Merits and boundaries of the BCLC staging and treatment algorithm: Learning from the past to improve the future with a novel proposal

Tumor biology characteristics score based on alpha-fetoprotein and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist II as a predictor for recurrence and survival after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

Current hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) staging systems lack comprehensive assessment of tumor biologic characteristics. This study aimed to develop and validate a tumor biology characteristics score (TBCS) based on alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist II (PIVKA-II) to predict long-term oncologic outcomes after HCC resection.

METHODS

In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent curative resection for HCC between June 2018 and December 2022 were included. TBCS (range, 2-6 points) was calculated by combining preoperative AFP (<20, 20-199, and ≥200 ng/mL) and PIVKA-II levels (<40, 40-399, and ≥400 mAU/mL). Patients were stratified into low (2 points), medium (3-4 points), and high TBCS groups (5-6 points). The primary outcomes were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 695 patients were analyzed; the low, medium, and high TBCS groups comprised 132 (19.0%), 233 (33.5%), and 330 patients (47.5%), respectively. Notably, 5-year RFS was 30.4%, 14.7%, and 9.7%, whereas 5-year OS was 42.1%, 35.5%, and 23.5% for low, medium, and high TBCS groups, respectively (both P <.001). Multivariate analysis identified TBCS as an independent predictor of both RFS (medium TBCS: hazard ratio [HR], 1.583; 95% CI, 1.219-2.057; P =.001; high TBCS: HR, 1.895; 95% CI, 1.473-2.438; P <.001) and OS (high TBCS: HR, 1.781; 95% CI, 1.353-2.343; P <.001).

CONCLUSION

The novel TBCS combining AFP and PIVKA-II effectively stratified patients with HCC into distinct prognostic groups after curative-intent resection, independently predicting both RFS and OS. This score may help identify high-risk patients for more intense postoperative recurrence surveillance and receipt of adjuvant therapies.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma and the Role of Liver Transplantation: An Update and Review

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Multiple treatment modalities are available for the management of HCC, depending on its stage as determined by the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system. Because liver transplantation (LT) theoretically removes the cancer and replaces the organ at risk for future malignancy, LT is often considered the most definitive and one of the most efficacious treatment options for HCC. Nevertheless, the success and efficacy of liver transplantation depend on various tumor characteristics. As a result, multiple criteria have been developed to assess the appropriateness of a case of HCC for LT, with the pioneering Milan Criteria established in 1996. Over the past 20 to 30 years, these criteria have been critically evaluated, expanded, and often liberalized to make LT for patients with HCC a more universally applicable option. Furthermore, the development of other treatment modalities has enabled downstaging and bridging strategies for HCC prior to LT. In this narrative and comprehensive review, we provided an update on recent trends in the epidemiology of HCC, selection criteria for LT, implementation of LT across different regions, treatment modalities available as bridges, downstaging strategies, alternatives to LT, and, finally, post-LT surveillance.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: Revising the surgical approach in light of the concept of multiparametric therapeutic hierarchy

The clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is strongly influenced by several prognostic factors, mainly tumor stage, patient's health, liver function and specific characteristics of each intervention. The interplay between these factors should be carefully evaluated by a multidisciplinary tumor board. To support this, the novel "multiparametric therapeutic hierarchy" (MTH) concept has been recently proposed. This review will present the main features of available surgical treatments for HCC (liver transplantation, liver resection, ablation). Strengths and weaknesses are reported in the light of clinical decision making and of treatment allocation, with a special focus on the collocation of each treatment in the MTH framework and on how MTH may be useful in supporting clinical decision. Sequential treatments and their role to allow further surgical treatments will also be analyzed.

