Eight millimetre covered TIPS does not compromise shunt function but reduces hepatic encephalopathy in preventing variceal rebleeding

Covered TIPS Created with Viatorr Versus Fluency Stent-Grafts for the Refractory Ascites in Patients with Cirrhosis: An Observational Study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the long-term clinical efficacy and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) created with Fluency versus Viatorr stent-grafts for the treatment of refractory ascites in patients with cirrhosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 118 cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites undergoing TIPS with Fluency stent-grafts (Fluency group, n=83) or Viatorr stent-grafts (Viatorr group, n=35) at two centers from January 2017 to December 2021. Competing risk analysis was used to compare the incidence of clinical outcomes between groups after adjusting for confounders.

RESULTS

During a median of 30.9 months follow-up, 31 patients (26.3%) developed portal hypertension complications (11 cases of recurrent ascites, 16 cases of variceal bleeding, and four cases of both ascites and variceal bleeding), 15 patients (12.7%) developed shunt dysfunction, 58 patients (49.15%) developed overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE), and 74 patients (62.7%) died. After adjusting for confounding factors, the Viatorr stent was associated with a reduced OHE risk (38% vs 54% at 5 years, p=0.004) but a comparable incidence of portal hypertension complications (27% vs 27%, p=0.536), shunt dysfunction (14% vs 12%, p=0.401), and mortality (41% vs 37%; p=0.064) compared to the Fluency stents. These findings were consistent across most relevant subgroups.

CONCLUSION

In cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites undergoing TIPS, Viatorr stent-grafts were associated with lower risk of OHE while no significant differences in clinical efficacy compared to the Fluency stent-grafts.

Management of hepatic encephalopathy following transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: Current strategies and future directions

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPSs) are generally used for the management of complications of portal hypertension in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. However, hepatic encephalopathy (HE), which impairs neuropsychiatric function and motor control, remains the primary adverse effect of TIPS, limiting its utility. Prompt prevention and treatment of post-TIPS HE are critical, as they are strongly associated with readmission rates and poor quality of life. This review focuses on the main pathophysiological mechanisms underlying post-TIPS HE, explores advanced biomarkers and predictive tools, and discusses current management strategies and future directions to prevent or reverse HE following TIPS. These strategies include preoperative patient assessment, individualized shunt diameter optimization, spontaneous portosystemic shunt embolization during the TIPS procedure, postoperative preventive and therapeutic measures such as nutrition management, medical therapy, fecal microbiota transplantation, and stent reduction.

Creation of 6- to 10-mm-Diameter Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts Using a Novel Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Stent Graft in a Swine Model

PURPOSE

To assess the delivery, function, and patency of a new expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-encapsulated transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) stent graft ("Liverty") in an animal model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

TIPS were created in 2 successive groups: (a) 14 single and (b) 10 overlapping devices, in swine weighing 52-64 kg. Explants occurred at 30 (n = 10) and 60 (n = 14) days. These were evaluated by histomorphometric and histopathologic evaluations and electron microscopy.

RESULTS

Seven 6-mm-diameter, 5 7-mm-diameter, and 12 10-mm-diameter TIPSs were created using varied human TIPS access sets without adverse events, both sheathed and unsheathed advancement and deployment of the devices within liver tracts. One animal was sacrificed at 35 days due to encephalopathy; the remainder survived to endpoints. Twenty-two of 24 TIPSs were patent at 30-day and 60-day endpoints. The mean stenosis at 30 days was 13.3% (SD ± 10.1), and that at 60 days was 18.4% (SD ± 5.0). Two shunts were occluded by tissue overgrowth at the stent-free native hepatic vein end and downgrowth into TIPS. Histology and electron microscopy showed well-apposed, incorporated devices lined with smooth, uniform neointimal tissue averaging 0.48 mm (single devices) and 0.74 mm (overlapped devices) thick with minimal adventitial inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

The new Liverty TIPS stent graft was straightforward to deploy for TIPS creation and resulted in patent 6-mm-diameter, 7-mm-diameter, and 10-mm-diameter shunts in both single and overlapping configurations. One- and 2-month histology showed desired tissue healing without in-stent stenosis.

Post-TIPS Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy Increases Long-Term but Not Short-Term Mortality in Cirrhotic Patients With Variceal Bleeding: A Large-Scale, Multicenter Real-World Study

BACKGROUND

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an established procedure for managing portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients, but the impact of post-TIPS overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) on survival remains controversial. While its effect on short-term survival is well-documented, its long-term implications remain unclear.

AIMS

This study aims to investigate the long-term impact of post-TIPS OHE on mortality in cirrhotic patients for variceal bleeding, focusing on the timing and predictive value of OHE beyond the first year post-TIPS.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 3262 cirrhotic patients who underwent TIPS for variceal bleeding at seven Chinese tertiary centers between January 2010 and June 2020. Clinical data, including demographics, procedure details, post-TIPS complications and survival outcomes, were collected. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and OHE, with follow-up until death, liver transplantation or 60 months. Propensity score matching minimised confounding effects, and multivariate Fine-Grey competing risk models identified independent mortality predictors.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 1077 days, 33.2% developed post-TIPS OHE, associated with higher MELD and Child-Pugh scores. Among these, 19.3% died, with a median time from OHE onset to death of 947 days. Post-TIPS OHE was not linked to early survival (within 12 months) but emerged as an independent predictor of long-term mortality beyond 24 months, consistent across various clinical scenarios.

CONCLUSION

Post-TIPS OHE does not affect short-term survival but significantly increases long-term mortality risk. These findings highlight the need for continuous monitoring and tailored interventions to improve long-term outcomes in post-TIPS patients.

Hemodynamic investigations on the portal hypertension and treatment of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) based on CFD simulation

Hemodynamic processes from the portal vein(PV) to the inferior vena cava(IVC) were mimicked for three patients with portal hypertension(PH) and the effects of stent parameters on the outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt(TIPS) were investigated through computational fluid dynamics(CFD). The liver region was simulated with porous media model and the spatial distributions of superior mesenteric vein(SMV) and splenic vein(SV) blood were solved through the Eulerian multiphase model. The present method is able to simulate the PH flow and predict the PV pressure, the stent shunt rate and the SMV blood proportion after TIPS treatment. According to the CFD results, the stent diameter exerts dominant effects on the TIPS outcomes while the stent placement shows substantial effects on the TIPS outcomes. Energy loss of the TIPS stents and distributary effects of the PV bifurcation dominate the PV hemodynamics and the TIPS outcomes. For stents with large diameter or proper placement, the energy loss is low therefore the PV pressure reduction and stent shunt rate are high. Stents inserted on the left and right branches of the PV are able to utilize distributary effects of the PV bifurcation therefore reduce the SMV blood flowing into the IVC.

Body Compositions Correlate With Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt: A Multicentre Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The relationship between body composition and the risk of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) following transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) needs to be investigated.

METHODS

Overall, 571 patients from 5 medical centers were included. To assess body compositions, we evaluated skeletal muscle indices, adipose tissue indices, sarcopenia, and myosteatosis at the third lumbar vertebral level. Univariate and Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for post-TIPS OHE. An integrated score was then constructed using stepwise multiple regression analyses, with a cut-off value selected using the best Youden index. Finally, the Akaike information criterion (AIC) was performed to compare the integrated score and independent risk factors on their ability in predicting post-TIPS OHE.

