Plate Fixation With Cancellous Graft for Scaphoid Nonunion With Avascular Necrosis

Surgical Treatment of Scaphoid Fractures: Recommendations for Management

Background: Several operative treatments exist for scaphoid fractures, varying by approach (e.g., ercutaneous, volar, or dorsal), implant type (e.g., screw or Kirschner wire), and bone raft choice (e.g., none, nonvascularized, or vascularized). Many previous systematic eviews and meta-analyses have investigated outcomes following different surgicalÚpproaches, the use of vascularized versus nonvascularized bone graft for scaphoidßracture nonunions, and treatment for specific fracture patterns. However, given the advancements n scaphoid fracture treatment in recent years, there is a need for updated treatment recommendations hat would be beneficial to hand surgeons. Purpose: We present a comprehensive review of the operative treatment of scaphoid fractures based on recent literature and propose a unified treatment algorithm for managing these fractures. Methods: The English-language literature was searched from 2002 to 2023 for high evidence level (e.g., randomized trials), review, and meta-analysis articles with the following search terms: "scaphoid, "u8220"scaphoid" AND "nonunion, " and "scaphoid" AND "malunion. " Each article was creened by the authors to determine the scaphoid fracture scenario addressed and ubsequent treatment recommendations. The findings from article reviews were then rganized by scaphoid fracture types in this manuscript. Results: A total of 95 pertinent articles were ultimately selected and used as the basis for reviewing different scaphoid fracture scenarios. A treatment algorithm was then proposed based on literature review. Conclusion: This summary of the recent literature can guide hand surgeons in addressing scaphoidßractures. Future research in scaphoid fracture treatment, particularly for nonunions, would be most beneficial n the form of systematic review, meta-analysis, or multicenter prospective randomized clinical trials. Level of Evidence: IV.

Scaphoid Plate Osteosynthesis in Complex Fractures and Wrist Trauma: A Case Series

Introduction Treatment of scaphoid fracture is challenging due to its unique blood supply and geometry. Traditionally, a headless compression screw is the standard treatment for unstable scaphoid fracture. Some fractures are complex, for example, comminution with bone loss. A scaphoid plate is an option in these difficult fractures providing adequate rotational stability. Aim To share our experience in using scaphoid plates in complex wrist trauma and comminuted fractures. Method and material Complex wrist trauma involving scaphoid fractures that were comminuted and multi-fragmentary fractures treated with plate osteosynthesis were retrospectively reviewed between July 2019 and September 2021. Patient demographic data, preoperative radiographs, CT scans, pain, wrist range of motion, and fracture union rate to union were reviewed. Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH®) score was recorded at 1-year postoperative follow-up.  Results Nine patients associated with complex wrist trauma were included in this case series. The mean follow-up was 2.5 years (13-30 months). The union rate was 100%. The mean arc of motion was 105° (95-110°). QuickDASH® score was 19.96 at 1-year postoperative follow-up. Four patients had good outcomes, four satisfactory, and one poor outcome. One hardware complication was observed which was the impingement of the plate proximally over the articular surface of the distal radius. Conclusion A scaphoid plate is a reliable option for treating complex and difficult fractures. It provides adequate stability, especially in comminution, bone loss, or multi-fragmentary fractures which are not amendable using other fixation methods. We recommend the expansion of plate osteosynthesis beyond scaphoid nonunion into complex wrist trauma.

Fixation Techniques for Scaphoid Nonunion

Scaphoid fractures are common injuries with high risk of nonunion. Various fixation techniques exist for managing scaphoid nonunions, including Kirschner wires, single or dual headless compression screws, combination fixation techniques, volar plating, and compressive staple fixation. The indication for each fixation technique varies depending on the patient, type of nonunion, and clinical scenario.

Proximal Hamate Reconstruction of Proximal Pole Scaphoid Nonunion: A Case Series and Analysis of Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Small proximal pole scaphoid nonunions present a clinical challenge influenced by fragment size, vascular compromise, deforming forces exerted through the scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL), and potential articular fragmentation. Osteochondral autograft options for proximal pole reconstruction include the medial femoral trochlea, costochondral rib, or proximal hamate. This study reports the clinical outcomes of patients treated with proximal hamate osteochondral autograft reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective review identified patients treated with this surgery from 2 institutions with a minimum 6-month follow-up. Clinical outcomes included the Visual Analog Dcale pain score, 12-item Short-Form survey, abbreviated Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score, wrist and forearm range of motion (ROM), radiographic assessment, and complications. We reviewed and compared these outcomes with those of the current published literature.

