Transfers of the Ipsilateral C7 Plus the Spinal Accessory Nerve Versus Triple Nerve Transfers for Treatment of C5-C6 Avulsion of the Brachial Plexus

Contralateral seventh cervical nerve transfer for central spastic arm paralysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

The specific benefits of a contralateral cervical 7 nerve transplant in people with spastic paralysis of the upper extremity caused by cerebral nerve injury are unclear. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of contralateral C7 nerve transfer for central spastic paralysis of the upper extremity, we conducted a comprehensive literature search and meta-analysis.

Materials and methods

PRISMA guidelines were used to search the databases for papers comparing the efficacy of contralateral cervical 7 nerve transfer vs. rehabilitation treatment from January 2010 to August 2022. The finishing indications were expressed using SMD ± mean. A meta-analysis was used to assess the recovery of motor function in the paralyzed upper extremity.

Results

The meta-analysis included three publications. One of the publications offers information about RCTs and non-RCTs. A total of 384 paralyzed patients were included, including 192 who underwent CC7 transfer and 192 who received rehabilitation. Results from all patients were combined and revealed that patients who had CC7 transfer may have regained greater motor function in the Fugl-Meyer score (SMD 3.52, 95% CI = 3.19-3.84, p < 0.00001) and had superior improvement in range of motion compared to the rehabilitation group (SMD 2.88, 95% CI = 2.47-3.29, p < 0.00001). In addition, the spasticity in the paralyzed upper extremity significantly improved in patients with CC7 transfer (SMD -1.42, 95% CI = -1.60 to -1.25, p < 0.00001).

Conclusion

Our findings suggested that a contralateral C7 nerve transfer, which has no additional adverse effects on the healthy upper limb, is a preferable method to restore motor function.

Morphological basis of radial nerve dysfunction in newborns differs from that of no radial nerve dysfunction in adults in C5-C6-C7 injuries to the brachial plexus: a cadaveric study

OBJECTIVE

Injuries to the upper and middle trunks of brachial plexus result in dysfunction of radial nerves in newborns but do not in adults. We hypothesized that the radial nerve had a lower proportion of myelinated nerve fibers (MNFs) from the lower trunk in newborns than in adults, and in newborns those MNFs were less developed than MNFs in the radial nerve from the middle and upper trunks.

METHODS

We dissected bilateral brachial plexus of six newborn and six adult cadavers. The radial nerve and its fascicles were separated proximally to posterior divisions of the upper, middle and lower trunks, and fascicles of the radial nerve were harvested from three trunks to calculate respective percentage of MNFs accounting for the total number of MNFs in the radial nerve. We determined diameters of axons and g-ratios of MNFs in the radial nerve from three trunks.

RESULTS

Compared with adults, the percentage of MNFs in the radial nerve from the lower trunk was lower (p < 0.05), from the middle trunk higher (p < 0.05) and from the upper trunk similar (p > 0.05) in newborns, though MNF counts from three trunks were higher in newborns, respectively (p < 0.01, all). In newborns, MNFs in the radial nerve from the lower trunk had smaller axonal diameters and higher g-ratios than those from the middle and upper trunks (p < 0.017, all), while in adults there were no such differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower proportion of MNFs in the radial nerve from the lower trunk in newborns than in adults, and in newborns immaturity of MNFs from the lower trunk relative to MNFs from the middle and upper trunks may be the major morphological basis of difference in clinical appearances of radial nerve palsy caused by injuries to C5-C6-C7 between newborns and adults.