RESULTS

Sarcopenia and all skeletal muscle indices had limited associations with post-TIPS OHE. The index of the subcutaneous adipose tissue (SATI) ( P =0.005; OR: 1.034, 95% CI: 1.010-1.058) and myosteatosis (297 cases, 52.01%, 125 with OHE, 42.09%; P =0.003; OR: 1.973; 95% CI: 1.262-3.084) were both ascertained as independent risk factors for post-TIPS OHE. The integrated score (Score ALL =1.5760 + 0.0107 * SATI + 0.8579 * myosteatosis) was established with a cutoff value of -0.935. The akaike information criterion (AIC) of Score ALL , SATI, and myosteatosis was 655.28, 691.18, and 686.60, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

SATI and myosteatosis are independent risk factors for post-TIPS OHE. However, the integrated score was more significantly associated with post-TIPS OHE than other skeletal muscle and adipose tissue factors.

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Combined With Concurrent Antegrade Embolization of Large Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunts

OBJECTIVES

To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) combined with concurrent antegrade embolization in treating portal hypertension with oesophagogastric variceal bleeding in patients with and without large spontaneous portosystemic shunts (L-SPSSs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed data from patients with portal hypertension who underwent TIPS from November 2015 to April 2022. The patients were screened according to the inclusion criteria and were divided into L-SPSSs group (L-S group) and Non L-SPSSs group (Non L-S group). The primary outcome was the 2-year liver transplantation-free survival (TFS) rate. Secondary outcomes contained the incidence of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE), ectopic embolization and the 2-year rebleeding rate.

RESULTS

A total of 259 patients were enrolled (64 patients in L-S group and 195 patients in Non L-S group). The average age was 57.2 years, and the success rate of procedure was 100%. Baseline data showed no significant differences between two groups. There was a statistically significant difference in the 2-year liver transplantation-free rate between two groups (L-S vs. Non L-S, 84.38% vs. 71.28%; p = 0.045). OHE occurred in 19 (29.69%) patients with L-SPSSs and 104 (53.33%) patients without L-SPSSs, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.001). And no statistically significant difference was found in ectopic embolism incidence rate and the 2-year rebleeding rate between two groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified male gender, portal vein thrombosis and preoperative high blood ammonia levels as independent risk factors for long-term survival.

CONCLUSION

Compared to Non L-S group, the patients in L-S group achieve longer liver transplantation-free survival and lower incidence rate of OHE without increasing the risk of 2-year rebleeding and ectopic embolization.

The clinical relevance of acute-on-chronic liver failure in medical procedures: Endoscopy, interventions and surgery

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a specific, but complex and multifactorial form of acute decompensation (AD) of cirrhosis and is characterized by an extraordinary dynamic natural course, rapidly evolving organ failure and high short-term mortality. In daily clinical practice, patients with liver cirrhosis and decompensation have indications for different medical procedures such as endoscopies, interventional treatments like transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) or even surgical procedures. In these situations, clinicians often need to balance the expected benefits of such procedures with the risks of causing acute decompensation or ACLF. This review summarizes the evidence of medical procedures and their role in precipitating or preventing ACLF and highlights the aspects to consider during patient selection.

TIPS and hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis

Despite a better understanding in its prognosis and pathogenesis, hepatic encephalopathy (HE) remains one of the major complications of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) with a prevalence ranging from 35 to 50%. Its epidemiology differs according to the indication for TIPS (salvage/rescue TIPS, preemptive (pTIPS) or elective TIPS). In salvage/rescue TIPS, the prognosis is linked to that of bleeding, and HE should not be a contraindication to TIPS, especially as bleeding is a common precipitating factor of HE. In pTIPS, i.e. TIPS performed within the 72 h after stabilization of acute variceal bleeding in high-risk patients, the risk rebleeding and HE is reduced, when compared to endoscopic and drugs treatment. As a consequence, the Baveno VII recommendations state that HE at admission should not be considered as a contraindication to pTIPS placement. In elective situations, such as refractory (intractable ascites (intolerance to diuretics) or resistant ascites (i.e. despite optimal diuretic treatment (spironolactone 400 mg/d and Furosemide 160 mg/d combined with low-salt treatment (< 5.2 g/day) or recurrent ascites (the need for at least 3 paracenteses per year) and secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding, it is recommended to systematically look for risk factors for HE, and chronic or refractory HE remain not recommended to TIPS in most centers. Chronic HE involves persistent neurological symptoms with fluctuating acute episodes. Recurrent HE refers to repeated episodes occurring within 6 months, while refractory HE is resistant to standard treatments, often requiring more aggressive management (Vilstrup et al. 2014). A careful selection of patients is mandatory before elective TIPS decision. Risk factors must be identified and corrected if possible before any TIPS decision is made. Management of HE after TIPS is based on identification of precipitating factors, curative treatment with lactulose as first-line therapy and rifaximin as second-line therapy, and nutritional management. In elective TIPS, prophylactic administration of rifaximin is recommended in order to decrease the risk of further HE development in selected patients (not in everyone, at least according to Baveno VII). Liver transplantation (LT) should be discussed with a multidisciplinary team as an alternative option to TIPS in case of high-risk of post-TIPS HE, and in case of refractory HE after TIPS.

Identifying the optimal measurement timing and hemodynamic targets of portal pressure gradient after TIPS in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The optimal timing of measurement and hemodynamic targets of portacaval pressure gradient (PPG) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the ideal moment for hemodynamic measurements and the optimal target of PPG in patients undergoing covered TIPS for variceal bleeding.

METHODS

Between May 2018 and December 2021, 466 consecutive patients with recurrent variceal bleeding treated with covered TIPS were prospectively included. Post-TIPS PPG was measured immediately (immediate PPG), 24-72 hours (early PPG), and again 1 month (late PPG) after TIPS placement. The agreement among PPGs measured at different time points was assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman method. The unadjusted and confounder-adjusted effects of PPGs on clinical outcomes (portal hypertensive complications [PHCs], overt hepatic encephalopathy [OHE], further decompensation, and death) were assessed using Fine and Gray competing risk regression models.

RESULTS

The agreement between early PPG and late PPG (ICC: 0.34) was better than that between immediate PPG and late PPG (ICC: 0.23, p <0.001). Early PPG revealed an excellent predictive value for PHCs (early PPG≥ vs. <12 mmHg: adjusted hazard ratio 2.17, 95% CI 1.33-3.55, p = 0.002) and OHE (0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.91, p = 0.030), while immediate PPG did not. Late PPG showed a predictive value for PHC risk but not OHE. By targeting the lowest risk of further decompensation, we identified an optimal hemodynamic target with early PPG ranging from 11 to 14 mmHg that was associated with a decreased risk of OHE and effective prevention of PHCs.

CONCLUSIONS

PPG measured 24 to 72 hours after TIPS correlates with long-term PPG and clinical outcomes, and a hemodynamic target PPG of 11-14 mmHg is associated with reduced encephalopathy but not compromised clinical efficacy.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

The optimal timing of measurement and hemodynamic targets of portacaval pressure gradient (PPG) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) remain unclear. Here we show that post-TIPS PPG measured at least 24 hours but not immediately after the procedure correlated with long-term PPG and clinical events. Thus, PPG measurements taken at least 24 hours after TIPS should be used to guide decision making in order to improve clinical outcomes. Targeting a post-TIPS PPG of 11-14 mmHg or a 20%-50% relative reduction from pre-TIPS baseline measured 24-72 hours after the procedure was associated with reduced encephalopathy but not compromised clinical efficacy. Thus, these criteria could be used to guide TIPS creation and revision in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding undergoing covered TIPS.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03590288.

