Revision Surgery after Carpal Tunnel Release –Analysis of the Pathology in 200 Cases during a 2 Year Period

Delayed Repair of Recurrent Motor Branch Injury after Carpal Tunnel Release

Iatrogenic injury to the recurrent motor branch of the median nerve is an uncommon but severe complication following carpal tunnel release. Surgeons should be aware of the anatomical variations of this branch, particularly with the advent of smaller incisions and endoscopic techniques. Here, we present the case of a 60-year-old woman whose recurrent motor branch injury was not identified until 2 years following her index procedure. She underwent a successful primary repair 25 months after her initial injury, with notable improvements in thumb function, strength, and return of thenar muscle bulk beginning 2 months after surgery and continuing through last follow-up at 7 months. Our patient's outcome suggests that repair of a severed recurrent motor branch remains a viable option 2 years after initial injury and that functional improvement and thenar muscle reinnervation can occur even after considerable time has elapsed.

Using an acellular dermal matrix as a neuroprotective wrap-around for treating recurrent nerve entrapment syndromes: a proof of concept

Recurrent nerve entrapment syndrome is a well-known complication in peripheral nerve surgery that often leads to multiple reoperations and increases the risk of unfavorable outcomes due to scarring. In our outpatient clinic, we found two patients with recurrent nerve entrapment syndrome with significant symptoms such as complete sensory loss and chronic pain who were willing to undergo re-exploration of their entrapped nerves and cover them with a human acellular dermal matrix (ADM) as a protective shield against recurrence. Both patients had complete recovery of the nerve entrapment syndrome with satisfactory clinical results. The use of a human ADM appears to be a promising tool for recurrent nerve entrapment surgery without adding morbidity to the procedure.

Clinical results of carpal tunnel Re-release revision surgery and synovial wrap for recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome

Introduction

Carpal tunnel syndrome is a challenging condition when conventional carpal tunnel revision surgery fails to alleviate symptoms. This study aims to assess the outcomes of combining carpal tunnel revision surgery with a synovial wrap for cases of recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome in patients who had adhered median nerve, with a minimum 1-year follow-up.

Patients and methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 10 patients (mean age: 73.7 years, nine females and one male) who underwent treatment for recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome. The approach involved carpal tunnel revision surgery coupled with a median nerve synovial wrap. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 1 year. The procedure involved harvesting a 3.5 cm × 4 cm section of the flexor synovial membrane with a distal ulnar pedicle, which was then wrapped around the adherent site of the median nerve. Physical assessments included the pain visual analogue scale (VAS), Tinel sign in the carpal tunnel, thenar muscle atrophy, the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test (SW test), manual muscle test (MMT) as assessed on the 5-point British Medical Research Council Scale (5/5, normal; 0/5, absent), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) questionnaire. The physical variables were compared before surgery and at final follow-up.

Results

All patients showed some improvement in SW test. The MMT for the abductor pollicis brevis showed significant improvement at final follow-up (3 for four patients, 4 for four patients, and 5 for two patients) compared to pre-surgery assessments (2 for six patients, 3 for two patients, and 4 for two patients). The mean VAS score and DASH score at final follow-up (13.0 ± 10.3, 19.3 ± 12.7, respectively) were significantly lower than those recorded before surgery (76.5 ± 11.1, 52.4 ± 17.1, respectively). The Tinel sign and the thenar muscle atrophy significantly improved from before surgery to final follow-up.

Conclusion

Carpal tunnel release with a synovial wrap demonstrated significant improvements in muscle strength, pain relief and function. The synovial wrap method is an effective procedure for treating recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome.

Optimizing Outcomes in Revision Peripheral Nerve Surgery of the Upper Extremity

Peripheral nerve surgeries for compressive neuropathy in the upper extremity are generally successful. However, cases that either fail or have complications requiring revision surgery are challenging. During revision consideration, surgeons should perform a comprehensive preoperative workup to understand the etiology of the patient's symptoms and categorize symptoms as persistent, recurrent, or new in relation to the index procedure. Revision surgery often requires an open, extensile approach with additional procedures to optimize outcomes. Even with proper workup and treatment, clinical outcomes of revision surgeries are inferior compared to primary surgeries and patients should be well informed prior to undergoing such procedures.

Revision Carpal Tunnel Release Following Endoscopic Compared With Open Decompression

Importance

Carpal tunnel release (CTR) technique may influence the likelihood of revision surgery. Prior studies of revision CTR following endoscopic CTR (ECTR) compared with open CTR (OCTR) have been limited by sample size and duration of follow-up.

Objective

To estimate the incidence of revision CTR following ECTR compared with OCTR in a national cohort.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study used data from the US Veterans Health Administration. Participants included all adults (age ≥18 years) undergoing at least 1 outpatient CTR from October 1, 1999, to May 20, 2021. Data were analyzed from May 21, 2021, to November 27, 2023.

Exposure

Index CTR technique.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was time to revision CTR, defined as repeat ipsilateral CTR during the study period. Secondary outcomes were indications for revision, findings during revision, and additional procedures performed during revision.

Results

Among 134 851 wrists from 103 455 patients (92 510 [89.4%] male; median [IQR] age, 62 [53-70] years) undergoing at least 1 CTR, 1809 wrists underwent at least 1 revision at a median (IQR) of 2.5 (1.0-3.8) years. In competing-risks analysis, the cumulative incidence of revision was 1.06% (95% CI, 0.99%-1.12%) at 5 years and 1.59% (95% CI, 1.51%-1.67%) at 10 years. ECTR was associated with increased hazard of revision CTR compared with OCTR (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.56; 95% CI, 1.34-1.81; P < .001). The risk difference for revision CTR associated with ECTR compared with OCTR was 0.57% (95% CI, 0.31%-0.84%) at 5 years (number needed to harm, 176) and 0.72% (95% CI, 0.36%-1.07%) at 10 years (number needed to harm, 139). Regardless of index CTR technique, the most common indication for revision was symptom recurrence (1062 wrists [58.7%]). A reconstituted transverse carpal ligament (TCL) was more common after ECTR compared with OCTR, whereas scarring of the overlying tissues and of the median nerve itself were more common following OCTR. Incomplete transverse-carpal-ligament release was observed in 251 of the wrists undergoing revision CTR (13.94%) and was more common among revisions following ECTR (odds ratio, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.11-2.37; P = .01).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of revision CTR in the Veterans Health Administration, ECTR was associated with increased risk of revision compared with OCTR, but the absolute risk was low regardless of technique. Intraoperative findings at revision varied significantly according to index CTR technique.

