Hyperprogression in hepatocellular carcinoma: Illusion or reality?

Evaluation of hyperprogressive disease with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma: A secondary analysis of the IMbrave150 trial

The use of Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as monotherapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been associated with an increased risk of hyperprogressive disease (HPD), the occurrence of which carries a poor prognosis. However, it is unknown whether contemporary frontline treatment with the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab causes significant HPD. This study conducted a secondary analysis of patient-level data from the IMbrave150 randomized controlled trial of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib for frontline treatment of HCC. Multiple established definitions of early progression and treatment failure applicable to clinical trials were evaluated, including Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) HPD, HPD based on percent change of sum of longest diameter (SLD HPD), treatment failure HPD (TF HPD), and fast progression (FP). The incidence of these measures was compared between arms. The risk factors for and prognosis of TF HPD were evaluated. The risk of RECIST HPD and TF HPD was significantly lower with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment than with sorafenib treatment-odds ratio for RECIST HPD: 0.29 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.82), TF HPD: 0.30 (0.17, 0.54). TF HPD was similarly associated with poor prognosis, irrespective of treatment arm. High blood alpha-fetoprotein and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were both associated with an increased risk of TF HPD. For all definitions of early progression/treatment failure, the risk was either significantly lower with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab than with sorafenib, or there were no differences. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment is unlikely to cause significant HPD.

Efficacy, safety, and correlative biomarkers of bintrafusp alfa in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer patients: a phase II clinical trial

Background

The strategy of dual blockade of TGF-β and PD-L1 pathways has not been previously tested in platinum-refractory recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer (R/M NPC) patients. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bintrafusp alfa in refractory R/M NPC patients.

Methods

In this single-arm, single-centre phase II clinical trial, 38 histologically confirmed R/M NPC patients were enrolled and administered with bintrafusp alfa every 2 weeks. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), and safety.

Findings

Thirty-eight patients were accrued (33 men; median age, 54 years). ORR was 23.7% (complete response, n = 2; partial response, n = 7). The median DOR was 19.2 months, median PFS was 2.3 months, median OS was 17.0 months, and 1-year OS rate was 63.2%. Unfortunately, 25 patients (65.7%) progressed within 8 weeks of treatment, 15 patients (39.5%) and 8 patients (21.1%) developed hyper-progressive disease (HPD) per RECIST v1.1 and tumor growth rate (TGR) ratio respectively. Sixteen patients (42.4%) experienced ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), most commonly anemia (n = 9, 23.7%) and secondary malignancies (n = 4, 10.5%). TRAEs led to permanent treatment discontinuation in 7 patients. Patients with strong suppression of plasma TGFβ1 level at week 8 were unexpectedly associated with worse ORR (9.1% vs 44.4%, P = 0.046) and development of HPD. There was no correlation between PD-L1 expression and ORR.

Interpretation

Bintrafusp alfa demonstrated modest activity in R/M NPC but high rates of HPD and treatment discontinuation secondary to TRAEs are concerning.

Funding

The project was supported by Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Charity Foundation Professorship Endowed Fund and Merck KGaA.

Unraveling the Complexities of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as effective therapeutics for multiple cancers. Nevertheless, as immunotherapeutic approaches are being extensively utilized, substantial hurdles have arisen for clinicians. These include countering ICIs resistance and ensuring precise efficacy assessments of these drugs, especially in the context of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This review attempts to offer a holistic overview of the latest insights into the ICIs resistance mechanisms in HCC, the molecular underpinnings, and immune response. The intent is to inspire the development of efficacious combination strategies. This review also examines the unconventional response patterns, namely pseudoprogression (PsP) and hyperprogression (HPD). The prompt and rigorous evaluation of these treatment efficacies has emerged as a crucial imperative. Multiple clinical, radiological, and biomarker tests have been advanced to meticulously assess tumor response. Despite progress, precise mechanisms of action and predictive biomarkers remain elusive. This necessitates further investigation through prospective cohort studies in the impending future.

