Survival benefit of adequate lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing liver resection for clinically node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Adjuvant chemotherapy compared with observation in patients with resected biliary tract cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

Several randomized controlled trials compared adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with observation in patients with resected biliary tract cancer (BTC) have yielded inconsistent outcomes. In order to assess the efficacy of adjuvant therapy in these patients, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We conducted a thorough search in various databases, which included MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ASCO Abstracts, ESMO Abstracts and ClinicalTrials.gov. All relevant randomized controlled trials investigating the adjuvant chemotherapy compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer were identified. The primary outcome of interest was overall survival (OS), while secondary outcome was relapse-free survival (RFS). Statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.3. Additionally, publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test in Stata 12.0.

RESULTS

A total of 5 randomized controlled trials, involving 1406 patients, were included in this analysis. Compared with observation, adjuvant chemotherapy improved RFS [HR 0.84 (0.73-0.96), p=0.01] (I2=0%, p=0.89) but not OS [HR 0.89 (0.77-1.03), p=0.12] (I2=51%, p=0.09) in the entire population after BTC resection. Subgroup analyses revealed that adjuvant chemotherapy did improve both OS [HR 0.76 (0.62-0.93), p=0.009] (I2=7%, p=0.37) and RFS [HR 0.74 (0.58-0.95), p=0.02] (I2=0%, p=0.39) in patients with lymph node positivity. Furthermore, patients receiving oral fluoropyrimidine monotherapy showed benefit from the adjuvant therapy, with longer OS [HR 0.78 (0.65-0.94), p=0.009] (I2=2%, p=0.31) and RFS [HR 0.81 (0.68-0.95), p=0.01] (I2=0%, p=0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

To conclude, adjuvant chemotherapy have the potential to offer advantages in patients with resected BTC. Specifically, patients demonstrating positive lymph node status have a higher likelihood of benefiting from adjuvant therapy. Our analysis supports the current standard of care of adjuvant fluoropyrimidine. However, the recommendation of oral fluoropyrimidine monotherapy as the preferred option is not definitive, as it is based on limited studies. Further validation of these outcomes is necessary by conducting extensive randomized controlled trials.

Defining advanced lymph node metastasis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A multicenter study

BACKGROUND

There is no specific boundary for stratifying survival outcomes in patients with node-positive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). This study aimed to propose advanced nodal status in ICC.

METHODS

Data from patients with pathologically confirmed node-positive ICC who underwent liver resection (LR) with lymph node dissection (LND) from 2000 to 2020 at three tertiary centers were retrospectively analyzed. The boundaries of regions and the yield that stratified overall survival (OS) were evaluated. The lymph node (LN) regions were defined as follows: hepatoduodenal ligament, common hepatic artery, and peripancreatic area (HCP-area), gastrohepatic area (GH-area), and para-aortic area (A-area).

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients with node-positive ICC were enrolled in this study. The median numbers of retrieved LNs and involved LNs (ILNs) were 15 (range: 2-56) and 2 (range: 1-20), respectively. Most patients (96.5%) had ILNs in the HCP-area, whereas only 3 patients (3.5%) had ILNs in other areas without HCP-area involvement. OS of patients with LN metastasis confined to the HCP-area was better than for those beyond this area (median OS: 24.3 vs. 13.3 months, p = 0.047). The best cut-off number of ILNs to stratify OS was 4, and patients with 1-3 ILNs showed better OS than those with ≥ 4 ILNs (25.4 vs. 13.8 months, p = 0.006). Combining distribution and yield showed the best prognostic power compared to using either distribution or yield alone.

CONCLUSION

In patients with node-positive ICC, LN metastasis beyond the HCP-area or ≥ 4 ILNs can be proposed as advanced N disease.

Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted and Open Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) Analysis

BACKGROUND

The advantages of robotic-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) in comparison with open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) have not been well-established. We aimed to compare their short-term outcomes by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent RPD/OPD at our hospital were recruited. Stabilised IPTW were performed to adjust observed covariates. Short-term outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

After IPTW, the effective sample comprised 807 patients (199 RPD, 608 OPD) with balanced clinicopathological characteristics. RPD had a longer operation time, fewer intraoperative blood loss (IBL), and lower blood transfusion rate than OPD. RPD was associated with a lower incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula and reoperation but did not reach statistical significance. In pancreatic adenocarcinoma, RPD had a significantly higher number of lymph nodes examined. There were no significant differences in postoperative morbidities and length-of-stay.

CONCLUSIONS

RPD was associated with fewer IBL and transfusion rates than OPD. RPD can be considered feasible and safe.

Should lymphadenectomy be recommended in radical surgery of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients? A retrospective study

PURPOSE

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is an extremely deadly cancer with high recurrence incidence, particularly in patients with lymph node metastasis (LNM). The necessity of lymphadenectomy including lymph node biology (LNB) and dissection (LND) during ICC radical surgery remains debate.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the patients diagnosed with ICC and underwent radical surgery at the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from 2012 to 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 308 ICC patients were involved in this study. pLNM+ group had poorer OS (P < 0.0001) and poorer DFS (P < 0.0001) compared with pLNM- group. Compared to the LN- group, LN+ group exhibited worse OS (P = 0.038) and worse DFS (P = 0.003). After PSM and IPTW, compared with LN- group, LNB exhibited longer operation time (IPTW: P = 0.0024) and longer hospitalization days (IPTW: P = 0.0112) with no significant differences in complications, DFS, and OS. Compared with LN- group, LND group had no better DFS and OS, only more complications (IPTW: P = 0.0191), longer operation time (all P < 0.001), higher risk of bleeding (all P < 0.05), transfusion (IPTW: P = 0.014) and longer hospitalization days (IPTW: P = 0.0044). Compared with LNB group, LND had longer operation time (P = 0.0227), higher risk of bleeding (P = 0.017) and transfusion (P = 0.0321), and more postoperative complications (P = 0.0425), with no difference in DFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

Lymphadenectomy does not necessarily provide long-term survival or recurrence benefits. LND only achieves the effect of LNB while negatively affects postoperative recovery without survival benefit for ICC patients. LNB can be performed for accurate pathological staging while not all patients may require LND based on their specific circumstances.