RESULTS

Four patients (mean age: 24 years, 75% men) with a 12.8-month average follow-up (range: 6-20 months) were included. Radiographic union was identified in all cases by 12 weeks (range, 10-12). The average wrist ROM was 67.5% flexion/extension and 100% pronation/supination compared with the contralateral side at the final follow-up. The mean QuickDASH score was 17.6 (SD, 13). No complications were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal pole scaphoid nonunion reconstruction using autologous proximal hamate osteochondral graft demonstrated encouraging clinical and radiographic outcomes. Proximal hamate harvest involves minimal donor site morbidity without a distant operative site, uses an osteochondral graft with similar morphology to the proximal scaphoid, requires no microsurgical technique, and permits reconstruction of the SLIL using the volar capitohamate ligament.

Perfusion of the proximal scaphoid pole: correlation between preoperative ge-MRI and intraoperative findings

BACKGROUND

Gadolinium enhanced MRI (ge-MRI) is considered as gold standard for perfusion evaluation in case of scaphoid nonunion (SNU). However, its clinical value and specificity is still not clearly evaluated. This study compares preoperative ge-MRI-based perfusion assessment and intraoperative proximal pole (PP) perfusion after scaphoid reconstruction by vascularized bone grafts. In addition, the postoperative osseous consolidation (OC) was correlated to intraoperative perfusion findings.

METHODS

Between 08/2010 and 01/2020, 60 of 271 patients with scaphoid nonunion received a vascularized radius bone graft for reconstruction. Medical reports were checked for intra-op perfusion findings. Consolidation rate was assessed at mean follow-up of 3 months by CT evaluation. In 50 cases (83.2%), complete medical and radiological history could be obtained. Preoperative ge-MRI was reevaluated by a blinded radiologist for advanced analysis of sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Preoperative ge-MRI (initial finding, IF) showed 23 avascular, 20 malperfused, and seven vital PP. Blinded radiological follow-up (second finding, SF) revealed 14 avascular, 28 malperfused, and 8 vital PP, with a concordance of 65.3% (n = 35). After correlation with the intra-op findings, a specificity of preoperative ge-MRI of 76.5% (IF) and 88.2 (SF), respectively, was revealed for exclusion of avitality. For detection of malperfusion, there was a sensitivity of 92.7% (IF) and 85.4% (SF), respectively. Complete OC was seen 12 weeks postoperatively in 37 (73.5%), partial OC in 9 (18.3%), and nonunion in 4 cases (8.2%) on CT-scans. Of the 41 malperfused/avascular PP, 31 (75.6%) progressed to complete and 6 (14.6%) to partial (at least 2 adjacent CT-layers of 2 mm) OC, with 4 nonunions.

CONCLUSION

The sensitivity and specificity of ge-MRI for detection/ exclusion of malperfusion/avitality of the PP was lower than expected. Therewith, the intraoperative assessment of PP perfusion regains a high value in decision-making for the appropriate graft. We recommend preservation of the dorsal radial vascular plexus initially until the vascularity of the proximal pole has been estimated. Patient education for all contingencies and retraction options should be obtained.

Clinical outcomes of double-screw fixation with bone grafting for displaced scaphoid nonunions: A series of 21 cases

Purpose

This study reports the clinical outcomes of double-screw fixation with bone grafting for displaced scaphoid nonunions.

Patients and methods

This study was a retrospective survey. From January 2018 to December 2019, 21 patients with displaced scaphoid fractures underwent open debridement and two headless compression screw fixation with bone grafting. The preoperative and postoperative lateral intrascaphoid angle (LISA) and scapholunate angle (SLA) were recorded. Preoperative and postoperative grip strength (% of the healthy side), active range of motion (AROM), visual analogue scale (VAS), and patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) scores at the final follow-up were obtained for all patients for comparison.

