The relationship between ASSH membership and the treatment of distal radius fracture in the United States Medicare population

Implant cost variation in surgically treated distal radius fractures

Aims & objectives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate for cost variation in distal radius fractures (DRFs) treated with a volar locking plate (VLP) and to identify key factors that affect the total construct cost.

Materials & methods

A retrospective case series was conducted for a single healthcare system. A total of 140 patients with a DRF treated with a VLP from May 2014 to December 2021 were identified. Patients were excluded for polytrauma, open fractures, and skeletal immaturity.

Results

Most patients were female (n = 120, 85.7%) and were on average 59 ± 13.7 years old. Patients most often injured their dominant hand (n = 75, 53.6%) and presented with an AO/OTA 23C fracture (n = 93, 66.4%). Twenty-two surgeons were included with fellowship training in hand or trauma and orthopaedic or plastic surgery residency. Orthopaedic hand-trained surgeons treated the highest proportion of 23C fractures (69.8%). Ninety patients (64.3%) were treated at a surgery center. The average cost was $1289.67 ± $215.32 (range: $857.83-$2156.95). The most expensive fixation constructs used a variable angle locking screw ($1316.75 ± $264.99) or a multidirectional threaded peg ($1321.67 ± $192.94). Multivariable regression analysis revealed none of the study variables to be significant contributors to construct cost (all p-values >0.27).

Conclusions

Surgically treated DRFs with a VLP demonstrated similar total implant costs regardless of fracture pattern, surgeon specialty, or treatment facility. Contrary to previous literature, VLPs showed minimal cost variation, although some surgeons were able to decrease the overall cost by reducing the number of screws used.

Biomechanics of Subcutaneous Locked Plating Versus Burke Plate and External Fixator for Comminuted Distal Radius Fractures

Background External fixators that span the wrist have been the historical norm in treating distal radius fractures. We have modified a dorsal distraction approach by using a subcutaneously applied locked bridge plate through two small incisions superficial to the extensor tendons and outside the extensor compartment. The purpose of this study was to biomechanically evaluate this modified method of fixation for comminuted distal radius fractures in comparison with two established constructs. Methods Matched cadaver specimens were used to model an AO Type 23-C3 distal radius fracture. Biochemical testing for stiffness during axial compressive loading was done on three constructs: a conventional Burke distraction plate, the subcutaneous internal fixation plating technique, and an external fixator. All specimens were cyclically loaded for 3000 cycles and then retested. Results The modified construct was found to be stiffer than the external fixator (p=0.013). When compared to the Burke plate, the modified construct was significantly less stiff before axial cycling (p=0.025). However, the difference was not maintained after cycling, and the post-axial loading stiffness difference was non-significant (p=0.456). Conclusion Our data demonstrate the biomechanical integrity of the subcutaneous plating technique for the fixation of comminuted distal radius fractures. It is stiffer than an external fixator and has the theoretical advantage of avoiding pin-tract infections. In addition, it is subcutaneous and not a cumbersome external construct. Our construct is minimally invasive, and it does not violate the dorsal extensor compartments. This allows for finger movement even while the construct is in place.

Hand Surgeons Are Tackling Tougher Scaphoids: A Study of ABOS Candidate Data

BACKGROUND

This study will evaluate whether those who have completed a hand fellowship treat a disproportionate number of scaphoid fractures based on recent American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) data. We hypothesize that surgeons who have completed a fellowship in hand surgery will address most surgically treated scaphoid fractures, particularly those with fracture nonunions or requiring graft.

METHODS

We queried the ABOS database for case log information submitted for part II of the ABOS examination. This search included all cases with Current Procedural Terminology codes for procedures related to scaphoid fixation. Demographic information, case volume, type of case, and complication rate were compared for hand fellowship-trained surgeons and those who had completed other fellowships as well as non-fellowship-trained surgeons.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1686 surgeons reported treating 4244 scaphoid fractures. Of these surgeons, 1180 had completed a hand surgery fellowship. Hand fellowship-trained surgeons were shown to have operatively treated more scaphoid fractures both in total volume and on a per-surgeon basis. Hand fellowship-trained surgeons were also found to have performed a significantly higher proportion of difficult cases, which were those listed as being a malunion/nonunion or those incorporating a pedicle graft. There was no difference in the complication rate between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Among those orthopedic surgeons reporting case information for part II of the ABOS certification examination, statistically significant differences exist in case volume and case difficulty among surgeons with different areas of fellowship training. Complication rates increase with patient age and examination year.

Distal Radius Fracture Management: Surgeon Factors Markedly Influence Decision Making

INTRODUCTION

It is our hypothesis that physician-specific variables affect the management of distal radius (DR) fractures in addition to patient-specific factors.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted evaluating treatment differences between Certificate of Additional Qualification hand surgeons (CAQh) and board-certified orthopaedic surgeons who treat patients at level 1 or level 2 trauma centers (non-CAQh). After institutional review board approval, 30 DR fractures were selected and classified (15 AO/OTA type A and B and 15 AO/OTA type C) to create a standardized patient data set. The patient-specific demographics and surgeon's information regarding the volume of DR fractures treated per year, practice setting, and years posttraining were obtained. Statistical analysis was done using chi-square analysis with a postanalysis regression model.