Outcomes and Role of Lymphadenectomy in Hypervascular Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Based on CT-Vascularity

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and role of lymphadenectomy in hypervascular intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) quantified using the arterial phase of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with mass-forming (MF) or predominantly MF type ICC who underwent surgical resection from 2000 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Using the image of the late arterial phase, CT-vascularity was calculated by dividing the CT value of the tumor (Hounsfield units) with that of the liver parenchyma. According to the CT-vascularity, patients were divided into hypervascular (CT-vascularity > 1) and non-hypervascular (CT-vascularity ≤ 1) groups. Clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. Further, the prognostic impact of lymphadenectomy was assessed in the hypervascular group.

RESULTS

Of the 135 patients with MF-ICC, the hypervascular group, and non-hypervascular group comprised 47 (34.8%) and 88 patients (65.2%), respectively. The hypervascular group displayed clinical features typically associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (i.e., viral hepatitis or history of HCC) and less aggressive tumor characteristics such as lower proportions of regional lymph node metastasis. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of the hypervascular group were significantly better than those of the non-hypervascular group (all, p < 0.001), and these results were retained after adjusting for known prognostic factors. Further, implementation of lymphadenectomy was not associated with benefit for OS and RFS in the hypervascular group (p = 0.819, p = 0.912).

CONCLUSION

Hypervascular ICC itself represents a favorable prognosis, and there is a possibility of omitting lymphadenectomy in this subgroup.

Surgical management, including the role of transplantation, for intrahepatic and peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic and peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma are life threatening disease with poor outcomes despite optimal treatment currently available (5-year overall survival following resection 20-35%, and <10% cured at 10-years post resection). The insidious onset makes diagnosis difficult, the majority do not have a resection option and the high recurrence rate post-resection suggests that occult metastatic disease is frequently present. Advances in perioperative management, such as ipsilateral portal vein (and hepatic vein) embolisation methods to increase the future liver remnant volume, genomic profiling, and (neo)adjuvant therapies demonstrate great potential in improving outcomes. However multiple areas of controversy exist. Surgical resection rate and outcomes vary between centres with no global consensus on how 'resectable' disease is defined - molecular profiling and genomic analysis could potentially identify patients unlikely to benefit from resection or likely to benefit from targeted therapies. FDG-PET scanning has also improved the ability to detect metastatic disease preoperatively and avoid futile resection. However tumours frequently invade major vasculo-biliary structures, with resection and reconstruction associated with significant morbidity and mortality even in specialist centres. Liver transplantation has been investigated for very selected patients for the last decade and yet the selection algorithm, surgical approach and both value of both neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies remain to be clarified. In this review, we discuss the contemporary management of intrahepatic and peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a review for clinicians

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is an aggressive liver malignancy that arises from second-order biliary epithelial cells. Its incidence is gradually increasing worldwide. Well-known risk factors have been described, although in many cases, they are not identifiable. Treatment options are continuously expanding, but the prognosis of iCCA remains dismal. R0 liver resection remains the only curative treatment, but only a limited number of patients can benefit from it. Frequently, major hepatectomies are needed to completely remove the tumour. This could contraindicate surgery or increase postoperative morbidity in patients with chronic liver disease and small remnant liver volume. In cases of anticipated inadequate future liver remnant, regenerative techniques may be used to expand resectability. The role and extent of lymphadenectomy in iCCA are still matters of debate. Improvements in iCCA diagnosis and better understanding of genetic profiles might lead to optimized surgical approaches and drug therapies. The role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies is broadening, gaining more and more acceptance in clinical practice. Combining surgery with locoregional therapies and novel drugs, such as checkpoint-inhibitors and molecular-targeted molecules, might improve treatment options and survival rates. Liver transplantation, after very poor initial results, is now receiving attention for the treatment of patients with unresectable very early iCCA (i.e. <2 cm) in cirrhotic livers, showing survival outcomes comparable to those of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ongoing prospective protocols are testing the efficacy of liver transplantation for patients with unresectable, advanced tumours confined to the liver, with sustained response to neoadjuvant treatment. In such a continuously changing landscape, the aim of our work is to review the state-of-the-art in the surgical and medical treatment of iCCA.

Machine learning-based prognostic prediction and surgical guidance for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

The prognosis following radical surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is poor, and optimal follow-up strategies remain unclear, with ongoing debates regarding anatomic resection (AR) versus non-anatomic resection (NAR). This study included 680 patients from five hospitals, comparing a combination of eight feature screening methods and 11 machine learning algorithms to predict prognosis and construct integrated models. These models were assessed using nested cross-validation and various datasets, benchmarked against TNM stage and performance status. Evaluation metrics such as area under the curve (AUC) were applied. Prognostic models incorporating screened features showed superior performance compared to unselected models, with AR emerging as a key variable. Treatment recommendation models for surgical approaches, including DeepSurv, neural network multitask logistic regression (N-MTLR), and Kernel support vector machine (SVM), indicated that N-MTLR's recommendations were associated with survival benefits. Additionally, some patients identified as suitable for NAR were within groups previously considered for AR. In conclusion, three robust clinical models were developed to predict ICC prognosis and optimize surgical decisions, improving patient outcomes and supporting shared decision-making for patients and surgeons.

Prognostic impact of lymph node dissection in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score analysis

PURPOSE

The clinical significance of lymph node dissection (LND) in patients with peripheral type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains unclear. Although LND is usually performed for perihilar type ICC, there is no consensus on whether routine LND should be performed for peripheral type ICC. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of LND in patients who underwent hepatectomy for peripheral type ICC.

METHODS

This study included consecutive patients who underwent macroscopically curative initial hepatectomy for ICC at our hospital from 2000 to 2018. Among them, peripheral type ICCs with the macroscopic appearance of mass-forming (MF) or MF + periductal infiltrating (PI) types were analyzed. Propensity score analyses (1:1 matching and inverse probability treatment weighting) were adopted to adjust confounding variables. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between the LND and no LND (NLND) groups.

RESULTS

During the study period, 201 patients underwent hepatectomy for ICC. The number of peripheral ICC patients with MF type or MF + PI type was 142. The LND group comprised 94 patients and the NLND group comprised 48 patients. The N1 group showed significantly poorer OS and DFS than the N0 and NLND groups (P < 0.001). After propensity score adjustment, there were no significant differences in OS and DFS between the LND and NLND groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis was significant; however, the therapeutic effect of LND was not demonstrated in peripheral type ICC. The indication of LND should be carefully considered on an individual patient basis.

Mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: treatment outcomes after curative-intent resection in an Australian tertiary referral hospital

BACKGROUND

Mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (MF-ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer and liver resection offers the best chance of possible cure. This study aimed to assess treatment outcomes and prognostic factors for long-term survival in patients who underwent curative-intent liver resection.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on prospectively collected data from patients with MF-ICC managed at the Royal North Shore/North Shore Private Hospital from January 1998 to October 2023. Baseline, peri-operative and long-term outcomes have been analysed, including an overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) analysis.

RESULTS

During the 25-year study period, 47 patients underwent curative-intent liver resection for primary MF-ICC at a median age of 70 years. The median OS was 36 months, with a 5-year OS of 33%. Multiple liver tumours (HR = 2.84; 95% CI = 1.24-6.48; P = 0.013) and a positive resection margin (HR = 2.46; 95% CI = 1.10-5.52; P = 0.029) were identified as independent predictors of poor long-term OS. Recurrence occurred in 62% of patients after a median DFS of 16 months, with poor tumour differentiation (HR = 3.93; 95% CI = 1.62-9.54; P = 0.002) and elevated tumour markers (HR = 3.47; 95% CI = 1.53-7.87; P = 0.003) as independent predictors of poor DFS.

CONCLUSION

Liver resection can offer a significant chance for prolonged survival in a highly selected population of patients with MF-ICC. However, the surgical challenges inherent in treating this rare disease are evident, emphasizing the need for a multimodal approach and continued exploration of additional therapies to enhance personalized treatment strategies.

Lymph node metastasis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: the present and prospect of detection and dissection

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) ranks as the second most primary liver cancer that often goes unnoticed with a high mortality rate. Hepatectomy is the main treatment for ICC, but only 15% of patients are suitable for surgery. Despite advancements in therapeutic approaches, ICC has an unfavorable prognosis, largely due to lymph node metastasis (LNM) that is closely linked to the elevated recurrence rates. Consequently, the identification of precise and suitable techniques for the detection and staging of LNM assumes paramount importance for ICC therapy. While preoperative imaging plays a crucial role in ICC diagnosis, its efficacy in accurately diagnosing LNM remains unsatisfactory. The inclusion of lymph node dissection as part of the hepatectomy procedures is significant for the accurate pathological diagnosis of LNM, although it continues to be a topic of debate. The concept of sentinel lymph node in ICC has presented a novel and potentially valuable approach for diagnosing LNM. This review aims to explore the current state and prospects of LNM in ICC, offering a promising avenue for enhancing the clinical diagnosis and treatment of ICC to improve patient prognosis.

Impact of clinical lymph node status on survival in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma undergoing liver resection plus lymphadenectomy

BACKGROUNDS

Liver resection plus lymphadenectomy is essential to ensure precise staging in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). This study aimed to investigate the influence of the clinical status of lymph nodes on the survival outcomes in ICC patients.

METHODS

Between January 2015 and December 2020, consecutive patients diagnosed with ICC who underwent liver resection plus lymphadenectomy were enrolled. Clinical assessment of lymph node status included positron emission tomography/computed tomography examination by radiologists pre-operatively, alongside intraoperative abdominal examination by the surgical team. Retrospective collection and analysis of clinical information alongside survival data were performed to assess outcomes.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 359 patients, with 291 (81.0%) and 151 (42.1%) displaying clinically and pathologically positive lymph nodes, respectively. The clinical assessment method had a sensitivity of 81.2% and a specificity of 54.3%. Following a median follow-up period of 32 months, the overall survival (OS) rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 69.1%, 50.6%, and 41.2%, respectively, while the disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 60.7%, 42.8%, and 40.1%, respectively, across the cohort. Patients who had clinically positive but pathologically negative lymph nodes recorded the highest median OS (52 months) and median DFS (32 months). Conversely, those who were clinically negative but pathologically positive experienced the lowest median OS (16 months) and median DFS (8 months).

CONCLUSION

The current approach to clinically assessing lymph node status in ICC has a significant rate of false positives. Patients with clinically positive but pathologically negative lymph nodes exhibit the most favourable survival outcomes.

Intra- and Peri-tumoral Radiomics Based on Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-MRI to Identify Lymph Node Metastasis and Prognosis in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) affects treatment strategies and prognosis. However, preoperative imaging is not reliable enough for identifying LNM.

PURPOSE

To develop and validate a radiomics nomogram based on dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MR images for identifying LNM and prognosis in iCCA.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

SUBJECTS

Two hundred four patients with pathologically proven iCCA who underwent curative-intent resection and lymphadenectomy (training cohort: N = 107, internal test cohort: N = 46, and external test cohort: N = 51).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

T1- and T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging and DCE imaging at 1.5 T or 3.0 T.

ASSESSMENT

Radiomics features were extracted from intra- and peri-tumoral regions on preoperative DCE-MR images. Imaging features were evaluated by three radiologists, and significant variables in univariable and multivariable regression analysis were included in clinical model. The best-performing radiomics signature and clinical characteristics (intrahepatic duct dilatation, MRI-reported LNM) were combined to build a nomogram. Patients were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups based on their nomogram scores (cutoff = 0.341). Patients were followed up for 1-102 months (median 12) after surgery, the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were calculated.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration, decision curve, Delong test, Kaplan-Meier curves, log rank test. Two tailed P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The nomogram incorporating intra- and peri-tumoral radiomics features, intrahepatic duct dilatation and MRI-reported LNM obtained the best discrimination for LNM, with areas under the ROC curves of 0.946, 0.913, and 0.859 in the training, internal, and external test cohorts. In the entire cohort, high-risk patients had significantly lower RFS and OS than low-risk patients. High-risk of LNM was an independent factor of unfavorable OS and RFS.