Results

Patients were treated for an average of 38.3 months (range 12-250) after the injury. The average time of postoperative follow-up was 30.5 months (range 24-48). All fractures achieved union at a mean of 2.7 months (range 2-4) after surgery, and 14 scaphoids of 21 patients (66.7%) healed by 8 weeks. CT scans showed no evidence of cortical penetration of either screw in all patients. There was a statistically significant improvement in AROM, grip strength, and PRWE. No complications occurred in this study, and all patients returned to work.

Conclusion

This study indicates that double-screw fixation with bone grafting is an effective technique for treating displaced scaphoid nonunions.

Excessive Derotational K-Wire Angulation Decreases Compression by Headless Compression Screw

Background  Scaphoid fracture is the most common carpal bone fracture. Open reduction internal fixation of scaphoid fractures typically undergo stabilization by a single headless compression screw (HCS). During screw insertion, a derotational Kirschner wire (K-wire) is often placed for rotational control of the near and far fragment. Questions/Purposes  The aim of this study was to determine if there is an angle of derotational K-wire placement in relation to the axis of a HCS that compromises the amount of compression generated at a fracture site by the HCS. We hypothesize that increased off-axis angle will lead to decreased compression across the fracture site. Methods  A Cellular Block 20 rigid polyurethane foam (Sawbones, Vashon, WA) scaphoid model was created to eliminate variability in bone mineral density in cadaveric bone. MiniAcutrak HCS screws (Acumed, Hillsboro, OR) were used for testing. Three conditions were tested: (1) HCS with derotational wire inserted parallel to the HCS (zero degrees off-axis); (2) HCS with derotational wire inserted 10 degrees off-axis; and (3) HCS with derotational wire inserted 20 degrees off-axis. Results  A statistically significant difference in the mean compression of the control group (56.9 N) was found between the mean compression with the derotational K-wire placed 20 degrees off-axis (15.2 N) ( p  = 0.001). Conclusions  Compression at the fracture site could be impeded by placing an excessively angulated off-axis derotation wire prior to insertion of the HCS. Clinical Relevance  Our study adds a new detail to the optimal technique of HCS placement in scaphoid fractures to improve compression and fracture union.

Scaphoid Nonunion: A Review of Surgical Strategies

The scaphoid is predisposed to nonunion after fracture because of its tenuous blood supply and propensity for delayed diagnosis. Many surgical techniques exist and continue to be developed to treat scaphoid non-unions. However, with variability in patient presentation, differences in nonunion location and type, and multiple bone graft sources and fixation options, selecting a surgical strategy proves a difficult task. The goal of this article is to provide an updated review of surgical strategies used to treat scaphoid nonunions. Particular attention is paid to methods of fixation as well as the ongoing debate over indications for structural and vascularized bone grafting. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(5):e235-e242.].

CMC Mimickers: Differential Diagnosis and Work-Up for Radial-Sided Wrist Pain

In patients with radial-sided wrist pain, a myriad of possible etiologies exists and as such, a detailed history, examination, and, where indicated, imaging is obtained to try and aid with its diagnosis. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of radial-sided wrist pain, diagnostic modalities and discuss current treatment options. More detailed information is out-of-scope for this article and if needed, we would guide the reader to seek out other selected texts, as indicated.

Does Proximal Hamate Graft for Proximal Scaphoid Reconstruction Restore Native Wrist Kinematics?

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to determine whether reconstruction of the proximal pole of the scaphoid with a proximal hamate graft restores native carpal kinematics.

METHODS

A cadaveric study was designed assessing wrist kinematic after proximal hamate graft for proximal pole of the scaphoid nonunion. Wireless sensors were mounted to the carpus using a custom pin and suture anchor system to 8 cadavers. A wrist simulator was used to move the wrist through a cyclical motion about the flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation axes. Each specimen was tested under a series of 3 conditions: (1) a native state, "Intact"; (2) fractured scaphoid proximal pole, "Fracture"; and (3) post-reconstruction of the proximal pole of the scaphoid using a proximal hamate graft, "Graft."

