An analysis of women's and men's surgical priorities and willingness to have rheumatoid hand surgery

Adherence to Non-operative Clinical Quality Measures in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Background: Clinical quality measures exist for non-operative management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Factors predicting adherence are unclear. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients with chronic CTS using MarketScan Research Database (2015-2020) was conducted. Six logistic regression models were designed to study adherence to quality measures within 1 year after diagnosis. Results: Of 782,717 patients identified, 514,073 (65.7%) were female with an average (SD) age of 51.4 (13.4) years. Only 88 patients (0.01%) met all quality measures. Greatest compliance observed with receipt of nerve conduction study (NCS; 283,959 [36.3%]), no prescription of medications (336,297 [43.0%]) and no laser therapy (772,979 [98.8%]); 294,305 patients (37.6%) received hand surgeon referral. Hand surgeon referral predicted higher likelihood of NCS and splinting (OR, 1.83; 95% CI: 1.81-1.84; OR, 2.53; 95% CI: 2.50-2.56) and medication over-prescription (OR, 1.05; 95% CI: 1.00-1.10). Females were more likely to be referred to a hand surgeon and be referred for splinting (OR 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.03; OR 1.19; 95% CI: 1.18-1.21) but less likely to have no prescriptions or avoid laser therapy (OR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.84-0.85; OR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.79-0.86). Medicare recipients adhered less to quality measures compared to patients with fee-for-service insurance. As comorbidities increased, patients were less likely to receive hand surgeon referral and carpal tunnel release. Conclusions: Findings suggest that hand surgery referrals increased adherence to quality measures. Females, Medicare recipients and multimorbid patients should be targeted for improved care. Future quality care efforts should incentivise adherence for Medicare beneficiaries and improve guideline recognition amongst physicians. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

Development of a Machine Learning Model to Predict the Use of Surgery in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

One in five patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) rely on surgery to restore joint function. However, variable response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) complicates surgical planning, and it is difficult to predict which patients may ultimately require surgery. We used machine learning to develop predictive models for the likelihood of undergoing an operation related to RA and which type of operation patients who require surgery undergo.

METHODS

We used electronic health record data to train two extreme gradient boosting machine learning models. The first model predicted patients' probabilities of undergoing surgery ≥5 years after their initial clinic visit. The second model predicted whether patients who underwent surgery would undergo a major joint replacement versus a less intensive procedure. Predictors included demographics, comorbidities, and medication data. The primary outcome was model discrimination, measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

We identified 5,481 patients, of whom 278 (5.1%) underwent surgery. There was no significant difference in the frequency of DMARD or steroid prescriptions between patients who did and did not have surgery, though nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescriptions were more common among patients who did have surgery (P = 0.03). The model predicting use of surgery had an AUC of 0.90 ± 0.02. The model predicting type of surgery had an AUC of 0.58 ± 0.10.

CONCLUSIONS

Predictive models using clinical data have the potential to facilitate identification of patients who may undergo rheumatoid-related surgery, but not what type of procedure they will need. Integrating similar models into practice has the potential to improve surgical planning.

Health Disparities in Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery: A Scoping Review

PURPOSE

Social determinants of health (SDOH) are linked to poor health care outcomes across the different medical specialties. We conducted a scoping review to understand the existing literature and identify further areas of research to address disparities within hand surgery.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane was conducted. Inclusion criteria were English studies examining health disparities in hand surgery. The following were assessed: the main SDOH, study design/phase/theme, and main disease/injury/procedure. A previously described health disparities research framework was used to determine study phase: detecting (identifying risk factors), understanding (analyzing risk factors), and reducing (assessing interventions). Studies were categorized according to themes outlined at the National Institute of Health and American College of Surgeons: Summit on Surgical Disparities.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 446 articles, with 49 articles included in final analysis. The majority were detecting-type (31/49, 63%) or understanding-type (12/49, 24%) studies, with few reducing-type studies (6/49, 12%). Patient factors (31/49, 63%) and systemic/access factors (16/49, 33%) were the most frequently studied themes, with few investigating clinical care/quality factors (4/49, 8%), clinician factors (3/49, 6%), and postoperative/rehabilitation factors (1/49, 2%). The most commonly studied SDOH include insurance status (13/49, 27%), health literacy (10/49, 20%), and social deprivation (6/49, 12%). Carpal tunnel syndrome (9/49, 18%), upper extremity trauma (9/49, 18%), and amputations (5/49, 10%) were frequently assessed. Most investigations involved retrospective or database designs (29/49, 59%), while few were prospective, cross-sectional, or mixed-methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite an encouraging upward trend in health disparities research, existing studies are in the early phases of investigation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Most of the literature focuses on patient factors and systemic/access factors in regard to insurance status. Further work with prospective, cross-sectional, and mixed-method studies is needed to better understand health disparities in hand surgery, which will inform future interventions.

