Chemotherapy toxicities and geriatric syndromes in older patients with malignant gliomas

Clinical Predictors of Overall Survival in Very Elderly Patients With Glioblastoma: A National Cancer Database Multivariable Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Surgery for the very elderly is a progressively important paradigm as life expectancy continues to rise. Patients with glioblastoma multiforme often undergo surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and chemotherapy (CT) to prolong overall survival (OS). However, the efficacy of these treatment modalities in patients aged 80 years and older has yet to be fully assessed in the literature.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was used to retrospectively identify patients aged 65 years and older with glioblastoma multiforme (1989-2016). All available patient demographic characteristics, disease characteristics, and clinical outcomes were collected. To study OS, bivariable survival models were created using Kaplan-Meier estimates. A Cox proportional-hazards model was used for final adjusted analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 578 very elderly patients (aged 80 years and older) and 2836 elderly patients (aged 65-79 years) were identified. Compared with elderly patients, very elderly patients were more likely to have Medicare (odds ratio [OR] 1.899 [95% CI: 1.417-2.544], P < .001) while less likely to have private insurance status (OR 0.544 [95% CI: 0.401-0.739], P < .001). In addition, very elderly patients were more likely to travel the least distance for treatment and have multiple tumors ( P < .001). When controlling for demographic and disease characteristics, very elderly patients were less likely to receive gross total resection (GTR) (OR 0.822 [95% CI: 0.681-0.991], P < .041), RT (OR 0.385 [95% CI: 0.319-0.466], P < .001), or postoperative CT (OR 0.298 [95% CI: 0.219-0.359], P < .001) relative to elderly counterparts. Within very elderly patients, GTR, RT, and CT all independently and significantly predicted improved OS ( P < .001 for all). These predictive models were deployed in an online calculator ( https://spine.shinyapps.io/GBM_elderly ).

CONCLUSION

Very elderly patients are less likely to receive GTR, RT, or CT when compared with elderly counterparts despite use of these therapies conferring improved OS. Selected very elderly patients may benefit from more aggressive attempts at surgical and adjuvant treatment.

Evaluation of the key geriatric assessment constructs in primary brain tumor population - a descriptive study

INTRODUCTION

Despite an increasing aging population, older adults (≥ 65 years) with primary brain tumors (PBTs) are not routinely assessed for geriatric vulnerabilities. Recent reports of geriatric assessment (GA) in patients with glioblastomas demonstrated that GA may serve as a sensitive prognosticator of overall survival. Yet, current practice does not include routine evaluation of geriatric vulnerabilities and the relevance of GA has not been previously evaluated in broader cohorts of PBT patients. The objective of this descriptive study was to assess key GA constructs in adults with PBT dichotomized into older versus younger groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis of data collected from 579 participants with PBT recruited between 2016 and 2020, dichotomized into older (≥ 65 years, n = 92) and younger (≤ 64 years, n = 487) from an ongoing observational trial. GA constructs were evaluated using socio-demographic characteristics, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), polypharmacy (>5 daily medications), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), Neurologic Function Score (NFS), and patient-reported outcome assessments including general health, functional status, symptom burden and interference, and mood. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, chi-square tests, and Pearson correlations were used to evaluate differences between age groups.

RESULTS

Older participants were more likely to have problems with mobility (58% vs. 44%), usual activities (64% vs 50%) and self-care (38% vs 26%) compared to the younger participants (odds ratios [ORs] = 1.3-1.4, ps < 0.05), while older participants were less likely to report feeling distressed (OR = 0.4, p < 0.05). Older participants also had higher CCI and were more likely to have polypharmacy (OR = 1.7, ps < 0.05). Increasing age strongly correlated with worse KPS score (r = -0.232, OR = 1.4, p < 0.001) and worse NFS (r = 0.210, OR = 1.5, p < 0.001). No differences were observed in overall symptom burden, symptom interference, and anxiety/depression scores.

