Is early mobilization after volar locking plate fixation in distal radius fractures really beneficial? A meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies

Distal Radius Fracture Rehabilitation

Distal radius fracture (DRF) is arguably the most common upper extremity fracture resulting from a fall accident. These clinical practice guidelines (CPG) were developed to guide all aspects of the management of DRF by physical therapists and other rehabilitation practitioners, such as certified hand therapists. This CPG employed a systematic review methodology to locate, appraise, and synthesize contemporary evidence while developing practice recommendations for determining the prognosis of outcomes, examination, and interventions while managing individuals with DRF. The quality of the primary studies found in the literature search was appraised using standardized tools. The strength of the available evidence for a particular practice domain (e.g., prognosis or intervention) was graded as strong, moderate, weak, or conflicting, where such gradings guided the level of obligation for each practice recommendation. Lastly, the CPG also provided the gaps in the evidence pool for the rehabilitation of DRF that future research efforts can address. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(9):CPG1-CPG78. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.0301.

A Volar Locking Plate With Fossa Specific Fixation Provides Comparable Stability Between Articular and Nonarticular Cadaveric Models of Distal Radius Fracture

BACKGROUND

Distal radius fractures often present with a 3-part articular fragmentation pattern, with separation of the dorsal and volar lunate fossa. The column concept of distal radius fixation addresses the importance of stabilizing both the scaphoid fossa lateral column and the lunate fossa intermediate column. Recent evidence strengthens the value of immediate postoperative mobilization. Satisfactory outcomes following these protocols are predicated on volar locking plates (VLPs) providing adequate stability to the fracture repair. We hypothesize that a VLP which individually supports both lateral and intermediate distal radius columns may provide comparable stability between articular and non-articular cadaveric fracture models under parameters meant to simulate postoperative loading.

METHODS

Eleven cadaveric matched pair specimens were randomized to receive a simulated AO Type A2 non-articular distal radius fracture on one side with an AO Type C3 articular fracture on the contralateral side. Stiffness during cyclic loading was compared between fracture groups. A matched-paired Student t-test was used to determine statistical significance (P = .05).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences (P = .35) in stiffness between the articular models (mean 370.0 N/mm, +/-93.5) and the non-articular models (360.4 N/mm, +/-60.0) of distal radius fracture.

CONCLUSION

A VLP that individually supports the scaphoid and lunate fossa with fixed angle subchondral support may provide comparable fixation strength with resistance to displacement between articular and non-articular fracture patterns. The current results suggest that fossa-specific VLP fixation in articular fractures can maintain construct stability during postoperative loading.

Residual dorsal displacement following surgery in distal radial fractures: A cause for trouble?

PURPOSE

Distal radius fractures have great impact on activities of daily living of affected patients. Repeatedly, a non-anatomic restoration of the volar tilt can be observed in a minimum of 20% in postoperative X-ray control examinations. Hence, the question arises whether the achieved reduction is functionally acceptable, or whether a further attempt should be made to improve the surgical outcome.

METHODS

The data presented here originate from a prospective analysis including three therapy studies on surgical treatment options for fractures of the distal radius between 2004 and 2011. For this study, the participants were divided into two groups: The first group represents the cases with non-anatomical restoration of the volar tilt with - 5° to 5°. The second group contains patients with an anatomical volar tilt between 6° and 15°.

RESULTS

A total of 624 patients were screened according to the inclusion criteria. Radiological evaluation showed consolidation of all fractures. The mean volar tilt as measured in standard x-rays of the wrist was 0° and 8°, respectively. The range of wrist motion in relation of the healthy opposite side was comparable in all directions (for example comparison group 1: Ext/Flex 94/94%; group 2: Ext/Flex 93/93%). Functional assessment of postoperative midterm results employing the Castaing and Gartland & Werley scores 2.3 years after surgery did not reveal significant differences between both groups.

CONCLUSION

According to the available data, a volar tilt in the range of - 5° to 5° can be tolerated intraoperatively without any risk of loss of function regarding the patient's manual abilities.