RESULTS

A notable difference was observed between CAQh and non-CAQh surgeons. Surgeons in practice longer than 10 years or who treat >100 DR fractures/year were more likely to choose surgical intervention and obtain a preoperative CT scan. The two most influential factors in decision making were the patients' age and medical comorbidities, with physician-specific factors being the third most influential in medical decision making.

DISCUSSION

Physician-specific variables have a notable effect on decision making and are critical for the development of consistent treatment algorithms for DR fractures.

Predictors of Management of Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Aged >65 Years

BACKGROUND

Treatment of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in patients aged >65 years is controversial. The purpose of this study was to identify what patient and fracture characteristics may influence the decision to pursue surgical versus nonsurgical treatment in patients aged >65 years sustaining a DRF.

METHODS

We queried our institutional DRF database for patients aged >65 years who presented to a single academic, tertiary center hand clinic over a 5-year period. In all, 164 patients treated operatively were identified, and 162 patients treated nonoperatively during the same time period were selected for comparison (total N = 326). Demographic variables and fracture-specific variables were recorded. Patient and fracture characteristics between the groups were compared to determine which variables were associated with each treatment modality (operative or nonoperative).

RESULTS

The average age in our cohort was 72 (SD: 11) years, and 274 patients (67%) were women. The average Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 4.1 (SD: 2.1). The CCI is a validated tool that predicts 1-year mortality based on patient age and a list of 22 weighted comorbidities. Factors associated with operative treatment in our population were largely related to the severity of the injury and included increasing dorsal tilt (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.12; P < .001) and AO Classification type C fractures (OR, 5.42; 95% CI, 2.35-11.61; P < .001). Increasing CCI was the only factor independently associated with nonoperative management (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.997; P = .046).

CONCLUSION

Fracture severity is a strong driver in the decision to pursue operative management in patients aged >65 years, whereas increasing CCI predicts nonoperative treatment.

Nonsurgical Management of Distal Radius Fractures in the Elderly: Approaches, Risks and Limitations

The elderly have conventionally been defined as individuals over the age of 65 and are projected to represent about 21% of the United States (US) population by the year 2030. Distal radius fractures (DRF) in particular are one of the most common fractures among elderly patients and their incidence continues to rise in part due to increased activity levels among the elderly, increased life expectancy, rising rates of obesity, changes to dietary habits, and the prevalence of osteoporosis. Although various treatment options exist for these injuries, nonsurgical treatment of distal radius fractures remains a mainstay among elderly patients with mounting evidence of its non-inferiority to surgical fixation in the literature. Here, we summarize the overall approach to nonsurgical treatment of distal radius fractures in the elderly population while examining its supporting data and highlighting potential risks and limitations to it.

Implicit and Explicit Factors That Influence Surgeons' Decision-Making for Distal Radius Fractures in Older Patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors that influence surgeons' decision-making in the treatment of distal radius fractures in older patients.

METHODS

Fourteen clinical vignettes of a 72-year-old patient with a distal radius fracture were sent to 185 orthopedic hand and/or trauma surgeons. The surgeons were surveyed regarding the demographic/practice details, treatment decision (surgical or nonsurgical), and factors that influenced management, including the Charlson Comorbidity Index, functional status, radiographic appearance, and handedness. Multivariable regression analyses were used to assess the effect of both surgeon-described (explicit) and given clinical (implicit) factors on the treatment decision and to evaluate for discrepancies.

RESULTS

Sixty-six surgeons completed the survey, and 7 surgeons completed 10-13 vignettes. Surgeons made the explicit determination to pursue nonsurgical treatment based on the presence of comorbidities (odds ratio [OR], 0.02 for surgery; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.05), but the observation of the underlying clinical data suggested that the recommendation for surgical treatment was instead based on a higher functional status (OR, 3.54/increase in functional status; 95% CI, 2.52-4.98). Those employed by hospitals/health systems were significantly less likely to recommend surgery than those in private practice (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.79) CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the presence of comorbidities, functional status, and practice setting has a significant impact on a surgeon's decision to treat distal radius fractures in older patients. The discrepancy between the surgeon-described factors and underlying clinical data demonstrates cognitive bias.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Surgeons should be aware of cognitive biases in clinical reasoning and should work through consequential patient decisions using an analytical framework that attempts to reconcile all available clinical data.

Dorsal Bridge Plate for Distal Radius Fractures: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

This study presents patient demographics, injury characteristics, outcomes, and complications associated with dorsal bridge plating (DBP) in the treatment of distal radius fractures.

METHODS

A literature search performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines identified 206 articles, 12 of which met inclusion criteria, accounting for 310 patients. Included articles contained the results of DBP for treatment of distal radius fractures with reported outcomes between 1988 and 2018. Data were pooled and analyzed focusing on patient demographics, as well as 3 primary outcomes of complications, range of motion (ROM), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and QuickDASH scores.

