1
|
Meesters K, Chappell F, Demirjian A. Trends in Antibiotic Use in a Large Children's Hospital in London (United Kingdom): 5 Years of Point Prevalence Surveys. Antibiotics (Basel) 2024; 13:172. [PMID: 38391558 PMCID: PMC10886203 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13020172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Antibiotics are commonly prescribed in paediatrics. As their excessive use contributes to adverse drug events, increased healthcare costs, and antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial stewardship initiatives are essential to optimising medical care. These single-centre point prevalence surveys aimed to provide insights into antibiotic prescribing trends and identify targets for paediatric AMS activities. Methods: 14 point prevalence surveys were conducted from March 2016-April 2021, collecting data on antibiotic prescriptions, indication, adherence to guidelines, and route of administration. The UK adapted the World Health Organisation's AWaRe classification-guided antibiotic categorization. Results: 32.5% of all inpatients were on at least one antimicrobial; this remained stable during all surveys (range: 20-44%, p = 0.448). Of all prescriptions, 67.2% had an end- or review-date, and the majority was for agents in the Watch category (46.8-70.5%). Amoxicillin and clavulanate were the most frequently prescribed antibiotics (20.8%), followed by gentamicin (15.3%). Approximately 28.8% of all prescriptions were for prophylactic indications, while 7.6% of the prescriptions were not adherent to the hospital guidelines. Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of ongoing monitoring and robust AMS initiatives to ensure prudent antibiotic prescribing in paediatric healthcare. It underscores the need for tailored guidelines, educational efforts, and targeted interventions to enhance the quality of antibiotic usage, ultimately benefiting both individual patients and public health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Meesters
- Department of Paediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Evelina London Children's Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6H 3V4, Canada
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada
| | - Faye Chappell
- Department of Paediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Evelina London Children's Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Alicia Demirjian
- Department of Paediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Evelina London Children's Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK
- Healthcare-Associated Infection (HCAI), Fungal, Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR), Antimicrobial Use (AMU) & Sepsis Division, United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London NW9 5EQ, UK
- Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Poluektova O, Robertson DA, Rafferty A, Cunney R, Lunn PD. A scoping review and behavioural analysis of factors underlying overuse of antimicrobials. JAC Antimicrob Resist 2023; 5:dlad043. [PMID: 37168837 PMCID: PMC10164659 DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlad043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Overuse of antimicrobials is a challenging global issue that contributes to antimicrobial resistance. Despite widespread awareness of the problem among members of the medical community and various attempts to improve prescription practices, existing antimicrobial stewardship programmes are not always effective. In our view, this may reflect limited understanding of factors that influence prescription of antimicrobials as empirical therapy, implying a need to address the psychological mechanisms behind some of the specific behaviours involved. Objectives To identify factors that influence the antimicrobials prescription as empirical therapy, and to relate these factors to findings from behavioural science. Methods We conducted a scoping review of the literature on the factors underlying antimicrobial prescription decisions, following the protocol designed using PRISMA guidelines. Results and conclusions From a final sample of 90 sources, we identified ten factors important in antimicrobial prescription decisions. In the second stage of our analysis, we grouped them into five final categories: (1) nature of the decision, (2) social influences, (3) individual differences, (4) characteristics of the patient, (5) context. We analyse these categories using a behavioural science perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Deirdre A Robertson
- Behavioural Research Unit, The Economic and Social Research Institute, Whitaker Square, Sir John Rogerson’s Quay, Ireland
- Trinity College Dublin, School of Psychology, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Aisling Rafferty
- Children’s Health Ireland, Department of Pharmacy, Dublin, Ireland
- University of Birmingham, School of Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Sciences,Birmingham, UK
| | - Robert Cunney
- Children’s Health Ireland, Irish Meningitis and Sepsis Reference Laboratory, Dublin, Ireland
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Department of Microbiology, Dublin, Ireland
- Children’s Health Ireland, Department of Microbiology, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Peter D Lunn
- Behavioural Research Unit, The Economic and Social Research Institute, Whitaker Square, Sir John Rogerson’s Quay, Ireland
- Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Development of a Novel Assessment Tool and Code Sepsis Checklist for Neonatal Late-Onset Sepsis. Adv Neonatal Care 2022; 22:6-14. [PMID: 34334674 DOI: 10.1097/anc.0000000000000896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate diagnosis and timely management of neonatal late-onset sepsis (nLOS) have been less well-studied than those of early-onset sepsis. We noticed a delay in nLOS detection and management in our neonatal intensive care unit. PURPOSE To develop an assessment tool to aid in the recognition and reporting of nLOS and to standardize the management process once sepsis is recognized. METHODS The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) improvement model provided the framework for interventions for our antibiotic stewardship program, including the aims of this project. A literature review was performed to evaluate tools and other literature available to guide the evaluation and management of suspected sepsis. A quality improvement project was initiated to develop tools for the detection and management of nLOS. RESULTS An nLOS assessment tool to help identify neonates at risk for nLOS and a Code Sepsis checklist to standardize the process of evaluation and management of nLOS were developed. The guiding principles of this tool development were empowerment of nurses to initiate the assessment process, clarification of team roles, and removal of barriers to appropriate antibiotic administration. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Useful and practical tools valued by nursing and the multidisciplinary team may facilitate timely identification and treatment of infants with nLOS. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH Future directions include validation of the nLOS assessment tool and the Code Sepsis checklist as well as ensuring the reliability of the tool to improve detection of nLOS and to reduce time to administer antibiotics in cases of nLOS.
