HBsAg level at time of liver transplantation determines HBsAg decrease and anti-HBs increase and affects HBV DNA decrease during early immunoglobulin administration

Expanding the donor pool: Kidney transplantation from serum HBV DNA or HBeAg-positive donors to HBsAg-negative recipients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

HBsAg-positive (HBsAg[+]) donors are rarely accepted for kidney transplantation (KT), especially when the donor is also HBV DNA-positive (HBV DNA[+]) or HBeAg-positive (HBeAg[+]) serologically. This study aimed to report kidney transplant outcomes from HBsAg(+) donors to HBsAg(-) recipients.

METHODS

Consecutive cases were retrospectively identified from 1 July 2017 to 31 December 2020. KTs from HBsAg(-)/HBcAb-positive (HBcAb[+]) donors to HBcAb(-) recipients were selected as the control group. The primary outcomes were de novo HBV infection (DNH), graft and patient survival.

RESULTS

We identified 105 HBsAg(-) recipients who received HBsAg(+) kidneys and 516 HBcAb(-) recipients who received HBcAb(+) kidneys. A higher DNH rate was observed after receiving HBsAg(+) kidneys than after receiving HBcAb(+) kidneys after a median follow-up of 23.0 months (4/105[3.8%] vs. 2/516[0.4%], p = .009). All four infected recipients receiving HBsAg(+) kidneys had HBsAg clearance after treatment. Graft and patient survival were comparable between the groups (p = .630, p = .910). The DNH rates were 0/22(0%), 3/70(4.3%) and 1/13(7.7%) after receiving HBsAg(+), HBV DNA(+) and HBeAg(+) kidneys, respectively (p = .455). The DNH rate was lower if the donor had received antiviral treatment (4/42[9.5%] vs. 0/63[0%], p = .023). HBsAb(-) recipients had a higher DNH incidence than HBsAb(+) recipients (3/25[12.0%] vs. 1/80[1.3%], p = .041).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of HBsAg(+) donors contributed to comparable graft and patient survival, but HBV DNA(+) or HBeAg(+) donors and HBsAb(-) recipients maybe associated with a higher risk of HBV infection. These findings help expand the donor pool and emphasize the role of donor antiviral treatment and recipient HBV immunity in establishing optimal prophylactic regimens.

Kidney Transplantation From Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg)–Positive Living Donors to HBsAg-Negative Recipients: Clinical Outcomes at a High-Volume Center in China

Background

Data on kidney transplantation (KTx) from hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)–positive (HBsAg+) donors to HBsAg-negative (HBsAg−) recipients [D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg-)] are limited. We aimed to report the outcomes of D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg−) KTx in recipients with or without hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb).

Methods

Eighty-three D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg−) living KTx cases were retrospectively identified. The 384 cases of KTx from hepatitis B core antibody–positive (HBcAb+) living donors to HBcAb-negative (HBcAb−) recipients [D(HBcAb+)/R(HBcAb−)] were used as the control group. The primary endpoint was posttransplant HBsAg status change from negative to postive (-− →+).

Results

Before KTx, 24 donors (28.9%) in the D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg−) group were hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA positive, and 20 recipients were HBsAb−. All 83 D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg−) recipients received HBV prophylaxis, while no D(HBcAb+)/R(HBcAb−) recipients received prophylaxis. After a median follow-up of 36 months (range, 6–106) and 36 months (range, 4–107) for the D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg−) and D(HBcAb+)/R(HBcAb−) groups, respectively, 2 of 83 (2.41%) D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg−) recipients and 1 of 384 (0.26%) D(HBcAb+)/R(HBcAb−) became HBsAg+, accompanied by HBV DNA-positive (P = .083). The 3 recipients with HBsAg−→+ were exclusively HBsAb−/HBcAb− before KTx. Recipient deaths were more frequent in the D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg−) group (6.02% vs 1.04%, P = .011), while liver and graft function, rejection, infection, and graft loss were not significantly different. In univariate analyses, pretransplant HBsAb−/HBcAb− combination in the D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg−) recipients carried a significantly higher risk of HBsAg−→+, HBV DNA−→+, and death.

Conclusions

Living D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg−) KTx in HBsAb+ recipients provides excellent graft and patient survivals without HBV transmission. HBV transmission risks should be more balanced with respect to benefits of D(HBsAg+)/R(HBsAg−) KTx in HBsAb-/HBcAb− candidates.