Explainable attention-enhanced heuristic paradigm for multi-view prognostic risk score development in hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

Existing prognostic staging systems depend on expensive manual extraction by pathologists, potentially overlooking latent patterns critical for prognosis, or use black-box deep learning models, limiting clinical acceptance. This study introduces a novel deep learning-assisted paradigm that complements existing approaches by generating interpretable, multi-view risk scores to stratify prognostic risk in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

METHODS

510 HCC patients were enrolled in an internal dataset (SYSUCC) as training and validation cohorts to develop the Hybrid Deep Score (HDS). The Attention Activator (ATAT) was designed to heuristically identify tissues with high prognostic risk, and a multi-view risk-scoring system based on ATAT established HDS from microscopic to macroscopic levels. HDS was also validated on an external testing cohort (TCGA-LIHC) with 341 HCC patients. We assessed prognostic significance using Cox regression and the concordance index (c-index).

RESULTS

The ATAT first heuristically identified regions where necrosis, lymphocytes, and tumor tissues converge, particularly focusing on their junctions in high-risk patients. From this, this study developed three independent risk factors: microscopic morphological, co-localization, and deep global indicators, which were concatenated and then input into a neural network to generate the final HDS for each patient. The HDS demonstrated competitive results with hazard ratios (HR) (HR 3.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.91-5.43 in SYSUCC; HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.58-3.47 in TCGA-LIHC) and c-index values (0.751 in SYSUCC; 0.729 in TCGA-LIHC) for Disease-Free Survival (DFS). Furthermore, integrating HDS into existing clinical staging systems allows for more refined stratification, which enables the identification of potential high-risk patients within low-risk groups.

CONCLUSION

This novel paradigm, from identifying high-risk tissues to constructing prognostic risk scores, offers fresh insights into HCC research. Additionally, the integration of HDS complements the existing clinical staging system by facilitating more detailed stratification in DFS and Overall Survival (OS).

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis: A meta‑analysis

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with coexisting portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is associated with poor patient outcomes. The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with HCC with PVTT remain a subject of debate. In the present study, a comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library, was conducted to identify studies evaluating the outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with HCC and PVTT. The primary outcomes assessed were overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS), with complication rates as a secondary outcome. A total of six studies comprising 750 patients were included in the present meta-analysis. The neoadjuvant therapy group exhibited significantly superior OS [hazard ratio (HR), 0.39; P<0.001] and RFS (HR, 0.31; P<0.001) compared with the primary hepatectomy control group. Compared with the control group, neoadjuvant radiotherapy improved OS (HR, 0.34; P<0.001) and RFS (HR, 0.24; P=0.004). While the neoadjuvant intervention subgroup exhibited an improved OS compared with controls (HR, 0.37; P=0.001), no significant difference in RFS was observed (HR, 0.11; P=0.095). Geographical analysis revealed that the Chinese subgroup demonstrated a significantly improved OS and RFS (HR, 0.41 for both; P<0.001), compared with the control group. However, the Japanese and Korean subgroups showed no improvement in OS (HR, 0.25; P=0.057) compared with the control group, and the results did not reach statistical significance. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of blood transfusion, blood loss, operation time, bile leakage, ascites, peritoneal infection, postoperative bleeding, complications or mortality (all P>0.05). Overall, neoadjuvant therapy significantly improved survival outcomes in patients with HCC and PVTT without increasing complication rates, supporting its efficacy and manageable safety profile.

Machine learning model using immune indicators to predict outcomes in early liver cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) generally have good survival rates following surgical resection. However, a subset of these patients experience recurrence within five years post-surgery.

AIM

To develop predictive models utilizing machine learning (ML) methods to detect early-stage patients at a high risk of mortality.

METHODS

Eight hundred and eight patients with HCC at Beijing Ditan Hospital were randomly allocated to training and validation cohorts in a 2:1 ratio. Prognostic models were generated using random survival forests and artificial neural networks (ANNs). These ML models were compared with other classic HCC scoring systems. A decision-tree model was established to validate the contribution of immune-inflammatory indicators to the long-term outlook of patients with early-stage HCC.