A Multi-Scale Computational Model of the Hepatic Circulation Applied to Predict the Portal Pressure After Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS)

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a widely used surgery for portal hypertension. In clinical practice, the diameter of the stent forming a shunt is usually selected empirically, which will influence the postoperative portal pressure. Clinical studies found that inappropriate portal pressure after TIPS is responsible for poor prognosis; however, there is no scheme to predict postoperative portal pressure. Therefore, this study aims to develop a computational model applied to predict the portal pressure after TIPS ahead of the surgery. For this purpose, a patient-specific 0-3-D multi-scale computational model of the hepatic circulation was developed based on preoperative clinical data. The model was validated using the prospectively collected clinical data of 18 patients. Besides, the model of a representative patient was employed in the numerical experiment to further investigate the influences of multiple pathophysiological and surgical factors. Results showed that the difference between the simulated and in vivo measured portal pressures after TIPS was -1.37 ± 3.51 mmHg, and the simulated results were significantly correlated with the in vivo measured results (r = 0.93, p < 0.0001). Numerical experiment revealed that the estimated model parameters and the severity of possible inherent portosystemic collaterals slightly influenced the simulated results, while the shunt diameter considerably influenced the results. In particular, the existence of catheter for pressure measurement would markedly influence postoperative portal pressure. These findings demonstrated that this computational model is a promising tool for predicting postoperative portal pressure, which would guide the selection of stent diameter and promote individualization and precision of TIPS.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for the patients on the liver transplant list

Patients with cirrhosis-associated and portal hypertension-associated complications may benefit from TIPS and/or liver transplantation. In many patients, the decision of whether or not TIPS should be placed prior to liver transplantation is fairly clear-cut. Nevertheless, there are some patients in whom the decision can be more complex. On one hand, TIPS is easily available in contrast to liver transplantation, and patients with TIPS may have clinical improvement. On the other hand, although TIPS may improve the situation of the patient, this improvement may not be sufficient to significantly improve the quality of life. Furthermore, TIPS malposition may be challenging for liver transplantation surgery. This review approaches the advantages and disadvantages of TIPS placement in patients who are candidates for liver transplantation and proposes decision pathways for patients with complications of portal hypertension on the liver transplant waiting list.

Portal hypertension: recommendations for diagnosis and treatment. Consensus document sponsored by the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver (AEEH) and the Biomedical Research Network Centre for Liver and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd)

Portal hypertension is a hemodynamic abnormality that complicates the course of cirrhosis, as well as other diseases that affect the portal venous circulation. The development of portal hypertension compromises prognosis, especially when it rises above a certain threshold known as clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). In the consensus conference on Portal Hypertension promoted by the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver and the Hepatic and Digestive diseases area of the Biomedical Research Networking Center (CIBERehd), different aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of portal hypertension caused by cirrhosis or other diseases were discussed. The outcome of this discussion was a set of recommendations that achieved varying degrees of consensus among panelists and are reflected in this consensus document. The six areas under discussion were: the relevance of CSPH and the non-invasive methods used for its diagnosis and that of cirrhosis, the prevention of the first episode of decompensation and its recurrence, the treatment of acute variceal bleeding and other complications of portal hypertension, the indications for the use of TIPS, and finally, the diagnosis and treatment of liver vascular diseases.

Portal hypertension: recommendations for diagnosis and treatment. Consensus document sponsored by the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver (AEEH) and the Biomedical Research Network Center for Liver and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd)

Portal hypertension is a hemodynamic abnormality that complicates the course of cirrhosis, as well as other diseases that affect the portal venous circulation. The development of portal hypertension compromises prognosis, especially when it rises above a certain threshold known as clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). In the consensus conference on Portal Hypertension promoted by the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver and the Hepatic and Digestive diseases area of the Biomedical Research Networking Center (CIBERehd), different aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of portal hypertension caused by cirrhosis or other diseases were discussed. The outcome of this discussion was a set of recommendations that achieved varying degrees of consensus among panelists and are reflected in this consensus document. The six areas under discussion were: the relevance of clinically significant portal hypertension and the non-invasive methods used for its diagnosis and that of cirrhosis, the prevention of the first episode of decompensation and its recurrence, the treatment of acute variceal bleeding and other complications of portal hypertension, the indications for the use of TIPS, and finally, the diagnosis and treatment of liver vascular diseases.

Hemodynamic comparisons of different shunt positions and geometrical model simplification strategies in the simulation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a widely used surgery for portal hypertensive patients, whose potential postoperative complications are closely related to the hemodynamic condition of the portal venous system. The selection of shunt position in the surgery may affect the postoperative hemodynamics; however, it is difficult for clinical studies to investigate the influence. Therefore, this study aims to employ the computational model simulating TIPS to compare the hemodynamic differences resulting from different shunt positions, and also to investigate the influences of different geometrical model simplification strategies used in the TIPS simulation. For this purpose, the clinical data of two representative patients were retrospectively collected, based on which, the computational hemodynamic models of the portal venous systems after TIPS were constructed, incorporating three typical shunt positions (i.e. shunt at the left/main/right portal vein) and three types of geometrical model simplification. Results showed that among the models with different shunt positions, the area-averaged flow velocity magnitudes in the shunts were very similar, while the model with shunt at the main portal vein showed the lowest postoperative portal pressure and the smallest area of high wall shear stress near the portal venous bifurcation. Among the models using different geometrical model simplification strategies, the simulated blood pressures at the main portal veins were very similar, but showed marked differences near the shunt inlets. Moreover, the area-averaged flow velocity magnitudes in the shunts were almost the same, while the velocity distributions differed a lot, leading to the different spatial distributions of wall shear stress near the portal venous bifurcations and shunt walls. These results on one hand suggested that placing the shunt at the main portal vein is more beneficial for the patient; on the other hand, they proved the feasibility of utilizing simplified model to save computational cost without losing the accuracy when the pressure at the main portal vein is mainly focused on. These findings would assist clinical decision-making and promote more accurate and efficient TIPS simulations.

Systems of care that improve outcomes for people with hepatic encephalopathy

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a critical neuropsychiatric complication of liver cirrhosis with a significant impact on patient quality of life and survival. The global prevalence of cirrhosis and associated HE necessitates a comprehensive understanding of the condition and effective systems of care to optimize outcomes. This review addresses the epidemiology, classification, diagnosis, and management of HE, with an emphasis on systems of care that improve outcomes for people with HE. Current diagnostic challenges include differentiating cognitive deficits attributable to HE from those caused by other etiologies, highlighting the need for accurate diagnostic methods. Traditional psychometric tests, while valuable for diagnosing covert HE (CHE), are limited in their ability to predict overt HE (OHE) due to various confounding factors. As a result, non-psychometric tools have been developed to provide outcome-based predictions aligned with the clinical course of HE. The management of HE includes addressing precipitating factors, pharmacologic interventions to reduce ammonia levels, and supportive care, with lactulose and rifaximin playing a central role. Preventive strategies with the use of remote monitoring in the outpatient management of HE, integrating technology for real-time tracking of therapy compliance and symptom evolution, could contribute to reducing hospital readmissions and improving patient care.

The evolution of the TIPS placement technique and its applications over four decades

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), a highly effective procedure reducing portal hypertension, has been in use for over seven decades and is now a cornerstone in managing portal hypertension-related complications such as variceal bleeding and ascites. Historically, TIPS has dealt with two main challenges: ensuring stent patency and preventing post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy. The introduction of PTFE-coated stents markedly reduced the risk of TIPS dysfunction and stent patency is no longer a major concern. However, despite improved patient selection criteria, hepatic encephalopathy continues to be a significant and persistent issue. In addition, the broader application of TIPS in recent decades has brought to light additional, albeit less common, complications, such as post-TIPS heart failure. This review offers a comprehensive overview of TIPS historical evolution, advancements in technique, and its application in the treatment of portal hypertension.

CIRSE Standards of Practice on Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts

BACKGROUND

Proposed in the early 1980s as a solution for managing complications of portal hypertension, the percutaneous creation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt has consistently gained a central role. Increasingly lower complication rates have been observed thanks to improvements in both technologies and the skills of interventional radiologists.

PURPOSE

This document is aimed at interventional radiologists and provides best practice recommendations for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation, describing patient selection, intraprocedural management and follow-up, in addition to recommendations in paediatric settings.

