When adjusted for confounding socioeconomic variables, glaucoma patients had significantly worse QoL than those classified as normal (β = -6.8 Rasch score units; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A glaucoma diagnosis, based on an objective reference standard for GON, was significantly associated with worse Rasch-adjusted scores of QoL. Utilization of such objective criteria may provide clinically relevant metrics with potential to improve comparability of research findings and validation of newly proposed diagnostic tools.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

[Impact of glaucoma medications and ocular surface disease on the quality of life of glaucoma patients in the district of Sousse (Tunisia)]

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of glaucoma treatment and ocular surface disease (OSD) on the vision-specific quality-of-life (VS-QoL) of glaucoma patients attending Farhat Hached university hospital Sousse-Tunisia.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study enrolling one-hundred-twenty patients followed for primary open angle glaucoma. All patients successfully responded to the Arabic version of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25 (NEI-VFQ 25). QoL was quantified in terms of scores (0-100) and correlated with the characteristics of glaucoma treatment and status of the ocular surface.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty patients were studied. The mean number of medications and instilled drops was 1.95 (1-4) and 2.69 (1-7) respectively. A total of 66.7% patients reported side effects of treatment. On examination, moderate or severe dry eye syndrome was identified in 90% of cases. A total of 16.7% of patients had superficial punctate keratopathy. The number of instilled drops per day, the use of brimonidine or oral carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, and the presence of OSD had a negative impact on the NEI-VFQ 25 scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Glaucoma treatment and OSD are 2 factors potentially reducing the QoL of glaucoma patients, on which the ophthalmologist can act by optimizing treatment and regularly examining the ocular surface of glaucoma patients.