DATA CONCLUSION

The nomogram integrating intra- and peri-tumoral radiomics signatures has potential to identify LNM and prognosis in iCCA.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Probability of Lymph Node Metastases in Patients Undergoing Adequate Lymphadenectomy during Surgery for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

Introduction: Nodal metastases (lymph node metastasis [LNM]) are one of the major determinants of prognosis following surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Previous studies investigating the correlation between clinical-radiological features and the probability of LNM include patients undergoing inadequate nodal sampling. Aim of this study was to develop a model to predict the risk of LNM in patients undergoing adequate lymphadenectomy using preoperative clinical and radiological features. Methods: Patients undergoing radical surgery for ICC with adequate lymphadenectomy at seven Italian Centers between 2000 and 2023 were collected and divided into a derivation and a validation cohort. Logistic regression and dominance analysis were applied in the derivation cohort to identify variables associated with LNM at pathology. The final coefficients were derived from the model having the highest c-statistic in the derivation cohort with the lowest number of variables included (parsimony). The model was then tested in the external validation cohort, and the linear predictor was divided into quartiles to generate four risk categories. Results: A total of 693 patients were identified. Preoperative CA 19-9, clinically suspicious lymph nodes at radiology, patients’ age, and tumor burden score were significantly associated with LNM. These factors were included in a model (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://aicep.website/calculators/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">https://aicep.website/calculators/</ext-link>) showing a c-statistic of 0.723 (95% CI: 0.680, 0.766) and 0.771 (95% CI: 0.699, 0.842) in the derivation and validation cohort, respectively. A progressive increase of pathological lymph node positivity across risk groups was observed (29.9% in low-risk, 45.1% in intermediate-low risk, 51.5% in intermediate-high risk, and 87.3% in high-risk patients; p = 0.001). Conclusions: A novel model that combines preoperative CA 19-9, clinically suspicious lymph nodes at radiology, patients’ age, and tumor burden score was developed to predict the risk of LNM before surgery. The model exhibited high accuracy and has the potential to assist clinicians in the management of patients who are candidate to surgery.

Effectiveness, safety, and biomarker analysis of lenvatinib plus toripalimab as chemo-free therapy in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a real-world study

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are currently limited. Chemo-containing regimens are the mainstay treatments but associated with notable toxicity, poor tolerance, and reduced compliance, necessitating exploration of alternative therapies. Lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors has shown substantial clinical activity in preliminary studies. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of lenvatinib plus toripalimab (a novel PD-1 antibody) as chemo-free therapy in advanced ICC.

METHODS

This retrospective study included consecutive advanced ICC patients receiving lenvatinib plus toripalimab between February 2019 and December 2023. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Prognostic factors and exploratory analyses for genetic alternations were also conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 25.9 months. Median OS and PFS were 11.3 (95% CI: 9.5-13.1) and 5.4 (95% CI: 3.8-7.0) months, respectively. ORR was 19.2% and DCR was 75.6%. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) was 50.0%, with no grade 5 AEs reported. Patients with normal baseline CA19-9 levels exhibited a higher ORR (p = 0.011), longer PFS (11.5 versus 4.6 months; HR 0.47; p=0.005), and OS (21.0 versus 9.7 months; HR 0.43; p=0.003). The presence of IDH1 mutations correlated with increased ORR (60.0% versus 8.9%, p=0.016).

CONCLUSION

Lenvatinib plus toripalimab represents an effective and well-tolerated chemo-free therapeutic option for advanced ICC. Baseline CA19-9 levels and IDH1 mutations may serve as predictive treatment-related biomarkers.

A snapshot on current approaches to lymphadenectomy in liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: results from an international survey

The use of lymphadenectomy (LND) during resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is still debated, leading to differing practices in different centers and countries. The aim of this study was to assess such differences. A survey on LND for ICC was distributed to the members of the International Hepato-PancreatoBiliary Association (IHPBA) and the Italian Chapter of IHPBA (AICEP). Two-hundred thirty-four surgeons completed the survey (88% males; median age 46 years). Preoperative nodal staging was deemed mandatory/very important by 65%. Adequate LND was defined as hepatoduodenal ligament LND by 33%, LND at specific nodal stations by 28% and retrieval of > 5 nodes by 28%. The decision to perform LND was influenced by comorbidities (48%), chronic liver disease (38%) and satellitosis (32%). Most participants modify perioperative management in case of clinically positive nodes, 50% stating they would give neoadjuvant therapy. The role of LND in clinically node negative disease was adequate staging for 88%, survival benefit for 50.5% and clinical trials eligibility for 18.5%. Our survey confirms heterogeneity in the evaluation of role and extent of LND for ICC, how this relates to subjective perception of importance of LND, and need of a systematic approach in this area.

Impact of Lymph Node Dissection for Patients With Clinically Node-Negative Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Background

Lymph node status is a prominent prognostic factor for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). However, the prognostic value of performing lymph node dissection (LND) in patients with clinical node-negative ICC remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of LND on long-term outcomes in this subgroup of patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent radical liver resection for clinically node-negative ICC from three tertiary hepatobiliary centers. The propensity score matching analysis at 1:1 ratio based on clinicopathological data was conducted between patients with and without LND. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared in the matched cohort.

Results

Among 303 patients who underwent radical liver resection for ICC, 48 patients with clinically positive nodes were excluded, and a total of 159 clinically node-negative ICC patients were finally eligible for the study, with 102 in the LND group and 57 in the non-LND group. After propensity score matching, two well-balanced groups of 51 patients each were analyzed. No significant difference of median RFS (12.0 vs. 10.0 months, P = 0.37) and median OS (22.0 vs. 26.0 months, P = 0.47) was observed between the LND and non-LND group. Also, LND was not identified as one of the independent risks for survival. Among 51 patients who received LND, 11 patients were with positive lymph nodes (lymph node metastasis (LNM) (+)) and presented significantly worse outcomes than those with LND (-). On the other hand, postoperative adjuvant therapy was the independent risk factor for both RFS (hazard ratio (HR): 0.623, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.393 - 0.987, P = 0.044) and OS (HR: 0.585, 95% CI: 0.359 - 0.952, P = 0.031). Furthermore, postoperative adjuvant therapy was associated with prolonged survivals of non-LND patients (P = 0.02 for RFS and P = 0.03 for OS).

Conclusions

Based on the data, we found that LND did not significantly improve the prognosis of patients with clinically node-negative ICC. Postoperative adjuvant therapy was associated with prolonged survival of ICC patients, especially in non-LND individuals.

Endoscopic ultrasound with tissue acquisition of lymph nodes in patients with potentially resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Background and study aims Lymph node (LN) involvement is a poor prognostic factor for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the yield and impact on clinical decision making of endoscopic ultrasound with tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) of LNs in patients with potentially resectable iCCA. Patients and methods In this multicenter cohort study, patients with potentially resectable iCCA and preoperative EUS between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively included. The impact of EUS-TA was defined as the percentage of patients who did not undergo surgical exploration due to pathologically confirmed positive LNs found with EUS-TA. Results A total of 56 patients underwent EUS, with 91% of patients to target suspicious LNs on imaging. EUS-TA of LNs confirmed malignancy in 21 LNs among 19 patients (34%). In 17 patients (30%), surgical exploration was withheld due to nodal involvement. Finally, 24 patients (43%) underwent surgical exploration among whom positive regional LNs were identified in six patients (25%). Conclusions In patients with potentially resectable iCCA and suspicious LNs on cross-sectional imaging, EUS-TA confirmed LN involvement in 30% of patients. Surgical exploration was withheld mostly because of extraregional LN involvement and regional LN involvement in patients with high surgical risk.