RESULTS

The fracture condition resulted in a statistically significant change in scapholunate kinematics across the entire arc of motion relative to the intact condition. Reconstruction with proximal hamate grafts restored scapholunate kinematics close to the intact state in both flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation axes. The lunocapitate flexion during wrist flexion was significantly different after the hamate graft reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal hamate to scaphoid transfer resulted in restoration of near normal carpal kinematics to the intact state.

Predictors of Failure for Vascularized and Nonvascularized Bone Grafting of Scaphoid Nonunions: A Systematic Review

Objective This article compares predictors of failure for vascularized (VBG) and nonvascularized bone grafting (NVBG) of scaphoid nonunions.

Methods We conducted a systematic literature review of outcomes after VBG and NVBG of scaphoid nonunion. Fifty-one VBG studies (N = 1,419 patients) and 81 NVBG studies (N = 3,019 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Data were collected on surgical technique, type of fixation, time from injury to surgery, fracture location, abnormal carpal posture (humpback deformity and/or dorsal intercalated segmental instability [DISI]), radiographic parameters of carpal alignment, prior failed surgery, smoking status, and avascular necrosis (AVN) as defined by punctate bleeding, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with contrast, MRI without contrast, X-ray, and histology. Meta-analysis of proportions was conducted with Freeman–Tukey double arcsine transformation. Multilevel mixed-effects analyses were performed with univariable and multivariable Poisson regression to identify confounders and evaluate predictors of failure.

Results The pooled failure incidence effect size was comparable between VBG and NVBG (0.09 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05–0.13] and 0.08 [95% CI 0.06–0.11], respectively). Humpback deformity and/or DISI (incidence-rate radios [IRRs] 1.57, CI: 1.04–2.36) and lateral intrascaphoid angle (IRR 1.21, CI: 1.08–1.37) were significantly associated with an increased VBG failure incidence. Time from injury to surgery (IRR 1.09, CI: 1.06–1.12) and height-to-length (H/L) ratio (IRR 53.98, CI: 1.16–2,504.24) were significantly associated with an increased NVBG failure incidence, though H/L ratio demonstrated a wide CI. Decreased proximal fragment contrast uptake on MRI was a statistically significant predictor of increased failure incidence for both VBG (IRR 2.03 CI: 1.13–3.66) and NVBG (IRR 1.39, CI: 1.16–1.66). Punctate bleeding or radiographic AVN, scapholunate angle, radiolunate angle, and prior failed surgery were not associated with failure incidence for either bone graft type (p > 0.05).

Conclusion Humpback deformity and/or DISI and increasing lateral intrascaphoid angle may be predictors of VBG failure. Time from injury to surgery may be a predictor of NVBG failure. AVN as defined by decreased contrast uptake on MRI may be a marker of increased failure risk for both bone graft types.

Scaphoid plating for recalcitrant scaphoid fractures: a systematic review

We conducted a systematic review of scaphoid plating for recalcitrant scaphoid fractures using EMBASE, Pubmed, Cochrane and MEDLINE. Thirteen studies were included. Ninety-three per cent of cases reported were male with a mean age of 27 years. Bony union was reported in eleven studies and achieved in 72% to 100% of cases. Scaphoid plates showed no significant difference in union incidence compared with headless compression screws. Mean removal incidence of plates was 21%. Postoperative flexion-extension arc was 119°. Grip strength improved by 14% postoperatively over that before surgery. There was a general improvement in patient-reported outcome measures. Eighty-six per cent of reported participants returned to their previous work. In these clinical reports, plates frequently required removal more frequently than headless compression screws.

Volar Plating versus Headless Compression Screw Fixation of Scaphoid Nonunions: A Meta-analysis of Outcomes

