Effectiveness of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation therapy and strength training among post-menopausal women with thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. A randomized trial

Efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological, pharmacological and surgical treatments for hand osteoarthritis in 2024: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

We aimed to update the 2018 systematic literature review on the efficacy and safety of treatments for hand osteoarthritis (OA), which was based on 126 studies.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search on randomised controlled trials from June 2017 up to 31 December 2023. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB2 tool. Meta-analyses of previous and new studies regarding the efficacy for pain, function, grip strength and OMERACT/OARSI responders were performed. Certainty of evidence was judged using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) tool.

RESULTS

Sixty-five new studies were included. For non-pharmacological interventions, there was low-certainty evidence for a small long-term effect of hand exercises and a moderate long-term effect of thumb orthoses for pain, and moderate-certainty evidence that assistive devices had a moderate long-term effect on function. Concerning pharmacological interventions, there was low-certainty evidence for a moderate short-term effect of oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on pain, high- and moderate-certainty evidence for a small short-term effect of topical NSAIDs and oral glucocorticoids on function, respectively, and low-certainty evidence that oral glucocorticoids had a small short-term effect on function. Further, there was low-certainty evidence that methotrexate had a small long-term effect on pain. The heterogeneity of studies did not allow for any meta-analyses on surgery.

CONCLUSION

The results largely support current treatment recommendations. However, there is a lack of interventions that efficiently improve grip strength, and the evidence for most current treatments is still limited. To better understand action mechanism of different treatments, future trials should include hand OA subtyping and be powered for subgroup analyses.

Exercise-Based Interventions Are Effective in the Management of Patients with Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Exercise-based interventions are a common management strategy in patients with thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis (CMCJ OA); however, their exact effect on or the use of an optimal training programme for reducing pain and disability remains unclear. Our purpose was to evaluate the effectiveness of exercise-based interventions compared with other conservative interventions in patients with CMCJ OA. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Fourteen randomised clinical trials with 1280 patients were finally included. Exercise-based interventions present statistically and clinically better outcomes in reducing pain intensity (mean difference [MD]: -21.91; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -36.59, -7.24; p = 0.003) and wrist disability (MD: -8.1, 95% CI: -4.6, -11.5; p = 0.02) compared with no treatment at short-term follow-up. Proprioceptive exercises have statistically and clinically better outcomes compared with standard care only in pain intensity at very short-term (standardised mean difference [SMD]: -0.76; 95% CI: -1.30, -0.21; p = 0.007) and short-term (SMD: -0.93; 95% CI: -1.86, -0.01; p = 0.049) follow-up and statistically better results in wrist disability at very short-term (SMD: -0.94; 95% CI: -1.68, -0.21; p = 0.01) follow-up. No differences were found between the comparators at mid- and long-term follow-up. Low to moderate certainty of evidence suggests that exercise-based interventions can provide clinically better outcomes compared with no treatment in patients with thumb CMCJ OA, at least in the short term.

Proprioception evaluation and treatment: Hand therapist practice patterns

BACKGROUND

Little is known about how hand therapists assess proprioception and treat deficits in clinical practice and what types of diagnoses they see most often. To our knowledge, no survey has been completed regarding proprioception practice patterns among hand therapists.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine current practice patterns related to the treatment and assessment of proprioception deficits by hand therapists in the United States.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional study using a survey instrument.

METHODS

The survey was sent to occupational and physical therapists identified as certified hand therapists or members of the American Society of Hand Therapists. The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys was used in reporting results.

RESULTS

Members of American Society of Hand Therapists (n=152) responded to the survey. The participants were asked if they provided rehabilitation services to people who have proprioceptive deficits, and 122 (82%) responded yes, and 27 (18%) responded no. Most therapists use a standardized technique for assessing proprioceptive deficits. Hand therapists' mean confidence level in treating proprioception deficits was 7.2 out of 10 compared to the mean confidence level reported evaluating them, which was 6.1 out of 10.

CONCLUSIONS

Most hand therapists evaluate and treat proprioception deficits across a variety of diagnoses. While the frequency and duration of proprioception treatment varies, most hand therapists reported high use of open- and closed-chain exercises and activities along with elastic taping as part of their intervention approach.