Is routine lymph node dissection recommended for liver resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aimed to elucidate the therapeutic effects of routine lymph node dissection (LND) with liver resection on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

METHODS

Databases, including MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched to identify studies comparing LND and non-LND for ICC liver resection. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS), in-hospital morbidity, blood loss, and R0 rate.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies involving 4407 patients were included. The OS did not differ between the LND (n = 2158) and non-LND (n = 2249) groups (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.83-1.32). The secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups. Subgroup analyses stratified by the risk of bias showed a significant difference in OS between the high- and low-risk groups (P = 0.0008). In the low-risk group, LND (vs. non-LND) was associated with superior OS (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.98). Most studies in low-risk groups involved patients who were clinically node-negative.

CONCLUSIONS

The therapeutic effects of routine LND for ICC have not been demonstrated. However, LND had a positive impact on OS in studies with a low risk of bias, thus suggesting that there may be a subset of ICC patients who would benefit from LND.

Long-term oncological results of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The effectiveness of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCA) remains insufficiently studied.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study including patients with histologically proven iCCA within Milan criteria treated by percutaneous RFA from 2000 to 2022. The primary outcome was overall survival in treatment-naive patients and secondary outcomes included ablation completeness, adverse events, local and distant recurrence. A total of 494 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on cirrhosis treated by RFA were included as a comparison group. Oncological events were analysed using Kaplan-Meier, log-rank and univariate/multivariate Cox models.

RESULTS

The main population included 71 patients, mostly cirrhotic (80%) with solitary tumours (66%) of a median size of 24 mm. Local recurrence was 45% at 5 years, lower in multibipolar versus monopolar RFA (22% vs. 55%, p = .007). In treatment-naive patients (n = 45), median overall and recurrence-free survivals were 26 and 11 months, respectively. Tumour size (p = .01) and Child-Pugh B (p = .001) were associated with death. The rate of distant recurrence was 59% at 5 years significantly lower for single tumours of less than 2 (p = .002) or 3 cm (p = .02). In cirrhotic patients naïve of previous treatment (n = 40), overall survival was shorter than in HCC (26 vs 68 months, p < .0001), with more local recurrences (p < .0001). Among distant recurrences, 50% were extrahepatic metastases compared to 12% in HCC (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Multibipolar RFA provides better results in terms of tumour recurrence than monopolar RFA and could be used to treat small iCCA (<3 cm). Adjuvant chemotherapy should be discussed due to the frequent extra-hepatic metastasis at recurrence.

Cholangiocarcinoma: The Current Status of Surgical Options including Liver Transplantation

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) poses a substantial threat as it ranks as the second most prevalent primary liver tumor. The documented annual rise in intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) incidence in the United States is concerning, indicating its growing impact. Moreover, the five-year survival rate after tumor resection is only 25%, given that tumor recurrence is the leading cause of death in 53-79% of patients. Pre-operative assessments for iCCA focus on pinpointing tumor location, biliary tract involvement, vascular encasements, and metastasis detection. Numerous studies have revealed that portal vein embolization (PVE) is linked to enhanced survival rates, improved liver synthetic functions, and decreased overall mortality. The challenge in achieving clear resection margins contributes to the notable recurrence rate of iCCA, affecting approximately two-thirds of cases within one year, and results in a median survival of less than 12 months for recurrent cases. Nearly 50% of patients initially considered eligible for surgical resection in iCCA cases are ultimately deemed ineligible during surgical exploration. Therefore, staging laparoscopy has been proposed to reduce unnecessary laparotomy. Eligibility for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) requires certain criteria to be granted. OLT offers survival advantages for early-detected unresectable iCCA; it can be combined with other treatments, such as radiofrequency ablation and transarterial chemoembolization, in specific cases. We aim to comprehensively describe the surgical strategies available for treating CCA, including the preoperative measures and interventions, alongside the current options regarding liver resection and OLT.

Sex disparity in clinical characteristics and long-term prognosis after liver resection for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis

Aim

To compare the survival outcomes between male and female patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who underwent liver resection.

Methods

Data from 976 consecutive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients undergoing liver resection between January 2005 and May 2013 at the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. Patient clinicopathological characteristics, overall survival, and cumulative recurrence rates were compared between male and female patients using propensity score matching.

Results

Propensity score matching generated 313 matched pairs of patients. Among the entire cohort, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival and recurrence rates of the male and female patients were 60.2 %, 37.3 %, and 27.7 % vs. 65.8 %, 40.4 %, and 31.0 % (P = 0.380) and 50.6 %, 67.4 %, and 74.2 % vs. 44.4 %, 63.5 %, and 69.6 % (P = 0.123), respectively. In the matched cohort, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival and recurrence rates of the male and female patients were 60.6 %, 35.9 % and 22.4 % vs. 66.4 %, 40.6 % and 31.1 % (P = 0.041) and 51.5 %, 69.3 % and 83.9 % vs. 44.3 %, 63.6 %, and 69.9 % (P = 0.041), respectively. After adjustment for other confounding variables by multivariate Cox regression analysis, male sex was independently associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.322, 95 % confidence interval: 1.079-1.621, P = 0.007) and tumor recurrence (hazard ratio = 1.337, 95 % confidence interval: 1.088-1.645, P = 0.006). A subgroup analysis of patients younger than 55 years old after propensity score matching showed that male patients had significantly worse overall survival and higher recurrence rates than female patients after surgery, while no significant difference in long-term overall survival and recurrence was observed between male and female patients older than 55 years old after propensity score matching.

Conclusion

Male sex was an independent risk factor for overall survival and tumor recurrence in patients after liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Biliary tract cancers: French national clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (TNCD, SNFGE, FFCD, UNICANCER, GERCOR, SFCD, SFED, AFEF, SFRO, SFP, SFR, ACABi, ACHBPT)

INTRODUCTION

This document is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines of the management of biliary tract cancers (BTC) (intrahepatic, perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinomas, and gallbladder carcinomas) published in September 2023, available on the website of the French Society of Gastroenterology (SNFGE) (www.tncd.org).