Collapse
|
4
|
Woods-Hill CZ, Xie A, Lin J, Wolfe HA, Plattner AS, Malone S, Chiotos K, Szymczak JE. OUP accepted manuscript. JAC Antimicrob Resist 2022; 4:dlab195. [PMID: 35098126 PMCID: PMC8794647 DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlab195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Antimicrobial and diagnostic stewardship initiatives have become increasingly important in paediatric settings. The value of qualitative approaches to conduct stewardship work in paediatric patients is being increasingly recognized. This article seeks to provide an introduction to basic elements of qualitative study designs and provide an overview of how these methods have successfully been applied to both antimicrobial and diagnostic stewardship work in paediatric patients. A multidisciplinary team of experts in paediatric infectious diseases, paediatric critical care and qualitative methods has written a perspective piece introducing readers to qualitative stewardship work in children, intended as an overview to highlight the importance of such methods and as a starting point for further work. We describe key differences between qualitative and quantitative methods, and the potential benefits of qualitative approaches. We present examples of qualitative research in five discrete topic areas of high relevance for paediatric stewardship work: provider attitudes; provider prescribing behaviours; stewardship in low-resource settings; parents’ perspectives on stewardship; and stewardship work focusing on select high-risk patients. Finally, we explore the opportunities for multidisciplinary academic collaboration, incorporation of innovative scientific disciplines and young investigator growth through the use of qualitative research in paediatric stewardship. Qualitative approaches can bring rich insights and critically needed new information to antimicrobial and diagnostic stewardship efforts in children. Such methods are an important tool in the armamentarium against worsening antimicrobial resistance, and a major opportunity for investigators interested in moving the needle forward for stewardship in paediatric patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Z. Woods-Hill
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, 3641 Locust Walk # 210, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Corresponding author. E-mail:
| | - Anping Xie
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 750 E Pratt St., Baltimore, MD 21202, USA
| | - John Lin
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Heather A. Wolfe
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Alex S. Plattner
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Disease, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Sara Malone
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Disease, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Kathleen Chiotos
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Julia E. Szymczak
- The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, 3641 Locust Walk # 210, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Affiliation(s)
- C Lynch
- Healthcare Infection Society, Montagu House, Wakefield Street, London, WC1N, UK.
| | - N Mahida
- Healthcare Infection Society, Montagu House, Wakefield Street, London, WC1N, UK
| | - J Gray
- Healthcare Infection Society, Montagu House, Wakefield Street, London, WC1N, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Diagnostic Test Stewardship and Relevance of Culturing Practices. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2019; 21:50. [PMID: 31754887 DOI: 10.1007/s11908-019-0708-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common infections in the ICU. Prompt diagnosis is vital as mortality increases with delayed antibiotic therapy. However, accurate diagnosis is challenging due to non-specific clinical features in a complicated patient cohort. Microbiological culture data remains a crucial aspect in confirming diagnosis. RECENT FINDINGS Literature data comparing the benefit of invasive respiratory sampling to non-invasive is inconclusive. Differences in culturing practices translate in overidentification of organisms of unclear significance. Positive culture data in a low pre-test probability does not differentiate between true infection and colonization resulting in overtreatment. Furthermore, there are also opportunities for modifying the reporting of respiratory tract cultures that can better guide antimicrobial therapy. Under the umbrella of antimicrobial stewardship, diagnostic stewardship can be incorporated to create a systematic approach that would target culturing practices to match the right pre-test probability. Ideal outcome will be targeting cultures to the right patient population and minimizing unnecessary treatment.
Collapse
|