Use of nerve conduction studies in carpal tunnel syndrome

This review article examines the use of nerve conduction studies in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome. These studies should be understood not as a test that determines the diagnosis but as a measure of impaired nerve function. They are sensitive indicators of local demyelination and axonal loss that can detect and quantify these changes before the appearance of clinical signs, providing information that cannot be obtained with the unaided senses of the physician, nor by any other investigation. They are the best available indicator of overall disease severity, correlating with symptoms and anatomical change in the median nerve. They have some prognostic value for surgical outcome and are sufficiently sensitive to change for the evaluation of treatment response. When surgery does not yield the expected improvement in symptoms, they can help to establish whether decompression has been achieved provided preoperative results are available for comparison.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Improve after Hypothenar Fat Flap for the Treatment of Recurrent Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Background: Recalcitrant carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) can present with persistent or recurrent symptoms after carpal tunnel release (CTR). A common aetiology for recurrent CTS is the development of perineural adhesions due to excess scarring. The hypothenar fat pad flap (HFPF) has been described to decrease the amount of scarring formed after revision CTR. Herein, we present a prospective evaluation of these patients. Methods: A prospective series of consecutive patients by a single surgeon with recurrent CTS was conducted. All patients had at least 3 months follow-up. Patients received a revision open CTR with HFPF. The primary outcome was the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ). Secondary outcomes included pain and satisfaction on visual analogue scale, range of motion, grip strength, patient-reported outcomes and complications. Clinical outcomes were compared between preoperative and postoperative intervals using paired t-tests, with significance defined as p < 0.05. Results: Fifteen wrists (14 patients) were recruited for the study. Patients were predominantly male (n = 9; 66%). Revision open CTR with HFPF was performed a median of 42 months (range: 4-300 months) post primary CTR. Patients demonstrated improved patient-reported outcomes with significantly improved BCTQ pain score (p < 0.01), Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation (p < 0.01) and QuickDASH (p < 0.001). Two patients in the series reported postoperative complications; however, there was no incidence of donor site morbidity recorded. Conclusions: Revision open CTR with hypothenar fat pad flap is associated with decreased pain, high patient satisfaction and improved functional measures compared to pre-operative status. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

Persistent Pain as an Early Indicator for Operative Carpal Tunnel Revision after Primary Release: A Retrospective Analysis of Recurrent and Persistent Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Prolonged symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) after primary carpal tunnel release (CTR) can reduce the quality of life and lead to multiple referrals across specialties. The following study aimed to identify differences in symptoms, signs, and intraoperative findings between recurrent and persistent CTS cases to avoid undesired outcomes after primary CTR.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on revision CTRs performed between 2005 and 2015 using literature-based definitions for recurrent (a relapse of symptoms occurs following a symptom-free period of ≥3 months) and persistent (symptoms persisting longer than three months after surgical release) CTS. The parameters assessed were symptoms, clinical signs, and intraoperative findings.

RESULTS

Out of 53 cases, 85% (n = 45) were external referrals, whereby our own revision rate was 0.67% (n = 8/1199). Paresthesia and numbness were frequent in both groups; however, abnormal postoperative pain was reported more often in persistent cases (86%; n = 30/35) in comparison to recurrent cases (50%; n = 9/18; p = 0.009). Scarring around the median nerve was observed in almost all recurrent cases (94%; n = 17/18) and in 40% (n = 14/35) of persistent cases (p < 0.001). Incomplete division of the palmar ligament was the primary cause for revision in the persistent cohort (49%; n = 17/35).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients experiencing symptoms for more than three months after CTR, primarily presenting as pain, it is advisable to consider referring the patient to a certified hand clinic for additional evaluation.

Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Surgery: Risk Factors and Rates of Revision Surgery

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of our study was to compare the 1-year revision surgery rates and outcomes of open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Our hypothesis was that, compared to open release, endoscopic carpal tunnel release was an independent risk factor for revision surgery within 1-year.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 4338 patients undergoing isolated endoscopic or open carpal tunnel release. Demographic data, medical comorbidities, surgical approach, need for revision surgery, hand dominance, history of prior injection, and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System upper extremity (UE), pain interference (PI) and physical function scores were analyzed. Multivariable analysis was used to identify the risk factors for revision surgery within one year of the index procedure.

RESULTS

In total, 3280 patients (76%) underwent open and 1058 (24%) underwent endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Within one year of the index procedure, 45 patients required revision carpal tunnel release. The average time to revision was 143 days. The rate of revision carpal tunnel release in the open group was 0.71% compared to 2.08% in the endoscopic group. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that endoscopic surgery, male sex, cubital tunnel syndrome, tobacco use, and diabetes were associated independently with revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we found that endoscopic carpal tunnel release was associated independently with a 2.96 times greater likelihood of requiring revision carpal tunnel release within one year, compared to open carpal tunnel release. Male sex, concurrent cubital tunnel syndrome, tobacco use, and diabetes also were associated independently with greater risk of needing revision carpal tunnel release within one year.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic II.

Median Nerve and Carpal Tunnel Morphology Before and After Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: A 6-Year Follow-up Study

BACKGROUND

Our purpose was to describe structural and morphological features of the median nerve and carpal tunnel on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies obtained before, immediately after, 6 weeks after, and 6 years after endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR).

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, 9 patients with a diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) underwent ECTR. Standardized MRI studies were obtained before ECTR, immediately after ECTR, and 6 weeks and 6 years after surgery. Structural and morphological features of the median nerve and carpal tunnel were measured and assessed for each study with comparisons made between each time point.

RESULTS

All 9 patients had complete symptom resolution postoperatively. On the immediate postoperative MRI, there was a discrete gap in the transverse carpal ligament in all patients. There was retinacular regrowth noted at 6 weeks in all cases. The median nerve cross-sectional area and the anterior-posterior dimension of the carpal tunnel at the level of the hamate increased immediately after surgery and these changes were maintained at 6 years.

CONCLUSIONS

We defined structural and morphological changes on MRI for the median nerve and carpal tunnel in patients with continued symptom resolution 6 years after ECTR. Changes in median nerve and carpal tunnel morphology that occur immediately after surgery remain unchanged at mid-term follow-up in asymptomatic patients. Established imaging criteria for CTS may not apply to postoperative patients. Magnetic resonance imaging appears to be of limited clinical utility in the workup of persistent or recurrent CTS.

Is the outcome of a revision carpal tunnel release as good as those of a primary release? A matched cohort study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare primary and revision carpal tunnel release outcomes in all patients with carpal tunnel syndrome and when corrected for baseline severity and demographics.