RESULTS

Immune-inflammatory markers, albumin-bilirubin scores, alpha-fetoprotein, tumor size, and International Normalized Ratio were closely associated with the 5-year survival rates. Among various predictive models, the ANN model generated using these indicators through ML algorithms exhibited superior performance, with a 5-year area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85 (95%CI: 0.82-0.88). In the validation cohort, the 5-year AUC was 0.82 (95%CI: 0.74-0.85). According to the ANN model, patients were classified into high-risk and low-risk groups, with an overall survival hazard ratio of 7.98 (95%CI: 5.85-10.93, P < 0.0001) between the two cohorts.

CONCLUSION

A non-invasive, cost-effective ML-based model was developed to assist clinicians in identifying high-risk early-stage HCC patients with poor postoperative prognosis following surgical resection.

Hierarchically Positioning Laparoscopic Microwave Ablation in the Therapeutic Span of Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-Life Comparative Analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic microwave ablation (LMWA) has yet to gain a specific place in treatment guidelines for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study compared the outcomes of LMWA and trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for early non-resectable patients with HCC, taking percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) as the reference treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective multicenter observational study was conducted, enrolling non-transplantable, non-resectable patients who had early HCC treated with LMWA (n = 658) from Padua and Milan centers, and with PRFA (n = 844), and TACE (n = 425) from the ITA.LI.CA multicenter database. The matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) method was used to obtain weighted LMWA and TACE populations similar to the reference PRFA population.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic ablation showed an excellent safety profile, and MAIC-weighted early postoperative deaths were comparable among the groups. The MAIC-weighted overall survival was similar between the LMWA (1-, 3-, and 5 year survival of 91.0 %, 67.9 %, 47.0 %, respectively) and PRFA (1-, 3- and 5 year survivals of 90.0 %, 64.7 %, 46.6 %, respectively) groups (p = 0.678) and significantly better for the LMWA group than for the TACE group (1-, 3- and 5 year survivals of 84.7 %, 48.8 %, 33.6 %, respectively) (p < 0.001). Weighted multivariate overall survival analysis and competing risk/subgroup analyses confirmed the non-inferiority of LMWA to PRFA and its superiority to TACE. The LMWA- and PRFA-treated patients had a significantly lower risk of HCC-related death (p = 0.004) than the TACE-treated patients (p = 0.001). Conversely, the groups did not differ significantly in terms of non-HCC-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The non-inferiority of LMWA to PRFA, its superiority to TACE, and its applicability to a wide range of presentations with few contraindications support its inclusion among radical therapies for treating early-HCC patients.

Evaluation of screening program for hepatocellular carcinoma at a single center

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the seventh most common cancer in the world and is a form of liver cancer that starts in the cells of the liver. The best way to increase the chances of survival for people at high risk for HCC is to detect it early through regular monitoring. For monitoring purposes, it is recommended to conduct ultrasound exams every 4 to 6 months, sometimes in combination with alpha-fetoprotein tests.

Aim of the work

Assess the HCC surveillance and its ability to detect HCC patients early on and improve their management.

Patients and methods

The study involved 300 patients of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) investigated at Menoufia University’s Institute of National Liver in Egypt. Patients were evaluated using the Liver Cancer of Barcelona Clinic (BCLC) staging system. Furthermore, the patients were classified into three surveillance categories: no surveillance, routine surveillance, and sporadic surveillance.

Results

A substantial difference statistically among the groups that received and did not receive surveillance with consideration for the stage of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in particular was found. Patients who were observed usually got their diagnoses earlier. Those who were not under surveillance frequently had advanced cases of hepatocellular carcinoma upon diagnosis (HCC).

Conclusion

High-risk patients were regularly investigated for having HCC is necessary for early disease detection, appropriate therapy, and improved survival. Consistent monitoring with AFP and ultrasound allows for early detection of HCC.