METHODS

The CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee established a writing group consisting of seven European clinicians with recognised expertise in the creation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. The writing group reviewed the existing literature performing a pragmatic evidence search using PubMed to select relevant publications in the English language and involving human subjects, preferably published from 2009 to 2024. The final recommendations were developed by consensus.

RESULTS

TIPS creation has an established role in the successful management of portal hypertension and its complications. This Standards of Practice document provides up-to-date recommendations for patient selection, materials, its safe performance, and follow-up with complications management.

The crucial role of risk factors when dealing with hepatic Encephalopathy

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a common condition in patients with cirrhosis, representing the second most frequent cause of decompensation. Approximately 30-40% of patients with cirrhosis will experience overt HE during the clinical course of their illness. In most cases, it is possible to identify a precipitating or risk factor for HE. These are distinct concepts that play different roles in the development of this condition. While precipitating factors act acutely, risk factors are generally present over an extended period and contribute to the overall likelihood of developing HE. The two types of factors require different approaches, with risk factors being more susceptible to prevention. The aim of this review is to describe the most important risk factors (such as severity of liver disease, previous episode of HE, minimal/covert HE, spontaneous and iatrogenic shunt, malnutrition, chronic therapies, metabolic diseases) for the development of HE and how to prevent it.

Comparison of outcomes for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation: Viatorr versus Fluency versus a bare stent/Fluency stent combination

PURPOSE

To compare clinical outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) created with the single covered-uncovered stent (Viatorr TIPS Endoprosthesis) versus covered stent (Fluency) versus a combination of covered and uncovered stent.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From May 2016 and July 2019, a total of 180 liver cirrhosis patients with recurrent variceal bleeding underwent TIPS creation with single covered-uncovered stent (n = 63) or covered stent (n = 41) or a covered and uncovered stent combination (n = 76). Shunt dysfunction, rebleeding, overt hepatic encephalopathy and mortality was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test.

RESULTS

The difference of baseline characteristics among these three groups were not significant. The included patients had a median age of 51 years (IQR 43-61), and 101 (56.1%) were men. The 1-year and 2-year shunt dysfunction rates were 1.6% and 3.2% in the single covered-uncovered stent group, 7.3% and 7.3% in the covered stent group and 5.3% and 6.6% in the combination group, respectively. There was no significant difference among groups [Hazard Ratio (HR) (95%CI): 1 vs 2.29 (0.38 - 13.72) vs 2.10 (0.41 - 10.83); P = 0.913]. No significant differences in the incidence of all-cause rebleeding were observed between the groups at 1 year (Viatorr vs Fluency vs combination: 11.1% vs 17.1% vs 10.5%) as well as 2 years (15.9% vs 17.1% vs 11.8%), with the HR (95%CI) being 1 vs 1.27 (0.5-3.21) vs 0.74 (0.30-1.82); P = 0.475). The 1-year and 2-year incidence of overt hepatic encephalopathy were 30.2% and 30.2% in the single covered-uncovered stent group, 22.0% and 22.0% in the covered stent group and 25.0% and 25.0% in the combination group, respectively. However, there was no significant difference among these three groups (P = 0.402). In addition, there was no significant difference in the 1-year and 2-year mortality (6.3% and 7.9% vs. 4.9% and 9.8% vs. 6.6% and 9.2%, P = 0.606).

CONCLUSION

No significant difference was observed among different stent groups. Fluency covered stent and the generic bare stent/Fluency covered stent was not an unreasonable alternative to the Viatorr stent for TIPS creation.

Road to recompensation: Baveno VII criteria and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in liver cirrhosis

Liver cirrhosis has long been considered a point of no return, with limited hope for recovery. However, recent advancements, particularly the Baveno VII criteria and the utilization of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), have illuminated the concept of hepatic recompensation. In this editorial we comment on the article by Gao et al published in the recent issue. This editorial provides a comprehensive overview of the evolution of understanding cirrhosis, the criteria for recompensation, and the efficacy of TIPS in achieving recompensation. We discuss key findings from recent studies, including the promising outcomes observed in patients who achieved recompensation post-TIPS insertion. While further research is needed to validate these findings and elucidate the mech-anisms underlying recompensation, the insights presented here offer renewed hope for patients with decompensated cirrhosis and highlight the potential of TIPS as a therapeutic option in their management.

Advances in the management of complications from cirrhosis

Cirrhosis with complications of liver decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) constitute a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Portal hypertension is central to the progression of liver disease and decompensation. The most recent Baveno VII guidance included revision of the nomenclature for chronic liver disease, termed compensated advanced chronic liver disease, and leveraged the use of liver stiffness measurement to categorize the degree of portal hypertension. Additionally, non-selective beta blockers, especially carvedilol, can improve portal hypertension and may even have a survival benefit. Procedural techniques with interventional radiology have become more advanced in the management of refractory ascites and variceal bleeding, leading to improved prognosis in patients with decompensated liver disease. While lactulose and rifaximin are the preferred treatments for hepatic encephalopathy, many alternative treatment options may be used in refractory cases and even procedural interventions such as shunt embolization may be of benefit. The approval of terlipressin for the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) in the USA has improved the way in which HRS is managed and will be discussed in detail. Malnutrition, frailty, and sarcopenia lead to poorer outcomes in patients with decompensated liver disease and should be addressed in this patient population. Palliative care interventions can lead to improved quality of life and clinical outcomes. Lastly, the investigation of systemic therapies, in particular immunotherapy, has revolutionized the management of HCC. These topics will be discussed in detail in this review.

Reduced risk of overt hepatic encephalopathy and death after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in patients with hepatic venovenous communications

PURPOSE

Hepatic venovenous communications (HVVC) is detectable in more than one-third of cirrhotic patients, where portal hypertension (PHT) tends to present more severely. We aimed to explore the prognostic implications of HVVC in patients with sinusoidal PHT treated by transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).

METHOD

The multicenter data of patients (2020-2022) undergoing balloon-occluded hepatic venography during TIPS were retrospectively analyzed. Pre-TIPS total bile acids (TBA) levels in portal, hepatic and peripheral veins were compared between groups. The primary endpoint was the development of overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE) within one year after TIPS.

RESULTS

183 patients were eligible and classified by the presence (n = 69, 37.7 %) or absence (n = 114, 62.3 %) of HVVC. The agreement between wedged hepatic venous pressure and portal venous pressure was poor in HVVC group (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC]: 0.141, difference: 13.4 mmHg, p < 0.001), but almost perfect in non-HVVC group (ICC: 0.877, difference: 0.4 mmHg, p = 0.152). At baseline, patients with HVVC had lower Model for end-stage liver disease scores (p < 0.001), blood ammonia levels (p < 0.001), TBA concentrations in the hepatic (p = 0.011) and peripheral veins (p = 0.049) rather than in the portal veins (p = 0.516), and a higher portosystemic pressure gradient (p = 0.035), suggesting more effective intrahepatic perfusion in this group. Within 1-year post-TIPS, HVVC group had a lower incidence of overt HE (11.7 % vs. 30.5 %, p = 0.004, HR: 0.34, 95 % CI: 0.16-0.74, absolute risk difference [ARD]: -17.4) and an improved liver transplantation-free survival rate (97.1 % vs. 86.8 %, p = 0.021, HR: 0.16, 95 % CI: 0.05-0.91, ARD: -10.3).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with sinusoidal PHT treated by TIPS, the presence of HVVC was associated with a reduced risk of overt HE and a potential survival benefit.

Efficacy and safety of precision-guided transjugular extrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TEPS) in the management of cavernous transformation of the portal vein with portal hypertension: a case series

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Performing a Transjugular intrahepatic portal system shunt (TIPS) in patients with portal vein cavernous transformation (CTPV) poses significant challenges. As an alternative, transjugular extrahepatic portal vein shunt (TEPS) may offer a potential solution for these patients. Nonetheless, the effectiveness and safety of TEPS remain uncertain. This case series study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TEPS in treating patients with CTPV portal hypertension complications.

