Synergism of eravacycline combined with other antimicrobial agents against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter baumannii

In vitro synergistic effect and mutant prevention concentration of eravacycline alone or in combination with various antibiotics against OXA-48 producing enterobacterales

This study examines the effects of combining eravacycline with various antibiotics on carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) isolated from bloodstream infections. Fifty Enterobacterales isolates that produce the OXA-48 enzyme were tested for their Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) using broth microdilution. The Mutant Prevention Concentrations (MPCs) of eravacycline, tigecycline, levofloxacin, colistin, fosfomycin, meropenem, and tobramycin were evaluated against CRE isolates. The bactericidal and synergistic effects of eravacycline, alone or in combination with other antibiotics, were assessed using time-kill curve (TKC) experiments. The in vitro synergistic activities of tested antibiotics in combination with eravacycline were also determined by microbroth checkerboard technique, and results were interpreted using the fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index. The results of our study demonstrated that colistin exhibited the best bactericidal activity and the highest susceptibility rates among the evaluated strains. Eravacycline exhibited lower MPC values compared to tigecycline when used alone. The results of the TCK method showed that the most effective synergistic interactions were observed when eravacycline was combined with levofloxacin, colistin, or meropenem. The results obtained by microbroth checkerboard techniques also described synergistic activity with all tested eravacycline combinations against tested clinical isolates of Enterobacterales. No antagonism was detected. The study's results indicate that the combination of eravacycline with colistin, meropenem, tobramycin or levofloxacin showed synergistic activity against strains of Enterobacterales that produce OXA-48. This combination therapy may be a viable alternative for treating carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales bacteria. In addition, eravacycline's lower MPC value suggests it may avoid the emergence of resistant mutant strains in the population.

Investigation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of eravacycline alone and in combination with various antibiotics against MDR Acinetobacter baumanni strains

BACKGROUND

Acinetobacter baumannii is an obligately aerobic, non-motile, non-fermenting, gram-negative, opportunistic pathogen. The fact that this pathogen, which is the leading cause of nosocomial infections, is naturally resistant to many antibiotics and quickly acquires new resistance mechanisms gradually limits the antibiotic options that can be used in treatment. So, our study aims to investigate the in vitro antibacterial effects of eravacycline, a new tetracycline-class antibiotic, and compare this antibiotic with the antibiotics used in the clinic to treat the infection caused by A. baumannii. Also, eravacycline was tested in combination with meropenem or colistin against A. baumannii strains, which are resistant to colistin and meropenem. The antibiotic susceptibility of strains was determined by the microbroth dilution method. In addition, the agar dilution method determined the mutant inhibition concentration (MPC) values of the studied antibiotics. To investigate the effects of the antibiotics mentioned in our study on biofilm formation, the biofilm-forming abilities of the strains were evaluated by the crystal violet staining method. The bactericidal and synergistic effects of the studied antibiotics alone or in combination were determined by the time-dependent killing curve (TKC) method.

RESULTS

The present antibacterial susceptibility experiments showed that 98% of the strains were multi-drug resistant (MDR). Our results in mutant inhibition studies showed that eravacycline is an antibiotic with the potential to prevent the emergence of resistant mutants with its low MPC value. When the effects of antibiotics on biofilm formation were investigated in our thesis study, it was determined that 95% of our strains formed biofilm. In biofilm inhibition experiments, it was observed that eravacycline at minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) inhibited biofilm formation by 84% alone, 86% combined with colistin, and 85% combined with meropenem. Our combination experiments showed that 1×MIC eravacycline-meropenem and 4×MIC eravacycline-colistin combinations were synergistic against A. baumannii strains. In addition, the combination of 4×MIC eravacycline-meropenem also showed bactericidal activity at the 24th hour. No antagonist effects were detected in our combination studies.

CONCLUSION

Present results reveal essential pharmacodynamic data on eravacycline, a new antibiotic for treating A. baumannii infections, which poses a global threat.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

Comparative evaluation of eravacycline susceptibility testing methods in 587 clinical carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates: broth microdilution, MIC test strip and disc diffusion

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of different methods for determining carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) susceptibility to eravacycline.

METHODS

We collected 587 CRAB strains from Huashan Hospital affiliated to Fudan University between 2019 and 2023. The broth microdilution (BMD) method served as the reference standard. The susceptibility results were evaluated using the clinical breakpoints established by the Chinese Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (ChinaCAST) (susceptible MIC,  ≤ 1 mg/L; inhibition zone diameter,  ≥ 15 mm). The study compared the reliability of the MIC test strip (MTS) and disc diffusion (DD) methods in detecting CRAB susceptibility to eravacycline.

