Population pharmacokinetics of tazobactam/ceftolozane in Japanese patients with complicated urinary tract infection and complicated intra-abdominal infection

Rationale and evidence for the use of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

Healthcare-associated infections involving Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) phenotype are associated with impaired patient-centered outcomes and poses daily therapeutic challenges in most of intensive care units worldwide. Over the recent years, four innovative β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) combinations (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam) and a new siderophore cephalosporin (cefiderocol) have been approved for the treatment of certain DTR-GNB infections. The literature addressing their microbiological spectrum, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety was exhaustively audited by our group to support the recent guidelines of the French Intensive Care Society on their utilization in critically ill patients. This narrative review summarizes the available evidence and unanswered questions on these issues.

METHODS

A systematic search for English-language publications in PUBMED and the Cochrane Library database from inception to November 15, 2022.

RESULTS

These drugs have demonstrated relevant clinical success rates and a reduced renal risk in most of severe infections for whom polymyxin- and/or aminoglycoside-based regimen were historically used as last-resort strategies-namely, ceftazidime-avibactam for infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)- or OXA-48-like-producing Enterobacterales, meropenem-vaborbactam for KPC-producing Enterobacterales, ceftazidime-avibactam/aztreonam combination or cefiderocol for metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales, and ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem-relebactam for non-MBL-producing DTR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, limited clinical evidence exists in critically ill patients. Extended-infusion scheme (except for imipenem-relebactam) may be indicated for DTR-GNB with high minimal inhibitory concentrations and/or in case of augmented renal clearance. The potential benefit of combining these agents with other antimicrobials remains under-investigated, notably for the most severe presentations. Other important knowledge gaps include pharmacokinetic information in particular situations (e.g., pneumonia, other deep-seated infections, and renal replacement therapy), the hazard of treatment-emergent resistance and possible preventive measures, the safety of high-dose regimen, the potential usefulness of rapid molecular diagnostic tools to rationalize their empirical utilization, and optimal treatment durations. Comparative clinical, ecological, and medico-economic data are needed for infections in whom two or more of these agents exhibit in vitro activity against the causative pathogen.

CONCLUSIONS

New BL/BLI combinations and cefiderocol represent long-awaited options for improving the management of DTR-GNB infections. Several research axes must be explored to better define the positioning and appropriate administration scheme of these drugs in critically ill patients.

A single- and multiple-dose study to characterize the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of ceftolozane/tazobactam in healthy Chinese participants

Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) is approved in several countries to treat complicated urinary tract infections, complicated intra-abdominal infections, and nosocomial pneumonia. There is a paucity of pharmacokinetics and safety data for C/T in Chinese participants. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of C/T in 12 healthy Chinese participants after three single administrations of increasing doses (0.75 g, 1.5 g, and 3 g) and multiple administrations of 1.5 g C/T every 8 h for 3 days. After single doses, maximum concentrations of ceftolozane and tazobactam were reached by the end of the 1-h infusion and declined in a biphasic manner thereafter, with mean half-lives of 1.9-2.2 h and 0.74-0.95 h, respectively. Volume of distribution (V_d) and renal clearance (CL) were consistent across the three single-dose levels for ceftolozane (V_d, 15.8-19.5 L; CL, 5.68-6.09 L/h) and tazobactam (V_d, 23.3-28.6 L; CL, 20.8-23.5 L/h). Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) extrapolated to infinity (ceftolozane, 88.1-328 h∙μg/mL; tazobactam, 10.7-48.0 h∙μg/mL) increased in a dose-dependent manner. After multiple doses over 3 days, AUC from time 0 to 8 h, and concentration at the end of infusion were similar to single-dose measurements (geometric mean ratios, 0.87-1.01 for both drugs). C/T was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events or discontinuations reported; all adverse events were mild. The pharmacokinetics and safety/tolerability of C/T in healthy Chinese participants was comparable to that in previous studies in other populations, supporting the use of C/T for the treatment of Chinese patients.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Susceptibility in Spain: Antimicrobial Activity and Resistance Suppression Evaluation by PK/PD Analysis