METHODS

The study encompassed a cohort of 22 patients diagnosed with CTPV who underwent TEPS procedures. Of these, 13 patients manifested recurrent hemorrhagic episodes subsequent to conventional therapies, 8 patients grappled with recurrent or refractory ascites, and 1 patient experienced acute bleeding but refused endoscopic treatment. Comprehensive postoperative monitoring was conducted for all patients to rigorously evaluate both the technical and clinical efficacy of the intervention, as well as long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

The overall procedural success rate among the 22 patients was 95.5% (21/22).During the TEPS procedure, nine patients were guided by percutaneous splenic access, three patients were guided by percutaneous hepatic access, five patients were guided by transmesenteric vein access from the abdomen, and two patients were guided by catheter marking from the hepatic artery. Additionally, guidance for three patients was facilitated by pre-existing TIPS stents. The postoperative portal pressure gradient following TEPS demonstrated a statistically significant decrease compared to preoperative values (24.95 ± 3.19 mmHg vs. 11.48 ± 1.74 mmHg, p < 0.01).Although three patients encountered perioperative complications, their conditions ameliorated following symptomatic treatment, and no procedure-related fatalities occurred. During a median follow-up period of 14 months, spanning a range of 5 to 39 months, we observed four fatalities. Specifically, one death was attributed to hepatocellular carcinoma, while the remaining three were ascribed to chronic liver failure. During the follow-up period, no instances of shunt dysfunction were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Precision-guided TEPS appears to be a safe and efficacious intervention for the management of CTPV.

6-mm shunt transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in patients with severe liver atrophy and variceal bleeding

OBJECTIVES

We proposed a strategy for the creation of a 6-mm transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and to assess its effectiveness compared to a conventional 8-mm shunt for TIPS-induced hepatic encephalopathy (HE).

METHODS

Patients were reviewed retrospectively using propensity score matching (1:1) and divided into 6-mm and 8-mm shunt groups based on shunt diameter. The stent patency, HE incidence, and rebleeding rate between the two groups were then compared.

RESULTS

From January 2018 to June 2021, both 6-mm shunt group and 8-mm shunt group included 58 patients. The 6-mm shunt group had significantly smaller liver volumes (879.3 ± 237.1 vs. 1008.8 ± 293.0; p = 0.010), and the median stent patency times were 30.7 and 33.8 months in the 6-mm and 8-mm groups, respectively (p = 0.124). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in the 1-year (8.6% vs. 3.4%; p = 0.242) and 2-year (17.2% vs. 12.1%; p = 0.242) rebleeding rates. The 1-year cumulative incidences of overt HE were 12.1% and 27.6% in the 6-mm and 8-mm groups, respectively (p = 0.040), and the 2-year cumulative overt HE incidences in these groups were 19.0% and 36.2%, respectively (p = 0.038). Notably, patients with a 6-mm shunt also experienced less hepatic impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with variceal bleeding and a small liver volume, the 6-mm shunt significantly reduced the incidence of overt HE, protected perioperative liver function, and did not affect stent patency or rebleeding rate.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

For patients with variceal bleeding with small liver volume, the 6-mm transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) significantly reduced the incidence of overt hepatic encephalopathy after TIPS, protected perioperative liver function, and did not affect stent patency and rebleeding rate.

KEY POINTS

• A strategy for the creation of a 6-mm transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for patients with variceal bleeding and a small liver volume was proposed. • The 6-mm transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt significantly reduced the incidence of overt hepatic encephalopathy. • The 6-mm transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt did not affect stent patency or rebleeding rate.

Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Refractory to Endoscopic Management: Indications and Role of Interventional Radiology

For over 60 years, diagnostic and interventional radiology have been heavily involved in the evaluation and treatment of patients presenting with gastrointestinal bleeding. For patients who present with upper GI bleeding and have a contraindication to endoscopy or have an unsuccessful attempt at endoscopy for identifying or controlling the bleeding, interventional radiology is often consulted for evaluation and consideration of catheter-based intervention.

Prognosis of LSPD versus TIPS for the treatment of esophagogastric variceal bleeding in cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare postoperative complications in patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EVB) who underwent laparoscopic splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization (LSPD) versus transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedures.

METHODS

A retrospective collection of medical records was conducted from January 2014 to May 2020 at Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. The study included patients from the departments of trauma surgery, interventional radiology, and general surgery who were diagnosed with EVB caused by portal hypertension and treated with LSPD or TIPS. Follow-up data were obtained to assess the occurrence of postoperative complications in both groups.

RESULTS

A total of 201 patients were included in the study, with 104 cases in the LSPD group and 97 cases in the TIPS group. There was no significant difference in the 1-year and 3-year post-surgery survival rates between the TIPS and LSPD groups (P = 0.669, 0.066). The 3-year survival rate of Child-Pugh B patients in the LSPD group was higher than TIPS group (P = 0.041). The LSPD group also had a significantly higher rate of freedom from rebleeding at 3-year post-surgery compared to the TIPS group (P = 0.038). Stratified analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the rebleeding rate between the two groups. Furthermore, the LSPD group had a higher rate of freedom from overt hepatic encephalopathy at 1-year and 3-year post-surgery compared to the TIPS group (P = 0.007, < 0.001). The LSPD group also had a lower rate of severe complications at 3-year post-surgery compared to the TIPS group (P = 0.020).

CONCLUSION

Compared to TIPS, LSPD does not increase the risk of mortality and rebleeding, while demonstrating fewer complications. In patients classified as Child-Pugh A and B, the use of LSPD for treating EVB is both safe and effective.

Preventing variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Preventing rebleeding is crucial, but the best prevention technique for patients with cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) remains debatable. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis compared a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with endoscopic therapy (ET) plus nonselective beta-blockers (NSBBs) for preventing variceal rebleeding in this patient population.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched from their inception until May 18, 2023. The studies were screened using predetermined criteria, relevant data were extracted, and pooled analyses were performed using the Reviewer Manager 5.4.1 software.

RESULTS

We retrieved 1032 studies, of which 5 studies comprising a total of 272 patients were included. The postoperative variceal rebleeding rate was significantly lower in the TIPS group than in the ET + NSBBs group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.11-0.35, P < 0.05, I2 = 0%), but the portal vein recanalization rate was higher (OR = 7.92, 95% CI = 3.04-20.67, P < 0.05, I2 = 0%). The rates of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and mortality did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that TIPS prevents variceal rebleeding without increasing the hepatic encephalopathy risk more effectively than ET plus NSBBs, but this benefit did not translate into improved survival. Thus, it may be preferable to ET plus NSBBs for preventing variceal rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis and PVT. However, more large-scale and multicenter randomized controlled trials involving other patient populations are required to verify the clinical efficacy of both these treatments and ensure generalizability.

Prediction of mortality and overt hepatic encephalopathy undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Data on medium- and long-term efficacy and safety of Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) using Viatorr stents in Chinese patients are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the 5-year mortality and the incidence of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) after Viatorr stent insertion, and construct a model to predict post-TIPS OHE preoperatively.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-two patients undergoing Viatorr stent insertion in our institution between August 2016 and December 2019 were included, and randomly divided into training and validation cohort at a 70/30 ratio. Patients were followed up until death or the end date of follow-up (December 31st, 2021). The primary end point was all-cause mortality, and the secondary end points were OHE, variceal rebleeding, recurrent ascites and shunt dysfunction.