RESULTS

The MICs required to inhibit 50% and 90% of CRAB growth were as follows: BMD, 0.5/1 mg/L; MTS, 0.38/0.75 mg/L. According to the ChinaCAST breakpoints, the BMD method demonstrated a 98.13% (576/587) susceptibility rate, whereas the MTS and DD methods showed susceptibility rates of 97.96% (575/587) and 97.61% (573/587), respectively. The essential agreement rate between the MTS and BMD methods was 94.55%. Categorical agreement (CA) rates for the MTS and DD methods were 99.83% and 99.49%, respectively. The major error (ME) rate for MTS was 0.17%, with no very major errors (VMEs) observed. For the DD method, the ME rate was 0.51%, also with no VMEs.

CONCLUSION

The MTS and DD methods demonstrated strong consistency with the BMD reference method, with CA, ME and VME rates meeting methodological evaluation criteria. Both MTS and DD methods are reliable alternatives for assessing the antibacterial activity of eravacycline in clinical microbiology laboratories.

Antibacterial Therapy Options for Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

The review presents current treatment regimens for infections associated with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, which are leading nosocomial pathogens exhibiting multidrug resistance to available antibacterial drugs. To date, widely used beta-lactam antibiotics, including carbapenems, have lost their effectiveness in combating acinetobacter infections, while new antibiotics remain poorly available to patients. Therefore, the only measure to combat the antibiotic resistance of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii is to evaluate the efficiency of combination therapy in vitro and in vivo, which is of particular interest to Russian and foreign researchers.

Insights into the Rising Threat of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Epidemic Infections in Eastern Europe: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance is a major global public health challenge, particularly with the rise of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA). This study aimed to describe the characteristics of CRE and CRPA infections in Eastern Europe, focusing on Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, and Slovenia.

METHODS

Following MOOSE and PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review of articles published between 1 November 2017 and 1 November 2023 was conducted using the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CDSR, DARE, and CENTRAL databases. The search strategy used a combination of free text and subject headings to gather pertinent literature regarding the incidence and treatment patterns of CRE and CRPA infections. A total of 104 studies focusing on infections in both children and adults were included in this review.

RESULTS

This review revealed a significant prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative isolates and underscored the effectiveness of imipenem/relebactam and ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and of ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/relebactam and ceftazidime/avibactam against non-metallo-β-lactamase-producing CRPA strains.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the urgent need for comprehensive measures to combat the escalating threat of CRE and CRPA infections in Eastern European countries. At the same time, it shows the activity of the standard of care and new antimicrobials against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens in Eastern Europe. Clinical real-world data on the treatment of carbapenem-resistant infections in Eastern Europe are needed.

Efficacy and safety of eravacycline (ERV) in treating infections caused by Gram-negative pathogens: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Eravacycline (ERV) is a novel synthetic fluorocycline antibiotic with broad-spectrum antibacterial efficacy against pathogens. This study sought to investigate ERV's effectiveness and safety in treating Gram-negative pathogens (GNPs) infections.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to September 2023. Included in the review were studies assessing the efficacy or safety of ERV in treating GNP infections.

RESULTS

Three randomized controlled trials, seven cohort studies, and two case reports were included. There was no statistically significant difference between ERV and comparators in clinical cure (OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.59-1.19), microbiologic eradication (OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.36-1.33), and mortality (OR = 1.66, 95% CI = 0.81-3.41). However, a significantly higher rate of adverse events with ERV was observed compared to the control group (OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.21-1.99). Additionally, cohort studies reported a clinical cure rate of 73.2% (88.8% in RCTs), an AE rate of 4.5% (38.3% in RCTs), and mortality of 16.2% (1.5% in RCTs). Patients in RCTs received ERV monotherapy, whereas almost half of the patients in cohort studies were treated with ERV in combination with other antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies are warranted to investigate the safety and efficacy of ERV monotherapy or combination therapy in critically ill patients.