Comparison of laparoscopic hepatectomy and radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a SEER population-based propensity score matching study

This study was designed to compare the efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in terms of their therapeutic effect on small hepatocellular carcinoma (SHCC). The SEER database was employed to integrate SHCC patients who had received treatment with either LH (n = 1132) or RFA (n = 797). The LH group (n = 623) and the RFA group (n = 623) were matched with 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) in order to reduce the possibility of selection bias. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression method were employed to ascertain the prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Both before and after PSM, the 1, 3 and 5-years OS and DSS were significantly higher in the LH groups compared to the RFA group. Besides, for SHCC with tumor size ≤ 2cm (n = 418), even P values not reaching statistical significance, the survival curves were compatible with a superiority of LH over RFA for OS and DSS in overall (P = 0.054 and P = 0.077), primary SHCC (P = 0.110 and P = 0.058) and recurrent SHCC (P = 0.068 and P = 1.000) cohorts. In contrast, for SHCC with tumor size between 2 and 3 cm (n = 828), LH group always had a better OS and DSS in the all cohorts (all P < 0.05). In addition, higher AFP level, poor differentiation grade, recurrent tumor and treatment type were independent prognostic factors for OS, while poor differentiation grade, larger tumor size and treatment type were the independent prognostic factors for DSS (all P < 0.05). LH was associated with better OS and DSS than RFA in SHCC patients. Even in tumor size ≤ 2 cm, LH still should be the first choice as its long-term survival benefits.

The Neoangiogenic Transcriptomic Signature Impacts Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prognosis and Can Be Triggered by Transarterial Chemoembolization Treatment

Background/Objectives: We evaluated the relationship between the neoangiogenic transcriptomic signature (nTS) and clinical symptoms, treatment outcomes, and survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Methods: This study prospectively followed 328 patients in the derivation and 256 in the validation cohort (with a median follow-up of 31 and 22 months, respectively). The nTS was associated with disease presentation, treatments administered, and overall survival rates. Additionally, this study investigated how multiple treatments influenced changes in nTS status and alterations in microRNA expression. Results: The nTS was identified in 27.4% of patients, linked to aggressive features like multifocality and elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), a pattern consistent with that of the validation cohort. Most patients in both cohorts received treatment for HCC. nTS+ patients had limited access to, and benefited less from, liver transplantation or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) compared to nTS- patients. By the end, 78.9% had died, with nTS- patients showing better median survival and response to treatments than their nTS+ counterparts, who had lower survival across all treatment types. Among those who received transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), 31.2% (21/80 patients after the initial treatment and another four following a second TACE) transitioned from an nTS- to an nTS+ status. This shift was associated with lower survival and alterations in microRNA expressions related to oncogenic pathways. Conclusions: The nTS markedly influences treatment eligibility and survival in patients with HCC. Notably, the nTS can develop after repeated TACE procedures, significantly impacting patient survival and altering oncogenic microRNA expression patterns. These findings highlight the critical role of the nTS in guiding treatment decisions and prognostication in HCC management.

Hepatocellular carcinoma in HBsAg seroclearance: clinical features, recurrence, and prognosis following curative hepatectomy

Aim

To explore clinical features and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg)-serocleared patients and identify risk factors associated with postoperative recurrence after curative hepatectomy.

Methods

Patients who had undergone initial hepatectomy for HCC from January 2010 through December 2022. Clinicopathological data were compared between HBsAg-seropositive and HBsAg-serocleared patients. Furthermore, risk factors associated with early and late postoperative HCC recurrence (early and late recurrences (ER and LR), respectively) were analyzed for HBsAg-serocleared HCC patients treated by curative hepatectomy.

Results

A total of 2184 consecutive patients undergoing initial hepatectomy for HCC were enrolled, including 339 (15.5%) HBsAg-serocleared and 1845 (84.5%) HBsAg-seropositive cases. Tumor characteristics were comparable between the two groups. After curative hepatectomy, the ER rate was lower in the HBsAg-serocleared group than in the HBsAg-seropositive group (16.2% vs 26.3%; p = 0.000). LR rates in the HBsAg-seropositive and HBsAg-serocleared groups were similar (8.3% vs 6.9%, respectively, p = 0.418). Multivariate analysis showed that among HBsAg-serocleared patients, Hong Kong Liver Cancer stage and microvascular invasion were risk factors associated with postoperative ER, while γ-glutamyl transferase level and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were associated with LR.