Development of anti-hepatitis B surface (HBs) antibodies after HBs antigen loss in HIV-hepatitis B virus co-infected patients

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-seroconversion, or loss of HBsAg and acquisition of anti-hepatitis B surface (HBs) antibodies, defines functional cure of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. After HBsAg-loss, little is known regarding the development of anti-HBs antibodies and even less so in individuals co-infected with HIV.

OBJECTIVES

To determine anti-HBs antibody kinetics after HBsAg-loss and explore determinants of HBsAg-seroconversion in HIV-HBV co-infected patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients enrolled in the French HIV-HBV cohort were included if they had >1 study visit after HBsAg-loss. Individual patient kinetics of anti-HBs antibody levels were modeled over time using mixed-effect non-linear regression, whereby maximum specific growth rate and maximal level of antibody production were estimated from a Gompertz growth equation.

RESULTS

Fourteen (4.6%) of 308 co-infected patients followed in the cohort exhibited HBsAg-loss, all of whom were undergoing antiretroviral therapy. Nine (64.3%) of these patients achieved HBsAg-seroconversion during a median 3.0 years (IQR=1.1-5.1) after HBsAg-loss. Across individuals with HBsAg-seroconversion, the fastest rates of antibody growth ranged between 0.57-1.93year^-1 (population maximum growth rate=1.02) and antibody production plateaued between 2.09-3.66 log₁₀ mIU/mL at the end of follow-up (population maximal antibody levels=2.66). Patients with HBsAg-seroconversion had substantial decreases in HBV DNA viral loads (P=0.03) and proportion with elevated ALT levels (P=0.02) and HBeAg-positive serology (P=0.08). No such differences were observed in those without HBsAg-seroconversion.

CONCLUSIONS

Most co-infected patients with HBsAg-seroconversion produced and maintained stable antibody levels, yet kinetics of anti-HBs production were much slower compared to those observed post-vaccination or after clearance of acute HBV-infection.

A 6-month mixed-effect pharmacokinetic model for post-transplant intravenous anti-hepatitis B immunoglobulin prophylaxis

Background

Although individualized dosage regimens for anti-hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) therapy have been suggested, the pharmacokinetic profile and factors influencing the basis for individualization have not been sufficiently assessed. We sought to evaluate the pharmacokinetic characteristics of anti-HBIG quantitatively during the first 6 months after liver transplantation.

Methods

Identical doses of 10,000 IU HBIG were administered to adult liver transplant recipients daily during the first week, weekly thereafter until 28 postoperative days, and monthly thereafter. Blood samples were obtained at days 1, 7, 28, 84, and 168 after transplantation. Plasma HBIG titer was quantified using 4 different immunoassay methods. The titer determined by each analytical method was used for mixed-effect modeling, and the most precise results were chosen. Simulations were performed to predict the plausible immunoglobulin maintenance dose.

Results

HBIG was eliminated from the body most rapidly in the immediate post-transplant period, and the elimination rate gradually decreased thereafter. In the early post-transplant period, patients with higher DNA titer tend to have lower plasma HBIG concentrations. The maintenance doses required to attain targets in 90%, 95%, and 99% of patients were ~15.3, 18.2, and 25.1 IU, respectively, multiplied by the target trough level (in IU/L).

Conclusion

The variability (explained and unexplained) in HBIG pharmacokinetics was relatively larger in the early post-transplant period. Dose individualization based upon patient characteristics should be adjusted focusing quantitatively on the early post-transplant period.

Antiviral therapy of hepatitis delta virus infection - progress and challenges towards cure

Hepatitis B-/D-virus co-infection causes the most severe form of viral hepatitis, frequently leading to liver cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation and consecutive liver-related mortality. Treatment options for hepatitis delta are limited. The only recommended therapy is pegylated interferon alpha which leads to virological responses in about 25-30% of patients. However, interferon therapy is associated with frequent side-effects and late HDV RNA relapses have been described during long-term follow even in patients who were HDV RNA negative 24 weeks after the end of therapy. Thus, alternative treatment options are urgently needed. Clinical studies have been performed exploring prenylation inhibitors, viral entry inhibitors and nucleic acid polymers to block particle release. We here summarize the progress and challenges towards cure of HDV infection.