METHODS

A total of 903 hands of primary and 132 hands of revision patients underwent carpal tunnel release and patients completed online questionnaires on demographics, clinical severity, and satisfaction. The primary outcome measure, the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), was administered at intake and six months after surgery.

RESULTS

The BCTQ total score at six months was better in primary (1.55±0.58) than revision patients (1.94±0.73, p=<0.001), and primary patients improved more on the BCTQ total score (1.10±0.71 vs. 0.90±0.72, p=0.003). In patients matched on similar baseline characteristics using propensity score matching, the BCTQ total score at six months was also better in primary patients (1.65±0.63) than in revision patients (1.92±0.73, p=0.002), and primary patients still had more improvement in BCTQ total score (1.18±0.73 vs. 0.89±0.73, p=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the outcome after revision carpal tunnel release is only 16% worse compared to primary carpal tunnel release. Preoperative symptom severity, functional status, and demographics may play a role since correcting for these factors reduces the difference in outcome between primary and revision CTR.

The distance between the distal margin of the flexor retinaculum and the radiocarpal joint as a landmark in CTS surgery: a cadaver study

BACKGROUND

The most frequent peripheral entrapment neuropathy is compression of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel, known as carpal tunnel syndrome. The most effective treatment is surgery, where the flexor retinaculum (FR¹) is divided. Nevertheless, after this operation, a significant number of patients suffer from persistent symptoms due to incomplete FR distal release. It may be difficult to identify the distal boundary of the FR due to the minimal skin incision. We aimed to identify an anatomical landmark to avoid incomplete distal FR release. The radiocarpal (RC²) joint can be palpated, and lies in close proximity to the boundaries of the FR. Thus, the distance between the RC joint space and the distal FR margin - the RC-FR distance - could be a reliable and individual morphologic measurement from easily acquired regional anthropological measurements.

METHODS

During this study, 39 radiocarpal regions of 23 embalmed cadavers were dissected, and measurements were taken. Linear regression corresponding to the ulnar length and the RC-FR distance was established.

RESULTS

The mean RC-FR distance from the RC joint space to the distal FR margin was 3.8cm (95% CI 3.5-4.0), and the range was 2.3 to 5.1cm. This distance was 1.1cm (95% CI 0.8-1.4) longer in males than in females (p < 0.00001), and there were no side-specific differences. The individual projection of the distal FR margin in centimeters can be calculated by measurement of the ipsilateral ulnar length divided by 4 and reduced by 2.9, p < 0.005.

CONCLUSIONS

The side-equal and sex-specific position of the distal flexor retinaculum margin could be calculated from the palpable radiocarpal joint space based on the ipsilateral ulnar length.

A Comparison of Histologic and Intraoperative Visual Assessments of Transverse Carpal Ligament During Revision Carpal Tunnel Release

PURPOSE

We sought to determine surgeon-pathologist agreement with respect to distinguishing between a previously undivided transverse carpal ligament (TCL) and scar during revision carpal tunnel release (CTR). Additionally, we aimed to describe the histologic findings of the TCL and flexor tenosynovium during revision CTR.

METHODS

All patients undergoing revision CTR for persistent or recurrent CTS by a single surgeon between 2013 and 2019 were included. An intraoperative assessment was made as to the presence of scar versus a previously undivided TCL by the surgeon. Two pathology specimens (1 consisting of flexor retinaculum and 1 consisting of tenosynovium) were sent for histopathological analysis with hematoxylin-eosin staining. The pathologist's assessment of the flexor retinaculum specimen was categorized as either "ligamentous" if a previously undivided TCL was identified or "nonligamentous" if scar or any other tissue was identified. The surgeon's intraoperative assessment served as the reference standard when comparing the histologic assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients underwent 46 revision CTRs. The histologic assessment agreed with the surgeon's intraoperative assessment of a previously undivided TCL versus a scar in 30 of 46 (65%) cases. In 12 of 46 (26%) revision cases, the surgeon determined that there was a previously undivided TCL. In these 12 cases, the pathologist identified a ligament 17% of the time.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeon-pathologist agreement is low with respect to determining previously undivided TCLs versus nonligamentous tissue in the setting of revision CTR. The results of this investigation suggest that pathologists (with limited clinical information) have difficulty confirming the clinical diagnosis of persistent CTS with previously unreleased TCL when using routine hematoxylin-eosin staining. Routine biopsy of the TCL during revision CTR may be of limited clinical utility, as it does not alter the diagnosis or management in these cases.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic III.

Local Corticosteroid Injections versus Surgical Carpal Tunnel Release for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy. This meta-analysis compared local steroid injections (LSIs) versus carpal tunnel release (CTR) for the management of CTS. Neurophysiological parameters, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and the complication rate were investigated. We hypothesized that LSIs may represent an effective and safe alternative to surgical management. Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the 2020 PRISMA statement. All the clinical investigations comparing LSIs versus CTR for carpal tunnel syndrome were accessed. In March 2022, the following databases were accessed: Pubmed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Embase. No time constrains were used for the search. The risk of bias and statistical analyses were conducted using the Review Manager Software 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen). Results: Data from 1096 procedures were retrieved. The mean follow-up was 12.3 (1 to 58) months. The mean age of the patients was 51.1 ± 4.6. Nocturnal paraesthesia (p < 0.0001) and visual analogue scale (p < 0.0001) were greater in the LSIs cohort. No difference was found in the functional (p = 0.2) and symptom (p = 0.4) subscales of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), median nerve distal motor latency (p = 0.9), median nerve motor amplitude (p = 0.7), median nerve sensory conduction velocity (p = 0.4), or median nerve sensory amplitude (p = 0.3). No difference was found in terms of minor complications (p = 0.9). No major complications were observed within the duration of follow-up. Conclusion: Both CTR and LSIs were effective and feasible in reducing symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. Though LSIs led to greater pain relief, this superiority was not permanent. Irrespective of the severity of the symptoms, current evidence suggests that a cycle of LSIs may be considered in patients with CTS. However, patients must be aware that LSIs may not be the definitive therapy, and CTR should be recommended.

Management of Recurrent Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Few comparisons have been performed between the outcomes of surgical techniques for recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome. Using a meta-analysis, this study aimed to compare the outcomes of different surgical techniques using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain as outcomes.