METHODS

This collaborative work was conducted under the auspices of French medical and surgical societies involved in the management of BTC. Recommendations were graded in three categories (A, B and C) according to the level of scientific evidence until August 2023.

RESULTS

BTC diagnosis and staging is mainly based on enhanced computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and (endoscopic) ultrasound-guided biopsy. Treatment strategy depends on BTC subtype and disease stage. Surgery followed by adjuvant capecitabine is recommended for localised disease. No neoadjuvant treatment is validated to date. Cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy combined to the anti-PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab is the first-line standard of care for advanced disease. Early systematic tumour molecular profiling is recommended to screen for actionable alterations (IDH1 mutations, FGFR2 rearrangements, HER2 amplification, BRAFV600E mutation, MSI/dMMR status, etc.) and guide subsequent lines of treatment. In the absence of actionable alterations, FOLFOX chemotherapy is the only second-line standard-of-care. No third-line chemotherapy standard is validated to date.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines are intended to provide a personalised therapeutic strategy for daily clinical practice. Each individual BTC case should be discussed by a multidisciplinary team.

Impact of Tumor Subclassifications for Identifying an Appropriate Surgical Strategy in Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is subclassified into small and large duct types. The impact of these subclassifications for identifying appropriate surgical strategies remains unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included 118 patients with ICC who underwent liver resection. Based on the pathological examination results, the participants were divided into the small duct-type ICC group (n = 64) and large duct-type ICC group (n = 54). The clinicopathological features and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups to investigate the impact of subclassification for selecting appropriate surgical strategies.

RESULTS

Ten patients in the small duct-type ICC group had synchronous or metachronous hepatocellular carcinoma. The large duct-type ICC group had higher proportions of patients who underwent major hepatectomy, extrahepatic bile duct resection, portal vein resection, and lymph node sampling or dissection than the small duct-type ICC group. The large duct-type ICC group had significantly higher incidences of lymph node metastasis/recurrence and pathological major vessel invasion than the other. The small duct-type ICC group exhibited significantly higher recurrence-free and overall survival rates than the large duct-type ICC group. Further, the large duct-type ICC group had a significantly higher incidence of lymph node metastasis/recurrence than the small duct-type ICC at the perihilar region group.

CONCLUSIONS

Suitable surgical strategies may differ between the small and large duct-type ICCs. In patients with large duct-type ICCs, hepatectomy with lymph node dissection and/or biliary reconstruction should be considered, whereas hepatectomy without these advanced procedures can be suggested for patients with small duct-type ICCs.

Value of lymph node dissection in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the impact of lymph node dissection (LND) on outcomes following resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched from inception to 30th January 2023 for studies that compared LND with no LND (NLND) among patients with ICC. To limit the effect of unbalanced covariates, only studies that utilized propensity score-based methods were included. Subgroup analysis of patients with clinically node-negative (cN0) ICC was analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 3776 patients with ICC, individuals in the LND versus NLND cohorts had comparable overall survival (OS) (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.78, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.57-1.06, P = 0.11), disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 0.84, 95 % CI 0.70-1.01, P = 0.07) and risk of major complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95 % CI 0.70-1.62, P = 0.75). Subgroup analysis of cN0 patients, OS was significantly higher in patients who underwent LND (HR 0.61, 95 % CI 0.50-0.74, P < 0.01), with a non-significant trend towards improved DFS (HR 0.81, 95 % CI 0.65-1.01, P = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

This study found no differences in long-term survival or morbidity following LND for ICC. Subgroup analysis of cN0 patients, who underwent LND detected improved OS with a trend towards better DFS, compared to patients with NLND.

[The Russian consensus on the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma]

The Russian consensus on the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was prepared by the group of experts consisting of surgeons, interventional radiologists, radiation therapists and oncologists. The purposes of this consensus are clarification and consolidation of opinions of multidisciplinary team on the following issues of management of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: indications for surgical treatment, features of therapeutic tactics for mechanical jaundice, technical aspects of liver resection, prevention of post-resection liver failure, indications for liver resection using transplantation technologies, laparoscopic and robot-assisted liver resection, perioperative systemic chemotherapy, local non-resection/non-radiotherapy methods of treatment, radiotherapy, follow-up and choice of treatment for recurrence.

Predicting risk of recurrence after resection of stage I intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Early-stage intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is often an indication of curative-intent resection. Although patients with early-stage ICC generally have a better prognosis than individuals with advanced ICC, the incidence and risk factors of recurrence after early-stage ICC remain unclear.

METHODS

A multi-institutional database was used to identify patients who underwent surgery between 2000 and 2018 for ICC with pathologically confirmed stage I disease. Cox regression analysis was used to identify clinicopathological factors associated with recurrence, and an online prediction model was developed and validated.

RESULTS

Of 430 patients diagnosed with stage I ICC, approximately one-half of patients (n = 221, 51.4%) experienced recurrence after curative-intent resection. Among patients with a recurrence, most (n = 188, 85.1%) experienced it within 12 months. On multivariable analysis, carcinoembryonic antigen (hazard ratio [HR], 1.011; 95% CI, 1.004-1.018), systemic immune-inflammation index (HR, 1.036; 95% CI, 1.019-1.056), no lymph nodes evaluated (HR, 1.851; 95% CI, 1.276-2.683), and tumor size (HR, 1.101; 95% CI, 1.053-1.151) were associated with greater hazards of recurrence. A predictive model that included these weighted risk factors demonstrated excellent prognostic discrimination in the test (12-month recurrence-free survival [RFS]: low risk, 80.1%; intermediate risk, 60.3%; high risk, 37.7%; P = .001) and validation (12-month RFS: low risk, 84.5%; intermediate risk, 63.5%; high risk, 47.1%; P = .036) datasets. The online predictive model was made available at https://ktsahara.shinyapps.io/stageI_icc/.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with stage I ICC without vascular invasion or lymph node metastasis had a relatively high incidence of recurrence. An online tool can risk stratify patients relative to recurrence risk to identify individuals best suited for alternative treatment approaches.

Predicting very early recurrence in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after curative hepatectomy using machine learning radiomics based on CECT: A multi-institutional study

BACKGROUND

Even after curative resection, the prognosis for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) remains disappointing due to the extremely high incidence of postoperative recurrence.