RESULTS

Average age was 55 years, median follow-up was 24 months, and the most common use was in comminuted (92%) intra-articular (92%) distal radius fracture caused by fall (58%), or motor vehicle collision or motorcycle collision (27%). A minority of patients had open fractures (16%) and most were cases of polytrauma (65%). Median time from placement to DBP removal was 17 weeks (mean, 119 days). At final follow-up, mean wrist ROM was 45° flexion, 50° extension, 75° pronation, and 73° supination. Mean DASH score was 26.1, and mean QuickDASH score was 19.8. The overall rate for any complication was 13%; the most common was hardware failure (3%) followed by symptomatic malunion or nonunion (3%), and persistent pain after hardware removal (2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Dorsal bridge plating was found to be used most commonly in intra-articular, comminuted distal radius fractures with overall functional wrist ROM, moderate patient-reported disability, and a 13% complication rate at follow-up.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

The Wrist and Radius Injury Surgical Trial: 12-Month Outcomes from a Multicenter International Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Optimal treatment for distal radius fractures in older adults remains uncertain. No randomized trials comparing the most frequently used treatments in this population have been conducted. Surgical treatment rates vary widely, and the sustained benefits of surgery are uncertain.

METHODS

The Wrist and Radius Injury Surgical Trial, a randomized, multicenter trial, enrolled 304 adults aged 60 years and older with isolated, unstable distal radius fractures at 24 institutions. Patients who wanted surgery (n = 187) were randomized to internal fixation, external fixation, or percutaneous pinning; patients who preferred conservative management (n = 117) received casting. The primary outcome was the 12-month Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) summary score.

RESULTS

At 12 months, there were no differences by treatment in primary outcome. Twelve-month MHQ summary scores differed between internal fixation and external fixation by 3 points (97.5 percent CI, 6.0 to 11.5) and between internal fixation and pinning by -0.14 (97.5 percent CI, -9.2 to 8.9). However, at 6 weeks, the mean MHQ summary score for internal fixation was greater than for external fixation by 19 (p < 0.001), pinning by 11 (p < 0.001), and casting by 7 (p = 0.03). Internal fixation participants demonstrated significantly better radiologic alignment throughout the follow-up period. Malunion was experienced by 48 percent of casting participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Recovery was fastest for internal fixation and slowest for external fixation according to most measures, but by 12 months there were no meaningful differences in outcomes. Casting participants experienced satisfactory results despite loss of radiologic alignment.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

Stable rates of operative treatment of distal radius fractures in Ontario, Canada: a population-based retrospective cohort study (2004–2013)

Background

Rates of surgical management of distal radius fractures are increasing internationally despite the higher cost and limited outcome evidence to support this shift. This study examines the epidemiology of distal radius fractures and asks if the same shift has occurred in Ontario, Canada (population 13.9 million).

Methods

This population-based, retrospective cohort study examined distal radius fractures in people aged 18 years and older over a 10-year period (2004–2013). The incidence analyses were based on the first occurrence of a fracture within a 2-year time period. The number of fractures, age-adjusted incidence rates and frequency of fracture treatment type by year were assessed. We used a Poisson regression with robust standard errors to determine if there was a statistically significant change in the frequency of fracture treatment type over time.

Results

There were 25 355 distal radius fractures among Ontarians 18 years of age and older in 2013. Between 2004 and 2013, the age-adjusted incidence rate for people 35 years of age and older was stable, between 2.32 and 2.70 per 1000 population. Rates of cast immobilization remained stable between 82% and 84%. Of those patients treated surgically, the rate of open reduction and internal fixation rose from 7% in 2004 to 13% in 2013 at the expense of other types of surgical management.

Conclusion

In Ontario, rates of cast immobilization are stable and there has been a movement toward open reduction and internal fixation among patients treated surgically.

Outcomes and Complications in the Management of Distal Radial Fractures in the Elderly

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to identify trends in management and to compare the outcomes and complications following nonoperative and operative management (including external fixation, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, and open reduction and internal fixation) for distal radial fractures in patients ≥65 years of age.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis, with use of the OptumLabs Data Warehouse database, of patients ≥65 years of age who had been managed for a distal radial fracture between 2009 and 2014 (as indicated by diagnosis codes according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification). Ninety-day and 1-year complication rates per 1,000 fractures were analyzed overall and by treatment modality.

RESULTS

Thirteen thousand, seven hundred and thirteen distal radial fractures were analyzed. The overall 90-day complication rate was 36.5 per 1,000 fractures, and the 1-year upper-extremity-specific complication rate was 236.2 and 307.5 per 1,000 fractures for nonoperative and operative management, respectively. Overall, post-injury stiffness was the most common 1-year upper-extremity-specific complication (incidence, 11.5%). There was no significant difference between operative and nonoperative management in terms of 90-day complication rates. However, operative management had a higher 1-year complication rate than nonoperative management (307.5 versus 236.2 per 1,000 fractures). Overall, the 5 most common upper-extremity-specific complications following operative treatment of distal radial fracture were stiffness (16.0%), chronic regional pain syndrome (9.9%), median neuropathy (8.0%), implant-related complications (3.8%), and tendon-related complications (2.8%). Stiffness was significantly more frequent following operative management (16.0% versus 9.8%; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Operative management of a distal radial fracture should be carefully considered when discussing treatment options with patients ≥65 years of age.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Management of Unstable Distal Radius Fractures: A Survey of Hand Surgeons