METHODS

The following categories were used to define the study's inclusion criteria: population, intervention, comparator, outcomes, and study design. Studies were examined by 2 reviewers, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. The studies were assigned to 1 of the following treatment groups: decompression with or without neurolysis, autologous fat transfer, hypothenar fat pad, pedicled or free flap, and "other." For our primary outcome, we compared improvement using the BCTQ and VAS for pain between the treatment groups. For our secondary outcome, postoperative BCTQ and VAS pain values were compared.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included: 5 case series with postoperative data only and 9 pre-post studies without a control group. With regard to our primary outcome, the studies reported an average improvement of 1.2 points (95% confidence interval [CI][1.5, 0.9]) on a scale of 1-5 on the symptoms severity scale (SSS) of the BCTQ, 1.9 points (95% CI [1.37, 0.79]) on a scale of 1-5 on the function severity scale of the BCTQ, and 3.8 points (95% CI [4.9, 2.6]) on a scale of 1-10 on the VAS for pain. We only found significantly lesser improvement in the "other" treatment group than in the hypothenar fat pad group and autologous fat transfer group using the SSS. The hypothenar fat pad group had the best reported postoperative SSS score of 1.75 (95% CI [1.24, 2.25]), function severity scale score of 1.55 (95% CI [1.20, 1.90]), and VAS pain score of 1.45 (95% CI [0.83, 2.07]).

CONCLUSIONS

All the techniques showed clinically important improvements in all the outcomes. We found lesser improvement in the "other" treatment group than in the hypothenar fat pad group and autologous fat transfer group using the SSS. We found that the hypothenar fat pad group had the best reported postoperative values in our secondary analysis.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

High-resolution ultrasound in the diagnosis of failed carpal tunnel decompression: a study of 35 cases

We used high-resolution ultrasound to examine 35 median nerves (35 patients) with failed carpal tunnel decompression to identify the cause of failure. The carpal tunnel was examined before revision surgery, and the results were correlated with surgical findings. The cross-sectional area was measured, and nerve morphology was analysed at the sites of compression. We found persistent median nerve compression in 30 out of 35 patients. In 20 patients, the compression was caused by a residual transverse carpal ligament, in four by perineural fibrosis, in five by both of these causes and in one by tenosynovitis. In four patients, evidence of median nerve injury with an epineural/fascicular lesion was detected; and in one, no abnormalities were found. Surgical findings were consistent with the ultrasound findings except in one patient where tenosynovitis was associated with a giant cell tumour, which was missed by ultrasound. High-resolution ultrasound can provide helpful information in preoperative diagnosis of failed carpal tunnel decompression with good correlation between the ultrasound and surgical findings.Level of evidence: IV.

Revision of Carpal Tunnel Surgery

Carpal tunnel release is one of the most commonly performed upper extremity procedures. The majority of patients experience significant improvement or resolution of their symptoms. However, a small but important subset of patients will experience the failure of their initial surgery. These patients can be grouped into persistent, recurrent, and new symptom categories. The approach to these patients starts with a thorough clinical examination and is supplemented with electrodiagnostic studies. The step-wise surgical management of revision carpal tunnel surgery consists of the proximal exploration of the median nerve, Guyon’s release with neurolysis, the rerelease of the transverse retinaculum, evaluation of the nerve injury, treatment of secondary sites of compression, and potential ancillary procedures. The approach and management of failed carpal tunnel release are reviewed in this article.

T2-weighted MRI defines critical compression in the distal carpal tunnel that is relieved after decompressive surgery

Introduction

Despite Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) being the most common entrapment neuropathy, its pathophysiology remains debated. Sub-synovial connective tissues (SSCT) within the carpal tunnel are thought to play a role but are poorly characterised. MRI analysis offers potentially novel insights into SSCT characteristics.

Methods

A pilot study of T2-weighted MRI was performed in healthy controls (n=7), and in CTS patients (n=16) pre- and 6 months post-surgical decompression. Image analysis was performed to quantify SSCT cross-sectional area, SSCT signal intensity ratio, and wrist index (depth/width) at distal, middle and proximal wrist landmarks.

Results

Median SSCT signal intensity was lower in the distal carpal tunnel of CTS patients pre-operatively (0.96) compared to controls (1.13; P = 0.008) and normalised post-operatively (1.13, P = 0.001). Median wrist index was also lower in CTS patients pre-operatively (0.60) compared to controls (0.67, P = 0.022), and again normalised post-operatively (0.74, P =0.001). This was attributed to changes in carpal depth in the antero-posterior axis with decompression surgery.

Conclusion

This pilot study successfully demonstrated MRI assessment of SSCT in patients with CTS. The decreased SSCT signal intensities suggest predominant changes at the distal tunnel, potentially indicating reduced SSCT perfusion pre-surgery which normalised post-surgery. Our preliminary findings merit further investigation in a larger cohort.

Does Recurrence of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) after Complete Division of the Transverse Ligament Really Exist?

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) after complete and sufficient division of the transverse ligament really exists. Another goal was to analyze the underlying reasons for recurrent CTS operated on in our department. Over an observation period of eleven years, 156 patients underwent surgical intervention due to CTS. The records of each patient were analyzed with respect to baseline data (age, gender, affected hand), as were clinical signs and symptoms pre- and postoperatively. To assess long-term results, standardized telephone interviews were performed using a structured questionnaire in which the patients were questioned about persisting symptoms, if any. Of the 156 patients, 128 underwent first surgical intervention due to CTS in our department. In long-term follow-up, two-thirds of these patients had no symptoms at all; one-third of the patients described mild persisting numbness. None of the patients experienced a recurrence of CTS. The 28 patients who received their first operation outside of our department were operated on for recurrent CTS. The cause of recurrence was incomplete division of the distal part of the transverse carpal ligament in all cases. The results suggest that recurrent CTS after complete and sufficient division of the transverse ligament is very unlikely.

In Situ Neurolysis of Ulnar Nerve for Patients With Failed Anterior Subcutaneous Transposition - A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Various surgical techniques have been attempted to treat patients with failed anterior subcutaneous transposition performed for cubital tunnel syndrome.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze intraoperative findings of failed anterior subcutaneous transposition and to report the outcome of in Situ neurolysis of ulnar nerve.

METHODS

Patients who, under diagnosis of failed anterior subcutaneous transposition of ulnar nerve, underwent in Situ neurolysis between 2001 and 2018 were included in this study. We excluded patients with follow-up of less than one year, records of traumatic ulnar nerve injury, and concomitant double crush syndrome such as cervical spondylosis causing radicular pain, ulnar tunnel syndrome, or thoracic outlet syndrome. Surgical outcomes were evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS) pain score and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, which were assessed before and after surgery. A total of 28 elbows in 27 patients whose average age was 58.5 (range, 31-76) yr were enrolled, and the duration of follow-up was 5.8 (range, 1.0-14.9) yr.