Comparison of antimicrobial activities and resistance mechanisms of eravacycline and tigecycline against clinical Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in China

Tigecycline (TGC) is currently used to treat carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections, while eravacycline (ERV), a new-generation tetracycline, holds promise as a novel therapeutic option for these infections. However, differences in resistance mechanism between ERV and TGC against A. baumannii remain unclear. This study sought to compare the characteristics and mechanisms of ERV and TGC resistance among clinical A. baumannii isolates. A total of 492 isolates, including 253 CRAB and 239 carbapenem-sensitive A. baumannii (CSAB) isolates, were collected from hospitalized patients in China. The MICs of ERV and TGC against A. baumannii were determined by broth microdilution. Genetic mutations and expressions of adeB, adeG, adeJ, adeS, adeL, and adeN in resistant strains were examined by PCR and qPCR, respectively. The in vitro recombination experiments were used to verify the resistance mechanism of ERV and TGC in A. baumannii. The MIC90 of ERV in CRAB and CSAB isolates were lower than those of TGC. A total of 24 strains resistant to ERV and/or TGC were categorized into three groups: only ERV-resistant (n = 2), both ERV- and TGC-resistant (n = 7), and only TGC-resistant (n = 15). ST208 (75%, n = 18) was a major clone that has disseminated in all three groups. The ISAba1 insertion in adeS was identified in 66.7% (6/9) of strains in the only ERV-resistant and both ERV- and TGC-resistant groups, while the ISAba1 insertion in adeN was found in 53.3% (8/15) of strains in the only TGC-resistant group. The adeABC and adeRS expressions were significantly increased in the only ERV-resistant and both ERV- and TGC-resistant groups, while the adeABC and adeIJK expressions were significantly increased and adeN was significantly decreased in the only TGC-resistant group. Expression of adeS with the ISAba1 insertion in ERV- and TGC-sensitive strains significantly increased the ERV and TGC MICs and upregulated adeABC and adeRS expressions. Complementation of the wildtype adeN in TGC-resistant strains with the ISAba1 insertion in adeN restored TGC sensitivity and significantly downregulated adeIJK expression. In conclusion, our data illustrates that ERV is more effective against A. baumannii clinical isolates than TGC. ERV resistance is correlated with the ISAba1 insertion in adeS, while TGC resistance is associated with the ISAba1 insertion in adeN or adeS in A. baumannii.

Evaluation of MMV Pandemic Response Box compounds to identify potent compounds against clinically relevant bacterial and fungal clinical isolates in vitro

Background

Multidrug resistant bacterial and fungal pathogens are resistant to a number of significant front-line drugs, hence, identification of new inhibitory agents to combat them is crucial. In this study, we aim to evaluate the activity of Pandemic Box compounds from Malaria Medicines Venture (MMV) against A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa bacterial, C. auris, C. albicans and A. niger fungal clinical isolates.

Methods

Isolates were initially screened with 201 antibacterial and 46 antifungal compounds (10 μM) using a microbroth dilution in triplicates to determine MIC. A persister assay was performed for bacterial pathogens.

Results

Out of 201 antibacterial compounds, twenty-nine and seven compounds inhibited the growth of A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa at 10 μM, respectively. MMV1580854, MMV1579788, eravacycline and epetraborole inhibited both the bacterial test isolates. In a persister assay, MMV1634390 showed complete bactericidal effect against A. baumannii. With antifungal activity compounds, C. auris responded to15 compounds, Six compounds inhibited C. albicans and one was effective against A. niger at 10 μM. The ratio of Minimum Fungicidal Concentration (MFC): Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of MMV1782110 was 2 against C. auris. Eberconazole, amorolfine and luliconazole are fungicidal targeting C. albicans at a MFC: MIC ratio of 2.

Conclusion

Five compounds from MMV Pandemic Box were found to be inhibiting colistin and ceftazidime resistant A. baumannii clinical isolate, also against colistin and β-lactam resistant P. aeruginosa clinical isolate. MMV1634390 showed complete bactericidal effect against A. baumannii in a persister assay. MMV1782110, Eberconazole, amorolfine and luliconazole exhibited potent anti-fungal activity. Further investigations are warranted to identify the targets and mechanism.