Background  Length of immobilization after operative fixation of unstable distal radius fractures and management in elderly patients is an area of debate. Purpose  The purpose of this study is to delineate common practices of fellowship-trained hand surgeons and how they compare with current evidence-based protocols. Methods  Surveys were distributed to American Society for Surgery of the Hand members on preferred methods of fixation, postoperative immobilization, and variations in treatment of elderly patients with unstable distal radius fractures. Responses were analyzed in comparison to a literature review. Subgroups were compared with regard to training, practice type, and years in practice. Results  Four-hundred eighty-five surveys were analyzed. Volar fixed-angle plating was the most common choice of fixation (84.7%). Patients are most often immobilized for 1 to 2 weeks (40.0%) with range of motion (ROM) therapy begun most commonly between 1 and 4 weeks (47.2%). The majority of surgeons do not treat fractures differently in patients more than 65 years old. Physicians with more than 20 years of experience were significantly more likely to begin wrist ROM sooner with volar plating versus other fixation techniques compared with physicians with less than 20 years of experience (40.7% vs. 34.2%, respectively). Also, physicians in academic-only practices were more likely to immobilize patients for a shorter time after volar plating compared with those in privademics. Conclusion  Volar fixed-angle plating is the dominant fixation method for unstable distal radius fractures among fellowship-trained hand surgeons. Elderly patients are not treated more conservatively and rigid immobilization after operative fixation remains the treatment of choice despite current evidence-based protocols.

Considerations in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Distal Radius Fractures in Elderly Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With the incidence of distal radius fractures increasing in the elderly population, we sought to summarize the current orthopedic and medical management of these fractures in the elderly osteoporotic population.

RECENT FINDINGS

The number of osteoporotic patients undergoing surgical fixation for distal radius fractures has increased in recent years. This is likely due to the improved outcomes seen with volar locking plates, as well as an increase in the number of fellowship-trained hand surgeons. Despite this potential improvement in acute fracture management, a majority of these patients are underdiagnosed and undertreated for their underlying osteoporosis or endocrinopathies. The implementation of fracture liaison services and the ability of the treating orthopedist to recognize this gap in patient care result in a higher number of patients initiating appropriate treatment. It is vital that when discussing acute fracture management, a thorough discussion is had with patients regarding functional outcome and the benefits of both surgical and non-operative management. As these fractures become more prevalent and a greater percentage undergo surgical intervention, the economic burden of distal radius fractures will continue to rise. It is imperative that the treating surgeon view these fractures as sentinel events that are predictive of future hip and vertebral fractures. While relatively new, the use of fracture liaison services to help aide in proper screening and treatment of osteoporotic patients is of great value. Non-pharmacologic therapy such as physical therapy, smoking and alcohol cessation programs, and dietary modifications are crucial in treating patients with osteoporosis. While bisphosphonates remain the first-line treatment in patients with osteoporosis, novel therapies show promise for future use.

Older Patient Preferences for Internal Fixation after a Distal Radius Fracture: A Qualitative Study from the Wrist and Radius Injury Surgical Trial

BACKGROUND

Distal radius fracture treatments provide similar functional outcomes. It has been hypothesized that the use of internal fixation is increasing because of physician preferences. The multisite randomized Wrist and Radius Injury Surgical Trial provides a unique opportunity to examine patient preferences in the absence of surgeon influence. The authors' objective was to investigate patient preference for internal fixation even after being informed of the equipoise among treatments.

METHODS

The authors performed 30 semistructured interviews with older individuals, all older than 60 years, approached at their institution for the Wrist and Radius Injury Surgical Trial. The authors' sample included three groups: those with a preference for internal fixation (n = 11), those with preference for nonsurgical treatment (n = 6), and those without a preference who consented to surgical randomization (n = 13). We used grounded theory for data collection and analysis.

RESULTS

All participants indicated their chief concern was regaining full function. Patients based their preferences for internal fixation on multiple values, including obstacles to recovery, autonomy, aesthetics, and pain relief. Some patients who did not select internal fixation reflected on their experiences, questioning whether they would have had a potentially different outcome with internal fixation treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Without evidence for a superior treatment, patients focus on factors that pertain to recovery rather than outcomes, with most preferring the volar locking plating system. To best align with patient values, physicians should focus their discussion with patients on aspects of the recovery period rather than functional outcomes. Evidence from the Wrist and Radius Injury Surgical Trial will provide high-level information about patient-reported, functional, and radiographic outcomes.

Distal radius fractures-Regional variation in treatment regimens

OBJECTIVES

After recent technical innovations of fracture surgery implants, treatment traditions are changing for distal radius fractures, the most common orthopaedic injury. The aim of this study was to determine if the choice of surgical method for treatment of distal radius fractures differ between healthcare regions in Sweden.

METHOD

The study was based on all (n = 22 378) adult patients who were registered with a surgical procedure due to a distal radius fracture during 2010-2013 in Sweden. Consecutive data was collected from the Swedish National Patient Registry.

RESULTS

The proportions of use of surgical method varied among the 21 healthcare regions between 41% and 95% for internal fixation, between 2.3% and 44% for percutaneous fixation and between 0.6% and 19% for external fixation. Differences between regions were statistically significant in all but 6 comparisons when controlled for age and gender. Incidence rates of surgical treatment of a distal radius fracture varied between 4.2 and 9.2/10 000 person-years.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that there is a large variation in operative management of distal radius fractures between Swedish healthcare regions.