METHODS

A total of 280 iCCA patients following curative hepatectomy from three independent institutions were recruited to establish the retrospective multicenter cohort study. The very early recurrence (VER) of iCCA was defined as the appearance of recurrence within 6 months. The 3D tumor region of interest (ROI) derived from contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) was used for radiomics analysis. The independent clinical predictors for VER were histological stage, AJCC stage, and CA199 levels. We implemented K-means clustering algorithm to investigate novel radiomics-based subtypes of iCCA. Six types of machine learning (ML) algorithms were performed for VER prediction, including logistic, random forest (RF), neural network, bayes, support vector machine (SVM), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). Additionally, six clinical ML (CML) models and six radiomics-clinical ML (RCML) models were developed to predict VER. Predictive performance was internally validated by 10-fold cross-validation in the training cohort, and further evaluated in the external validation cohort.

RESULTS

Approximately 30 % of patients with iCCA experienced VER with extremely discouraging outcome (Hazard ratio (HR) = 5.77, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) = 3.73-8.93, P < 0.001). Two distinct iCCA subtypes based on radiomics features were identified, and subtype 2 harbored a higher proportion of VER (47.62 % Vs 25.53 %) and significant shorter survival time than subtype 1. The average AUC values of the CML and RCML models were 0.744 ± 0.018, and 0.900 ± 0.014 in the training cohort, and 0.769 ± 0.065 and 0.929 ± 0.027 in the external validation cohort, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Two radiomics-based iCCA subtypes were identified, and six RCML models were developed to predict VER of iCCA, which can be used as valid tools to guide individualized management in clinical practice.

Should lymphadenectomy performed routinely in patients with primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma undergoing curative hepatectomy? A retrospective cohort study with propensity-score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

The benefit of routine lymphadenectomy (LD) in improving outcomes for patients with primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) undergoing curative hepatectomy remains unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study enrolled 269 consecutive patients who underwent liver resection for primary ICC from January 2009 to July 2020 in West China Hospital. The association of the nodal status with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

RESULTS

Seventy-five (27.9%) patients underwent curative liver resection combined with LD (LD+ group), while 194 (72.1%) patients received curative liver resection without LD (LD- group and Nx group). Among the LD+ group, metastatic disease was present in 36 patients (48%, N1 group) and absent in 39 patients (N0 group). During the follow-up period, 116 patients (43.1%) experienced tumor recurrence and 101 patients (37.5%) died due to recurrence. Multivariate analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis (N1, HR 3.682, 95% CI 1.949-6.957, p < 0.001) was associated with worse OS, while LD+ status (HR 0.504, 95% CI 0.298-0.853, p = 0.011) was associated with improved OS. Adjuvant therapy was a protective factor for both DFS (HR 0.602, 95% CI, 0.447-0.810, p = 0.001) and OS (HR 0.683, 95% CI 0.484-0.963, p = 0.030). After 1:1 PSM, the LD+ patients (n = 74) displayed similar 1-, 3- and 5-year DFS rates (40.0, 7.9 and 7.9% vs. 29.0, 13.7 and 13.7%, p = 0.741) and OS rates (56.0, 26.6 and 22.2% vs. 58.9, 25.6, and 16.4%, p = 0.644) to the LD- patients (n = 74). Additionally, among the 75 LD+ patients, 48 patients underwent hepatic hilar lymphadenectomy (HHL), and 27 patients underwent extended hepatic hilar lymphadenectomy (EHL). Both DFS (p = 0.504) and OS (p = 0.215) were similar between the HHL and EHL groups.

CONCLUSION

Routine LD and adjuvant therapy may contribute to improved OS according to the crude analysis. LD could provide accurate staging without excessive risk and guide adjuvant therapy based on the tumor stage, potentially resulting in better survival. These results suggest that a routine LD should be considered during curative hepatectomy for ICC.

Role of routine lymph node dissection alongside resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The global incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA) is soaring. Due to often delayed presentation, only a narrow spectrum of the disease is usually surgically resectable. To more accurately stage the disease, reduce recurrence, and improve overall survival, surgical teams are increasingly performing intraoperative lymph node dissection (LND) as well. This procedure has its associated morbidity, while there is no consensus or formal guidelines on its role in this setting. Hence, there is a need to better delineate the evidence for performing LND alongside surgical resection of the ICCA.

AIM

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the role of LND in improving prognostication and survival post-resection of ICCA.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search using Pubmed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, for all studies involving LND, ICCA, and surgical resection using several keywords, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) tags, and appropriate synonyms. All clinical studies comparing curative intent resection of ICCA with LND vs resection without LND were included, while single-arm case series, studies with insufficient data, and duplicates were excluded. We included all English-language studies from the different academic databases up till early December 2022. The primary outcome measures were set for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

This systematic review and meta-analysis included 15 studies that fulfilled the selection criteria comprising 11413 patients with surgically-resectable ICCA, of whom 6424 (56.3%) underwent hepatectomy with LND while the remainder underwent hepatectomy only. In patients who underwent LND, on average, 27.7% of the resected lymph nodes were positive for metastatic disease. Overall, the results showed that performing LND did not significantly improve OS or DFS. However, the effect of LND on OS showed a degree of variability by geographical region, in Eastern and Western countries. As LND is increasingly being performed, further time-based analysis was undertaken to identify time-dependent changes in the role of LND. An increasing adoption of LND was not associated with improved OS. Furthermore, no roles were identified for neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy or increasing lymph node retrieval in improving OS either.

CONCLUSION

LND might aid in staging, prognosticating, and deciding further management of resected ICCA, but does not improve OS and DFS and is unsuitable for high-risk patients unlikely to benefit from further treatments.

Is Lymphadenectomy Reasonable for Elderly Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Patients?

BACKGROUND

In this study, we aimed to determine the impact of lymphadenectomy (LND) on clinical outcomes in ICC patients aged ≥ 70 years.

METHODS

Four hundred and three eligible patients diagnosed with ICC who underwent hepatectomy between 2004 and 2019 were enrolled in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The impact of LND on perioperative mortality and overall survival (OS) as well as the optimal total number of lymph nodes examined (TNLE) was estimated.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-nine pairs of patients were matched by propensity score matching. Perioperative mortality was comparable between the LND and non-LND (nLND) groups (0.7% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.367). The median OS in the LND group was significantly longer (44 vs. 32 months, P = 0.045) and LND was identified as an independent protective factor for OS by multivariate analysis (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.92, P = 0.014). Patients with the following characteristics were potential beneficiaries of LND: white, female, no/moderate fibrosis, tumor size > 5 cm, solitary tumor, and localized invasion (all P < 0.05). TNLE ≥ 6 had the greatest discriminatory power for identifying lymph node metastasis (area under the curve, 0.704, Youden index, 0.365, P = 0.002). Patients with pathologically confirmed lymph node metastasis are likely to benefit from adjuvant therapy (40 months vs. 4 months, P = 0.052).

