Microbial contamination of non-invasive ventilation devices used by adults with cystic fibrosis

Exhaled gases and the potential for cross-infection via noninvasive ventilation machines

Use of long-term ventilation (LTV) benefits patients with a diverse range of conditions, including Duchenne muscular dystrophy, motor neurone disease and scoliosis [1]. Patients with pulmonary disease as well as neuromuscular disease can benefit from LTV. COPD patients treated with LTV experience a reduction in hospital admissions and the use of LTV in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients is increasing [2, 3].

Guidelines suggest that exhaled gases do not reach the outlet of noninvasive ventilators in clinical use. In this study, when tidal volumes exceeded 800 mL, exhaled gases did reach the ventilator, leading to a risk of cross-infection between users.https://bit.ly/3EdvtY6

Persistent Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection associated with non-invasive ventilation in a child with spinal muscular atrophy type 1

NONE

Current standards of care suggest the use of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIV) in children with spinal muscular atrophy and symptomatic respiratory failure. Theoretical concerns exist regarding NIV equipment as a source of infection in restrictive lung disease due to the possibility of prolonged NIV device use, greater risk in acquiring infections, and difficulties in managing and clearing infections. NIV devices may draw pathogens through the air inlet port that may contaminate the internal surfaces. These pathogens may then infect children with spinal muscular atrophy. We present a case of 2 genetically identical Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultures from both the patient's NIV device and from nasopharyngeal samples. This infection persisted both in nasopharyngeal aspirate cultures and from NIV equipment cultures despite the use of an eradication program involving both the child and the NIV device.

Cleaning and infection control of airway clearance devices used by CF patients

Respiratory treatment for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients includes use of respiratory devices. Contamination of airway clearance devices has not been adequately explored. We aimed to determine whether airway clearance devices are contaminated after use and whether cleaning guidelines for nebulizers are as effective for airway clearance devices. Patients brought their airway clearance devices to the clinic. Swabs from the devices were taken before and after cleaning and were cultured for bacterial counts. Total colony-forming units (CFU) was determined, and predominant colonies were identified using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry technology. Thirty devices were collected from 23 patients. Most of the devices (28/30) were contaminated when brought to the clinic. Complete bacterial eradication was achieved in 15 (50%) samples and partial eradication in 9 (30%). The cleaning was totally ineffective in four samples. Median CFU decreased significantly from 1250 (IQR 25–75% 175–10.000) to 0 (IQR 25–75% 0–700) before and after cleaning (p < 0.0001). The predominant organisms were identified in five samples only, and there was no concordance with sputum culture results. Airway clearance devices are contaminated after use, and appropriate cleaning can reduce contamination. The effect on disease progression in CF patients is unclear. There is a need for infection prevention and control guidelines for the growing number of respiratory devices.