Could We Predict the Response of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma?

The use of anti-programmed cell-death protein (ligand)-1 (PD-[L]1) is an important strategy for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the treatment only benefits 10-20% of patients when used as a monotherapy. Therefore, the selection of patients for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment is crucial for both patients and clinicians. This review aimed to explore the existing literature on tissue or circulating markers for the identification of responders or non-responders to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in HCC. For the clinically available markers, both etiological factors (viral versus non-viral) and disease extent (intra-hepatic vs. extrahepatic) impact the responses to anti-PD-1/PD-L1, warranting further studies. Preliminary data suggested that inflammatory indices (e.g., neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio) may be associated with clinical outcomes of HCC during the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment. Finally, although PD-L1 expression in tumor tissues is a predictive marker for multiple cancer types, its clinical application is less clear in HCC due to the lack of a clear-cut association with responders to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment. Although all translational markers are not routinely measured in HCC, recent data suggest their potential roles in selecting patients for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment. Such markers, including the immune classification of HCC, selected signaling pathways, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and auto-antibodies, were discussed in this review.

Hyperprogression, a challenge of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors treatments: potential mechanisms and coping strategies

Immunotherapy is now a mainstay in cancer treatments. Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies have opened up a new venue of advanced cancer immunotherapy. However, hyperprogressive disease (HPD) induced by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors caused a significant decrease in the overall survival (OS) of the patients, which compromise the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Therefore, HPD has become an urgent issue to be addressed in the clinical uses of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. The mechanisms of HPD remain unclear, and possible predictive factors of HPD are not well understood. In this review, we summarized the potential mechanisms of HPD and coping strategies that can effectively reduce the occurrence and development of HPD.

A phase II clinical study on the efficacy and predictive biomarker of pegylated recombinant arginase on hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Pegylated recombinant human arginase (PEG-BCT-100) is an arginine depleting drug. Preclinical studies showed that HCC is reliant on exogenous arginine for growth due to the under-expression of the arginine regenerating enzymes argininosuccinate synthetase (ASS) and ornithine transcarbamylase (OTC).

METHODS

This is a single arm open-label Phase II trial to assess the potential clinical efficacy of PEG-BCT-100 in chemo naïve sorafenib-failure HCC patients. Pre-treatment tumour biopsy was mandated for ASS and OTC expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Weekly intravenous PEG-BCT-100 at 2.7 mg/kg was given. Primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP); secondary endpoints included radiological response as per RECIST1.1, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Treatment outcomes were correlated with tumour immunohistochemical expressions of ASS and OTC.

RESULTS

In total 27 patients were recruited. The median TTP and PFS were both 6 weeks (95% CI, 5.9-6.0 weeks). The disease control rate (DCR) was 21.7% (5 stable disease). The drug was well tolerated. Post hoc analysis showed that duration of arginine depletion correlated with OS. For patients with available IHC results, 10 patients with ASS-negative tumour had OS of 35 weeks (95% CI: 8.3-78.0 weeks) vs. 15.14 weeks (95% CI: 13.4-15.1 weeks) in 3 with ASS-positive tumour; expression of OTC did not correlate with treatment outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

PEG-BCT-100 in chemo naïve post-sorafenib HCC is well tolerated with moderate DCR. ASS-negative confers OS advantage over ASS-positive HCC. ASS-negativity is a potential biomarker for OS in HCC and possibly for other ASS-negative arginine auxotrophic cancers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01092091. Date of registration: March 23, 2010.

Kinetics of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio during PD-1 inhibition as a prognostic factor in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors have improved survival outcomes and produced durable responses in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for some patients. Here, we evaluated the relationship between the baseline and kinetics of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and clinical outcomes in nivolumab-treated HCC patients.

METHODS

All consecutive HCC patients treated with nivolumab between July 2017 and June 2020 were screened for the eligibility. The NLRs were calculated before and at 2, 4 and 6 weeks after treatment. Survival outcomes were compared based on the baseline and kinetics of NLR. We additionally analysed the association of the baseline and dynamic changes in the NLR with hyperprogression (HPD).