Rational Basis for Optimizing Short and Long-term Hepatitis B Virus Prophylaxis Post Liver Transplantation: Role of Hepatitis B Immune Globulin

Antiviral therapy using newer nucleos(t)ide analogues with lower resistance rates, such as entecavir or tenofovir, suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication, improve liver function in patients with compensated or decompensated cirrhosis, and delay or obviate the need for liver transplantation in some patients. After liver transplantation, the combination of long-term antiviral and low-dose hepatitis B Immune globulin (HBIG) can effectively prevent HBV recurrence in greater than 90% of transplant recipients. Some forms of HBV prophylaxis need to be continued indefinitely after transplantation but, in patients with a low-risk of HBV recurrence (i.e., HBV DNA levels undetectable before transplantation), it is possible to discontinue HBIG and maintain only long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue(s) therapy. A more cautious approach is necessary for those patients with high pretransplant HBV DNA levels, those with limited antiviral options if HBV recurrence occurs (i.e., HIV or hepatitis D virus coinfection, preexisting drug resistance), those with a high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence, and those at risk of noncompliance with antiviral therapy. In this group, HBIG-free prophylaxis cannot be recommended.

The combination of long-term antiviral and low-dose Hepatitis B Immune globulin (HBIG) can effectively prevent HBV recurrence in > 90% of liver transplant recipients. In patients with low HBV DNA levels, nucleos(t)ide analogue(s) treatment without HBIG is possible.

Correlation between risk of hepatitis B virus recurrence and tissue expression of covalently closed circular DNA in living donor liver transplant recipients treated with high-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Despite the application of prophylaxis, the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence remains. However, actual mechanism(s) and definite risk factor(s) are obscure. The present study examined the correlation between the HBV load in liver explants and post-liver transplant (OLT) HBV recurrence.

METHODS

HBV DNA was extracted from liver tissue taken from 50 living donor OLT (LDLT) patients using the QuickGene DNA Tissue Kit S (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan) and subjected to real-time polymerase chain reaction with the following primers: 5'-CACATGGCCTCCAAGGAGTAA-3' (forward primer) and 5'-TGAGGGTCTCTCTCTTCCTCTTGT-3' (reverse primer). To prevent HBV infection, patients were treated daily with high-dose (10,000 IU) hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) for the first week after LDLT. They then received weekly doses for the next month and then monthly doses for ≤1 year. If the anti-hepatitis surface antigen antibody titer was <1,000 IU/L, an antiviral agent (AVA) was added to the regimen.

RESULTS

The mean (±SD) tissue HBV DNA and covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) loads were -0.8 ± 1.2 (range, -2.9 to 2.6) and -2.3 ± 1.1 (range, -4.6 to 0.6) log10 copies/cell, respectively. There was a significant correlation between serum and tissue HBV DNA (r = 0.65; P = .00) and cccDNA concentrations (r = 0.55; P = .00). Six patients suffered HBV recurrence and 9 required additional AVA. There was no direct correlation between HBV recurrence and tissue cccDNA concentration. However, the concentration of cccDNA was significantly greater those patients suffering recurrence and receiving AVA treatment (high-risk group).

CONCLUSION

High tissue cccDNA concentrations may be a risk factor for HBV recurrence despite high-dose HBIG prophylaxis.

A new scheme with infusion of hepatitis B immunoglobulin combined with entecavir for prophylaxis of hepatitis B virus recurrence among liver transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE

Liver transplantation significantly increases recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) among high-risk patients. Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and antiviral nucleotide analogues are effective prophylaxis reagents in preventing HBV recurrence. However, HBV recurrence still occurs with these treatments.

METHODS

To explore a more cost-effective prophylaxis protocol in patients after liver transplantation, we treated patients with an initial high dose of 10 000 IU HBIG during the anhepatic phase and a second high dose of HBIG at an optimal time point during surgery. The patients were treated with the traditional European protocol as a control, in which one dose of 10 000 IU HBIG was infused during the anhepatic phase and multiple doses of 10 000 IU HBIG were administered daily for 1 week after liver transplantation.