RESULTS

The most common pathologic finding identified during operation was severe adhesion of the transposed nerve in all elbows, followed by incomplete decompression of deep flexor-pronator aponeurosis in 26 elbows (93%). The average VAS pain score improved from 4.9 (range, 2-7) to 1.3 (range, 0-5), and the average DASH score from 31.7 (range, 18.1-66.7) to 14.1 (range, 5.0-46.6). Of the 28 elbows, 27 (96.4%) showed improvement of preoperative symptoms.

CONCLUSION

In Situ neurolysis of ulnar nerve for patients with failed anterior subcutaneous transposition resulted in satisfactory outcome.

Unplanned Return to the Operating Room in Upper-Extremity Surgery: Incidence and Reason for Return

PURPOSE

Complications after upper-extremity surgery are generally infrequent. The purpose of this study was to assess the rate of early unplanned return to the operating room (URTO) within 3 months after surgery) in upper-extremity surgical procedures. Our hypotheses were that the rate of URTO in upper-extremity surgery would be low and that surgically treated fractures would be at greatest risk for complications.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all upper-extremity surgical procedures performed at a large academic practice of fellowship-trained hand surgeons over a 5-year period. A chart review was conducted of all patients who underwent a second surgery within 3 months of the initial surgery. The surgical billing database was queried to determine the incidence of URTO per Current Procedural Terminology code.

RESULTS

There were 422 Current Procedural Terminology codes with URTO out of a total of 62,608, for an incidence of 0.6%. The most frequently performed procedures were carpal tunnel release (10,674; 0.1% URTO), trigger finger release (4,549; 0.5% URTO), and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for distal radius fracture (2,728; 1.2% URTO). Procedures with the highest incidences of URTO were open reduction and internal fixation of the ulna (4.9%) and excision of the olecranon bursa (4.1%). Traumatic injuries were more commonly associated with URTO compared with elective procedures. Bony trauma and soft tissue trauma had URTO incidences of 1.4% and 1.1%, respectively, whereas bony elective and soft tissue elective cases were 0.6% and 0.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The 90-day URTO rate after upper-extremity surgery was low but higher than previously reported 30-day reoperation rates. Elbow procedures were most likely to result in URTO, as were procedures relating to bony and soft tissue trauma. Based on these results, we are able to counsel patients that the most common procedures we perform have low URTO rates, but surgically treated fractures are at greatest risk.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic II.

A ratio to approximate the proximodistal extent of the flexor retinaculum in relation to the hand length

The flexor retinaculum of the hand is a fibrous structure forming the carpal tunnel in conjunction with the carpal bones. To prevent incomplete release of the carpal tunnel it is of benefit to know about the expected longitudinal expansion of the flexor retinaculum. The objective of the present study was to identify a possible correlation between the proximodistal expansion of the flexor retinaculum and the length of the hand. We conducted an anatomical study on 124 hands of 62 body donors. The hand length and the length of the flexor retinaculum were measured in millimeters. By dividing the length of the flexor retinaculum by the hand length an individual ratio was calculated. The mean length of the observed hands was 187.8 mm. The mean proximodistal length of the flexor retinaculum was 27.2 mm (range, 14-39 mm). A positive correlation was noted between the proximodistal length of the flexor retinaculum and length of the hand (p = 0.01). On average, the length of the flexor retinaculum corresponded to 14% (range, 8-20%) of the hand length in right hands versus 15% (range, 11-20%) in left hands. A greater proximodistal length of the flexor retinaculum in longer hands compared to shorter hands can be expected. The length of the flexor retinaculum corresponds to 14-15% of the length of the hand. However, one should be aware that the length of the flexor retinaculum extends as far as 20 % of the length of the hand.

Lipofibromatous Hamartoma in a Hispanic Patient with macrodactyly: a rare peripheral nerve tumor causing recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome

This is a rare case of a 42-year-old Hispanic male with macrodactyly who presented with recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) due to Lipofibromatous Hamartoma (LFH). A slowly growing mass in his right palm with pain and numbness, along with motor and sensory deficits in the median nerve distribution, was reported since the past year prior to visit. Previous open carpal tunnel release was performed at 16 years of age due to CTS without complications. The diagnosis of LFH was made based on ultrasound, electromyography test and physical examination. An extended open carpal tunnel release with transection of transverse ligament was performed. The 24-month postoperative evaluation showed complete resolution of symptoms. This report illustrates the management of a recurrent CTS due to LFH in a Hispanic adult patient with macrodactyly that was successfully treated with a carpal tunnel decompression.

Revision surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome: a retrospective study comparing the combination of Canaletto® and Dynavisc® gel versus Dynavisc® gel alone

The aim of this study was to assess the value of using a Canaletto® implant in combination with a gel composed of carboxymethylcellulose and polyethylene oxide in the surgical treatment of recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The case series included 31 patients with 32 hands operated for the second time for recurrent (22 cases) or recalcitrant (9 cases) CTS by neurolysis. The average patient age was 62 years. Dynavisc® gel alone was applied around the median nerve in the first 16 cases (Group I). The Canaletto® implant combined with Dynavisc® gel was used in the last 16 cases (group II). With an average follow up of 8 months (for group I) and 11 months (for group II), the pre/postoperative variation in pain assessed with a visual analog scale was 1.38/10 (group I) and 2.04/10 (group II), the QuickDASH score was 20.1/100 (Group I) and 20.48/100 (Group II), grip strength was 8% (Group I) and 20% (Group II), sensory nerve conduction speed was 23.20 m/s (group I) and 15.51 m/s (group II) and distal motor latency was 1.55 m/s (group I) and 1.21 m/s (group II). Ten patients recovered from hypoesthesia in both groups, 6 patients in group I and 2 patients in group II regained good trophicity of their superficial thenar muscles. Two patients from group II had not improved clinically although their electromyography had become normal. One patient from group II suffered a postoperative infection that required removal of the Canaletto® implant. He subsequently improved slightly. Our study found that for recurrent or recalcitrant CTS, the combination of Dynavisc® anti-adhesion gel around the median nerve and a Canaletto implant® after neurolysis results in outcomes that are as good as Dynavisc® alone, with a significant improvement of the QuickDASH score without the Canaletto®. In conclusion, the use of Dynavisc® gel alone around the median nerve after neurolysis seems to be as effective as other techniques described in literature but less invasive or time-consuming, and not associated with donor site morbidity such as the flexor tendon sheath.