Background  Headless compression screw fixation with bone grafting has been the mainstay of treatment for scaphoid nonunion for the past several decades. Recently, locked volar plate fixation has gained popularity as a technique for scaphoid fixation, especially for recalcitrant or secondary nonunions. Purpose  The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare union rates and clinical outcomes between locked volar plate fixation and headless compression screw fixation for the treatment of scaphoid nonunions. Methods  A literature search was performed for studies documenting treatment outcomes for scaphoid nonunions from 2000 to 2020. Inclusion criteria consisted of (1) average age > 18 years, (2) primary study using screw fixation, plate fixation, or both, with discrete data reported for each procedure, and (3) average follow-up of at least 3 months. Exclusion criteria consisted of studies with incomplete or missing data on union rates. Data from each study was weighted, combined within treatment groups, and compared across treatment groups using a generalized linear model or binomial distribution. Results  Following title and full-text review, 23 articles were included for analysis. Preoperatively, patients treated with plate fixation had significantly longer time from injury to surgery and were more likely to have failed prior surgical intervention. There was no significant difference between union rates at 92 and 94% for screw and plate fixation, respectively. However, plate fixation resulted in longer time to union and lower modified Mayo wrist scores. Conclusion  Patients treated with locked volar plate fixation were more likely to be used for recalcitrant or secondary nonunions. There was no statistically significant difference in union rates between screw and plate fixation. The results from this meta-analysis support the select use of locked volar plate fixation for scaphoid nonunion, especially recalcitrant nonunions and those that have failed prior surgical repair.

Scaphoid Nonunion Volar Plating with Pure Nonvascularized Cancellous Autograft

Background

Surgical treatment of scaphoid nonunion has evolved over the years to include a variety of procedures and techniques involving a number of vascularized and nonvascularized bone grafting options and fixation strategies. Volar plating of scaphoid nonunions with use of pure cancellous nonvascularized autograft is a safe and effective treatment method with good functional outcomes and union rates¹.

Description

Volar plating of the scaphoid nonunion is performed via a volar approach, with debridement and reduction of the nonunion site. A nonvascularized pure cancellous bone autograft is then harvested and impacted from the distal aspect of the ipsilateral radius or the olecranon. Finally, a low-profile volar locking plate is applied for fixation².

Alternatives

There is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment of scaphoid nonunion. Headless compression screws are currently popular, and advances have been made over time to include various nonvascularized and vascularized corticocancellous grafts. The advent of plate fixation of the scaphoid has enabled the surgical treatment of nonunion to better replicate scaphoid morphology, allowing for improved biomechanical stability and optimizing the biologic milieu for healing.

Rationale

Headless compression screws, although a reasonable option for most acute scaphoid fractures, may not be the most appropriate application for nonunions. Compression, in itself, is not required for the surgical treatment of scaphoid nonunion, and can even prove detrimental by forcing the reduction into a malunion. The stability of headless compression screws must rely on a structural graft to resist the compression and create friction. The more structural the graft, however, the less biologically active it tends to be. Further, the simple placement of a metallic screw within the fracture site is counter to orthopaedic principles because it dramatically lowers the surface area available for union. Volar locking plates address the shortcoming of headless compression screws by (1) directly buttressing the deforming forces superior to headless screws^3-6; (2) utilizing the most accessible, biologically active nonvascularized bone graft, which is pure cancellous graft; (3) allowing for maximal surface area contact for union; and (4) preserving the intraosseous vascular network within the scaphoid and its vascular supply at its dorsal ridge.

Expected Outcomes

Volar scaphoid plating with cancellous bone grafting is a reliable technique with excellent union rates and favorable functional outcomes. A review of 34 patients with scaphoid nonunions with segmental defects treated with volar plates and pure cancellous autograft demonstrated 100% union as verified by computed tomography scans postoperatively¹. Average Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores and grip strengths improved by final follow-up. Another series of 13 scaphoid nonunions with osteonecrosis treated with volar plating and pure cancellous autograft showed 100% union and good patient-reported and functional outcomes, despite smokers, proximal poles, and previous failed surgical procedures in the cohort². These favorable results are consistent with earlier reports of the modern plating systems; however, concerns for hardware-related complications have been elucidated over the years, including symptomatic hardware impingement⁷. This risk can be mitigated by proper surgical technique and plate placement.

