Self-Perceived Hand Normality Before and After Surgical Treatment of Dupuytren Contracture

Responsiveness and validity of the Normal Hand Score in patients undergoing carpal tunnel decompression

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

QuickDASH and PRWE Are Not Optimal Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Distal Radial Fracture Due to Ceiling Effect: Potential Implications for Future Research

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the floor and ceiling effects for both the QuickDASH (shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH] questionnaire) and the PRWE (Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation) following a distal radial fracture (DRF). Secondary aims were to determine the degree to which patients with a floor or ceiling effect felt that their wrist was "normal" according to the Normal Wrist Score (NWS) and if there were patient factors associated with achieving a floor or ceiling effect.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients in whom a DRF was managed at the study center during a single year was undertaken. Outcome measures included the QuickDASH, PRWE, EuroQol-5 Dimensions-3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L), and NWS.

RESULTS

There were 526 patients with a mean age of 65 years (range, 20 to 95 years), and 421 (80%) were female. Most patients were managed nonsurgically (73%, n = 385). The mean follow-up was 4.8 years (range, 4.3 to 5.5 years). A ceiling effect was observed for both the QuickDASH (22.3% of patients with the best possible score) and the PRWE (28.5%). When defined as a score that differed from the best available score by less than the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the scoring system, the ceiling effect increased to 62.8% for the QuickDASH and 60% for the PRWE. Patients who had a ceiling score on the QuickDASH and the PWRE had a median NWS of 96 and 98, respectively, and those who had a score within 1 MCID of the ceiling score reported a median NWS of 91 and 92, respectively. On logistic regression analysis, a dominant-hand injury and better health-related quality of life were the factors associated with both QuickDASH and PRWE ceiling scores (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The QuickDASH and PRWE demonstrate ceiling effects when used to assess the outcome of DRF management. Some patients achieving ceiling scores did not consider their wrist to be "normal." Future research on patient-reported outcome assessment tools for DRFs should aim to limit the ceiling effect, especially for individuals or groups that are more likely to achieve a ceiling score.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The effect of diabetes mellitus on the outcome of surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome

The aims of this study were to investigate the effect of diabetes mellitus (DM) on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and satisfaction after surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS). Pre- and 1-year postoperative QuickDASH, normal hand, and satisfaction scores were prospectively collected from 107 patients over a 6-year period. Patients without DM reported a significant QuickDASH improvement after surgery (preoperative 34.1 versus postoperative 20.5; p < 0.001), but patients with DM did not (preoperative 46.5 versus postoperative 43.2; p = 0.554). Postoperative QuickDASH (43.2 versus 20.5) and normal hand (65 versus 80) scores were significantly worse in patients with DM. Satisfaction rates were excellent in both groups (88% versus 82%; p = 0.480). Our study showed that surgery for CuTS did not lead to an improvement in QuickDASH score in patients with DM and consequently patients with DM reported worse postoperative PROMs compared with those without. However, lack of improvement in PROMs does not affect patient satisfaction.Level of evidence: IV.

Virtual management of clinically suspected scaphoid fractures

AIMS

The aim of this study was to describe the introduction of a virtual pathway for the management of patients with a suspected fracture of the scaphoid, and to report patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and satisfaction following treatment using this service.

METHODS

All adult patients who presented with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture that was not visible on radiographs at the time of presentation during a one-year period were eligible for inclusion in the pathway. Demographic details, findings on examination, and routine four-view radiographs at the time of presentation were collected. All radiographs were reviewed virtually by a single consultant hand surgeon, with patient-initiated follow-up on request. PROMs were assessed at a minimum of one year after presentation and included the abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (QuickDASH), the EuroQol five-dimension five-level health questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), the Net Promoter Score (NPS), and return to work.

RESULTS

A total of 221 patients were referred to the virtual pathway. Their mean age was 41 years (range 16 to 87) and there were 99 male patients (45%). A total of 189 patients (86%) were discharged with advice and 19 (9%) were recalled for clinical review: seven with an undisplaced scaphoid fracture, six with another fracture of the hand or wrist, two with a scapholunate ligament injury, and four in whom no abnormality was detected. A total of 13 patients (6%) initiated follow-up with the hand service: no fracture or ligament injury was identified in this group. PROMs were available for 179 patients (81%) at a mean follow-up of 19 months (range 13 to 33). The median QuickDASH score was 2.3 (interquartile range (IQR) 0 to 15.9), the median EQ-5D-5L was 0.85 (IQR 0.73 to 1.00), the NPS was 76, and 173 patients (97%) were satisfied with their treatment. There were no documented cases of symptomatic nonunion one year following injury.

CONCLUSION

We describe the introduction of a virtual pathway for the management of patients with a suspected scaphoid fracture. We found high levels of patient satisfaction, excellent PROMs, and no detrimental effects in the vast majority of cases. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(6):709-714.

Self-Reported Disability Following Surgery for Dupuytren Contracture in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients

Background: The aims of this study were to investigate the impact of diabetes mellitus on patient-reported functional outcome measures (PROMs) and satisfaction following surgical treatment of Dupuytren contracture.