Ultrasound Evaluation for Incomplete Carpal Tunnel Release

Background: Ultrasound can provide evaluation of the anatomy of the carpal tunnel in a convenient, noninvasive office setting. This study is intended to determine the accuracy and diagnostic performance of ultrasound, used by surgeons, for the evaluation of completeness of carpal tunnel release (CTR). Methods: Ten cadaver arms underwent randomized sectioning of 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, or 100% of the transverse carpal ligament. Following a brief training session, a blinded observer used ultrasound to evaluate the percentage of the transverse carpal ligament release. The release amount was then confirmed with an open exposure of the transverse carpal ligament. Results: Cronbach α and Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.92 and 0.87, demonstrating excellent reliability and validity of the technique. Diagnostic performance including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value was 100%, 75%, 86%, and 100%, respectively, for the diagnosis of incomplete release of the transverse carpal ligament by a novice sonographer orthopedic surgeon. Conclusions: The ultrasound is a highly accurate tool for the diagnosis of incomplete transverse carpal ligament release and requires a minimal amount of training to use for this purpose. It provides a rapid means of diagnosing incomplete release of the transverse carpal ligament following CTR.

Fatores de insucesso do tratamento cirúrgico da síndrome do túnel do carpo: Quando e como revisar a cirurgia de descompressão do túnel do carpo

Despite being a procedure widely used all over the world with high rates of symptom remission, surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome may present unsatisfactory outcomes. Such outcomes may be manifested clinically by non-remission of symptoms, remission of symptoms with recurrence a time after surgery or appearance of different symptoms after surgery. Different factors are related to this unsuccessful surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Prevention can be achieved through a thorough preoperative clinical evaluation of the patient. As such, the surgeon will be able to make differential or concomitant diagnoses, as well as determine factors related to patient dissatisfaction. Perioperative factors include the correct identification of anatomical structures for complete median nerve decompression. Numerous procedures have been described for managing postoperative factors. Among them, the most common is adhesion around the median nerve, which has been treated with relative success using different vascularized flaps or autologous or homologous tissue coverage. The approach to cases with unsuccessful surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome is discussed in more detail in the text.

[Revision surgery for carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome]

BACKGROUND

Carpal tunnel syndrome, a compressive neuropathy of the median nerve at the wrist and cubital tunnel syndrome, a compressive neuropathy of the ulnar nerve at the elbow, are the two most common peripheral nerve compression syndromes. Chronic compressive neuropathy of peripheral nerves causes pain, paraesthesia and paresis. Treatment strategies include conservative options, but only surgical decompression can resolve the mechanical entrapment of the nerve with proven good clinical results. However, revision rates for persistent or recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome is estimated at around 5% and for refractory cubital tunnel syndrome at around 19%. Common causes for failure include incomplete release of the entrapment and postoperative perineural scarring.

THERAPY

Precise diagnostic work-up is obligatory before revision surgery. The strategy of revision surgery is first complete decompression of the affected nerve and then providing a healthy, vascularized perineural environment to allow nerve gliding and nerve healing and to avoid recurrent scarring. Various surgical options may be considered in revision surgery, including neurolysis, nerve wrapping and nerve repair. In addition, flaps may provide a well vascularized nerve coverage in the case of recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome. In the case of recurrent cubital tunnel syndrome, anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve is mostly performed for this purpose.

RESULTS

In general, revision surgery leads to improvement of symptoms, although the outcome of revision surgery is less favourable than after primary surgery and complete resolution of symptoms is unlikely.

[Surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: open release of the flexor retinaculum and hypothenar fat flap for revision surgery]

OBJECTIVE

Decompression of the median nerve by complete release of the flexor retinaculum and the distal antebrachial fascia. In the case of revision surgery providing of a scar-free covering of the median nerve, if necessary.

INDICATIONS

Carpal tunnel release is indicated for symptomatic patients with painful paraesthesia or neurological deficits after adequate diagnostic evaluation. The hypothenar fat flap is indicated in revision surgery if a sufficient nerve bed of the median nerve is needed and to restore nerve gliding.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

General operative limitations. The hypothenar fat flap is not indicated in revision surgery if median nerve irritation is not caused by surrounding scaring but other reasons like tendonitis.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Proximal longitudinal incision of the palm. Subcutaneous dissection and incision of the palmar aponeurosis. Careful ulnar incision of the transverse carpal ligament. Considerate release of the distal and proximal parts of the retinaculum as well as the distal part of the antebrachial fascia. Exploration of the median nerve and palpation of the carpal tunnel and resection of compressive structures, if necessary. In case of revision surgery, if required, the hypothenar fat flap is raised. The fat flap is transposed without tension palmar to the median nerve and fixed to the radial side of the carpal tunnel.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Early functional mobilization. Immobilization for a short period is optional. After revision surgery and hypothenar fat flap, splinting for one week is recommended.

Sonography before and after carpal tunnel release: video article

Carpal tunnel release for compression of the median nerve at the wrist is a common procedure, often resulting in good clinical outcomes. There are, however, many anatomical variations in and around the carpal tunnel and it is important to be aware of these during carpal tunnel release. After surgery, recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome is uncommon, but difficult to diagnose and treat. Ultrasonography is often necessary for the evaluation of the anatomical variations before carpal tunnel release and to evaluate the most common complications after carpal tunnel release.

Round Acupuncture for the Treatment of Recurrent Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Objectives

Round Acupuncture having blunt end has developed from acupotomy. This case report is to find out that Round Acupuncture is effective in treating patients with recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), which has not improved by steroid injection or acupotomy.

Methods

Round Acupuncture was inserted into the distal fibers of transverse carpal ligament and released toward the proximal fibers. Treatment was performed three times in total. T ingling, numbn ess, night pain and swelling sensation were assessed, and provocative maneuvers were also used.

Results

After treat ment, all symptoms completely disappeared and the patient had no recurrence until 3 months after treatment.

Conclusion

Round Acupuncture co uld be an effective treatment for recurrent CTS.

Decompression for recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome provides significant functional improvement and patient satisfaction

This prospective single-centre study describes the functional outcomes, satisfaction and health-related quality of life after open revision carpal tunnel decompression for recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome. The QuickDASH, patient satisfaction and EuroQol-5 dimensions questionnaires were collected preoperatively and postoperatively over a 5-year period (2013-2018). The median time to revision was 13.3 years (range 3.9-35.4 years; interquartile range 7.2-15.9 years). Outcomes were available for 14 hands in 13 patients at a mean of 20 months after revision surgery. The mean preoperative and postoperative QuickDASH scores were 55 and 29, respectively, and the mean improvement in QuickDASH was 26. The mean improvement in EuroQol-5 dimensions score was 0.1, and 13 of the 14 patients were satisfied. The net promoter score was 85. This study confirms that patients undergoing revision open carpal tunnel decompression for recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome experience a significant improvement in function and health-related quality of life. Level of evidence: IV.

