The Impact of Social Deprivation and Hand Therapy Attendance on Range of Motion After Flexor Tendon Repair

Preoperative Depression Screening in Patients with Distal Radius Fractures: An Evaluation of Its Modifiability on Outcomes for Patients with Depressive Disorder

Background  It is unclear whether nonpharmacologic intervention for depressive disorder (DD) in the preoperative period can prevent postoperative complications in hand surgery patients. Questions/Purpose  The aims were to evaluate whether psychotherapy visits/depression screenings within 90 days of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for distal radius fractures (DRFs) were associated with lower rates of (1) medical complications and (2) health care utilization (emergency department [ED] visits and readmissions). Methods  A retrospective analysis of an administrative claims database from 2010 to 2021 was performed. DD patients who underwent ORIF for DRF were 1:5 propensity score matched by comorbidities, including those who did ( n  = 8,993) and did not ( n  = 44,503) attend a psychotherapy visit/depression screening 90 days before surgery. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to compare the odds ratio (OR) of medical complications, ED visits, and readmissions within 90 days. The p -values less than 0.001 were significant. Results  DD patients who did not attend a preoperative psychotherapy visit/depression screening experienced fivefold higher odds of total medical complications (25.66 vs. 5.27%; OR: 5.25, p  < 0.0001), including surgical site infections (1.23 vs. 0.14%; OR: 8.71, p  < 0.0001), deep wound infections (0.98 vs. 0.17%; OR: 6.00, p  < 0.0001), and transfusions (1.64 vs. 0.22%; OR: 7.61, p  < 0.0001). Those who did not attend a psychotherapy visit/depression screening experienced higher odds of ED utilizations (9.71 vs. 2.71%; OR: 3.87, p  < 0.0001), however, no difference in readmissions (3.40 vs. 3.54%; OR: 0.96, p  = 0.569). Conclusion  Depression screening may be a helpful preoperative intervention to optimize patients with DD undergoing hand surgery to minimize postoperative complications and health care utilization. Level of Evidence  Level III.

Social Deprivation is Associated with Increased Pain in Patients Presenting with Neuropathic Pain

Background

Neuropathic pain following nerve injury can be debilitating and negatively impact quality of life. Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is an efficacious technique for the management of neuropathic pain. However, this technique may be unequally available for many geographical locations. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the association between Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and preoperative pain in patients undergoing TMR for treatment of neuropathic pain.

Methods

Patients who underwent TMR for neuropathic pain in the lower and upper extremities were prospectively enrolled at our tertiary care clinic. A chart review was conducted to obtain socioeconomic, surgery, and comorbidity parameters. Preoperative pain scores (0-10 pain score index), and the ADI, reflecting deprivation status on a 0-100 scale, were collected.

Results

A total of 162 patients from 13 different states were included, of which 119 were amputees (74%). The median ADI was 25 (IQR: 16-41) and the median preoperative pain score was 6 (IQR: 5-8). A higher ADI was independently associated with higher preoperative pain. The time interval from nerve injury to TMR was not associated with ADI.

Conclusions

Patients undergoing surgical treatment of neuropathic pain from more socially deprived settings have increased pain experience upon initial evaluation, despite having similar time from nerve injury or amputation to TMR. These findings highlight the importance of identifying patients presenting from socially deprived settings, as this may impact their physical and mental health along with their coping mechanisms, resulting in increased pain.

Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantages influence outcomes following rotator cuff repair in the non-Medicaid population

BACKGROUND

Prior investigations have utilized various surrogate markers of socioeconomic status to assess how health care disparities impact outcomes after rotator cuff repair (RCR). When taken as individual markers, these factors have inconsistent associations. Medicaid insurance status is an accessible marker that has recently been correlated with less optimal outcomes after RCR. Socioeconomic disparities exist within the non-Medicaid population as well and are arguably more difficult to characterize. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) uses seventeen socioeconomic variables to establish a spectrum of neighborhood health care disparity. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantages, quantified by ADI, on 2-year patient reported outcome scores following RCR in the non-Medicaid population.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent RCR from 2015 to 2020 was performed. All procedures were performed by a group of 7 surgeons at a large academic center. Patient demographics and comorbidities were collected from charts. Rotator cuff tear size was assessed from arthroscopic pictures. ADI scores were calculated based on patients' home addresses using the Neighborhood Atlas tool. The primary outcome measure was American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. A linear regression analysis with covariate control for age and patient comorbidities was performed.