Distal Radius Fractures in the Elderly: Use of the Volar Bearing Plate

BACKGROUND

Distal radius fractures represent some of the most common injuries to the upper extremity, yet current evidence demonstrates great variability in the management of this injury. Elderly patients, in particular, stand to benefit from the early mobilization provided by operative fixation with a volar bearing plate.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review on all patients 65 years or older who underwent unilateral open reduction internal fixation of distal radius fractures using a volar bearing plate at a single institution between January 2014 and January 2016. We excluded patients with bilateral injuries, multiple fractures, and major injuries to the same extremity.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients met criteria for this study. By AO classification, we repaired 17 type A, 24 type B, and 14 type C fractures. At final radiographic measurements, average radial height compared with ulna measured -0.31 mm, average radial inclination measured 20.45 degrees, and average volar tilt measured 7.11 degrees. On discharge, 36 patients had wrist range-of-motion data consistent with a functional wrist. Four patients had limitations in the flexion/extension plane, 8 with radial-ulnar deviation, and 7 had limitations in both planes.

CONCLUSIONS

Distal radius fractures in the elderly may successfully be treated with a volar bearing plate. Useful strategies include supraperiosteal dissection of the radius from the pronator quadratus, use of a longer plate for stronger proximal fixation in osteoporotic bone, and regional block. This methodology allows for a safe procedure facilitating the early return of hand and wrist function.

Patient injury claims involving fractures of the distal radius

Background and purpose - Optimal treatment for distal radius fractures remains controversial, with a significant number of fractures resulting in complications and long-term morbidity. We investigated patient injury claims related to distal radius fractures to detect the critical steps in the treatment leading to avoidable adverse events Patients and methods - We analyzed all compensated patient injury claims in Finland between 2007 and 2011. Claims were collected from the Patient Insurance Center's (PIC) nationwide claim register. Patients of all ages were included. Each claim decision, original patient records, and radiographs related to treatment were reviewed. Results - During the study period, the PIC received 584 claims regarding distal radius fractures, of which 208 (36%) were compensated. Pain and impaired wrist function were the most common subjective reasons to file claims among compensated patients. In 66/208 patients, more than 1 adverse event leading to patient injury was detected. The detected adverse events could be divided into 3 main groups: diagnostic errors (36%, n = 103), decision/planning errors (30%, n = 87), and insufficient technical execution (32%, n = 91). Issues related to malalignment were the main concerns in each group. Diagnostic errors were often related to incorrect assessment of the fracture (re)displacement (75%, n = 78). All of the decision-making errors concerned physicians' decisions to accept unsatisfactory fracture alignment. The most common technical error was insufficient reduction (29%, n = 26). Interpretation - We identified avoidable adverse events behind patient injuries related to distal radius fracture treatment. This study will help physicians to recognize the critical steps in the treatment of this common fracture and enhance patient safety.

Radial Plate Fixation: A Novel Technique for Distal Radius Fractures

BACKGROUND

Distal radius fractures represent a common fracture pattern frequently treated with volar locked plating for fixation. However, other methods may provide equivalent outcomes and minimize risks associated with the volar approach and hardware placement. One such method is the radial plate.

METHODS

After confirmation of institutional board review, we retrospectively reviewed data from 7 patients with our primary functional outcomes measured by Mayo wrist and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores. The most recent radiographic and motion parameters were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean age at time of injury was 49 years (range, 19-68 years) with clinical follow-up of 81.6 months (range, 43.5-95.5 months). Five patients had good to excellent outcomes with a mean QuickDASH score of 0.92 for those patients. The mean QuickDASH score for all patients was 18.5. Mean radial height, inclination, and volar tilt were within 5% of the contralateral side. Standard deviation values for radiographic measures and clinical range of motion indicate significant variability in our data set.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the results are mixed, our small cohort indicates radial plate fixation could provide a viable alternative to volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures. Further prospective investigation is warranted to better describe long-term outcomes using this technique.

Distal Radius Fractures in the Elderly

Distal radius fractures are common in elderly patients, and the incidence continues to increase as the population ages. The goal of treatment is to provide a painless extremity with good function. In surgical decision making, special attention should be given to the patient's bone quality and functional activity level. Most of these fractures can be treated nonsurgically, and careful closed reduction should aim for maintenance of anatomic alignment with a focus on protecting fragile soft tissues. Locked plating is typically used for fracture management when surgical fixation is appropriate. Surgical treatment improves alignment, but improvement in radiographic parameters may not lead to better clinical outcomes. Treatment principles, strategies, and clinical outcomes vary for these injuries, with elderly patients warranting special consideration.

Differences in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures by Hand Fellowship Trained Surgeons: A Study of ABOS Candidate Data

PURPOSE

The management of distal radius fractures differs based on the nature of the fracture and the experience of the surgeon. We hypothesized that patients requiring surgical intervention would undergo different procedures when in the care of a surgeon with subspecialty training in hand surgery as compared with surgeons with no subspecialty training in hand surgery.

METHODS

We queried the ABOS database for case log information submitted for part II of the ABOS examination. Queries for all codes involved with distal radius fracture management were combined with associated codes for the management of median nerve neuropathy, triangular fibrocartilage complex tears, ulnar shaft, and styloid fractures. Hand fellowship trained orthopedic surgeons were compared with those completing other fellowships and non-fellowship trained orthopedic surgeons during their board collection period.

RESULTS

During the study period, 2,317 orthopedic surgeons reported treatment of 15,433 distal radius fractures. Of these surgeons, 411 had hand fellowship training. On a per surgeon basis, fellowship trained hand surgeons operatively treated more multifragment intra-articular distal radius fractures than their non-hand fellowship trained counterparts (5.3 vs 1.2). Additional procedures associated with the management of distal radius fractures were also associated with the fellowship training of the treating surgeon.