Long-term clinical outcome of tendon transfer and tendon graft for extensor tendon ruptures in rheumatoid hands

Purpose

To evaluate the objective and subjective long-term clinical outcomes of tendon transfer and tendon graft for extensor tendon ruptures in rheumatoid hands.

Methods

We evaluated the long-term clinical outcomes of tendon transfer and tendon graft for extensor tendon ruptures in rheumatoid hands of 37 patients (43 hands) followed up for a mean of 14 years (range, 10–21 years).

Results

The mean time from rupture to surgery was 13.1 weeks (range, 3–48 weeks). The mean extension lag of the metacarpophalangeal joint was 8.7° (range, 0–40°), the mean pulp-to-palm distance was 0.4 cm (range, 0–3 cm), and the mean overall satisfaction rate was 86.5 (range, 70–100). There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between tendon transfers and tendon grafts. There was a significant correlation between extension lag of the metacarpophalangeal joint and overall satisfaction rate (R² = 0.155; p = 0.009). Time to surgery was significantly correlated with extension lag of the metacarpophalangeal joint (R² = 0.437; p = 0.001) in the tendon graft group.

Conclusions

Both tendon transfer and tendon graft for extensor tendon ruptures in rheumatoid hands achieve satisfactory results that are maintained for an average of 14 years. In cases of tendon graft, the time to surgery should be considered, and there is concern over extension lag of MP joint.

Level of Evidence

IV

Assessment of Rheumatoid Hand Function as a Characteristic Feature of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients Treated with Methotrexate or Methotrexate with Biological Agents with and without Deformation of Hands

BACKGROUND

The hand is an excellent work tool that provides the functional ability to mechanical work. The hand is affected in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, it is a significant problem in the functional sphere as a result of deformities, the grasping function limitation and muscle strength.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was the assessment of grip strength, endurance and manipulation abilities of rheumatoid hands with or without deformities treated with methotrexate (MTX) or MTX plus biologics (MTX+BIO).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study involved 80 RA women, (40 received MTX+BIO, 40 MTX), treated at the Rheumatology Department of the Central Clinical Hospital of Interior Affairs in Warsaw. VAS-pain, DAS28, SDAI, HAQ, HAQ hands, estimation of hand grip strength, endurance, manipulation ability were analyzed.

RESULTS

In group MTX+BIO values of DAS28 (3.7±1.3 vs 4.3±1.2, p=0.019), HAQ (0.72 ± 0.57 vs 1.08± 0.87, p=0.011) and HAQ-hand (0.85±0.65 vs. 1.19±0.68, p=0.024) were statistically lower than in MTX group. Hand deformations recorded in 35 (43.7%) cases, 16 (40%) in MTX group, 19 (47.5%) in MTX+BIO. Comparison of grip strength, endurance, manipulation ability showed better results in MTX+BIO group with deformities (significance level from 0.013 to 0.046) than in MTX group. Relative differences in hand function in MTX + BIO group ranged from 10.8% (maximal power grip strength) to 127.6% (minimal hand endurance), after disease duration adjustment - from 28.2% (maximal power grip strength) to 148.4% (minimal hand endurance).

CONCLUSION

Measuring grip strength, hand endurance, manipulation abilities are useful in RA patients with hand deformities.