RESULTS

The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4- and 5-year cumulative survival rates were 92.4%, 87.9%, 85.3%, 80.2% and 80.2%, respectively. Post-TIPS OHE and Child-Pugh grade were independent prognostic factors. The rates of variceal rebleeding, recurrent ascites, shunt dysfunction and post-TIPS OHE were 9.1%, 14.3%, 5.3% and 28.0%, respectively. The variables of nomogram predicting post-TIPS OHE included age, diabetes and ascites grade. The area under time-dependent receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) in training and validation cohort were 0.806 and 0.751, respectively. The decision curve analysis (DCA) showed good net benefit both in training and validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

Post-TIPS OHE and Child-Pugh grade are independent prognostic factors for early mortality in cirrhosis patients, thus we construct a simple and convenient prediction model for post-TIPS OHE to identify high-risk patients preoperatively.

The Role of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt for the Management of Ascites in Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis

The development and progression of ascites represent a crucial event in the natural history of patients with cirrhosis, predisposing them to other complications and carrying a heavy impact on prognosis. The current standard of care for the management of ascites relies on various combinations of diuretics and large-volume paracenteses. Periodic long-term albumin infusions on top of diuretics have been recently shown to greatly facilitate the management of ascites. The insertion of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), an artificial connection between the portal and caval systems, is indicated to treat patients with refractory ascites. TIPS acts to decrease portal hypertension, thus targeting an upstream event in the pathophysiological cascade of cirrhosis decompensation. Available evidence shows a significant benefit on ascites control/resolution, with less clear results on patient survival. Patient selection plays a crucial role in obtaining better clinical responses and avoiding TIPS-related adverse events, the most important of which are hepatic encephalopathy, cardiac overload and failure, and liver failure. At the same time, some recent technical evolutions of available stents appear promising but deserve further investigations. Future challenges and perspectives include (i) identifying the features for selecting the ideal candidate to TIPS; (ii) recognizing the better timing for TIPS placement; and (iii) understanding the most appropriate role of TIPS within the framework of all other available treatments for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for portal hypertension with chronic portal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the long-term patency of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and determine the predictors of shunt dysfunction in patients with chronic portal vein occlusion (CPVO).

METHOD

This retrospective study was conducted from December 2010 to December 2020 in patients with portal hypertension and CPVO. Patients were followed up from initial TIPS insertion to December 2022 or death. Details of TIPS procedure, adverse events and clinical outcomes were recorded. The cumulative rate of shunt patency was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by using the log-rank test. Independent predictors of shunt dysfunction were calculated with the Cox regression model. A nomogram comprising independent variables was developed to enhance the predictive accuracy of shunt patency.

RESULTS

One hundred six patients (mean age, 45.3 years ± 13.6; 71 males and 35 females) were enrolled in the study. TIPS procedure was technically successful in 100 of 106 patients (94.3 %). The primary shunt patency rates for all 100 patients were 78.9 %, 74.7 %, 67.2 %, and 62.4 % at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively, and the overall shunt patency rates were 88.9 %, 86.8 %, 83.6 %, and 81.2 % at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Independent predictor of shunt dysfunction were inadequate inflow from superior mesenteric vein or splenic vein (the maximum diameter < 8 mm) and platelet count ≥ 300 × 109/L. The developed nomogram is a simple tool for accurately predicting shunt patency.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CPVO, inadequate inflow and high platelet count are important factors for TIPS dysfunction.

Effectiveness and prognosis of covered stents with different diameters in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) conducted utilizing stents of different diameters, thus providing recommendations for more logical selections of covered stents for patients with portal hypertension, in particular for the Asian population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wan Fang were searched for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies from inception until February 2023. The meta-analysis was carried out using Revman 5.4 Software. Heterogeneity between researches was assessed by the χ2 test and I2 index. The outcomes evaluated were the incidence of post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy (HE), variceal rebleeding, shunt dysfunction, 1-year overall survival and decrease in portal pressure gradient (PPG).

RESULTS

Eight appropriate clinical trials with 1246 patients were selected (638 and 608 patients in the experimental and control groups, respectively). In regards to preoperative PPG reduction, there was no discernible difference between the two groups [mean difference = 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.29-2.58, P = 0.12]. The rate of post-TIPS HE was significantly higher in patients in the 8 mm stent group than in the 6-7 mm stent group [odds ratio (OR) = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.42-0.70, P < 0.00001, I2 = 46%]. There were no significant differences in the rates of variceal rebleeding (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.67-1.65, P = 0.84, I2 = 0%), shunt dysfunction (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.53-1.47, P = 0.64, I2 = 0%) and 1-year overall survival (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.50-1.50, P = 0.61, I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSION

Asian populations with portal hypertension may benefit more from TIPS with 6-7 mm covered stents because they can reduce the risk of postoperative HE while offering similar efficacy when compared to 8 mm covered stents.

Shunt dysfunction patterns after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation using a combination of a generic stent-graft and bare-stents

PURPOSE

Even though transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) using Fluency Stent-grafts provides good shunt patency rates, shunt dysfunction is a great concern after TIPS creation, occurring in up to 20% of cases within one year. The objective of this study was to describe shunt dysfunction patterns after TIPS creation using a combination of generic stent-grafts/bare-stents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single-center retrospective study of all TIPS revisions between January 2005 and December 2020. TIPS revision angiograms were analyzed for stents' positions, stenoses' diameters, and stenoses' locations.

RESULTS

Out of 99 TIPS, a total of 33 TIPS revisions were included. The median time to TIPS revision was 10.4 months. Angiograms showed four patterns of TIPS dysfunction-associated features (DAF), defined as follows: Type 1 was defined as stenosis located after the stent end in the hepatic vein (HV), type 2 as intra-stent stenosis located in the hepatic vein, type 3 as intra-stent stenosis or a kink in the parenchymal tract or the portal vein end of the TIPS, and type 4 as a complete TIPS occlusion. Types 1, 2, 3, and 4 were seen in 23 (69.7%), 5 (15.2%), 2 (6.1%), and 3 (9.1%) TIPS respectively. TIPS revision was successful in 30 (90.1%) patients with median pre- and post-TIPS revision PSG of 18.5 mmHg and 8 mmHg respectively (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Our results illustrate the four angiographic patterns of TIPS DAF after TIPS creation using a combination of generic stent-grafts/bare-stents and emphasize the need for appropriate stent length extending to the HV/inferior vena cava junction.

A streamlined controlled-expansion covered tapered stent for TIPS in the treatment of PHT

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) relieves cirrhotic complications by reducing portacaval pressure gradient (PCG), but it lacks precision in achieving a targeted post-TIPS PCG simply through diameter adjustment of equal diameter stents. This study aimed to present a controlled-expansion, streamlined, and covered tapered stent, and examined its effects on pressure reduction compared with equal- diameter stents. Twenty-four patients who underwent standardized 8-mm stent TIPS implantation at West China Hospital from December 2017 to February 2021 were included in the current study. Virtual equal-diameter stent graft with different diameter and streamlined tapered stents were created in the post-TIPS 3-dimentional models reconstructed based on computed tomography angiography data. The numerical simulation showed that only two patients achieved targeted post-TIPS PCG consistent with the clinical invasive measurement. When 6-mm and 10-mm equal-diameter stents were employed, simulated post-TIPS PCGs for most patients remained outside the safe range, and recirculating flow was observed at the stent-portal vein anastomosis. In contrast, the use of the new streamlined taper stent resulted in post-TIPS PCGs within the 10-12 mmHg range for 17 out of 24 patients, with no recirculating flow observed at the anastomotic sites. In conclusion, the streamlined tapered stent could pose an effective solution to the problem that the big jump depressurization between two different equal-diameter stents and it would improve the hemodynamics in the region near the PV-stent anchorage. Therefore, the streamlined tapered stent may present a superior alternative for TIPS procedure.