RESULTS

There were 287 patients with a mean age of 60.11 years. The linear regression model between ADI and 2-year ASES score was significant (P = .02). When controlling for both age and patient comorbidities, every 0.9-point reduction in ADI resulted in a 1-point increase in the ASES score (P = .03). Patients with an ADI of 8, 9, or 10 had lower mean 2-year ASES scores than those with an ADI of 1 (87.08 vs. 93.19, P = .04), but both groups had similar change from preoperative ASES score (40.17 vs. 32.88, P = .12). The change in ASES score at 2-years in our study surpassed all established minimal clinically important difference values irrespective of ADI.

CONCLUSION

Patients with greater levels of disparity in their home neighborhoods have worse final ASES scores at 2 years, but patients significantly improve from their preoperative state regardless of social disadvantages. This is the first study to the authors' knowledge that examines ADI and outcomes following RCR. Providers should be aware that patients with higher ADI scores may have inferior preoperative shoulder function. The results of this study support the utilization of primary RCR in applicable tears regardless of socioeconomic status.

Key Considerations for Nerve Transfer Rehabilitation After Surgical Reconstruction for Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injuries

Nerve transfer surgery is commonly used to treat patients with brachial plexus injuries. However, guidelines on postoperative rehabilitation are not clearly established. Nerve transfers require the patient to relearn how to recruit newly innervated muscle(s), which may not occur naturally or intuitively. Supervised therapy is a valuable resource to guide patients through their lengthy recovery (often >12 months) because target muscle strength is both obtained and functionally used in daily life. This article highlights 10 key principles that provide the foundation for rehabilitation following nerve transfer surgery after a brachial plexus injury. Due to the shortcomings of the current evidence base for nerve transfer rehabilitation, we have included our anecdotal experience to augment the existing literature. It is important to have a collaborative surgeon-therapist relationship to communicate regarding operative details, expected timelines for reinnervation, patient needs, and realistic expectations. We provide examples of how to tailor the exercise program to synergistically recruit both the donor and target muscle action, including how to appropriately advance exercises based on the current level of nerve return. We also discuss the role that fatigue plays in denervated muscle and how fatigue may affect the exercise demands placed on the target muscle during specific stages of recovery.

Health Disparities in Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery: A Scoping Review

PURPOSE

Social determinants of health (SDOH) are linked to poor health care outcomes across the different medical specialties. We conducted a scoping review to understand the existing literature and identify further areas of research to address disparities within hand surgery.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane was conducted. Inclusion criteria were English studies examining health disparities in hand surgery. The following were assessed: the main SDOH, study design/phase/theme, and main disease/injury/procedure. A previously described health disparities research framework was used to determine study phase: detecting (identifying risk factors), understanding (analyzing risk factors), and reducing (assessing interventions). Studies were categorized according to themes outlined at the National Institute of Health and American College of Surgeons: Summit on Surgical Disparities.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 446 articles, with 49 articles included in final analysis. The majority were detecting-type (31/49, 63%) or understanding-type (12/49, 24%) studies, with few reducing-type studies (6/49, 12%). Patient factors (31/49, 63%) and systemic/access factors (16/49, 33%) were the most frequently studied themes, with few investigating clinical care/quality factors (4/49, 8%), clinician factors (3/49, 6%), and postoperative/rehabilitation factors (1/49, 2%). The most commonly studied SDOH include insurance status (13/49, 27%), health literacy (10/49, 20%), and social deprivation (6/49, 12%). Carpal tunnel syndrome (9/49, 18%), upper extremity trauma (9/49, 18%), and amputations (5/49, 10%) were frequently assessed. Most investigations involved retrospective or database designs (29/49, 59%), while few were prospective, cross-sectional, or mixed-methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite an encouraging upward trend in health disparities research, existing studies are in the early phases of investigation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Most of the literature focuses on patient factors and systemic/access factors in regard to insurance status. Further work with prospective, cross-sectional, and mixed-method studies is needed to better understand health disparities in hand surgery, which will inform future interventions.