CONCLUSIONS

Among orthopedic surgeons taking part II of the ABOS certifying examination, differences exist in the type, management, and reporting of distal radius fractures among surgeons with different areas of fellowship training.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study describes the association of hand surgery fellowship training on the choice of intervention for distal radius fractures and associated conditions.

Geographic and Age-Based Variations in Medicare Reimbursement Among ASSH Members

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate how American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) members' Medicare reimbursement depends on their geographical location and number of years in practice. Methods: Demographic data for surgeons who were active members of the ASSH in 2012 were obtained using information publicly available through the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). "Hand-surgeons-per-capita" and average reimbursement per surgeon were calculated for each state. Regression analysis was performed to determine a relationship between (1) each state's average reimbursement versus the number of ASSH members in that state, (2) average reimbursement versus number of hand surgeons per capita, and (3) total reimbursement from Medicare versus number of years in practice. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to detect a difference in reimbursement based on categorical range of years as an ASSH member. Results: A total of 1667 ASSH members satisfied inclusion in this study. Although there was significant variation among states' average reimbursement, reimbursement was not significantly correlated with the state's hand surgeons per capita or total number of hand surgeons in that given state. Correlation between years as an ASSH member and average reimbursement was significant but non-linear; the highest reimbursements were seen in surgeons who had been ASSH members from 8 to 20 years. Conclusions: Peak reimbursement from Medicare for ASSH members appears to be related to the time of surgeons' peak operative volume, rather than any age-based bias for or against treating Medicare beneficiaries. In addition, though geographic variation in reimbursement does exist, this does not appear to correlate with density or availability of hand surgeons.

Hand Surgeon Reporting of Tendon Rupture Following Distal Radius Volar Plating

Background: Volar plate fixation with locked screws has become the preferred treatment of displaced distal radius fractures that cannot be managed nonoperatively. This treatment, however, is not without complication. The purpose of this study was to determine what percentage of hand surgeons, over a 12-month period, have experienced a tendon complication when using volar plates for the treatment of distal radius fractures. Methods: A total of 3022 hand surgeons were e-mailed a link to an online questionnaire regarding their observation and treatment of tendon injuries associated with volar plating of distal radius fractures. Responses were reported using descriptive statistics. Results: Of the 596 (20%) respondents, 199 (33%) surgeons reported encountering at least one flexor tendon injury after distal radius volar plating over the past year of practice. The flexor pollicis longus was the most commonly reported tendon injury (254, 75%). Palmaris longus grafting (118, 37%) and tendon transfer (114, 36%) were the most often reported treatments following this complication. A total of 216 respondents (36%) also encountered 324 cases of extensor tendon rupture after volar plating of distal radius fractures, with tendon transfer (88%) being the preferred treatment option. Conclusions: Both flexor and extensor tendon ruptures can be seen after volar plating of distal radius fractures. Surgeons should be aware of these complications. Critical assessment of hardware position at the time of index procedure is recommended to avoid complications. Long-term studies are needed to standardize approaches to managing tendon rupture following volar plating of distal radius fractures.

Distal Radius Fractures: Approaches, Indications, and Techniques

Distal radius fractures remain among the most common fractures of the upper extremity. The indications for operative management continue to evolve based on outcomes from the most recent clinical studies. Advancements over the past decade have expanded the variety of fixation options available; however, the clinical superiority of a particular treatment modality remains without consensus. Each approach requires the use of unique surgical techniques, and the choice of a particular implant system should be based on the surgeon's familiarity with the implant design and its limitations. As our understanding of the management of distal radius fractures improves, so will our indications for each specific treatment modality.

Complications of Distal Radius Fixation

Complications following any form of distal radius fixation remain prevalent. With an armamentarium of fixation options available to practicing surgeons, familiarity with the risks of newer plate technology as it compares with other conventional methods is crucial to optimizing surgical outcome and managing patient expectations. This article presents an updated review on complications following various forms of distal radius fixation.

Utilization of Post-Acute Care Following Distal Radius Fracture Among Medicare Beneficiaries

PURPOSE

To examine the utilization and cost of post-acute care following isolated distal radius fractures (DRFs) among Medicare beneficiaries.

METHODS

We examined utilization of post-acute care among Medicare beneficiaries who experienced an isolated DRF (n = 38,479) during 2007 using 100% Medicare claims data. We analyzed the effect of patient factors on hospital admission following DRF and the receipt of post-acute care delivered by skilled nursing facilities, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, home health care agencies, and outpatient occupational therapy/physical therapy for the recovery of DRF.

RESULTS

In this cohort of isolated DRF patients, 1,694 (4.4%) were admitted to hospitals following DRF, and 20% received post-acute care. Women and patients with more comorbid conditions were more likely to require hospital admission. The utilization of post-acute care was higher among women, patients who resided in urban areas, and patients of higher socioeconomic status. The average cost per patient of post-acute care services from inpatient rehabilitation facilities and skilled nursing facilities ($15,888/patient) was significantly higher than the average cost other aspects of DRF care and accounted for 69% of the total DRF-related expenditure among patients who received inpatient rehabilitation.