Important Tips

Clear visualization of the entire volar surface of the scaphoid is crucial. Take care not to reflect too much capsule, so as to cause ulnar translation of the carpus.Thorough debridement of nonviable bone is paramount. Using a 2.0 or 3.0-mm low-speed burr with continuous irrigation can be helpful. We have had successful unions even in cases in which the remaining proximal pole was just a cortical shell and essentially a hollow vessel for graft.Err on the side of verticalization of the scaphoid, overextending and supinating the distal pole. Overstuffing the nonunion site with cancellous autograft aids in reduction and maximizes the osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties of the graft.Impaction of the graft is crucial, and the surgeon should harvest more autograft than one might initially anticipate.Secure the plate to the proximal portion of the scaphoid first. There is less room for error on the proximal portion where plate positioning is more critical.Do not cross the scaphoid "line in the sand"; to do so will result in plate impingement on the radius. Proper placement of the plate is just distal to the point at which the convex surface of the proximal pole transitions to become the concave surface of the scaphoid waist, as viewed from a volar approach.Plate modification for proximal pole fractures and nonunions: removal of the most proximal hole in the plate allows for improved fixation despite the plate itself remaining behind the scaphoid "line in the sand." In these cases, the locking screws must be directed so that they buttress the subchondral bone of each pole, especially the proximal pole.

Management of Proximal Pole Scaphoid Nonunions: A Critical Analysis Review

»

Optimal management of nonunions of the proximal pole of the scaphoid is controversial and dependent on many patient and pathophysiologic considerations.

»

If the proximal pole subchondral bone support is sufficient, options include open reduction and internal fixation, either alone or in combination with autologous nonvascularized or vascularized bone graft.

»

If the proximal pole is not salvageable, replacement with osteochondral autografts or osteochondral flaps is the only option for reconstruction of the native anatomy.

Mid-term outcome of volar plate fixation for scaphoid nonunion

AIMS

Fixation of scaphoid nonunion with a volar locking plate and cancellous bone grafting has been shown to be a successful technique in small series. Few mid- or long-term follow-up studies have been reported. The aim of this study was to report the mid-term radiological and functional outcome of plate fixation for scaphoid nonunion.

METHODS

Patients with a scaphoid nonunion were prospectively enrolled and treated with open reduction using a volar approach, debridement of the nonunion, and fixation using a locking plate and cancellous bone grafting, from the ipsilateral iliac crest. Follow-up included examination, functional assessment using the patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation (PRWHE), and multiplanar reformation CT scans at three-month intervals until union was confirmed.

RESULTS

A total of 49 patients with a mean age of 31 years (16 to 74) and a mean duration of nonunion of 3.6 years (0.4 to 16) were included. Postoperatively, the nonunion healed in 47 patients (96%) as shown on CT scans. The mean time to union was 4.2 months (3 to 12). Due to impingement of the plate on the volar rim of the radius and functional limitation, the hardware was removed in 18 patients. At a median follow-up of 38 months in 34 patients, the mean active range of motion (ROM) improved significantly from 89° to 124° (SD 44°; p = 0.003). The mean grip strength improved significantly from 52% to 79% (SD 28%; p < 0.001) of the contralateral side. The mean PRWHE score improved significantly from 66 to 17 points (SD 25; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Locking plate fixation supplemented with autologous cancellous bone grafting is a successful form of treatment for scaphoid nonunion. Functional outcomes improve with the passage of time, and mid-term results are excellent with a significant improvement in ROM, grip strength, and functional outcome as measured by the PRWHE. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(12):1697-1702.

Postoperative Outcomes of Volar Plate Fixation in Cases of Scaphoid Deformity or Nonunion: A Case Series

Background  Fractures through the waist of scaphoid are a common injury, resulting in deformity or nonunion. Recently, a locking plate has been shown to fix deformity or nonunion of scaphoid, with limited observation of functional postoperative outcomes. Objectives  We present a case series of 16 patients, with the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score evaluation in primary fixation of scaphoid fractures with humpback deformity ( n  = 11) and revision open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for nonunion ( n  = 5), using the Medartis TriLock 1.5 scaphoid plate and bone grafting. Patients and Methods  DASH scores were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively at 3, 6, and 12 (if required) months. Patient demographics, smoking status, employment type, and grip strengths were recorded. Results  Thirteen patients attended follow-up. Union was clinically and radiologically assessed with 13 achieving union. The mean preoperative DASH score was 34.0 ( n  = 16) and at treatment completion (discharge or DNA) was 11.5 ( n  = 13), with mean reduction of 18.5 ( p  = 0.03). At treatment completion, mean reduction in DASH score of revision ORIF was 13.7 ( p  = 0.27; n  = 4), compared with 20.7 ( p  < 0.01; n  = 9) in primary fixation with plate. Conclusions  Deformity correction, reduction in DASH score, and rate of union make the plate system useful in the management of scaphoid fractures with humpback deformity and revision for nonunion. Level of Evidence  This is a Level IV study.

