The importance of tears stability in SARS-CoV-2 transmission: COVID-19 prevalance in dry eye patients

A critical review of research methodologies for COVID-19 transmission in indoor built environment

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused massive losses for the global economy. Scholars have used different methods to study the transmission mode and influencing factors of the virus to find effective methods to provide people with a healthy built environment. However, these studies arrived at different or even contradictory conclusions. This review presents the main research methodologies utilized in this field, summarizes the main investigation methods, and critically discusses their related conclusions. Data statistical analysis, sample collection, simulation models, and replication transmission scenarios are the main research methods. The summarized conclusion for prevention from all reviewed papers are: adequate ventilation and proper location of return air vents, proper use of personal protective equipment, as well as the reasonable and strict enforcement of policies are the main methods for reducing the transmission. Recommendations including standardized databases, causation clarification, rigorous experiment design, improved simulation accuracy and verification are provided.

Dry eye symptoms are prevalent in moderate-severe COVID-19, while SARS-COV-2 presence is higher in mild COVID-19: Possible ocular transmission risk of COVID-19

Purpose

To evaluate the correlation between dry eye symptoms and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and to assess the real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT‒PCR) of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) from the conjunctival swab.

Methods

A prospective observational case series study was conducted of all suspected and confirmed COVID-19 patients from Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital (RSCM) and the Universitas Indonesia Hospital (RSUI). On the first day of the visit (day 0), systemic clinical symptoms and naso-oropharyngeal (NO) RT‒PCR results will classify all subjects as non-, suspected, or confirmed (mild, moderate, and severe) COVID-19. In all patients, we determined the dry eye symptoms based on the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and followed up 7(day 7) and 14 days (day 14) after the first visit. When it was technically possible, we also examined the objective dry eye measurements: tear meniscus height (TMH), noninvasive Keratograph® break-up time (NIKBUT), and ocular redness. Additionally, we took conjunctival swab samples for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR in all patients.

Results

The OSDI scores for 157 patients decreased across days 0, 7, and 14 (median (interquartile range): 2.3 (0-8), 0 (0-3), and 0 (0-0), p value < 0.0001 (D0 vs D14). The moderate-severe COVID-19 group had a higher OSDI score than the other groups at median D0 (15.6 vs 0-2.3), p value < 0.0001 and this pattern was consistently seen at follow-up D7 and D14. However, dry eye complaints were not correlated with the three objective dry eye measurements in mild-moderate COVID-19 patients. NO RT‒PCR results were positive in 32 (20.4%) patients, namely, 13 and 19 moderate-severe and mild COVID-19 patients, respectively. Positive RT‒PCR results were observed in 7/157 (4.5%) conjunctival swab samples from 1 in non-COVID-19 group and 6 in mild group.

Conclusion

In the early phase of infection, COVID-19 patients experience dry eye symptoms, which have no correlation with objective dry eye measurements. SARS-CoV-2 in conjunctival swab samples can be detected in patients with normal-to-mild COVID-19, which shows the risk of ocular transmission.