The free Thenar flap for thumb pulp reconstruction: A case report

The thumb is acknowledged to contribute significantly to hand function, accounting for up to 40% of its overall capability. Consequently, injuries affecting the thumb can have a profound impact on the quality of life experienced by patients. When it comes to the surgical reconstruction of thumb injuries, the primary objective is to promptly provide coverage of the affected area with glabrous skin, thus preserving both the length and functionality of the thumb. Managing injuries specifically involving the thumb pulp can be particularly challenging due to the digit's size and vital role. Acquiring an adequate amount of glabrous soft tissue poses a difficulty in such cases. Various reconstructive approaches, encompassing a range of options on the reconstructive ladder, have been documented for thumb pulp injuries. The most popular options include pedicled flaps and free flaps obtained from both the hands and feet. However, a consensus regarding the optimal method for reconstructing the thumb pulp has yet to be reached. We present a case of total thumb pulp reconstruction for a 40 × 30 mm defect using the free thenar flap in a 65-year-old carpenter who sustained a work-related injury. This flap was designed and raised on the superficial branch of the radial artery with a single subcutaneous vein and a branch of the palmar cutaneous nerve, the flap measured 43 × 32 mm. It was inset transversely with an end-to-end arterial anastomosis to the ulnar digital artery, venous anastomosis to the dorsal digital vein and nerve coaptation to the ulnar digital nerve. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged the following day without any complications. Eight months after surgery, the patient was extremely satisfied with the results of the procedure in terms of both function and appearance. The patient had experienced an improvement in function, sensation, and aesthetics. The patient had a QuickDASH disability/symptom score of 15.91 and a QuickDASH work module score of 18.75; the range of motion in the treated thumb was almost the same as the opposite thumb. The patient successfully resumed work three weeks following the procedure, initially with modified duties, and fully regained their work capacity within six weeks. As the patient's primary concern was their ability to return to work, the utilization of a free thenar flap offered several distinct advantages. These included minimal post-operative complications, facilitated by a single operative site, allowing for reconstruction under regional anesthesia. Moreover, the procedure was conducted in a single stage, enabling the patient to be discharged on the same day without the need for further procedures. Furthermore, similar to several other reconstructive options for the thumb, the utilization of a free thenar flap offered the advantage of providing high-quality, like-for-like glabrous tissue.

Influence of socio-economic status on functional recovery after ARDS caused by SARS-CoV-2: the multicentre, observational RECOVIDS study

PURPOSE

Survivors after acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are at high risk of developing respiratory sequelae and functional impairment. The healthcare crisis caused by the pandemic hit socially disadvantaged populations. We aimed to evaluate the influence of socio-economic status on respiratory sequelae after COVID-19 ARDS.

METHODS

We carried out a prospective multicenter study in 30 French intensive care units (ICUs), where ARDS survivors were pre-enrolled if they fulfilled the Berlin ARDS criteria. For patients receiving high flow oxygen therapy, a flow ≥ 50 l/min and an FiO2 ≥ 50% were required for enrollment. Socio-economic deprivation was defined by an EPICES (Evaluation de la Précarité et des Inégalités de santé dans les Centres d'Examens de Santé - Evaluation of Deprivation and Inequalities in Health Examination Centres) score ≥ 30.17 and patients were included if they performed the 6-month evaluation. The primary outcome was respiratory sequelae 6 months after ICU discharge, defined by at least one of the following criteria: forced vital capacity < 80% of theoretical value, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide < 80% of theoretical value, oxygen desaturation during a 6-min walk test and fibrotic-like findings on chest computed tomography.

RESULTS

Among 401 analyzable patients, 160 (40%) were socio-economically deprived and 241 (60%) non-deprived; 319 (80%) patients had respiratory sequelae 6 months after ICU discharge (81% vs 78%, deprived vs non-deprived, respectively). No significant effect of socio-economic status was identified on lung sequelae (odds ratio (OR), 1.19 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-1.97]), even after adjustment for age, sex, most invasive respiratory support, obesity, most severe P/F ratio (adjusted OR, 1.02 [95% CI 0.57-1.83]).

CONCLUSIONS

In COVID-19 ARDS survivors, socio-economic status had no significant influence on respiratory sequelae 6 months after ICU discharge.