DrugSK: A Stacked Ensemble Learning Framework for Predicting Drug Combinations of Multiple Diseases

Combination therapy is an important direction of continuous exploration in the field of medicine, with the core goals of improving treatment efficacy, reducing adverse reactions, and optimizing clinical outcomes. Machine learning technology holds great promise in improving the prediction of drug synergy combinations. However, most studies focus on single disease-oriented collaborative predictive models or involve excessive feature categories, making it challenging to predict the majority of new drugs. To address these challenges, the DrugSK comprehensive model was developed, which utilizes SMILES-BERT to extract structural information from 3492 drugs and trains on reactions from 48,756 drug combinations. DrugSK is an integrated learning model capable of predicting interactions among various drug categories. First, the primary learner is trained from the initial data set. Random forest, support vector machine, and XGboost model are selected as primary learners and logistic regression as secondary learners. A new data set is then "generated" to train level 2 learners, which can be thought of as a prediction for each model. Finally, the results are filtered using logistic regression. Furthermore, the combination of the new antibacterial drug Drafloxacin with other antibacterial agents was tested. The synergistic effect of Drafloxacin and Isavuconazonium in the fight against Candida albicans has been confirmed, providing enlightenment for the clinical treatment of skin infection. DrugSK's prediction is accurate in practical application and can also predict the probability of the outcome. In addition, the tendency of Drafloxacin and antifungal drugs to be synergistic was found. The development of DrugSK will provide a new blueprint for predicting drug combination synergies.

Combinations of Antibiotics Effective against Extensively- and Pandrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Patient Isolates

Infections due to drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains are increasing and cause significant morbidity and mortality, especially in hospitalized and critically ill patients. A. baumannii rapidly develops resistance to numerous antibiotics, and antibiotics traditionally used against this deadly pathogen have been failing in recent years, highlighting the need to identify new treatment strategies. Treatment options that have shown promise include revisiting common antibiotics not typically used against A. baumannii, evaluating new antibiotics recently introduced to market, and identifying combinations of antibiotics that display synergistic interactions. In this study, we characterized the antibiotic susceptibility profiles of extensively (XDR) and pandrug-resistant (PDR) A. baumannii patient isolates. We examined the potency of 22 standard-of-care antibiotics and the newer antibiotics eravacycline, omadacycline, and plazomicin against these strains. Furthermore, we examined combinations of these antibiotics against our collection to identify synergistic effects. We found that this collection is highly resistant to most or all standard-of-care antibiotics, except for minocycline and rifampin. We show that eravacycline and omadacycline are effective against these strains based on minimum inhibitory concentrations. We also identified two highly effective combinations, cefepime and amikacin and cefepime and ampicillin-sulbactam, which exhibited high rates of synergy against this collection. This information is valuable in our battle against highly drug resistant and virtually untreatable A. baumannii infections.

Third-Generation Tetracyclines: Current Knowledge and Therapeutic Potential

Tetracyclines constitute a unique class of antibiotic agents, widely prescribed for both community and hospital infections due to their broad spectrum of activity. Acting by disrupting protein synthesis through tight binding to the 30S ribosomal subunit, their interference is typically reversible, rendering them bacteriostatic in action. Resistance to tetracyclines has primarily been associated with changes in pump efflux or ribosomal protection mechanisms. To address this challenge, tetracycline molecules have been chemically modified, resulting in the development of third-generation tetracyclines. These novel tetracyclines offer significant advantages in treating infections, whether used alone or in combination therapies, especially in hospital settings. Beyond their conventional antimicrobial properties, research has highlighted their potential non-antibiotic properties, including their impact on immunomodulation and malignancy. This review will focus on third-generation tetracyclines, namely tigecycline, eravacycline, and omadacycline. We will delve into their mechanisms of action and resistance, while also evaluating their pros and cons over time. Additionally, we will explore their therapeutic potential, analyzing their primary indications of prescription, potential future uses, and non-antibiotic features. This review aims to provide valuable insights into the clinical applications of third-generation tetracyclines, thereby enhancing understanding and guiding optimal clinical use.

Eravacycline: a comprehensive review of in vitro activity, clinical efficacy, and real-world applications

INTRODUCTION

The escalating threat of multidrug-resistant organisms necessitates constant exploration for novel antimicrobial agents. Eravacycline has emerged as a promising solution due to its unique chemical structure, which enhances potency and expands its spectrum of activity.

AREA COVERED

This review provides a thorough examination of eravacycline, encompassing its in vitro activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobes, carbapenem-non-susceptible organisms, anaerobes, and other bacterial strains. Additionally, it evaluates evidence from clinical studies to establish its clinical effect and safety.