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced age (≥ 70 years) was not a contraindication for LND, which facilitates accurate nodal staging and guides postoperative management. Appropriately selected elderly populations could benefit from LND.

New Insights into Surgical Management of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma in the Era of “Transplant Oncology”

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) represents the second most frequent type of primary liver neoplasm. The diagnosis and treatment of patients with iCCA involves many challenges. To date, surgical resection with negative margins is the main curative option, achieving an acceptable long-term survival. Despite enabling a considerable improvement in the outcome, iCCA recurrence after surgery is still common. Tumor extension and the histological subtype, as well as vascular and lymph node involvements, are key factors used to define the prognosis. In this narrative review, we aimed to discuss the potential benefits of using different surgical strategies in the field of iCCA, including vascular resection, the mini-invasive approach, liver transplantation, the mechanism used to enable future liver remnant augmentation, and lymph node dissection. We also discussed the new protocols developed in the field of systemic treatment, including immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy. Recent advancements in the diagnosis, surgical treatment, and understanding of tumor biology have changed the landscape in terms of treatment options. Creating a multidisciplinary tumor board is essential to achieving the best patient outcomes. Further investigational trials are required with the intent of tailoring the treatments and establishing the right patient population who would benefit from the use of new therapeutics algorithms.

The optimal number of examined lymph nodes for accurate staging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A multi-institutional analysis using the nodal staging score model

BACKGROUND

This study aims to develop a nodal staging score (NSS) to determine the optimal number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) patients.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic data were collected from the SEER database (development cohort, n = 2782) and seven Chinese tertiary hospitals (validation cohort, n = 363). NSS was constructed based on a binomial distribution to indicate the probability of nodal disease absence. In addition, its prognostic value was examined by survival analysis and multivariable modeling on pN0 patients.

RESULTS

A model fit was performed in node-positive patients and a subgroup analysis was performed according to clinical characteristics. Statistically significant differences were only found in the subgroups when divided by the tumor size of 3 cm. As the number of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) increased, the likelihood of missing a metastatic LN decreased. NSS escalated as ELNs increased in groups with different tumor sizes, with plateaus at 7 and 11 LNs ensuring an NSS of 90.0% for ≤3 cm and >3 cm tumors, respectively. For pN0 patients, multivariate analysis revealed that NSS was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

CONCLUSIONS

For accurate staging of iCCA, the optimal number of ELNs was related to tumor size. We recommend that at least 7 and 11 LNs should be examined for tumor size ≤3 cm and >3 cm, respectively. Therefore, the NSS model could be helpful to make clinical decisions for pN0 iCCA.

Association of Laparoscopic Surgery with Improved Perioperative and Survival Outcomes in Patients with Resectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis from Propensity-Score Matched Studies

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have associated laparoscopic surgery with better overall survival (OS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). The potential benefits of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) over open liver resection (OLR) have not been demonstrated in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC).

METHODS

A systematic review of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases was performed to search studies comparing OS and perioperative outcome for patients with resectable iCC. Propensity-score matched (PSM) studies published from database inception to May 1, 2022 were eligible. A frequentist, patient-level, one-stage meta-analysis was performed to analyze the differences in OS between LLR and OLR. Second, intraoperative, postoperative, and oncological outcomes were compared between the two approaches by using a random-effects DerSimonian-Laird model.

RESULTS

Six PSM studies involving data from 1.042 patients (530 OLR vs. 512 LLR) were included. LLR in patients with resectable iCC was found to significantly decrease the hazard of death (stratified hazard ratio [HR]: 0.795 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.638-0.992]) compared with OLR. Moreover, LLR appears to be significantly associated with a decrease in intraoperative bleeding (- 161.47 ml [95% CI - 237.26 to - 85.69 ml]) and transfusion (OR = 0.41 [95% CI 0.26-0.69]), as well as with a shorter hospital stay (- 3.16 days [95% CI - 4.98 to - 1.34]) and a lower rate of major (Clavien-Dindo ≥III) complications (OR = 0.60 [95% CI 0.39-0.93]).

CONCLUSIONS

This large meta-analysis of PSM studies shows that LLR in patients with resectable iCC is associated with improved perioperative outcomes and, being conservative, yields similar OS outcomes compared with OLR.

Adjuvant therapy of biliary tract cancers

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are rare and heterogeneous malignant tumours including cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer. They are very aggressive, often refractory to chemotherapy and associated with an overall poor prognosis. Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment option but less than 35% present with resectable disease. Adjuvant treatments have been widely used but until recently, supportive data were limited to non-randomised, non-controlled retrospective studies. Recent evidence from the BILCAP trial has established adjuvant capecitabine as the standard of care. But there are still unanswered questions as to the role of adjuvant therapy. Further prospective data and translational research with reproducible evidence of clinical benefit are needed. In this review of adjuvant therapy in resectable BTCs, we will summarise the latest evidence setting current treatment standards and highlight future prospects.

The impact of tumor location on the value of lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy (LND) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients remains ill-defined. We sought to analyze the therapeutic value of LND relative to tumor location and preoperative lymph node metastasis (LNM) risk.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative-intent hepatic resection of ICC between 1990 and 2020 were included from a multi-institutional database. Therapeutic LND (tLND) was defined as LND that harvested ≥3 lymph nodes.

RESULTS

Among 662 patients, 178 (26.9%) individuals received tLND. Patients were categorized into central type ICC (n = 156, 23.6%) and peripheral type ICC (n = 506, 76.4%). Central type harbored multiple adverse clinicopathologic factors and worse overall survival (OS) compared with peripheral type (5-year OS, central: 27.0% vs. peripheral: 47.2%, p < 0.001). After consideration of preoperative LNM risk, patients with central type and high-risk LNM who underwent tLND survived longer than individuals who did not (5-year OS, tLND: 27.9% vs. non-tLND: 9.0%, p = 0.001), whereas tLND was not associated with better survival among patients with peripheral type ICC or low-risk LNM. The therapeutic index of hepatoduodenal ligament (HDL) and other regions was higher in central type than in peripheral type, which was more pronounced among high-risk LNM patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Central type ICC with high-risk LNM should undergo LND involving regions beyond the HDL.