Time from Booking Until Appointment and Healthcare Utilization in Hand Surgery Patients with Discretionary Conditions

Delaying treatment for benign musculoskeletal conditions may allow patients to learn self-efficacy and develop coping strategies, leading to less medical intervention and reduced cost. We tested the hypothesis that time from booking until appointment is not associated with healthcare costs. We further tested the secondary hypothesis that time from booking to appointment is not associated with specific healthcare utilizations. We identified 16,750 patients (55 % women; mean age 50 years) making first clinic visits to hand surgeons at our hospital between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2012. Booking time was defined as the time between the scheduling of an appointment and the actual visit. Imaging procedures, injections, nerve conduction studies, occupational therapy visits, surgery, and referrals were determined up until the patient's second visit with the surgeon, or 90 days. Costs were determined in Relative Value Units. Duration between booking and office visit was not associated with higher cost (regression coefficient [β] 0.0023, P = 0.77). Duration between booking and office visit was associated with a higher rate of nerve conduction studies (odds ratio [OR] 1.02, P < 0.001) and a lower rate of occupational therapy (OR 0.98, P < 0.001). There was substantial variation between surgeons. Greater wait time was not therapeutic, but is associated with different diagnostic and treatment measures that suggest people that are willing to wait have different types of problems. The variation by surgeon may make variation based on other factors, including time between booking and appointment, difficult to discern.

Rheumatoid hand surgery: is there a decline? A 22-year population-based study

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common idiopathic inflammatory arthritis affecting 0.8 % of the population. It can cause significant hand and wrist damage and dysfunction. Recent advances in anti-rheumatic treatments have the potential to decrease the prevalence of hand deformities in patients with RA. Our aim was to investigate whether there has been a decline over 22-years in the number of hand surgical procedures being undertaken for patients with RA and whether this correlates with the introduction of new anti-rheumatic therapies.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, population-based (Derbyshire) study of all patients with RA who underwent hand surgery at the Pulvertaft Hand Centre from 1990 to 2012. Index procedures included (1) teno-synovectomy and soft tissue procedures, (2) wrist arthrodesis/arthroplasty and (3) finger arthrodesis.

RESULTS

A total of 297 procedures were performed in 153 Derbyshire patients with RA over the 22-year period, with mean age at surgery 59 years (range 24-88 years). The female to male ratio was 2.5:1. The overall trend showed a peak in 2004 and a subsequent decline thereafter. This coincides with an increasing tendency by local rheumatologists to introduce earlier and more intensive conventional disease-modifying drugs and biological therapies for more resistant disease.

CONCLUSIONS

There has been a decline in the number of hand surgery procedures being performed on patients with RA during our 22-year population-based study. It indicates that medical treatments and strategies have been successful at preventing disease progression.

Health literacy in hand surgery patients: a cross-sectional survey

PURPOSE

To determine the prevalence of and factors associated with limited health literacy among outpatients presenting to an urban academic hospital-based hand surgeon.

METHODS

A cohort of 200 English- and Spanish-speaking patients completed the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) health literacy assessment tool, a sociodemographic survey, and 2 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-based computerized adaptive testing questionnaires: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference and Upper-Extremity Function. The NVS scores were divided into limited (0-3) and adequate (4-6) health literacy. Multivariable regression modeling was used to identify independent predictors of limited health literacy.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients (43%) had limited health literacy (English-speaking: 33%; Spanish-speaking: 100%). Factors associated with limited health literacy were advanced age, lower income, and being publicly insured or uninsured. Increasing years of education was a protective factor. Primary language was not included in the logistic regression model because all Spanish-speaking patients had limited health literacy. When evaluating health literacy on a continuum, primary language was the factor that most influenced the NVS scores, accounting for 14% of the variability.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited health literacy was commonplace among patients seeing a hand surgeon, more so in elderly and disadvantaged individuals. We hope our study raises awareness of this issue among hand surgeons and encourages providers to simplify messages and improve communication strategies.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic II.