CONCLUSIONS

Sociodemographic factors, including sex, socioeconomic status, and age, were significantly correlated with the use of post-acute care following isolated DRFs, and post-acute care accounted for a substantial proportion of the total expenditures related to these common injuries among the elderly. Identifying patients who will derive the greatest benefit from post-acute care can inform strategies to improve the cost efficiency of rehabilitation and optimize scarce health care resources.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic III.

Mortality after distal radial fractures in the Medicare population

The occurrence of a low energy fracture of the distal radius increases the risk for another, more serious fracture, such as a proximal femoral fracture. Early mortality after a proximal femoral fracture has been widely studied, but the association between a distal radial fracture and mortality is unknown. The date of death for all Medicare beneficiaries who sustained an isolated distal radial fracture in 2007 was determined using Medicare Vital Statistics files. The adjusted mortality rate for each age-sex group was calculated and compared with published US mortality tables. Distal radial fractures were not associated with an increased mortality rate. In fact, beneficiaries had a significantly lower mortality rate after distal radial fractures than the general population. This may be related to the injured beneficiaries' involvement in the healthcare system. Mortality rate did not vary significantly based on time from injury. Our results indicate that any mortality is unlikely to be attributable to the distal radial fracture or its treatment. Level of evidence: III.

Influence of surgeon, patient and radiographic factors on distal radius fracture treatment

The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgeon, patient, and radiographic factors influencing the recommendation for operative treatment in distal radius fractures. In a web-based study 252 orthopaedic surgeons from a variety of countries reviewed 30 consecutive sets of radiographs of patients that presented to our emergency department with a fracture of the distal radius. Surgeons were randomly assigned to receive either 'Radiographs only' or 'Radiographs and clinical information'. Surgery was recommended on average 52% of the time whether or not surgeons received clinical information. Female surgeons, surgeons with less than 21 years of experience, and hand surgeons were more likely to recommend operative treatment, but these factors explained only 1% of the variation. Radiographic criteria (intra-articular fractures, ulnar styloid fractures, dorsal comminution, dorsal tilt, and ulnar variance) explained 49% of the variation. The overall agreement on treatment was moderate and slightly higher among surgeons that received radiographs alone. Level of evidence: Level II, therapeutic; not a clinical study.

Radiographs Versus Radiographic Measurements in Distal Radius Fractures

Surgeons use radiographic measures of deformity to help make treatment decisions in distal radius fractures. Precise threshold values are sometimes offered as a guide to treatment. The purpose was to evaluate if agreement on treatment recommendations would improve if surgeons were provided with radiographs rather than precise numeric radiographic measurements. We randomized 259 surgeons to review the scenarios of 30 consecutive adult patients with a distal radius fracture treated at our emergency department either with radiographs (135 surgeons) or with radiographic measurements (124 surgeons). Interrater reliability was measured with the Fleiss' generalized Kappa. Factors associated with a recommendation for operative treatment were sought in bivariate and multivariable analyses. Surgeons that received measurements only recommended operative treatment significantly more often, but were less likely to agree than surgeons evaluating actual radiographs. Patient factors - radiographic factors in particular - had a greater influence on treatment recommendation than surgeon factors. Agreement on treatment recommendations improved if surgeons were provided with radiographs instead of just measurements. There may be radiographic factors other than measures of deformity that some surgeons use to determine recommendations for surgery.

The influence of surgeon age on distal radius fracture treatment in the United States: a population-based study

PURPOSE

This study attempted to determine the extent to which surgeon age influences treatment patterns for distal radius fractures (DRFs). We hypothesized that younger surgeons perform open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for DRFs among elderly individuals more frequently than older surgeons, who employ a wider range of treatment modalities.

METHODS

We identified 61,314 Medicare beneficiaries who experienced DRFs and the 12,823 surgeons who performed ORIF, external fixation, pinning, or closed reduction on them during 2007. We examined the effect of surgeon age on DRF treatment pattern, controlling for patient characteristics and other surgeon factors using multinomial logistic regression. We then stratified our analysis by American Society for Surgery of the Hand membership to more closely examine the influence of surgeon specialization on the association between surgeon age and DRF treatment.

RESULTS

Surgeons aged 40 years and younger were more likely to perform ORIF and less likely to choose external fixation and percutaneous pinning to treat DRFs, compared with older surgeons. Surgeon specialization mitigated this relationship, and American Society for Surgery of the Hand members were more likely to choose ORIF compared with nonmembers. However, surgeon age remained a significant predictor of treatment choice after controlling for other factors and surgeon specialization.

CONCLUSIONS

Younger surgeons are more likely to perform ORIF for DRFs among Medicare beneficiaries over 65 years of age. Given the lack of evidence supporting any single treatment option for DRF, understanding the factors that drive dissemination of operative techniques may provide insight into treatment disparities within the Medicare population.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic III.

Mechanical failure of the distal radius volar locking plate

PURPOSE

To review 9 cases of mechanical failure of the volar locking plate for distal radial fractures.

METHODS

Records of 374 consecutive patients who underwent volar locking plating for distal radial fractures were reviewed. Mechanical failures of the volar locking plate were defined as plate breakage or bending, screw breakage or loosening, or collapse of articular fragments resulting in intra-articular screw extrusion.