Methods: Preoperative and 1-year postoperative PROMs were collected prospectively over 6 years (2013–2019). Patients completed the QuickDASH score and were asked ‘how normal is your hand?’, recording responses on a 100-point visual analogue scale. Patient satisfaction was also self-reported.

Results: Paired responses were available for 520 hands (478 patients; 72% follow-up rate). There were 62 patients with diabetes (12%). Pre (12.5 vs. 9.1; p = 0.01) and postoperative (11.4 vs. 6.8; p = 0.02) QuickDASH scores were significantly, but not clinically, worse in diabetic patients. Patient satisfaction was high in both groups. A large and significant improvement in self-perceived hand normality was observed in both groups (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in preoperative or change in hand normality between the groups, but the postoperative normal hand score was significantly higher in non-diabetic patients (94 vs. 90; p = 0.02).

Conclusion: Our study has demonstrated statistically significantly worse disability in diabetic patients with Dupuytren contracture both pre- and postoperatively, though the observed differences were far below the minimum clinically important difference for the QuickDASH. Both groups reported a large and statistically significant improvement in self-perceived hand normality following surgery.

Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic)

QuickDASH questionnaire items behave as 2 distinct subscales rather than one scale in Dupuytren's disease

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort BACKGROUND: Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and structural equation modelling (SEM) assess relationships between questionnaire items and the constructs ("factors") measured by a questionnaire. The QuickDASH has not been subjected to these analyses in Dupuytren's disease.

PURPOSE

To undertake EFA and SEM to identify the factors measured by the QuickDASH in patients with Dupuytren's disease.

METHODS

We identified 750 cases of surgery for Dupuytren's disease at a single center with preoperative QuickDASH scores. We performed EFA on QuickDASH responses in R, using established methodology. Based on the EFA results, we conducted SEM in a training sample of 200 participants. A test SEM analysis was performed in a second, independent sample of 200 participants.

RESULTS

EFA suggested a 2-factor model. Items 1-6 measured one factor (we interpreted this as "hand function"), whereas items 9-11 measured a different factor ("hand symptoms"). Items 7 and 8 (social and work activities) did not reflect either of these factors well, and may be influenced by other variables. A structural equation model based on the EFA results, with 2 first-order factors, demonstrated excellent fit in our first SEM sample. This was confirmed with a second independent sample in a test analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The QuickDASH PROM may measure 2 distinct factors in patients with Dupuytren's disease. This aligns with previous analyses of the full-length DASH PROM. Separation of the QuickDASH PROM into 2 sub-scales with distinct scores to measure "hand function" and "hand symptoms" may improve its structural validity in patients with Dupuytren's disease.

Epineural Methylene Blue Injection May Aid Localization of Digital Nerves in Dupuytren's Surgery

Background

In Dupuytren's surgery, limited fasciectomy is still the gold-standard treatment. A relatively high risk of iatrogenic nerve injury has been observed especially when the spiral cords of the Dupuytren's tissue pull digital nerves away from their normal anatomical location. Intraoperative neural marking could facilitate locating the potentially displaced nerves. Hence, surgery could be undertaken more quickly with a lower risk of iatrogenic nerve injury.

Objectives

We hypothesize that digital nerves may be stained with methylene blue (MB) in vivo providing a visual aid to distinguish them from Dupuytren's tissue. We aim to (a) test an in vivo nerve staining technique using MB in a rat sciatic nerve model and to (b) assess the safety of epineural MB injection.

Methods

Three experiments were performed: first, the effects of (a) sham surgery, (b) epineural needle insertion, and (c) 40 μL epineural saline injection were tested in the rat sciatic nerve. Second, we determined the (a) histoanatomical localization of the epineurally injected 40 µL 1 m/m% MB stock solution and (b) we tested which saline dilution (i.e., 1:40, 1:80, and 1:160) of the stock solution does provide optimal blue color upon 40 µL epineural injection. Third, the functional and morphological effect of 40 µL 1:80 diluted MB injection was compared with that of saline, injected into the contralateral sciatic nerve. The functional effects were tested by assessing the pain threshold by using a dynamic plantar esthesiometer (DPA) and by examination of the animal's gate and paw posture. Sciatic nerves were subjected to histological examination and morphometry to test structural damage.

Results

Neither epineural needle insertion nor saline injection caused any functional or morphological changes. Histological examination revealed that the MB stained the epineural compartment. Epineural injection of 40 μL 1:80 diluted MB into the sciatic nerve stained an 18.18-mm segment of the nerve distal to the puncture point. DPA revealed unchanged pain threshold values on the plantar surface of the limbs. Normal gait and foot posture suggested normal motor functions in all groups. No histological changes were seen in the stained nerves, and the nerve fiber density remained unchanged.

Conclusion

We demonstrated that in vivo nerve staining with MB is a suitable method to mark nerves without causing detectable negative effect to the stained nerve. Human trials are required to prove the efficacy of the technique in Dupuytren's disease.