Medical services and associated costs vary widely among surgeons treating patients with hand osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

There are substantial variations in medical services that are difficult to explain based on differences in pathophysiology alone. The scale of variation and the number of people affected suggest substantial potential to lower healthcare costs with the reduction of practice variation. Our study assessed practice variation across three affiliated urban sites in one city in the United States and related healthcare costs following the diagnosis of hand osteoarthritis (OA) in patients.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What are the factors associated with increased costs and surgery in the first year after diagnosis of hand OA? (2) How much practice variation exists among hand surgeons in terms of the number of patient visits, use of imaging tests, use of injections, occupational therapy use, and surgery? (3) What proportion of total cost is accounted for by patients who consult with an additional provider?

METHODS

Patients receiving a new diagnosis of primary hand OA between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2011, were identified from the research database of three affiliated urban hospitals in a single city in the United States. We included 2814 patients (69%, 1929 women) treated by six hand surgeons. We recorded all visits, imaging tests, injections, occupational therapy visits, and surgical procedures in the first year after that diagnosis. Costs were extracted from the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. Reliability of the database was assessed by manual checking of 120 patient charts (4.3% of all data); reliability was determined to be 94% (113 of 120) for diagnoses, 97% (116 of 120) correct surgeon, 100% (120 of 120) second surgeon, 99% (278 of 282) visits, 99% (132 of 134) imaging procedures, 92% (11 of 12) injections, 95% (21 of 22) surgical procedures, and 85% (102 of 120) prescribing occupational therapy.

RESULTS

Predictors of increased costs included younger patient age (regression coefficient [β] -3.5, semipartial R(2) 0.0049, 95% confidence interval [CI] -5.4 to -1.7, p < 0.001), seeing a second surgeon (β 283, semipartial R(2) 0.0095, 95% CI 176-391, p < 0.001), and specific surgeons (surgeon 1: β -243, semipartial R(2) 0.026, 95% CI -298 to -188, p < 0.001; surgeon 2: β -177, semipartial R(2) 0.0090, 95% CI -246 to -109, p < 0.001; surgeon 6: β 124, semipartial R(2) 0.0050, 95% CI 59-189, p < 0.001) (adjusted R(2) = 0.056). Similarly, factors associated with increased surgical intervention included younger patient age (β -0.0026, semipartial R(2) 0.0071, 95% CI -0.0037 to -0.0015, p < 0.001), male sex (β 0.041, semipartial R(2) 0.0028, 95% CI -0.069 to -0.012, p = 0.005), seeing a second surgeon (β 0.16, semipartial R(2) 0.0091, 95% CI 0.094-0.22, p < 0.001), and specific surgeons (surgeon 1: β -0.14, semipartial R(2) 0.026, 95% CI -0.18 to -0.11, p < 0.001; surgeon 2: β -0.13, semipartial R(2) 0.014, 95% CI -0.17 to -0.091, p < 0.001). There were large variations in the average number of visits (1.5-fold), imaging tests (threefold), use of injections (51-fold), occupational therapy (twofold), and surgery rates (sevenfold) among providers. One hundred twenty patients (4.3%) consulted a second surgeon within the first year after receiving the diagnosis of hand OA, which accounted for 8.1% (USD 68,826/USD 845,304) of the total costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who saw additional providers and who were of younger age incurred higher costs and a greater likelihood of undergoing surgery; the latter was also greater in male patients. Use of medical services and associated costs vary widely among providers treating patients with hand OA. Initiatives addressing practice variation-increased use of decision aids, for example-merit additional study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prognostic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Patients' expectations, experiences and the determinants of satisfaction related to metacarpophalangeal arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Most previous research has used quantitative patient-rated outcome measures to identify patients' perceptions related to metacarpophalangeal (MCP) arthroplasty. However, little is known about the lived experience of this procedure. The present study aimed to gain an in-depth understanding of patients' expectations and experiences, and the determinants of satisfaction related to MCP arthroplasty and postoperative rehabilitation.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with six participants from two London hospitals at four months to three years post-surgery. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using descriptive phenomenological analysis.