RESULTS

There were two mortalities among 50 patients treated with the new protocol and nine mortalities among 52 patients treated with the European protocol within 3 years after liver transplantation. The new prophylaxis method markedly improved the 3-year survival without HBV recurrence in 50 treated patients. However, there were five recurrences in 52 patients treated with the European protocol. High-risk factors such as HBV DNA+, positive hepatitis B e antigen, and hepatocellular carcinoma were all detected among five patients with HBV recurrence. The suppressed HBV recurrence was associated with significantly lower serum alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase in the new protocol-treated patients tested at 1 month and 1 week after liver surgery compared with those treated with the European protocol.

CONCLUSION

Infusion of two high doses of HBIG during surgery in combination with entecavir significantly prevented HBV recurrence and improved the 3-year survival after liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation in adults: Choosing the appropriate timing

Liver transplantation is indicated in patients with acute liver failure, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and rare liver-based genetic defects that trigger damage of other organs. Early referral to a transplant center is crucial in acute liver failure due to the high mortality with medical therapy and its unpredictable evolution. Referral to a transplant center should be considered when at least one complication of cirrhosis occurs during its natural history. However, because of the shortage of organ donors and the short-term mortality after liver transplantation on one hand and the possibility of managing the complications of cirrhosis with other treatments on the other, patients are carefully selected by the transplant center to ensure that transplantation is indicated and that there are no medical, surgical and psychological contraindications. Patients approved for transplantation are placed on the transplant waiting list and prioritized according to disease severity. Thus, the appropriate timing of transplantation depends on recipient disease severity and, although this is still a matter of debate, also on donor quality. These two variables are known to determine the “transplant benefit” (i.e., when the expected patient survival is better with, than without, transplantation) and should guide donor allocation.

Rapid early HDV RNA decline in the peripheral blood but prolonged intrahepatic hepatitis delta antigen persistence after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Chronic HDV infection is an inflammatory liver disease and liver transplantation (LTX) remains the only curative treatment option for most patients. The hepatitis D virus (HDV) uses HBsAg as its surface protein, however, it is controversial to what extend HDV may be detected independently of HBsAg in blood and liver after LTX. The aims of this study were to investigate kinetics of HDV RNA and HBsAg early after LTX, to apply the data to a mathematical model and to study long-term persistence of HDV after LTX.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 26 patients with chronic hepatitis delta who underwent LTX between 1994 and 2009. Blood samples were obtained every 1-3 days during the first 14 days after LTX. Data were applied to a mathematical model to study viral kinetics. Available liver biopsy samples were stained for HBV and HDV viral antigens and tested for HBV DNA/cccDNA.

RESULTS

HBsAg and HDV RNA became negative after a median of 5 days (range 1-13) and 4 days (range 1-10), respectively. Early HDV RNA and HBsAg decline paralleled almost exactly in all patients; however the mathematical model showed a high variability of virion death. HDAg stained positive in transplanted livers in six patients in the absence of liver HBV DNA/cccDNA, serum-HBsAg, and HDV RNA for up to 19 months after LTX.

CONCLUSIONS

HDV RNA and HBsAg decline follow almost identical kinetic patterns within the first days after LTX. Nevertheless, intrahepatic latency of HDAg has to be considered when exploring novel concepts to withdraw HBIG.

Hepatitis delta virus

Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) is a small, defective RNA virus that can infect only individuals who have hepatitis B virus (HBV); worldwide more than 15 million people are co-infected. There are eight reported genotypes of HDV with unexplained variations in their geographical distribution and pathogenicity. The hepatitis D virion is composed of a coat of HBV envelope proteins surrounding the nucleocapsid, which consists of a single-stranded, circular RNA genome complexed with delta antigen, the viral protein. HDV is clinically important because although it suppresses HBV replication, it causes severe liver disease with rapid progression to cirrhosis and hepatic decompensation. The range of clinical presentation is wide, varying from mild disease to fulminant liver failure. The prevalence of HDV is declining in some endemic areas but increasing in northern and central Europe because of immigration. Treatment of HDV is with pegylated interferon alfa; however, response rates are poor. Increased understanding of the molecular virology of HDV will identify novel therapeutic targets for this most severe form of chronic viral hepatitis.