DISCUSSION

While commonly used GA tools were not available, the study employed patient- and clinician-reported outcomes to identify potential future research directions for the use of GA in the broader neuro-oncology population. Findings illustrate missed opportunities in neuro-oncology practice and underscore the need for incorporation of GA into routine care of this population. Future studies are warranted to further evaluate the prognostic utility of GA and to better understand functional aging outcomes in this patient population.

Tele-neuro-oncology: Current Practices and Future Directions

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to describe the current state of telemedicine within neuro-oncology. This article will address the development of tele-neuro-oncology over time with a focus on current use and applications of telemedicine within the field. Current modalities and practical considerations for tele-neuro-oncology visits and opportunities for growth will be highlighted.

Recent Findings

The use of telemedicine has expanded significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly within neuro-oncology. The use of telemedicine is widely accepted by neuro-oncologic patients and providers and continues to expand in utilization and scope. The use of tele-neuro-oncology is expected to develop further with opportunities for multidisciplinary and integrated care, clinical trials, research, and education.

Summary

Telemedicine provides a unique, patient-centered approach to neuro-oncologic care. Telehealth will remain a valuable tool, and its use and role are expected to expand within neuro-oncology.

Treatment of Older Adult Patients with Glioblastoma: Moving towards the Inclusion of a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for Guiding Management

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults, and over half of patients with newly diagnosed GBM are over the age of 65. Management of glioblastoma in older patients includes maximal safe resection followed by either radiation, chemotherapy, or combined modality treatment. Despite recent advances in the treatment of older patients with GBM, survival is still only approximately 9 months compared to approximately 15 months for the general adult population, suggesting that further research is required to optimize management in the older population. The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) has been shown to have a prognostic and predictive role in the management of older patients with other cancers, and domains of the CGA have demonstrated an association with outcomes in GBM in retrospective studies. Furthermore, the CGA and other geriatric assessment tools are now starting to be prospectively investigated in older GBM populations. This review aims to outline current treatment strategies for older patients with GBM, explore the rationale for inclusion of geriatric assessment in GBM management, and highlight recent data investigating its implementation into practice.

Outcomes and Patterns of Care in Elderly Patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults, with an increased incidence among the elderly. However, the optimal treatment strategy in elderly patients remains unclear. This study seeks to investigate the effect of patient selection and treatment strategies on survival trends in these patients.

METHODS

Patients with diagnosis codes specific for GBM were queried from the National Cancer Database during 2004-2016. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to investigate outcomes. Survival curves and 5-year survival were also generated based on patient-specific factors.

RESULTS

Among 104,456 patients with GBM identified, elderly patients were less likely to receive radiotherapy (61.3% vs. 77.8%; P < 0.001) or chemotherapy (47.2% vs. 62.9%; P < 0.001) or to undergo surgical resection (68.3% vs. 81.8; P < 0.001). Mean overall survival was 9.1 months (standard deviation, 10.0) and 5-year survival was 5.3%. Multivariate analysis showed age 75-84 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.73; P = 0.003) and lower Karnofsky Performance Status (50-70: HR, 1.68, 95% CI, 1.35-2.08, P < 0.001; ≤40: HR, 1.79, 95% CI 1.18-2.72, P = 0.006) were associated with decreased overall survival, whereas surgical resection (subtotal resection: HR, 0.52, 95% CI, 0.38-0.71, P < 0.001; gross total resection: HR, 0.29, 95% CI, 0.21-0.41, P < 0.001), radiotherapy (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47-0.91; P = 0.012), and chemotherapy (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.88; P = 0.006) were associated with increased overall survival in elderly patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In an analysis of 104,456 patients with GBM, all treatment modalities were found to be used less frequently in elderly patients. Increasing age and poor performance status were associated with worsened survival. Gross total resection was associated with the greatest survival benefit, and chemotherapy and radiotherapy also improved survival outcomes. These treatment options improved outcomes regardless of performance status. Although maximal treatment strategies may improve survival in elderly patients with GBM, these treatment strategies must be balanced against patient-specific factors and quality-of-life concerns.