RESULTS

Participants' reasons for surgery varied considerably and their expectations were informed by previous surgical experience and information from healthcare professionals. Diverse, and occasionally ambivalent, perceptions of various aspects of postoperative treatment were expressed and all participants emphasized the importance of reassurance and understanding by the healthcare team. When describing the effect of surgery on their lives, all experienced a period of 'frustrating dependence' and adopted a variety of psychological and practical coping mechanisms. Experience of recovery and long-term outcome was influenced by factors extraneous to MCP arthroplasty, including medical condition and disease at adjacent joints. Factors influencing satisfaction included participants' evaluation of the extent to which goals and preoperative expectations had been met and the impact of surgery on their lives.

CONCLUSIONS

Joint goal-setting is essential for understanding patients' unique reasons for undergoing MCP arthroplasty and facilitating realistic expectations. Education on all aspects of postoperative care is vital. Patients should be made aware of variability in outcome and the potential for deterioration due to the chronic nature of rheumatoid arthritis.

The effect of swan neck and boutonniere deformities on the outcome of silicone metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis patients with swan neck deformities are postulated to have greater metacarpophalangeal joint arc of motion because of their need to flex the joint to make a fist, whereas the boutonniere deformity places the fingers into the flexed position, creating less demand on the joint for grip. This study analyzes the effect of these deformities on the joint's arc of motion and hand function.

METHODS

The authors measured the metacarpophalangeal joint arc of motion in 73 surgical patients. Data were allocated into groups by finger and hand deformity. Linear regression models were used to analyze the effect of the deformity on the joint's arc of motion. Functional outcomes were measured by the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Jebson-Taylor Test.

RESULTS

Nineteen fingers had boutonniere deformity, 95 had swan neck deformities, and 178 had no deformity. The no-deformity group had the least arc of motion at baseline (16 degrees) compared with the boutonniere (26 degrees) and swan neck (26 degrees) groups. Mean arc of motion in the no-deformity group compared with the boutonniere group at baseline was statistically significant, but all groups had similar arc of motion at long-term follow-up. Only mean Jebson-Taylor Test scores at baseline between the boutonniere and no-deformity groups were significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

The results did not support the hypothesis that swan neck deformities have better arc of motion compared with boutonniere deformity. Boutonniere deformity has worse function at baseline, but there was no difference in function among groups at long-term follow-up.

Individualized outcome measures of daily activities are sensitive tools for evaluating hand surgery in rheumatic diseases

OBJECTIVES

To explore the ability of six outcome measures to capture clinically important changes in patients with rheumatic diseases undergoing hand surgery and to study predictors of changes in activity performance in different patient and surgery strata.

METHODS

A total of 172 patients (median age 59 years, disease duration 18 years) were stratified into subgroups: diagnosis, age, general function, type of surgery. Performance of daily activities and satisfaction were assessed by the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Clinically important improvement was defined as a two-step improvement in COPM. Hand function was assessed by reference to grip strength (Grippit), pinch strength (pinch gauge), hand pain (visual analogue scale) and grip ability (Grip Ability Test). Responsiveness was calculated as effect size (ES) at 6-month follow-up compared with baseline.

RESULTS

Clinically important improvement was reached by 25-69% depending on outcome measure and type of surgery. Improvement was smaller in patients with multiple simultaneous procedures. Regardless of diagnosis, age, general function and type of surgery, patients improved significantly in all measures, with the largest changes in COPM(performance) and COPM(satisfaction) (ES 0.7-1.9). The ES of pain ranged from 0.2 to 0.7, Grippit from 0.1 to 0.5 and pinch gauge from 0.4 to 0.8. Hand pain was the only significant predictor of clinically important improvement of COPM(performance): odds ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.51, 0.98 (P = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

COPM was the most sensitive instrument to capture clinically important improvement, and hand pain was a significant predictor of improvement, irrespective of diagnosis, age, general functional level and type of surgery.

Objective functional outcomes and patient satisfaction after silicone metacarpophalangeal arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis

PURPOSE

Patient satisfaction is an essential measure of quality of care for rheumatoid arthritis. Prior research demonstrates that patient satisfaction improves after silicone metacarpophalangeal arthroplasty (SMPA) despite minimal change in hand function. The purpose of this study was to identify the level of objective functional recovery that yields satisfaction after SMPA. We hypothesized that measurable gains in objective hand function after SMPA will discriminate between satisfied and dissatisfied patients.