RESULTS

Among the 194 included cases, most patients were male (82.0%) and had a Child-Pugh Class A disease (70.6%). Patients with a baseline NLR ≥ 3 (hazard ratio [HR] 2.46; 95% CI 1.63-3.71) had a poorer overall survival than patients with baseline NLR < 3. During the treatment, the NLR increased rapidly in patients developing HPD, and only a ΔNLR at 4 weeks was predictive of HPD. The risk of HPD increased by 20% for every 20% increase in the ΔNLR at 4 weeks. Accordingly, an NLR increase at 4 weeks (HR 1.79; 95% CI 1.19-2.68) was associated with an increased risk of death, especially among patients with a baseline NLR ≥ 3.

CONCLUSIONS

The baseline and on-treatment kinetics for the NLR are effective prognostic indicators in nivolumab-treated patients with HCC. This may help to guide patient selection and on-treatment strategies for immunotherapies in advanced HCC.

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have historically had few options and faced extremely poor prognoses if their disease progressed after standard-of-care tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Recently, the standard of care for HCC has been transformed as a combination of the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) atezolizumab plus the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody bevacizumab was shown to offer improved overall survival in the first-line setting. Immunotherapy has demonstrated safety and efficacy in later lines of therapy as well, and ongoing trials are investigating novel combinations of ICIs and TKIs, in addition to interventions earlier in the course of disease or in combination with liver-directed therapies. Because HCC usually develops against a background of cirrhosis, immunotherapy for liver tumors is complex and oncologists need to account for both immunological and hepatological considerations when developing a treatment plan for their patients. To provide guidance to the oncology community on important concerns for the immunotherapeutic care of HCC, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to develop a clinical practice guideline (CPG). The expert panel drew on the published literature as well as their clinical experience to develop recommendations for healthcare professionals on these important aspects of immunotherapeutic treatment for HCC, including diagnosis and staging, treatment planning, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and patient quality of life (QOL) considerations. The evidence- and consensus-based recommendations in this CPG are intended to give guidance to cancer care providers treating patients with HCC.

Role of the alpha-fetoprotein response in immune checkpoint inhibitor-based treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

The dynamics of serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level have been found to be a useful predictor of therapeutic responsiveness in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We evaluated whether AFP changes were able to accurately reflect imaging-based responses and predict prognosis in patients receiving therapies including immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

METHODS

A total of 108 HCC patients with baseline serum AFP ≥ 20 ng/mL who received ICI-based treatment were included. We evaluated AFP-based responses, coupled with radiographic responses by RECIST, at 6-10 (time-point 1, TP1) and 14-18 weeks (time-point 2, TP2) of therapy in terms of the change of AFP from baseline, with a > 20% decrease or increase in level corresponding to the AFP response and progression, respectively. We examined the correlations between AFP and imaging-based responses, and the prognostic implications of the AFP-based measure.

RESULTS

Based on AFP change, there were 24 and 20 responders and 74 and 24 progressors at TP1 and TP2, respectively. The AFP responders yielded radiological objective responses in 90.9% (10/11) and 93.8% (15/16) of the cases at TP1 and TP2, respectively, compared with only 1.4% and none, respectively, of the AFP progressors at the corresponding times. The agreement between progression by RECIST and increased AFP level at the two time-points was 93.8% and 95.0%, respectively. The accuracy of the AFP-based criterion for predicting radiologic response/progression was comparable at TP1 and TP2. Both "AFP responder" and "AFP progressor" at TP1 or TP2 independently predicted the overall survival of patients (adjusted hazard ratios [95% confidence intervals], 0.360 [0.174-0.743] and 0.315 [0.117-0.850]; and 2.525 [1.362-4.679] and 3.908 [1.563-9.769], respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that on-treatment AFP changes can complement imaging findings and provide prognostic information for evaluating patients with AFP-producing HCC treated with ICI-based regimens.