Risk factors for revision cubital tunnel surgery✰

While surgical management of cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) results in the improvement of pain, paresthesia and restoration of motor function, there is a subset of patients who do not improve after primary surgery and require revision. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for revision after primary CuTS. A retrospective review of patients who underwent revision CuTS after unsuccessful primary surgery from February 1989 to May 2009 was performed. Data regarding patients' demographics, age at primary and revision surgeries, handedness, presenting symptoms and the duration, physical examination, McGowan grading, electrodiagnostic findings and final outcomes were collected. A total of 1239 patients undergoing 1279 cubital tunnel surgeries were identified; of which 17 patients who underwent 18 revision CuTS met our inclusion criteria. Forty-one randomly selected consecutive patients who underwent primary CuTS (control cohort) were compared to identify the risk factors associated with revision CuTS. Younger age at presentation, greater static 2-point discrimination (S2PD) and a history of diabetes were associated with a greater number of revision surgeries. Patients requiring revision for primary CuTS were 8.4 years on average younger, had greater S2PD and were more likely to have diabetes. Pain as a presenting symptom compared to weakness and numbness was also a more common complaint in this cohort of patients. Future larger multicenter prospective studies are recommended.

A case series of seven patients with recurrent median nerve neuropathy treated by the revision surgery of median nerve neurolysis and wrapping with radial artery perforator adipose flap

Adhesion neuropathy of the median nerve with persistent pain can be a challenging problem. Currently, coverage of the median nerve with a well-vascularized soft tissue is deemed necessary after secondary neurolysis. Herein, we reviewed the outcomes of seven patients with a persistent median nerve neuropathy after a primary open carpal tunnel release or a median nerve repair, treated with neurolysis and median nerve wrapping with radial artery perforator adipose flaps. During the revision surgery, after a careful and complete neurolysis of the scarred median nerve, the distally based radial artery perforator adipose flap without its fascia was raised and rotated to wrap the median nerve. The mean size of the perforator flap was 1146 mm², which was enough to wrap the median nerve in all patients. At 26 months postsurgery, both the visual analog scale score for pain with tingling, and the patient-reported outcome measures improved. There was no recurrence of the median nerve adhesion neuropathy and no major complications were noted. Tinel's sign at the palmar wrist completely disappeared in four patients and was relieved in three patients. The median distal motor latency becomes recordable, and closer to a normal compound motor action potential postoperatively in all patients. Secondary neurolysis and median nerve wrapping with a radial artery perforator adipose flap, which was modified to be softer and thinner than the radial artery perforator adipofascial flap, was a successful treatment for the recurrent median nerve neuropathy in terms of both pain relief and restoration of the hand function.

Evaluation and Management of Unsuccessful Carpal Tunnel Release

Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is a routine and effective surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. Dissatisfied patients after CTR are uncommon but present diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This article discusses the most common reasons for unsuccessful CTR, the appropriate ensuing workup, and current evidence regarding revision surgery. The authors' preferred treatment algorithm for the surgical management of the unsuccessful CTR is presented.

Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery Plus Intraoperative Corticosteroid Injection versus Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery Alone: A Double Blinded Clinical Trial

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome is a prevalent disease with significant morbidity. The current treatments range from oral medication and local corticosteroid injection to surgical carpal tunnel release (CTR). In this study, we tried to assess the results of Carpal Tunnel Release surgery in combination with the anti-inflammatory effect of local corticosteroid injection. Methods: 65 patients were enrolled by clinical and electrodiagnostic tests and randomly divided into two groups, 32 in group one which underwent surgery with Dexamethasone injection and 33 in group 2 which intervened with carpal tunnel release surgery alone. Data on Boston questionnaire of patients were conducted before and two weeks after surgery. Distal motor and sensory latencies of patients were recorded before and two months after surgery. Mean values were compared between groups before and after surgery. Results: The mean preoperative Boston index was 35.83 in group one and 37.7 in group two, these data postoperative were 15.83 and 19.15 respectively. The mean preoperative distal sensory latency was 54.8 in group one and 47.6 in group two, these data postoperative were 34.1 and 35.1 respectively. The mean preoperative distal motor latency was 63.2 in group one and 62.3 in group two, these data postoperative were 44.5 and 46.55 respectively. Conclusions: CTR surgery plus local corticosteroid injection did not significantly change in results of Electrodiagnostic test or Boston index compared to the non-injection group.

Management of Recalcitrant Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Recalcitrant carpal tunnel syndrome presents a clinical challenge. Potential etiologies of persistent or recurrent symptoms after primary carpal tunnel release include incomplete nerve decompression, secondary sites of nerve compression, unrecognized anatomic variations, irreversible nerve pathology associated with chronic compression neuropathy, perineural adhesions, conditions associated with secondary nerve compression, iatrogenic nerve injury, or inaccurate preoperative diagnosis. Understanding the pertinent surgical anatomy and pathophysiology is essential toward developing an effective diagnostic and treatment strategy. A thorough clinical history and examination guide a comprehensive diagnostic evaluation that includes serial examinations, neurophysiologic testing, and imaging studies. Conservative treatment may provide symptomatic relief; however, surgical management involving revision neuroplasty, neurolysis, nerve reconstruction, and/or local soft-tissue flap augmentation may be indicated in refractory cases.

Ultrasound-Guided Hydroneurolysis of the Median Nerve for Recurrent Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome is often associated with perineural scarring around the median nerve. Surgical options include relatively invasive procedures, such as fat pad grafting, ligament reconstruction, muscle transfer, and nerve wraps. All have limited success because of the possibility of repeated recurrent scarring postoperatively.

METHODS

We discuss a technique involving injection with external hydroneurolysis of the median nerve under ultrasound guidance for recurrent carpal tunnel. Injection enables a gentler dissection of the surrounding tissues compared with open external neurolysis, with less chance of recurrent scarring. This technique is a unique alternative to repeat operative intervention in recurrent carpal tunnel, as well as a prelude to repeat open decompression and salvage procedures.

RESULTS

Ultrasound-guided injection with external hydroneurolysis of the median nerve is a safer, more limited procedure compared with repeat open surgery, usually performed in an office setting. This procedure limits risk, anesthesia, and operating/recovery room expenses, offering relief in 70% to 80% of cases. Furthermore, in the 20% to 30% of patients with inadequate relief, surgery remains a viable option. US provides important information on the anatomy of the median nerve and carpal canal and can rule out covert pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

We offer an alternative treatment for recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome, a difficult problem for which many surgeons recommend nonoperative treatment. US provides objective data concerning residual nerve compression and allows for dynamic assessment. Theoretically, this also offers a viable solution for surgeons and their patients with recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome before being pressed to consider repeat open surgery.