METHODS

In this prospective, multicenter, cohort study, we observed 46 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint subluxation for 2 years after reconstructive surgery. We derived satisfaction scores from the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, ranging from 0 (least satisfied) to 100 (most satisfied), and dichotomized them using the Cohen large effect size. We measured hand function at baseline and follow-up including strength (grip strength and pinch strength), finger position (extensor lag and ulnar drift), and MCP arc of motion. We constructed receiver operating characteristic curves to identify optimal cutoffs in hand function that correspond with satisfaction.

RESULTS

At 2 years of follow-up, patients who achieved an extension lag of 30° or less were considered satisfied, which represented a 52% improvement (preoperative lag = 63°). Similarly, patients who gained improvement in ulnar drift from an average of preoperatively 62° to 9° postoperatively were satisfied. Finally, patients who achieved an improvement in MCP arc of motion from an average of 21° to 31° postoperatively were satisfied. No improvements in grip or pinch strength corresponded with postoperative patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients were satisfied with only modest gains in grip and pinch strength after silicone metacarpophalangeal arthroplasty. However, maintaining finger position, without recurrence of ulnar drift or extensor lag, and MCP arc of motion corresponded with patient satisfaction in the postoperative period.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

Reconstruction of the rheumatoid hand

Previous studies have shown large variation in the rate of common surgical procedures performed for the rheumatoid hand. This article provides a comprehensive overview of each surgical treatment option for rheumatoid hand reconstruction.

Development of a brief, 12-item version of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire

BACKGROUND

The Michigan Hand Questionnaire is one of the most widely used hand-specific surveys that measure health status relevant to patients with acute and chronic hand disorders. However, item redundancy exists in the original version, and an abbreviated survey could minimize responder burden and offer broader applicability.

METHODS

Patients (n = 422) with four specific hand conditions--rheumatoid arthritis (n = 162), thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (n = 31), carpal tunnel syndrome (n = 97), and distal radius fracture (n = 132)--completed the Michigan Hand Questionnaire at two time points. Correlation analysis identified two items from each of six domains (i.e., function, activities of daily living, work, pain, aesthetics, and satisfaction). The Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire score was calculated as the sum of the responses to the 12 items. Psychometric analysis was performed to describe the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire.

RESULTS

The Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire includes 12 items that were highly correlated with the summary Michigan Hand Questionnaire score (r = 0.99, p < 0.001). The Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire scores were highly correlated between the two time periods (r = 0.78, p < 0.001) and by disease type. Responsiveness of the Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire was high for all diseases and similar to that of the original Michigan Hand Questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

The 12-item Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire is an efficient and versatile outcomes instrument specific to hand disability that retains the psychometric properties of the original Michigan Hand Questionnaire. The Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire is an important tool with which to measure patient outcomes and the quality of care in hand surgery.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic, I.(Figure is included in full-text article.).

Hand appearance as a patient motivation for surgery and a determinant of satisfaction with metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis

PURPOSE

To determine patient motivations for surgery and satisfaction with outcomes for metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint arthroplasty in 3 domains (appearance, function, and pain) and whether patient-reported satisfaction correlates with standard outcome measures.

METHODS

In a randomized controlled trial of MCP joint implants, 33 patients with rheumatoid arthritis had primary MCP joint arthroplasty: 15 hands received Swanson implants, and 18 received NeuFlex implants. Range of motion, ulnar drift, grip strength, Sollerman hand function test, and the Michigan Hand Questionnaire were collected before surgery and 1 year after surgery. Preoperative patient motivations for and expectations of MCP joint arthroplasty were assessed for function, pain, and appearance. Patient-perceived improvement and satisfaction within the 3 domains and global satisfaction were assessed after surgery.