Vascularized bone graft and scapholunate fixation for proximal scaphoid nonunion: a case report

We report a 38-year-old woman with a proximal scaphoid fracture nonunion from an injury 1 year ago. She was successfully treated with 2,3 intercompartmental supraretinacular artery pedicled vascularized bone graft and scapholunate fixation. It highlights the possible combination of scapholunate fixation and vascularized bone grafting in treating proximal scaphoid nonunion.

[Nitinol memory alloy two foot fixator with autologous cancellous bone grafting for old scaphoid fracture and nonunion]

Objective

To summarize the effectiveness of nitinol memory alloy two foot fixator with autologous cancellous bone grafting in treating old scaphoid fracture and nonunion.

Methods

Between January 2013 and January 2017, 11 patients of old scaphoid fracture and nonunion were treated with nitinol memory alloy two foot fixator and autologous cancellous bone grafting. All patients were male with an average age of 26.1 years (range, 18-42 years). The fractures were caused by sport in 3 cases, falling in 7 cases, and a crashing object in 1 case. The interval between injury and operation was 6-18 months (mean, 8.9 months). Postoperative outcome measures included operation time, fracture healing time, grip strength, range of motion (ROM) of flexion, extension, ulnar deviation, and radial deviation, Mayo score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score.

Results

The operation time was 35-63 minutes (mean, 48 minutes). All incisions had primary healing with no infection and loosening or breakage of internal fixator. All patients were followed up 12-30 months (mean, 20.7 months). X-ray films showed that fracture healing was achieved in all patients with an average time of 15 weeks (range, 12-25 weeks). All internal fixators were removed after 10-12 months of operation (mean, 11.2 months). At last follow-up, the grip strength, ROMs of flexion, ulnar deviation, and radial deviation were superior to those before operation ( P<0.05), no significant difference was found in ROM of extension between pre- and post-operation ( t=0.229, P=0.824). There were significant differences in above indexes between affected and normal sides ( P<0.05). At last follow-up, the Mayo, VAS, DASH scores were also significantly superior to those before operation ( P<0.05).

Conclusion

For the old scaphoid fracture and nonunion, Ni-Ti arched shape-memory alloy fixator and autologous cancellous bone grafting can obtain good effectiveness, which is an effective treatment.

Revision surgery after vascularized or non-vascularized scaphoid nonunion repair: A national population study

HYPOTHESIS

We aimed (1) to discover the prevalence of vascularized bone grafting in the treatment of scaphoid nonunion and (2) to compare healing using vascularized bone grafting versus standard non-vascularized techniques. Secondarily, we sought to compare resource utilization between procedures and identify factors that may be associated with nonunion repair failure. We hypothesized that, despite being less common, vascularized bone grafts have greater success than non-vascularized bone grafting surgeries.

METHODS

We performed a large population analysis using the Truven MarketScan databases to identify patients from 2009 to 2017 with a diagnosis of a scaphoid nonunion undergoing repair surgery with and without the insertion of a pedicled or free vascularized bone graft. We defined any subsequent scaphoid or wrist surgery within 12 months after surgery as surgery failure. We compared success rates and post-operative resource utilization using Chi-squared tests.

RESULTS

Of 4177 eligible patients, 358 underwent nonunion repair with vascularized bone graft and 3819 patients received non-vascularized bone grafting. The failure rate requiring revision surgery was 5.0% in vascularized repair, versus 6.1% for non-vascularized surgery. Age and comorbidities did not affect bone graft type. Areas with higher median household incomes had more vascularized repairs. Vascularized bone graft patients received significantly more therapy and imaging after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Most scaphoid nonunion repairs are performed without vascularize bone grafting. Typical nonunions may not justify the increased time and technical demands of vascularized bone grafting, and traditional repair should remain first line treatment for scaphoid nonunions without additional risk factors. Further studies to elucidate which fractures benefit most from vascularized grafting are needed.