RESULTS

Nine mechanical failures occurred between 2 weeks and 3 months in 8 (2.4%) of the patients aged 25 to 82 (median, 74) years with AO fracture types of A3 (n=4), C1 (n=1), C2 (n=1), and C3 (n=3). Mechanical failures included screw pullout (n=5), locking plate bending (n=2), locking screws breakage (n=1), and loosening of locked variable angle screws (n=1). One patient underwent revision of fixation and 2 underwent implant removal. The remainder were treated conservatively. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months; their mean flexion arc was 87 degrees (standard deviation [SD], 17) and the mean rotation arc was 136 degrees (SD, 29 degrees). According to the Green and O'Brien score, their outcomes were good (n=1), fair (n=4), and poor (n=3).

CONCLUSION

Although mechanical failure of volar locking plate is uncommon, some are potentially preventable.

Using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement to assess reporting of observational trials in hand surgery

PURPOSE

To use the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement checklist to critically evaluate the change in quality of observational trial reporting in the Journal of Hand Surgery American between 2005 and 2011.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis of observational studies published in the Journal of Hand Surgery American was designed to sample 2 6-month periods of publication (March 2005 to August 2005 and June 2011 to November 2011). Fifty-one items were extracted from the STROBE statement for evaluation. Overall STROBE compliance rates for articles and specific checklist items were determined. Final compliance percentages from each period were compared by Student t-testing. Changes in item compliance over time were quantified.

RESULTS

Overall compliance with the STROBE statement was 38% (range, 10%-54%) in 2005 and 58% (range, 39%-85%) for 2011 manuscripts representing a significant improvement. Seventy-five percent or greater of articles (2005/2011) provided the explicit reporting of background (100%/97%), follow-up time (85%/94%), overall interpretation of data (100%/94%), and results of similar studies (95%/89%). Twenty-five percent or less of articles provided the study design in the abstract (10%/20%), a clear description of the study's setting (10%/23%), the handling of missing data (0%/6%), the potential directions of bias (5%/11%), and the use of a power analysis (0%/17%). Eighty-six percent (44/51) of items were more frequently satisfied in 2011 articles than in 2005 publications. Absolute increases in compliance rates of 40% or greater were noted in 10 items (20%) with no worsening in compliance for an individual item over 6%.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall quality of the reporting of observational trials in the Journal of Hand Surgery American improved from 2005 to 2011. Current observational trials in hand surgery could still benefit from increased reporting of methodological details including the use of power analyses, the handling of missing data, and consideration of potential bias.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic III.

Reflections 1 year into the 21-Center National Institutes of Health--funded WRIST study: a primer on conducting a multicenter clinical trial

The Wrist and Radius Injury Surgery Trial (WRIST) study group is a collaboration of 21 hand surgery centers in the United States, Canada, and Singapore, to showcase the interest and capability of hand surgeons to conduct a multicenter clinical trial. The WRIST study group was formed in response to the seminal systematic review by Margaliot et al and the Cochrane report that indicated marked deficiency in the quality of evidence in the distal radius fracture literature. Since the initial description of this fracture by Colles in 1814, over 2,000 studies have been published on this subject; yet, high-level studies based on the principles of evidence-based medicine are lacking. As we continue to embrace evidence-based medicine to raise the quality of research, the lessons learned during the organization and conduct of WRIST can serve as a template for others contemplating similar efforts. This article traces the course of WRIST by sharing the triumphs and, more important, the struggles faced in the first year of this study.

Distal radius fractures: current concepts

Despite the frequency of distal radius fractures, the optimal treatment remains without consensus opinion. A trend toward increased distal radius fracture open reduction and internal fixation has been identified, with biomechanical and clinical studies suggesting treatment advantages of certain fixation methods over others. Well-controlled patient trials are still missing to lend objective findings to management algorithms. This article reviews the literature over the past 5 years to guide our management regarding this common upper-extremity injury.

Treatment strategies of distal radius fractures

There has been a surge in the operative management of distal radius fractures. Closed reduction, external fixation, and open reduction with internal fixation each have advantages and disadvantages. The purpose of this review is not to provide the clinician with an algorithm for treatment of distal radius fractures. These fractures span an extensive spectrum of severity across age groups and demographics. Fortunately, the surgeon holds a vast array of options to provide care for patients with distal radius fractures. The choice of fixation or conservative care resides in the personality of the fracture and the needs of the patients.

Common myths and evidence in the management of distal radius fractures

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are the most common fracture treated by physicians, but questions remain regarding optimal management. Fracture patterns, biomechanics, and treatment strategies have been debated for more than 200 years, and research shows many controversies regarding long-held beliefs. Although these common myths have been propagated and considered fact, they are not based on the best-available evidence. This article illustrates some of the major controversies regarding the management of DRFs. To provide optimal care in a world of evidence-based medicine, clinicians must shift their thinking and accept that some of the indoctrinated ideas may represent a flawed heuristic approach.

Management of distal radius fractures from the North American perspective

In North America, the rate of nonoperative management of displaced distal radius fractures has declined as the rate of internal fixation has increased. Volar locking plate fixation has increased in popularity despite a lack of supportive level 1 evidence. Issues of cost-effectiveness are relevant because there is no best-practice treatment at this stage. Clinicians should be aware of the goals of treatment and challenges, particularly in managing elderly patients with distal radius fractures. Large, randomized controlled trials or meta-analyses may provide answers about when operative intervention is favored over nonoperative management and which operative intervention provides the best outcomes.