RESULTS

Function was rated the most important motivator for surgery by 31 patients, pain by 22, and appearance by 15. Twenty-six patients rated 2 or more motivators equally high. Michigan Hand Questionnaire subscores were moderately correlated or weakly correlated with patient-reported satisfaction. The Sollerman score was weakly correlated with patient-reported satisfaction. Range of motion, ulnar drift, and grip strength were not correlated with patient-reported satisfaction. More patients stated that a much better improvement was obtained for appearance than for function or pain relief.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient expectations of MCP joint arthroplasty were uniformly high. The greatest motivation for surgery was functional improvement. Pain was highly ranked, and 25 patients rated hand appearance as the first or second motivator. Patient satisfaction correlated poorly with traditional outcome measures and moderately with patient-reported outcomes. We conclude that appearance should be considered an important motivator for surgery and determinant of satisfaction.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic I.

Current concepts in the management of the rheumatoid hand

Hand surgeons are an integral part of the management team for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. There is now a greater understanding of the national use of rheumatoid hand surgery, which highlights the differences between hand surgeons and rheumatologists regarding the treatment of the rheumatoid hand. Advances in medical treatments have also decreased the prevalence of hand deformities caused by this disease. Hand surgeons today have less exposure to treating rheumatoid hand, but despite more effective medical options, surgery may still offer patients hope for improvement of hand function and appearance. This article summarizes the current state of rheumatoid hand surgery and discuss the surgical treatment strategies for optimizing outcomes for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Outcomes research in rheumatoid arthritis

Although rheumatoid arthritis causes significant disability for more than 1 million individuals in the United States, prior research regarding surgical treatment options has been limited by study sample size, study design, and methods of comparison. Furthermore, there is wide variation in the referral pattern for hand surgery consideration and type of surgical treatment of rheumatoid hand disease, yet the reasons for these differences are unclear. This review describes the role of outcomes research in rheumatoid hand disease by summarizing variations in surgical treatment, detailing current outcome assessment strategies, and offering potential strategies for designing future studies for rheumatoid hand disease.

Validity and responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a multicenter, international study

OBJECTIVE

Millions of patients experience the disabling hand manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), yet few hand-specific instruments are validated in this population. Our objective was to assess the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ) in patients with RA.

METHODS

At enrollment and at 6 months, 128 RA patients with severe subluxation of the metacarpophalangeal joints completed the MHQ, a 37-item questionnaire with 6 domains: function, activities of daily living (ADL), pain, work, aesthetics, and satisfaction. Reliability was measured using Spearman's correlation coefficients between time periods. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity was measured by correlating MHQ responses with the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 (AIMS2). Responsiveness was measured by calculating standardized response means (SRMs) between time periods.

RESULTS

The MHQ demonstrated good test-retest reliability (r = 0.66, P < 0.001). Cronbach's alpha scores were high for ADL (α = 0.90), function (α = 0.87), aesthetics (α = 0.79), and satisfaction (α = 0.89), indicating redundancy. The MHQ correlated well with AIMS2 responses. Function (r = -0.63), ADL (r = -0.77), work (r = -0.64), pain (r = 0.59), and summary score (r = -0.74) were correlated with the physical domain. Affect was correlated with ADL (r = -0.47), work (r = -0.47), pain (r = 0.48), and summary score (r = -0.53). Responsiveness was excellent among arthroplasty patients in function (SRM 1.42), ADL (SRM 0.89), aesthetics (SRM 1.23), satisfaction (SRM 1.76), and summary score (SRM 1.61).

CONCLUSION

The MHQ is easily administered, reliable, and valid to measure rheumatoid hand function, and can be used to measure outcomes in rheumatic hand disease.

Differences between the United States and the United Kingdom in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: analyses from a hand arthroplasty trial

Previous studies have found differences in rheumatoid hand surgical practice around the world. The specific aim of this study is to compare baseline characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK) that may be influenced by the two different health-care systems. Patients were recruited from three sites (two in the US and one in England) as part of a National Institutes of Health funded study to examine outcomes of silicone metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ) arthroplasty in RA patients. Outcomes measurements included biomechanical assessments (grip strength, pinch strength, and mean ulnar drift and extensor lag at the MCPJs of all four fingers), a health-related quality of life questionnaire (the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire), and a medication assessment. American patients have a significantly higher income level (p<0.001) and have completed higher levels of education (p<0.001) than British patients. There were no significant differences in terms of self-reported disease severity or deformity at the MCPJs. RA patients in the US are more likely to take biologic medications (p<0.001), steroids (p=0.02), and Cox-2 inhibitors (p=0.02). Patients in the UK are significantly more likely (p<0.001) to take nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. There are differences in the demographic characteristics and medication use of RA patients with hand deformities in the US and UK. These differences may be influenced by the private versus socialized health-care systems. However, the perception of hand disease severity in participants in this study appears to be comparable between these countries.