Conclusion

HBsAg-serocleared and HBsAg-seropositive HCC patients exhibited similar tumor characteristics. Curative hepatectomy-treated HBsAg-serocleared HCC patients experienced a lower ER rate and better short-term (⩽3 years) overall survival (OS) rates than their HBsAg-seropositive counterparts. LR, very late recurrence, and long-term (4-, and 5-year) OS rates were similar between the two groups.

Biomarkers for diagnosis and therapeutic options in hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver cancer is a global health challenge, causing a significant social-economic burden. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the predominant type of primary liver cancer, which is highly heterogeneous in terms of molecular and cellular signatures. Early-stage or small tumors are typically treated with surgery or ablation. Currently, chemotherapies and immunotherapies are the best treatments for unresectable tumors or advanced HCC. However, drug response and acquired resistance are not predictable with the existing systematic guidelines regarding mutation patterns and molecular biomarkers, resulting in sub-optimal treatment outcomes for many patients with atypical molecular profiles. With advanced technological platforms, valuable information such as tumor genetic alterations, epigenetic data, and tumor microenvironments can be obtained from liquid biopsy. The inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity of HCC are illustrated, and these collective data provide solid evidence in the decision-making process of treatment regimens. This article reviews the current understanding of HCC detection methods and aims to update the development of HCC surveillance using liquid biopsy. Recent critical findings on the molecular basis, epigenetic profiles, circulating tumor cells, circulating DNAs, and omics studies are elaborated for HCC diagnosis. Besides, biomarkers related to the choice of therapeutic options are discussed. Some notable recent clinical trials working on targeted therapies are also highlighted. Insights are provided to translate the knowledge into potential biomarkers for detection and diagnosis, prognosis, treatment response, and drug resistance indicators in clinical practice.

Gut Microbiota, Deranged Immunity, and Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Liver cancer, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is a significant gastrointestinal disease with a mortality rate as high as nearly 80% within five years. The disease's pathophysiology involves deranged immune responses and bile acid metabolism, with the gut microbiota (GM) playing a crucial role. Recent research highlights the potential of GM in influencing HCC treatment outcomes, especially regarding immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, few patients currently benefit from ICIs due to a lack of effective response biomarkers.

AIMS AND METHODS

This review aimed to explore the literature on HCC treatment issues, focusing on immune response, bile acid metabolism, and GM dysbiosis. This review included studies from PubMed, Medline, and major gastroenterology and hepatology meetings, using keywords like gut microbiota, immune system, liver cancer, and checkpoint inhibitors.

RESULTS

GM dysbiosis significantly impacts immune response and bile acid metabolism, making it a promising biomarker for ICI response. Modulating GM can enhance ICI treatment efficacy, although more research is needed to confirm its direct therapeutic benefits for HCC.

CONCLUSIONS

GM dysbiosis is integral to liver cancer pathogenesis and treatment response. Its modulation offers promising therapeutic avenues for improving HCC prognosis and response to immunotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of HAIC combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus HAIC monotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter propensity score matching analysis

Purpose

This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of the combined approach involving hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Patients and methods

In this multicenter retrospective study conducted from January 2020 to December 2023, we reviewed advanced HCC patients who were treated either with HAIC alone or with a combination of HAIC and TKIs. To address initial disparities between the two groups, we employed propensity score matching (PSM). Tumor response evaluation was performed following RECIST 1.1 criteria. We compared survival outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR), between the two treatment groups. Safety assessments were conducted for all patients.