The Management of Hepatic Encephalopathy from Ward to Domiciliary Care: Current Evidence and Gray Areas

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a common complication of advanced liver disease and acute liver failure. It is a condition that features several neuropsychiatric symptoms that affect mortality, morbidity and the quality of patients' and caregivers' lives. An HE diagnosis is generally an exclusion diagnosis. Once the patient is admitted to the hospital, clinical examination, blood tests and eventually neuroimaging should be performed with the aim of ruling out other causes of acute brain dysfunction. Moreover, HE is recognized using various precipitants that can potentially promote its onset, alone or in combination, and must be identified. Once the diagnostic process is complete, a correct treatment should be started. The anti-HE treatment is based on a combination of the correction of precipitants; non-absorbable antibiotics, such as rifaximin; and non-absorbable disaccharides. Once the patient is discharged from the hospital, specific anti-HE therapy should be maintained in order to prevent other HE episodes.

Post-Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) Hepatic Encephalopathy-A Review of the Past Decade's Literature Focusing on Incidence, Risk Factors, and Prophylaxis

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an established treatment for portal hypertension and its' complications in liver cirrhosis, yet the development of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) remains a significant concern. This review covers the reported incidence, risk factors, and management strategies for post-TIPS HE over the past decade. Incidence varies widely (7-61%), with factors like age, liver function, hyponatremia, and spontaneous portosystemic shunts influencing risk. Procedural aspects, including TIPS timing, indication, and stent characteristics, also contribute. Pharmacological prophylaxis with lactulose and rifaximin shows promise, but current evidence is inconclusive. Procedural preventive measures, such as shunt embolization and monitoring portal pressure gradients, are explored. Treatment involves pharmacological options like lactulose and rifaximin, and procedural interventions like stent diameter reduction. Ongoing studies on novel predictive markers and emerging treatments, such as faecal microbiota transplant, reflect the evolving landscape in post-TIPS HE management. This concise review provides clinicians with insights into the multifaceted nature of post-TIPS HE, aiding in improved risk assessment, prophylaxis, and management for patients undergoing TIPS procedures.

Diastolic dysfunction is associated with cardiac decompensation after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in patients with liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

About 20% of patients develop cardiac decompensation within the first year after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) insertion. However, risk factors for cardiac decompensation remain poorly defined. We aimed to evaluate predictors of cardiac decompensation after TIPS insertion in a large, well-defined cohort of patients with liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

234 cirrhotic patients who received a TIPS at Hannover Medical School were retrospectively followed up for one year to assess the incidence of cardiac decompensation. Echocardiographic parameters and established diagnostic criteria for cardiac impairment (e.g. by the American Society of Echocardiography/ European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (ASE/EACVI)) were investigated for an association with cardiac decompensation in a competing risk analysis. Survival was analyzed using a multivariable cox regression analysis adjusting for Freiburg index of post-TIPS survival.

RESULTS

Predominant TIPS indication was ascites (83%). Median age was 59 years, median MELD-score 12% and 58% were male. Overall, 41 patients (18%) developed cardiac decompensation within one year after TIPS insertion. Diastolic dysfunction according to the ASE/EACVI was diagnosed in 26% of patients at baseline and was linked to a significantly higher risk for cardiac decompensation (p = 0.025) after TIPS. When investigating individual echocardiographic baseline parameters, only pathological E/A (<0.8 or >2) was identified as a risk factor for cardiac decompensation (p = 0.015). Mortality and liver transplantation (n = 50) were significantly higher among patients who developed cardiac decompensation (HR = 5.29, p < 0.001) as well as in patients with a pathological E/A (HR = 2.34, p = 0.006). Cardiac high-risk status (44% of patients) was strongly linked to cardiac decompensation (HR = 2.93, p = 0.002) and mortality (HR = 2.24, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Cardiac decompensation after TIPS is a frequent and important complication and is associated with reduced survival. American Society of Echocardiography/EACVI criteria and E/A seem to be the best parameters to predict the cardiac risk in cirrhotic patients undergoing TIPS insertion.

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt: Devices Evolution, Technical Tips and Future Perspectives

Portal hypertension (PH) constitutes a pivotal factor in the progression of cirrhosis, giving rise to severe complications and a diminished survival rate. The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure has undergone significant evolution, with advancements in stent technology assuming a central role in managing PH-related complications. This review aims to outline the progression of TIPS and emphasizes the significant influence of stent advancement on its effectiveness. Initially, the use of bare metal stents (BMSs) was limited due to frequent dysfunction. However, the advent of expanding polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent grafts (ePTFE-SGs) heralded a transformative era, greatly enhancing patency rates. Further innovation culminated in the creation of ePTFE-SGs with controlled expansion, enabling precise adjustment of TIPS diameters. Comparative analyses demonstrated the superiority of ePTFE-SGs over BMSs, resulting in improved patency, fewer complications, and higher survival rates. Additional technical findings highlight the importance of central stent placement and adequate stent length, as well as the use of smaller calibers to reduce the risk of shunt-related complications. However, improving TIPS through technical means alone is inadequate for optimizing patient outcomes. An extensive understanding of hemodynamic, cardiac, and systemic factors is required to predict outcomes and tailor a personalized approach. Looking forward, the ongoing progress in SG technology, paired with the control of clinical factors that can impact outcomes, holds the promise of reshaping the management of PH-related complications in cirrhosis.

Impressive recompensation in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt-treated individuals with complications of decompensated cirrhosis based on Baveno VII criteria

BACKGROUND

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is the standard second-line treatment option for individuals with complications of decompensated cirrhosis, such as variceal bleeding and refractory ascites.

AIM

To investigate whether recompensation existed in TIPS-treated patients with decompensated cirrhosis according to Baveno VII criteria.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis was performed on 64 patients who received TIPS for variceal bleeding or refractory ascites. The definition of recompensation referred to Baveno VII criteria and previous study. Clinical events, laboratory tests, and radiological examinations were regularly conducted during a preset follow-up period. The recompensation ratio in this cohort was calculated. Beyond that, univariate and multivariate regression models were conducted to identify the predictors of recompensation.

RESULTS

Of the 64 patients with a 12-mo follow-up, 20 (31%) achieved recompensation. Age [odds ratio (OR): 1.124; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.034-1.222] and post-TIPS portal pressure gradient < 12 mmHg (OR: 0.119; 95%CI: 0.024-0.584) were identified as independent predictors of recompensation in patients with decompensated cirrhosis after TIPS.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that nearly one-third of the TIPS-treated patients achieved recompensation within this cohort. According to our findings, recompensation is more likely to be achieved in younger patients. In addition, postoperative portal pressure gradient reduction below 12 mmHg contributes to the occurrence of recompensation.

TIPS: indications, Contraindications, and Evaluation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the current and emerging indications, contraindications, and evaluation for TIPS. In the last three decades of use, there have been substantial changes and progress in this field, including the use of controlled-expansion, covered stents, which has broadened the clinical uses of TIPS.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent findings have rapidly expanded the indications for TIPS, including emerging uses in hepatorenal syndrome, hepatopulmonary syndrome and before abdominal surgery. The widespread use of controlled-expansion, covered stents has decreased rates of post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy, opening TIPS to a larger patient population. Overall, with newer stent technology and more research in this area, the clinical utility and potential of TIPS has rapidly expanded. Going forward, a renewed focus on randomized-control trials and long-term outcomes will be a crucial element to selecting appropriate TIPS recipients and recommending emerging indications for this procedure.

Do the stent blind insertion into the main portal vein (MPV) and stent diameter influence the surgical outcome of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)?