Clinical research in hand surgery

Clinical research designed to enhance the quality of health care has always received a great deal of national attention. Outcomes studies, clinical trials, and evidence-based research are key components of clinical research that have advanced the field of hand surgery. The purpose of the Weiland Award is to encourage innovations and progress in clinical research in hand surgery for the betterment of patients and to promote hand surgery's visibility in American medicine. This article will highlight my efforts in clinical research through 3 specific research themes: (1) outcomes research, (2) economic analysis, and (3) evidence-based research and quality assessment in health care.

A multicenter clinical trial in rheumatoid arthritis comparing silicone metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty with medical treatment

PURPOSE

Metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint deformities caused by rheumatoid arthritis can be treated using silicone metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty (SMPA). There is no consensus as to whether this surgical procedure is beneficial. The purpose of the study was to prospectively compare outcomes for a surgical and a nonsurgical cohort of rheumatoid arthritis patients.

METHODS

The prospective study was conducted from January 2004 to May 2008 at 3 referral centers in the United States and England. Over a 3-year period, 70 surgical and 93 nonsurgical patients were recruited. One year data are available for 45 cases and 72 controls. All patients had severe ulnar drift and/or extensor lag of the fingers at the MCP joints. The patients all had 1-year follow-up evaluations. Patients could elect to have SMPA and medical therapy or medical therapy alone. Outcomes included the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales, grip and pinch strength, Jebson-Taylor test, and ulnar deviation and extensor lag measurements at the MCP joints.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the mean age for the surgical group (60) when compared to the nonsurgical group (62). There was also no significant difference in race, education, and income between the 2 groups. At 1-year follow-up, the mean overall MHQ score showed significant improvement in the surgical group but no change in the nonsurgical group, despite worse MHQ function at baseline in the surgical group. Ulnar deviation and extensor lag improved significantly in the surgical group, but the mean Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales scores and grip and pinch strength showed no significant improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study demonstrated significant improvement for RA patients with poor baseline functioning treated with SMPA. The nonsurgical group had better MHQ scores at baseline, and their function did not deteriorate during the 1-year follow-up interval.

Knowledge translation: putting the "practice" in evidence-based practice

Knowledge translation (KT) is an iterative process that involves knowledge development, synthesis, contextualization, and adaptation, with the expressed purpose of moving the best evidence into practice that results in better health processes and outcomes for patients. Optimization of the process requires engaged interaction between knowledge developers and knowledge users. Knowledge users include consumers, clinicians, and policy makers. KT is highly reliant on understanding when research evidence needs to be moved into practice. Social, personal, policy, and system factors contribute to how and when change in practice can be accomplished. Evidence-based practitioners need to understand a conceptual basis for KT and the evidence indicating which specific KT strategies might help them move best evidence into action in practice. Audit and feedback, knowledge brokering, clinical practice guidelines, professional standards, and "active-learning" continuing education are examples of KT strategies.

Measuring outcomes in hand surgery

Outcomes research in hand surgery provides patients and providers with objective, reliable information to assist in making medical decisions. Endpoint measures in outcomes research and the instruments used to evaluate these endpoints are often specific to a particular disease or region. Hand surgery has many different measurable outcomes that can be used to monitor the quality of surgical practice, inform practice guidelines, and aid in the appropriate allocation of healthcare resources. In this article, we review some research techniques available to study the following surgical outcomes of the hand: national trends in surgical care, surgical complications, objective measures of hand function, patient-reported measures of hand function, and economic burden.