EXPERT OPINION

Eravacycline, a synthetic fluorocycline, belongs to the tetracyclines class. Similar to other tetracycline, eravacycline exerts its antibacterial action by reversibly binding to the bacterial ribosomal 30S subunit. Eravacycline demonstrates potent in vitro activity against many Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobes, anaerobes, and multidrug-resistant organisms. Randomized controlled trials and its associated meta-analysis affirm eravacycline's efficacy in treating complicated intra-abdominal infections. Moreover, real-world studies showcase eravacycline's adaptability and effectiveness in diverse clinical conditions, emphasizing its utility beyond labeled indications. Despite common gastrointestinal adverse events, eravacycline maintains an overall favorable safety profile, reinforcing its status as a tolerable antibiotic. However, ongoing research is essential for refining eravacycline's role, exploring combination therapy, and assessing its performance against biofilms, in combating challenging bacterial infections.

Evaluation of the synergistic effect of eravacycline and tigecycline against carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) poses a substantial healthcare challenge. This study assessed the in vitro efficacy of selected antibiotic combinations against CRKP infections.

METHODS

Our research involved the evaluation of 40 clinical isolates of CRKP, with half expressing Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) and half producing Metallo-β-lactamase (MBL), two key enzymes contributing to carbapenem resistance. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of four antibiotics: eravacycline, tigecycline, polymyxin-B, and ceftazidime/avibactam. Synergistic interactions between these antibiotic combinations were examined using checkerboard and time-kill analyses.

RESULTS

We noted significant differences in the MICs of ceftazidime/avibactam between KPC and MBL isolates. Checkerboard analysis revealed appreciable synergy between combinations of tigecycline (35%) or eravacycline (40%) with polymyxin-B. The synergy rates for the combination of tigecycline or eravacycline with polymyxin-B were similar among the KPC and MBL isolates. These combinations maintained a synergy rate of 70.6% even against polymyxin-B resistant isolates. In contrast, combinations of tigecycline (5%) or eravacycline (10%) with ceftazidime/avibactam showed significantly lower synergy than combinations with polymyxin-B (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). Among the MBL CRKP isolates, only one exhibited synergy with eravacycline or tigecycline and ceftazidime/avibactam combinations, and no synergistic activity was identified in the time-kill analysis for these combinations. The combination of eravacycline and polymyxin-B demonstrated the most promising synergy in the time-kill analysis.

CONCLUSION

This study provides substantial evidence of a significant synergy when combining tigecycline or eravacycline with polymyxin-B against CRKP strains, including those producing MBL. These results highlight potential therapeutic strategies against CRKP infections.

Emergence of eravacycline heteroresistance in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in China

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is resistant to almost all antibiotics. Eravacycline, a newer treatment option, has the potential to treat CRAB infections, however, the mechanism by which CRAB isolates develop resistance to eravacycline has yet to be clarified. This study sought to investigate the features and mechanisms of eravacycline heteroresistance among CRAB clinical isolates. A total of 287 isolates were collected in China from 2020 to 2022. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of eravacycline and other clinically available agents against A. baumannii were determined using broth microdilution. The frequency of eravacycline heteroresistance was determined by population analysis profiling (PAP). Mutations and expression levels of resistance genes in heteroresistant isolates were determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), respectively. Antisense RNA silencing was used to validate the function of eravacycline heteroresistant candidate genes. Twenty-five eravacycline heteroresistant isolates (17.36%) were detected among 144 CRAB isolates with eravacycline MIC values ≤4 mg/L while no eravacycline heteroresistant strains were detected in carbapenem-susceptible A. baumannii (CSAB) isolates. All eravacycline heteroresistant strains contained OXA-23 carbapenemase and the predominant multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was ST208 (72%). Cross-resistance was observed between eravacycline, tigecycline, and levofloxacin in the resistant subpopulations. The addition of efflux pump inhibitors significantly reduced the eravacycline MIC in resistant subpopulations and weakened the formation of eravacycline heteroresistance in CRAB isolates. The expression levels of adeABC and adeRS were significantly higher in resistant subpopulations than in eravacycline heteroresistant parental strains (P < 0.05). An ISAba1 insertion in the adeS gene was identified in 40% (10/25) of the resistant subpopulations. Decreasing the expression of adeABC or adeRS by antisense RNA silencing significantly inhibited eravacycline heteroresistance. In conclusion, this study identified the emergence of eravacycline heteroresistance in CRAB isolates in China, which is associated with high expression of AdeABC and AdeRS.

How to treat severe Acinetobacter baumannii infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To update the management of severe Acinetobacter baumannii infections (ABI), particularly those caused by multi-resistant isolates.

