[Clinical practice guidelines: Presumed benign ovarian tumors--aims, methods, and organization]

Efficacy of HE4, CA125, Risk of Malignancy Index and Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Index to Detect Ovarian Cancer in Women with Presumed Benign Ovarian Tumours: A Prospective, Multicentre Trial

BACKGROUND

Presumed benign ovarian tumours (PBOT) are defined by the International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA) group, without suspected sonographic criteria of cancer, without ascites or metastasis. The aim is to evaluate the efficacy of human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), the risk of malignancy index (RMI) and the risk of ovarian malignancy index (ROMA) to predict ovarian cancer in women with PBOT.

METHODS

It is a prospective, observational, multicentre, laboratory-based study including women with PBOT in four hospitals from 11 May 2015 through 12 May 2016. Preoperative CA125 and HE4 plasma levels were measured for all women. The primary endpoint was the specificity of CA125 and HE4 for diagnosing ovarian cancer. The main secondary endpoints were specificity and likelihood ratio of RMI, ROMA and tumours markers.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty patients were initially enrolled and 221 patients were finally analysed, including 209 benign ovarian tumours (94.6%) and 12 malignant ovarian tumours (5.4%). The malignant group had significantly higher mean values of HE4, CA125, RMI and ROMA compared to the benign group (p < 0.001). Specificity was significantly higher using a combination of HE4 and CA125 (99.5%) compared to either HE4 or CA125 alone (90.4% and 91.4%, respectively, p < 0.001). Moreover, the positive likelihood ratio for combination HE4 and CA125 was significantly higher (104.5; 95% CI 13.6-800.0) compared to HE4 alone (5.81; 95% CI 2.83-11.90) or CA125 alone (6.97; 95% CI 3.91-12.41).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of HE4 and CA125 represents the best tool to predict the risk of ovarian cancer in patients with a PBOT.

Biomarkers and algorithms for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: CA125, HE4, RMI and ROMA, a review

Ovarian cancer is the 5th leading cause of death for women with cancer worldwide. In more than 70% of cases, it is only diagnosed at an advanced stage. Our study aims to give an update on the biological markers for diagnosing ovarian cancer, specifically HE4, CA 125, RMI and ROMA algorithms.

Serum CA125 assay has low sensitivity in the early stages and can be increased in certain conditions such as menstruation or endometriosis. The level of HE4 is overexpressed in ovarian tumors. Its specificity is 94% and its level is not affected by endometriosis cysts. The combined measures of CA125 and HE4 have proved to be highly efficient with an area under the curve (AUC) of up to 0.96. Furthermore, this combined measure of CA125 can correct the variations in HE4 which are due to smoking or contraception combining estrogen plus progestin. While the specificity of RMI sometimes reaches 92%, the rather low AUC of 0.86 does not make it the best diagnostic tool. The specificity of ROMA is lower than HE4 (84% compared to 94%).

To date, the most efficient biological diagnostic tool to diagnose ovarian cancer is the combination of CA125 and HE4.

Preservation of fertility in surgery of benign and borderline malignant ovarian tumors

Benign ovarian tumors occur in 7% of women during their procreative years and involve both organic and functional tumors. The average age of onset for borderline ovarian tumors is ten years younger than that for ovarian cancers. Women with benign and borderline malignant ovarian tumors are therefore more likely to be affected by fertility issues. The causal link between infertility and benign ovarian tumor stems more from the therapeutic strategies adopted than from the histological nature of the benign ovarian tumor. The question of fertility preservation must therefore be addressed in the management of these patients through respect for "correct" surgical indications, through gestures centered around ovarian preservation, and finally, if necessary, by recourse to fertility preservation techniques.

[Single-port versus mini-laparoscopy in benign adnexal surgery: Results of a not randomized pilot study]

OBJECTIVE

Carry out a preliminary study comparing postoperative pain and intraoperative and postoperative complications between micro-laparoscopy and laparoscopic monotrocart non-oncological adnexal surgery.

METHODS

All patients should benefit from a benign adnexal surgery were included prospectively from February to May 2014. The insufflation pressure, infiltration of trocar holes with a local anesthetic, postoperative analgesics were prescribed standardized. Operative and postoperative complications, type and length of hospital stay as well as EVA and analgesic consumption were recorded.

RESULTS

Nine patients were included in monotrocart group versus 7 in the micro-laparoscopy group. There were no differences in operative and postoperative complications, the type and length of hospital stay, as well as cosmetics satisfaction. However, there was a significant difference in the VAS to D2 (2.15 vs. 4.08, P=0.04) and analgesic consumption at D0 (P=0.04), D1 (P=0.04), D2 (P=0.02) and D3 (P=0.01), for the benefit of micro-laparoscopy.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Despite an enrollment of patients low, micro-laparoscopy appears to have a significant advantage over the monotrocart laparoscopy for postoperative pain in benign adnexal surgery.

[Recommendations for clinical practice: Presumed benign ovarian tumors--short text]

These guidelines from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians on the diagnosis and treatment of presumed benign ovarian tumors (PBOT) concern physicians whether gynecologists, obstetricians, surgeons, radiologists, pediatricians, and general practitioners. Vaginal pelvic ultrasound is the first-line imaging examination in case of PBOT in adult women (grade A). In case of pure fluid unilocular mass less than 7 cm size, ultrasound is sufficient to characterize the mass (grade A). MRI is recommended as second-line to explore indeterminate masses or masses greater than 7 cm (grade B). Serum CA125 assay is not recommended as first-line diagnostic in adult women (grade C). Among women with a pure unilocular liquid cyst, hormonal therapy is ineffective (LE1) and is not recommended (grade A). Ultrasound-guided puncture is not recommended (grade B). In adult women without history of cancer, abstention is possible in case of asymptomatic pure unilocular cyst less than 10 cm (grade B). If symptoms develop, laparoscopy is the reference approach for PBOT surgical treatment (grade A). A conservative surgical treatment (cystectomy) should be preferred to oophorectomy in non-menopausal women without previous history of cancer (grade C). In cases of suspected adnexal torsion, laparoscopic surgical exploration is recommended (grade B). Conservative treatment, untwisting without oophorectomy, is recommended for non-menopausal women whatever the estimated duration of the twist and the macroscopic appearance of the ovary (grade B). During pregnancy, expectation is recommended for asymptomatic unilocular liquid masses less than 6 cm (grade C).