Hepatitis D virus: an update

Hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection involves a distinct subgroup of individuals simultaneously infected with the hepatitis B virus (HBV) and characterized by an often severe chronic liver disease. HDV is a defective RNA agent needing the presence of HBV for its life cycle. HDV is present worldwide, but the distribution pattern is not uniform. Different strains are classified into eight genotypes represented in specific regions and associated with peculiar disease outcome. Two major specific patterns of infection can occur, i.e. co-infection with HDV and HBV or HDV superinfection of a chronic HBV carrier. Co-infection often leads to eradication of both agents, whereas superinfection mostly evolves to HDV chronicity. HDV-associated chronic liver disease (chronic hepatitis D) is characterized by necro-inflammation and relentless deposition of fibrosis, which may, over decades, result in the development of cirrhosis. HDV has a single-stranded, circular RNA genome. The virion is composed of an envelope, provided by the helper HBV and surrounding the RNA genome and the HDV antigen (HDAg). Replication occurs in the hepatocyte nucleus using cellular polymerases and via a rolling circle process, during which the RNA genome is copied into a full-length, complementary RNA. HDV infection can be diagnosed by the presence of antibodies directed against HDAg (anti-HD) and HDV RNA in serum. Treatment involves the administration of pegylated interferon-α and is effective in only about 20% of patients. Liver transplantation is indicated in case of liver failure.

Prevention of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation with entecavir plus tenofovir combination therapy and perioperative hepatitis B immunoglobulin only

Combination therapy with antivirals plus hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) has become the standard treatment for prevention of post-liver transplant hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence. However, HBIg therapy is inconvenient and expensive. Alternative therapeutic approaches with modern nucleos(t)ide analogues are limited so far. The present case report describes prevention of HBV recurrence with entecavir and tenofovir. A 48-year-old male patient with hepatitis B-induced decompensated liver cirrhosis initially improved on lamivudine (LAM) until LAM resistance (rtL180M and rtM204V) emerged followed by renewed decompensation. Therefore, tenofovir was added to LAM leading to undetectable HBV DNA (<200 copies/mL). Six months later, low-level viremia (479 copies/mL) was detected. Treatment was escalated to tenofovir plus entecavir. HBV DNA became negative again, and the patient underwent orthotopic liver transplantation. HBIg was administered during transplantation (10,000 IU) and on the second and third postoperative days (total dose 26,000 IU). Subsequently, the anti-hepatitis B surface (HBs) titer rose to 1477 IU/L at day 4 post transplantation. Although HBIg should have been continued, the patient remained on combination therapy with tenofovir plus entecavir only. The anti-HBs titer decreased and became negative 4 months later. However, under continued combination therapy with oral antivirals, HBV DNA and hepatitis B surface antigen remained negative during the entire follow-up of 21 months after liver transplantation. Combination therapy with entecavir plus tenofovir may prevent post-liver transplant hepatitis B recurrence even without HBIg maintenance therapy. This case illustrates that combination oral antiviral therapy might substitute for HBIg as indefinite prophylactic regimen due to profound antiviral efficacy and low risk of viral resistance. Efficacy and safety must be further investigated in randomized controlled trials.

Epidemiology, pathogenesis and management of hepatitis D: update and challenges ahead

Hepatitis D is caused by infection with the hepatitis D virus (HDV) and is considered to be the most severe form of viral hepatitis in humans. Hepatitis D occurs only in individuals positive for the HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) as HDV is a defective RNA viroid that requires HBsAg for transmission. At least eight different HDV genotypes have been described and each has a characteristic geographic distribution and a distinct clinical course. HDV and HBV coinfection can be associated with complex and dynamic viral dominance patterns. Chronic HDV infection leads to more severe liver disease than HBV monoinfection and is associated with accelerated fibrosis progression, earlier hepatic decompensation and an increased risk for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. So far, only IFN-alpha treatment has proven antiviral activity against HDV in humans and has been linked to improved long-term outcomes. Studies conducted in the past 2 years on the use of PEG-IFN-alpha show that a sustained virologic response to therapy, measured in terms of undetectable serum HDV RNA levels, can be achieved in about one quarter of patients with hepatitis D. Novel alternative treatment options including prenylation inhibitors are awaiting clinical development for use in hepatitis D.

Liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus. Pre-emptive and peri-operative prophylaxis

In the past, reinfection of the graft by hepatitis B virus (HBV) after liver transplantation for HBV-related liver disease was often followed by severe liver damage and reduced survival. The long-term administration of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) dramatically reduced this risk. However, this procedure was ineffective in most patients with active viral replication pre-transplant. The use of lamivudine in the pre-transplant setting partially solved this problem. The emergence of resistant mutants to lamivudine was also solved by the addition of adefovir. At present, combination therapy by oral antivirals pre-transplant and HBIG plus the same drugs post-transplant achieves nearly 100% of protection against graft reinfection. In a recent study, a new intravenous HBIG, Niuliva has shown high efficacy in achieving protective anti-HBs levels after liver transplantation for HBV-related liver diseases, as well as a good safety profile. Using combination therapies, the doses of HBIG can be reduced or even stopped after several weeks or months post-transplant, continuing with oral antivirals alone. The recently introduced antivirals achieve a very high antiviral potency and low risk of resistance. This may further increase the efficacy in preventing graft reinfection in the post-liver transplantation setting.

The prevention of viral recurrence in the long term

The transplantation outcome depends largely on the prevention of hepatitis B recurrence. The spontaneous risk of HBV reinfection exceeds 75%, but major advances in prophylaxis during the last 15 years have led to the control of post-transplant hepatitis B reinfection in more than 90% of HBV transplants. Treatment with hepatitis B immune globulins (HBIG) plays a major role in prophylaxis, either as monotherapy in non-replicating patients or in combination with antiviral drugs in replicating subjects. Although no standardized therapeutic protocols have been defined, at present the prevailing approach is to use high-dose intravenous HBIG in the immediate perioperative period (first week, induction phase) and to administer over the long term monthly fixed or on-demand doses of intravenous or intramuscular HBIG (maintenance therapy), in association with antiviral(s). Results have been excellent, yet different strategies of long-term prophylaxis have been proposed in order to simplify therapy and reduce costs. Long-term prophylaxis with antiviral(s) and low-dose intramuscular HBIG seems to be the most promising option; in stable patients, the combination with antiviral agents reduces the need of HBIG, in particular when using on-demand administration protocols and intramuscular HBIG has proven as effective and safe as intravenous preparations during the maintenance phase.

What is the role of serology for the study of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in the age of molecular biology?

To assess quantitative serology in chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, testing by novel immunoassays has been carried out on 202 specimens from untreated patients and in 83 samples from 10 patients with chronic hepatitis B treated with lamivudine. Serum samples were assayed for quantitative HBsAg, in comparison with quantitative HBV-DNA, and for anti-HBc IgM and the avidity index (AI) of total anti-HBc antibodies. The AI was high (mean: 0.93 +/- 0.19) in all groups, confirming the consistency of this procedure in chronic HBV infections. A low-level positivity (2-28 Paul-Ehrlich units/ml) for IgM anti-HBc was detectable both in HBeAg-positive and in HBeAg-negative untreated chronic hepatitis cases (mean S/CO values by the Abbott Architect assay: 0.51 +/- 0.12 and 0.48 +/- 0.10, respectively; correlation between assays: r = 0.685), while treated patients (mean: 0.20 +/- 0.15) and inactive carriers (mean: 0.17 +/- 0.21), were generally negative for IgM. The levels of HBsAg (IU/ml) showed a weak correlation with HBV-DNA (IU/ml). A difference in HBsAg levels was found between inactive carriers (1,935 +/- 2,887 IU/ml) and chronic hepatitis B cases, either treated (5,199 +/- 9,259 IU/ml) or untreated (14,596 +/- 15,227 IU/ml). Pre-treatment levels of HBsAg in patients undergoing lamivudine treatment were correlated with a sustained response to therapy over 13-33 months (mean: 27.3) of follow-up: mean HBsAg values were 1,576 + 1,487 IU/ml in five responders and 6,063 + 5,142 in five nonresponders or breakthrough responders (P < 0.05). The availability of standardized quantitative immunoassays for HBsAg and anti-HBc IgM may be considered in addition to quantitative HBV-DNA in the staging and monitoring of chronic HBV infection.

A Decline in Hepatitis B virus Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Predicts Clearance, but does not Correlate with Quantitative HBeAg or HBV DNA Levels

Background

The elimination of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) is the final goal of hepatitis B treatment, but is rarely achieved. As quantitative assays for HBsAg recently became available, we have investigated whether quantitative HBsAg measurements can substitute for hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA quantification in treatment monitoring.

Methods

Within this study, 23 liver transplant patients and 18 heart transplant recipients were retrospectively analysed. Patients had been treated with famciclovir and/or lamivudine, in addition some had also received adefovir in cases of lamivudine resistance. Quantitative HBsAg and hepatitis B virus e antigen (HBeAg) levels were determined with the ArchitectTM assay. HBV DNA levels were determined with different assays available at given time points.