Results

Following the eligibility review, 138 patients underwent combined treatment with HAIC and TKIs (HT group), while 198 patients received HAIC monotherapy (HA group) and met the inclusion criteria for enrollment in this study. After PSM, 107 patients were assigned to each group. The HT group exhibited a longer median OS (18.0 versus 8.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.52, p < 0.001) compared to the HA group. Median PFS was also longer in the HT group, although without statistical significance (6.0 versus 4.7 months; HR, 0.85, p = 0.265). The HT group demonstrated a higher ORR (41.1% versus 25.2%; p = 0.020). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the incidence of all adverse events (AEs) or grade 3/4 AEs (any grade: 81.2% for HT versus 78.8% for HA, p = 0.68; grade 3/4: 18.1% for HT versus 13.6% for HA, p = 0.29). Importantly, all AEs were manageable and acceptable. Notably, no grade 5 AEs occurred in either group.

Conclusion

Combination therapy involving HAIC and TKIs effectively prolonged survival in advanced HCC patients. It represented a preferable alternative to HAIC monotherapy, with manageable safety.

Hepatocellular carcinoma-the role of the underlying liver disease in clinical practice

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related mortality. This particular type of cancer has the distinctive characteristic of mostly happening in individuals with an underlying liver disease. This makes the management of patients more challenging, since physicians must take into consideration two different conditions, the chronic liver disease and the tumor. The underlying liver disease has several implications in clinical practice, because different kinds of chronic liver disease can lead to varying degrees of risk of developing HCC, obstacles in surveillance, and differences in the efficacy of the treatment against HCC. A shift in the prevalence of liver diseases has been evident over the last few years, with viral hepatitis gradually losing the leading position as cause of HCC and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease gaining importance. Therefore, in an era of personalized medicine, it is imperative that physicians are aware of the underlying liver disease of individuals with HCC and its impact in the management of their tumors.

Mitochondria-Derived Vesicles, Sterile Inflammation, and Pyroptosis in Liver Cancer: Partners in Crime or Innocent Bystanders?

Alterations in cellular signaling, chronic inflammation, and tissue remodeling contribute to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development. The release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) upon tissue injury and the ensuing sterile inflammation have also been attributed a role in HCC pathogenesis. Cargoes of extracellular vesicles (EVs) and/or EVs themselves have been listed among circulating DAMPs but only partially investigated in HCC. Mitochondria-derived vesicles (MDVs), a subpopulation of EVs, are another missing link in the comprehension of the molecular mechanisms underlying the onset and progression of HCC biology. EVs have been involved in HCC growth, dissemination, angiogenesis, and immunosurveillance escape. The contribution of MDVs to these processes is presently unclear. Pyroptosis triggers systemic inflammation through caspase-dependent apoptotic cell death and is implicated in tumor immunity. The analysis of this process, together with MDV characterization, may help capture the relationship among HCC development, mitochondrial quality control, and inflammation. The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (i.e., atezolizumab and bevacizumab) has been approved as a synergistic first-line systemic treatment for unresectable or advanced HCC. The lack of biomarkers that may allow prediction of treatment response and, therefore, patient selection, is a major unmet need. Herein, we overview the molecular mechanisms linking mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation, and pyroptosis, and discuss how immunotherapy targets, at least partly, these routes.

Insights into Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Pathophysiology to Novel Therapies

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common primary liver cancer, accounts for 830,180 related deaths worldwide in 2020, according to GLOBOCAN, representing the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death, with a five-year survival rate of about 18% for advanced stage, and the second leading cause in men of cancer-related mortality worldwide [...].

What Is the Role of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery in Treating Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Cirrhosis?

Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) has been slowly introduced in the past two decades and today represents a major weapon in the fight against HCC, for several reasons. This narrative review conveys the major emerging concepts in the field. The rise in metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)-related HCC means that patients with significant cardiovascular risk will benefit more profoundly from MILS. The advent of efficacious therapy is leading to conversion from non-resectable to resectable cases, and therefore more patients will be able to undergo MILS. In fact, resection outcomes with MILS are superior compared to open surgery both in the short and long term. Furthermore, indications to surgery may be further expanded by its use in Child B7 patients and by the use of laparoscopic ablation, a curative technique, instead of trans-arterial approaches in cases not amenable to radiofrequency. Therefore, in a promising new approach, multi-parametric treatment hierarchy, MILS is hierarchically superior to open surgery and comes second only to liver transplantation.