RECENT FINDINGS

The in vitro activity of the various antimicrobial agents potentially helpful in treating ABI is highly variable and has progressively decreased for many of them, limiting current therapeutic options. The combination of more than one drug is still advisable in most circumstances. Ideally, two active first-line drugs should be used. Alternatively, a first-line and a second-line drug and, if this is not possible, two or more second-line drugs in combination. The emergence of new agents such as Cefiderocol, the combination of Sulbactam and Durlobactam, and the new Tetracyclines offer therapeutic options that need to be supported by clinical evidence.

SUMMARY

The apparent limitations in treating infections caused by this bacterium, the rapid development of resistance, and the serious underlying situation in most cases invite the search for alternatives to antibiotic treatment, the most promising of which seems to be bacteriophage therapy.

Eravacycline -Synergistic activity with other antimicrobials in carbapenem resistant isolates of Escherichia coli and Acinetobacter baumannii

Carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae are unaffected by most used antibiotics. Carbapenem resistance in Gram-negative bacterial isolates poses a concern. Eravacycline is a potent new therapy option to treat organisms that exhibit extended-spectrum -lactamases and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. The chequerboard microdilution panel method was used to evaluate the effectiveness of eravacycline when combined with other antibiotics. Most effective against Escherichia coli isolates was the combination of eravacycline and polymyxin B, with 60% synergism and eravacycline-Ceftazidime combination was the most potent combination against Acinetobacter baumannii with 80% synergism. Eravacycline is having synergistic benefits against carbapenem-resistant isolates when combined with cephalosporins or polymyxin B.

Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of ETEST Eravacycline for Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococci

Eravacycline (ERV) (brand name Xerava [Tetraphase]) is a new tetracycline-class antibacterial that has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs). ETEST is a gradient diffusion method that represents a simple alternative to the broth microdilution (BMD) method for performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). A multicenter evaluation of the performance of the new ETEST ERV (bioMérieux) in comparison with BMD was conducted following FDA and International Standards Organization (ISO) recommendations, using FDA- and EUCAST-defined breakpoints. Clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae (n = 542) and Enterococcus spp. (n = 137) were included. Based on the BMD reference method, 92 Enterobacteriaceae isolates and 9 enterococcal isolates were nonsusceptible to ERV according to the FDA breakpoints, while 7 Escherichia coli isolates and 3 Enterococcus sp. isolates were classified as ERV resistant according the EUCAST breakpoints. Referring to FDA performance criteria, the ETEST ERV demonstrated 99.4% and 100.0% essential agreement (EA), 98.0% and 94.9% categorical agreement (CA), very major error (VME) rates of 5.4% and 33.33%, and major error (ME) rates of 1.3% and 3.1% with clinical and challenge isolates, respectively, of Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcus spp. According to EUCAST breakpoints, E. coli and Enterococcus sp. isolate results also met ISO acceptance criteria for EA and CA (EA of 99.0% and 100.0%, respectively, and CA of 100.0% for both), without any VMEs or MEs. In conclusion, we report that ETEST ERV represents an accurate tool for performing ERV AST of Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcus sp. isolates.

Evaluating the Efficacy of Eravacycline and Omadacycline against Extensively Drug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Patient Isolates

For decades, the spread of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii has been rampant in critically ill, hospitalized patients. Traditional antibiotic therapies against this pathogen have been failing, leading to rising concerns over management options for patients. Two new antibiotics, eravacycline and omadacycline, were introduced to the market and have shown promising results in the treatment of Gram-negative infections. Since these drugs are newly available, there is limited in vitro data about their effectiveness against MDR A. baumannii or even susceptible strains. Here, we examined the effectiveness of 22 standard-of-care antibiotics, eravacycline, and omadacycline against susceptible and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) A. baumannii patient isolates from Cooper University Hospital. Furthermore, we examined selected combinations of eravacycline or omadacycline with other antibiotics against an XDR strain. We demonstrated that this collection of strains is largely resistant to monotherapies of carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, folate pathway antagonists, cephalosporins, and most tetracyclines. While clinical breakpoint data are not available for eravacycline or omadacycline, based on minimum inhibitory concentrations, eravacycline was highly effective against these strains. The aminoglycoside amikacin alone and in combination with eravacycline or omadacycline yielded the most promising results. Our comprehensive characterization offers direction in the treatment of this deadly infection in hospitalized patients.