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) surgery is a clinical intervention to treat portal hypertension (PH) by deploying a covered stent to establish a shunt path for the portal vein (PV) system, and proper surgical strategy is of great importance to balance the shunt effect and the risk of complications. To understand the clinical strategies of the stent blind insertion and stent selection in clinic, this study investigated the effects of varying stent insertion positions and diameters on the PV hemodynamics and the shunt effect by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis of five post-TIPS subjects. The results showed that the successful TIPS surgeries of the five PH subjects were confirmed by quantifying their pressure drops. The stent insertion positions at the main portal vein (MPV) slightly affected the clinically concerned hemodynamic indexes (i.e., MPV pressure, stent-outlet velocity) and the shunt index (SI). This indicated that the position of the stent going into the MPV may not need to be deliberately selected. Moreover, the covered stents with 6 mm and 8 mm diameters slightly influenced the hemodynamics as well, but the large-diameter stent better improved the shunt effect compared to the small-diameter one. Despite this, the 6 mm stent was suggested thanks to the higher risk of the hepatic encephalopathy (HE) observed in clinic, which indicated the excessive shunt of the 8 mm stent. The current work revealed the effects of different TIPS strategies on the surgical outcome, and could be useful for potential clinical practices.

Predicting overt hepatic encephalopathy after TIPS: Value of three minimal hepatic encephalopathy tests

Background & Aims

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a frequent and severe complication in patients after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) insertion. However, risk factors for post-TIPS HE remain poorly defined. Minimal HE (mHE) is a well-known risk factor for overt HE in patients with cirrhosis without TIPS. We aimed to evaluate three tools frequently used for diagnosing mHE for their dynamic changes and their predictive value for overt HE after TIPS.

Methods

We prospectively recruited 84 consecutive patients before TIPS insertion and monitored them for 180 days for post-TIPS HE. Before TIPS insertion, the patients underwent the portosystemic encephalopathy (PSE) syndrome test, the animal naming test (ANT), and the critical flicker frequency (CFF). Patients were retested after TIPS insertion.

Results

The majority of patients were male (67.9%), and the predominant indication for TIPS was refractory ascites (75%). Median age was 59 years, model for end-stage liver disease score was 12, and 66.3%, 64.6%, and 28.4% patients had evidence for mHE according to the PSE syndrome test, ANT, and CFF, respectively. Overall, 25 patients developed post-TIPS HE within 180 days after TIPS insertion. Post-TIPS incidence of overt HE was 22.2, 28.6, 45.5, and 55.6% in those with no, one, two, and three pathological tests at baseline, respectively. However, none of the three tests was significantly associated with post-TIPS HE. Of note, mean performance in all tests remained stable over time after TIPS insertion.

Conclusions

PSE syndrome test, ANT and CFF, which are frequently used for diagnosing mHE have limited value for predicting HE after TIPS insertion. We could not find evidence that TIPS insertion leads to a psychometric decline in the long term.

Impact and implications

This prospective observational study compared three diagnostic tests for mHE and showed the limited value of these tests for predicting overt HE in patients with cirrhosis undergoing TIPS insertion. In addition, the results suggest that cognitive performance generally remains stable after TIPS insertion. These results are important for physicians and researchers involved in the management of patients with cirrhosis undergoing TIPS procedures. The study's findings serve as a starting point for further investigations on the development of more effective strategies for predicting and managing post-TIPS HE.

Clinical trial number

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04801290.

Prevention and treatment of hepatic encephalopathy during the perioperative period of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an established procedure for treating the complications of portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis. While the pathogenesis of postoperative TIPS-related hepatic encephalopathy (HE) has yet to be fully understood, intraoperative portosystemic shunts may provide a pathological basis for the occurrence of postoperative HE in patients with liver cirrhosis. Studies at home and abroad have expressed mixed opinions about TIPS-related HE. This study presents a literature review on the risk factors for and prevention and treatment of perioperative TIPS-related HE in patients with liver cirrhosis, aiming to optimize the procedure and reduce the incidence of postoperative HE.

Small-Diameter Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt versus Endoscopic Variceal Ligation Plus Propranolol for Variceal Rebleeding in Advanced Cirrhosis

Background Some studies have shown that transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement within 72 hours of admission improves survival in patients at high risk who present with acute variceal bleeding. However, the role of small-diameter covered TIPS in the secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding is still debatable. Purpose To compare the efficacy of 8-mm TIPS and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) plus propranolol in the prevention of variceal rebleeding among participants with advanced cirrhosis. Materials and Methods Between June 2015 and December 2018, participants admitted to the hospital for variceal bleeding were considered for enrollment in this randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov). Participants with Child-Pugh class B or C cirrhosis were randomly assigned to receive an 8-mm covered TIPS or EVL and propranolol. The primary end point was recurrent variceal bleeding assessed using Kaplan-Meier curve analysis. Secondary end points included survival and overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE) assessed using Kaplan-Meier curve analysis. Results A total of 100 participants were enrolled, with 50 randomly assigned to the EVL plus propranolol group (median age, 54 years; IQR, 45-60 years; 29 male, 21 female) and 50 randomly assigned to the TIPS group (median age, 49 years; IQR, 43-56 years; 32 male, 18 female). The median follow-up period was 43.4 months. In the TIPS group, variceal rebleeding risk was reduced compared with variceal rebleeding risk in the EVL plus propranolol group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.31; 95% CI: 0.14, 0.69; P = .008), but the incidence of overt HE was higher in the TIPS group (30.0% vs 16.0%, P = .03). No differences in survival were observed between the two groups (1-year survival: TIPS, 98.0%; EVL plus propranolol, 92.0%; 3-year survival: TIPS, 94.0%; EVL plus propranolol, 85.7%; HR, 0.52; 95% CI: 0.19, 1.42; P = .22). Conclusion When compared with EVL plus propranolol, 8-mm TIPS led to reduced variceal rebleeding but did not impact overall survival in participants with Child-Pugh class B or C cirrhosis. Clinical trial registration no. NCT02477384 © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Barth in this issue.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for pediatric portal hypertension: A meta-analysis

To evaluate the feasibility of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in children with portal hypertensive complications, PubMed and Cochrane Library were queried to identify clinical studies evaluating TIPS in patients <18 years old. Baseline clinical characteristics, laboratory values, and clinical outcomes were extracted. Eleven observational studies totaling 198 subjects were included in the study. The pooled technical success rate and hemodynamic success rate were 94% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86-99%) and 91% (95% CI: 82-97%), respectively; ongoing variceal bleeding resolved in 99.5% (95% CI: 97-100%); refractory ascites was improved in 96% (95% CI: 69-100%); post-TIPS bleeding rate was 14% (95% CI: 1-33%); 88% of patients were alive or successfully received liver transplant (95% CI: 79-96%); and shunt dysfunction rate was 27% (95% CI: 17-38%). Hepatic encephalopathy occurred in 10.6% (21/198), though 85.7% (18/21) resolved with medical management only. In conclusion, based on moderate levels of evidence, TIPS is a safe and effective intervention that should be considered in pediatric patients with portal hypertensive complications. Future comparative studies are warranted.

Hepatic Encephalopathy following Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Placement

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a complex condition that arises as a complication of chronic liver disease and portosystemic shunting. Its pathophysiology involves several factors, including impaired ammonia metabolism, portosystemic shunting, sarcopenia, and systemic inflammation. The symptoms of HE can vary significantly, with manifestations ranging from subclinical signs to a comatose state. The West Haven classification system is most commonly used to grade the severity of HE. There is a broad differential for the presenting symptomatology of HE and other causes of altered mental status must be excluded during the workup. HE is a well-known complication of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement. Even though newer stent designs help reduce the risk of HE with smaller diameter shunts, it is essential that patients are counseled regarding this potential risk prior to the procedure. Once a diagnosis of HE has been confirmed, the mainstay of therapy is lactulose and rifaximin. In cases where a patient has received a TIPS placement and continues to experience refractory HE despite medical therapy, it may be necessary to consider shunt reduction or closure.