Results

We did not find a significant correlation between either HBsAg or HBeAg and HBV DNA levels – both in treated and untreated patients. More importantly, there was no significant concordance between an increase or decrease of HBsAg or HBeAg with HBV DNA. However, the curve and decline of quantitative HBsAg enabled prediction of eventual viral clearance. Eight patients showed a 2 log10 drop of HBsAg levels and eight patients demonstrated a reduction of HBsAg levels below 100 IU/ml; five patients fulfilled both criteria. Three of those five cleared HBsAg and became positive for antibodies against HBsAg.

Conclusions

Quantitative HBsAg and HBeAg cannot substitute for HBV DNA quantification during the assessment of antiviral therapy; however, the decline of HBsAg does predict eventual HBsAg clearance. A 2 log10 drop to below 100 IU/ml is associated with a high likelihood of HBsAg clearance.

Antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen trough levels and half-lives do not differ after intravenous and intramuscular hepatitis B immunoglobulin administration after liver transplantation

Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) administration remains an essential component of standard reinfection prophylaxis after liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus-related liver disease. Previous studies have suggested that intramuscular (IM) HBIG administration compared to intravenous (IV) HBIG administration may be cost-effective and dose-saving. To compare antibody against hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) kinetics after IV HBIG administration versus IM HBIG administration, 24 patients received 2000 IU of HBIG every 6 weeks over a study period of 48 weeks in a crossover design. HBIG was started intravenously in 12 patients (group A) and intramuscularly in 12 patients (group B). After 4 doses, at week 24 HBIG administration was switched from IM to IV and vice versa. Anti-HBs kinetics of 22 patients were evaluated. Mean anti-HBs levels measured 2, 4, and 6 weeks after each HBIG administration did not differ significantly (480 +/- 166, 319 +/- 126, and 221 +/- 106 IU/L after IV administration versus 457 +/- 166, 310 +/- 147, and 218 +/- 112 IU/L after IM administration). Half-lives of anti-HBs decline (IV, 25.5 +/- 6.0 days, versus IM, 24.7 +/- 6.2 days) and area under the curve values from week 2 to 6 (IV, 9.4 +/- 3.6 IU*day/mL, versus IM, 9.0 +/- 3.9 IU*day/mL) also showed no significant difference. Variation of anti-HBs levels after IV HBIG administration versus IM HBIG administration was neither significantly different within patients (intraindividual variance) nor between patients (interindividual variance). However, intraindividual variance was lower than interindividual variance after IV (P < 0.05) and IM (P < 0.05) HBIG administration at every time point (2, 4, and 6 weeks). In conclusion, IV HBIG administration and IM HBIG administration are equally effective with respect to the crucial pharmacokinetic parameters. That is, IM HBIG is not dose-saving; however, it may be cost-effective if the price per unit is lower. Individualized dosing intervals should be further evaluated as a cost-effective alternative to fixed dosing schemes.

Sustained HCV-RNA response and hepatitis Bs seroconversion after individualized antiviral therapy with pegylated interferon alpha plus ribavirin and active vaccination in a hepatitis C virus/hepatitis B virus-coinfected patient

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection is frequently associated with progressive liver disease. Treatment options are limited and no data on the efficacy of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin therapy are available. We report a case of a 49-year-old woman with chronic hepatitis B and C who was scheduled for a 48 weeks course of PEG-IFNalpha-2b plus ribavirin therapy. She had HCV genotype 2 infection and was negative for HBV-DNA and HBe antigen before treatment. Although the HCV-RNA response was rapid until week 12, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels showed a more linear decline. At week 48, HBsAg was still positive, however, with very low levels of only 0.06 IU/ml. Treatment was therefore continued for another 4 weeks combined with active HBV immunization until HBs seroconversion occurred. Forty-three weeks after treatment, the patient showed a robust HBs seroconversion (anti-HBs of 260 IU/ml) and a sustained HCV-RNA response. This case highlights that combination therapy of PEG-IFNalpha-2b with ribavirin of HBV/HCV-coinfected individuals cannot only induce a sustained HCV-RNA response but also HBsAg seroconversion in single patients. Monitoring of HBsAg levels can be useful in individualizing optimal treatment duration in HBV-infected patients.