Hand Surgeons Performing More Open Carpal Tunnel Releases Do Not Show Better Patient Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Although previous studies have shown that more experienced surgeons have better patient outcomes following a variety of procedures, in hand surgery and carpal tunnel release in particular, this relation remains unproven. The authors assessed whether there is an association between surgeon volume and patient outcomes following open carpal tunnel release.

METHODS

Patients who underwent carpal tunnel release between 2011 and 2015 at outpatient hand surgery clinics in The Netherlands were included. Surgeon annual volume was defined as the average number of carpal tunnel releases performed per year per participating surgeon over the study period. Primary outcome measures were the Symptom Severity Scale and Functional Status Scale of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire 6 months postoperatively. Multilevel random intercept linear regression analyses were performed to assess whether there was an association between surgeon annual volume and outcome measures, with adjustment for patient characteristics, concomitant procedures, and intake score on the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 1345 patients were included, operated on by 17 surgeons. Median annual surgeon volume was 75 (interquartile range, 50 to 149). Only 0.5 to 0.6 percent of the total variance in patient outcome on the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire could be explained by random differences between surgeons. The authors did not find an association between annual surgeon volume and outcome measures 6 months postoperatively (Symptom Severity Scale: β = 0.000; 95 percent CI, -0.001 to 0.001; and Functional Status Scale: β = 0.000; 95 percent CI, -0.001 to 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In the authors' sample of highly specialized hand surgeons operating in high-volume centers, they found no differences in outcome between high- and low-volume surgeons.

A prognostic model for the patient-reported outcome of surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Many prognostic factors have been studied in carpal tunnel decompression, but most studies consider only a subset of variables.

METHODS

Three thousand three hundred thirty-two operations were used to develop prognostic models, and 885 operations were used for validation. Outcome recorded on a Likert scale was dichotomized into success or failure. Modeling was performed with both logistic regression and artificial neural networks using 87 candidate variables.

RESULTS

Both approaches produced predictive multivariate models for outcome with areas under a receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.7 in the validation data set. Patients with moderately severe nerve conduction abnormalities, night waking, a family history of carpal tunnel syndrome, a good response to corticosteroid injection, and women have better outcomes. Greater functional impairment, diabetes, hypertension, and surgery on the dominant hand are associated with poorer outcomes.

DISCUSSION

A multivariate model partially predicts the outcome of carpal tunnel surgery, aids decision making, and helps to manage patient expectations. Muscle Nerve 58:784-789, 2018.

Treatment of Recurrent and Persistent Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: The Fasciocutaneous Dorsal Ulnar Artery Flap

Surgical treatment of recurrent and persistent carpal tunnel syndrome by repeat carpal tunnel release combined with soft tissue nerve coverage results in a higher success rate for symptomatic relief in the presence of a scarred median nerve. Several techniques, including local pedicled flaps, transposition flaps from the distal forearm, and free flaps, have been described, but consensus regarding a preferred technique has not been reached. The dorsal ulnar artery flap or Becker flap is a local fasciocutaneous flap based on a dorsal perforating branch of the ulnar artery that can be used for soft tissue coverage of the median nerve. Advantages of this technique are the quick and easy dissection and low donor site morbidity. Studies of its use for the treatment of recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome are limited.

Self-Reported Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Revision Carpal Tunnel Surgery With or Without Hypothenar Fat Pad Transposition

BACKGROUND

Carpal tunnel surgery is the most common surgical procedure performed on the hand. Although complications are rare, recurrent or persistent carpal tunnel syndrome can be a significant problem after primary decompression. Various procedures have been described for the treatment of these patients including repeat decompression and hypothenar fat pad transposition. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing revision carpal tunnel decompression with and without hypothenar fat pad transposition.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all patients undergoing revision carpal tunnel surgery at our institution between 2002 and 2014. Identified patients were contacted by telephone. A Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) was administered to all participants.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients underwent revision carpal tunnel surgery over the study period. Twenty-nine of 45 potential participants provided a survey response (64.9%) representing a total of 33 carpal tunnel revision surgeries. Seventeen hands underwent repeat decompression alone, and 16 hands underwent repeat decompression with hypothenar fat pad transposition. A trend toward improved overall BCTQ score was noted for patients undergoing decompression alone; however, no significant difference was determined for total survey score by procedure type. Similarly, total symptom severity and functional scores were not statistically significant between groups; however, a trend toward significance for improved symptom severity score was observed in patients undergoing decompression alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results reveal no difference in self-reported symptom severity and functional scores between patients undergoing revision carpal tunnel surgery with repeat decompression alone or decompression with fat pad transposition.

Abductor Digiti Minimi Flap for Vascularized Coverage in the Surgical Management of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Following Carpal Tunnel Release

BACKGROUND

The development of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) represents a potentially devastating complication following carpal tunnel release. In the presence of a suspected incomplete release of the transverse carpal ligament or direct injury to the median nerve, neurolysis as well as nerve coverage to prevent recurrent scar has been shown to be effective.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review and telephone interview was conducted for patients who underwent abductor digiti minimi flap coverage and neurolysis of the median nerve for CRPS following carpal tunnel release.

RESULTS

Fourteen wrists in 12 patients were reviewed. Mean patient age was 64 years (range, 49-83 years), and the mean follow-up was 44 months. Carpal tunnel outcome instrument scores were 47.4 ± 6.8 preoperatively and 27.1 ± 10.6 at follow-up ( P < .001). Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores at follow-up were 29.4 ± 26. No significant postoperative complications were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The abductor digiti minimi flap is a reliable option with minimal donor site morbidity. It provides predictable coverage when treating CRPS following carpal tunnel syndrome.

Which surgery should be offered for carpal tunnel syndrome in a patient who was previously treated for recurrence on the contralateral side? Preliminary study of 13 patients with the Canaletto® implant

There are no published studies on the management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) patients who have already been operated for recurrent CTS on the contralateral side. The aim of this study was to evaluate 13 patients with CTS who underwent primary release using a Canaletto^® implant. The 13 patients had all been operated for recurrent CTS previously. On the contralateral side, they all had subjective signs, and two of them already had complications. All were operated with the Canaletto^® implant according to Duché's technique, in a mean of 20minutes. After a mean 19.3-month follow-up, paresthesia, pain, and QuickDASH scores were significantly improved, even in one patient who underwent revision at another facility. This preliminary study suggests that use of a Canaletto^® implant as first-line treatment for CTS in patients who already underwent revision surgery on the other side is a simple and safe technique, without worsening of symptoms. These findings should be assessed with a prospective randomized controlled trial.