Pseudomonas aeruginosa remains one of the major causes of healthcare-associated infection in Europe; in 2019, 12.5% of invasive isolates of P. aeruginosa in Spain presented combined resistance to ≥3 antimicrobial groups. The Spanish nationwide survey on P. aeruginosa antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and molecular epidemiology was published in 2019. Based on the information from this survey, the objective of this work was to analyze the overall antimicrobial activity of the antipseudomonal antibiotics considering pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis. The role of PK/PD to prevent or minimize resistance emergence was also evaluated. A 10,000-subject Monte Carlo simulation was executed to calculate the probability of target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) considering the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distribution of bacteria isolated in ICU or medical wards, and distinguishing between sample types (respiratory and non-respiratory). Ceftazidime/avibactam followed by ceftolozane/tazobactam and colistin, categorized as the Reserve by the Access, Watch, Reserve (AWaRe) classification of the World Health Organization, were the most active antimicrobials, with differences depending on the admission service, sample type, and dose regimen. Discrepancies between EUCAST-susceptibility breakpoints for P. aeruginosa and those estimated by PK/PD analysis were detected. Only standard doses of ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam provided drug concentrations associated with resistance suppression.

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Adequacy of Novel β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitors against Gram-Negative Bacterial in Critically Ill Patients

The optimal regimens of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs), ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, and meropenem/vaborbactam, are not well defined in critically ill patients. This study was conducted to identify optimal regimens of BLBLIs in these patients. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed using the published data to calculate the joint probability of target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR). For the target of β-lactam of 100% time with free drug concentration remains above minimal inhibitory concentrations, the PTAs of BLBLIs standard regimens were <90% at a clinical breakpoint for Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. For ceftazidime/avibactam, 2000 mg/500 mg/8 h by 4 h infusion achieved >90% CFR for Escherichia coli; even for 4000 mg/1000 mg/6 h by continuous infusion, CFR for Klebsiella pneumoniae was <90%; the CFRs of 3500 mg/875 mg/6 h by 4 h infusion and 4000 mg/1000 mg/8 h by continuous infusion were appropriate for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. For ceftolozane/tazobactam, the CFR of standard regimen was >90% for Escherichia coli, however, 2000 mg/1000 mg/6 h by continuous infusion achieved <90% CFRs for Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. For meropenem/vaborbactam, standard regimen achieved optimal attainments for Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae; 2000 mg/2000 mg/6 h by 5 h infusion, 2500 mg /2500 mg/6 h by 4 h infusion, 3000 mg/3000 mg/6 h by 3 h infusion and 4000 mg/4000 mg/8 h by 5 h infusion achieved >90% CFRs for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The CFRs of three BLBLIs were similar for Escherichia coli, but meropenem/vaborbactam were superior for Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Ceftolozane-Tazobactam

Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) is a new fifth-generation cephalosporin/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination approved by the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections, complicated urinary tract infections, and hospital-acquired pneumonia in adult patients. This review will briefly describe the pharmacology of C/T and focus on the emerging clinical trial and real-world data supporting its current utilization. Additionally, our synthesis of these data over time has set our current usage of C/T at Barnes-Jewish Hospital (BJH). C/T is primarily employed as directed monotherapy at BJH when Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates are identified with resistance to other beta-lactams. C/T can also be used empirically in specific clinical situations at BJH prior to microbiological detection of an antibiotic-resistant P. aeruginosa isolate. These situations include critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, where there is a high likelihood of infection with multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa; patients failing therapy with a carbapenem; specific patient populations known to be at high risk for infection with MDR P. aeruginosa (e.g., lung transplant and cystic fibrosis patients); and patients know to have previous infection or colonization with MDR P. aeruginosa.

Finding the Dose for Ceftolozane-Tazobactam in Critically Ill Children with and without Acute Kidney Injury

Background: Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a new antibiotic against multidrug-resistant pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosas. Ceftolozane-tazobactam dosage is still uncertain in children, especially in those with renal impairment or undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Methods: Evaluation of different ceftolozane-tazobactam dosing regimens in three critically ill children. Ceftolozane pharmacokinetics (PK) were characterized by obtaining the patient’s specific parameters by Bayesian estimation based on a population PK model. The clearance (CL) in patient C undergoing CRRT was estimated using the prefilter, postfilter, and ultrafiltrate concentrations simultaneously. Variables such as blood, dialysate, replacement, and ultrafiltrate flow rates, and hematocrit were integrated in the model. All PK analyses were performed using NONMEM v.7.4. Results: Patient A (8 months of age, 8.7 kg) with normal renal function received 40 mg/kg every 6 h: renal clearance (CL_R) was 0.88 L/h; volume of distribution (Vd) Vd₁ = 3.45 L, Vd₂ = 0.942 L; terminal halflife (t_1/2,β) = 3.51 h, dosing interval area under the drug concentration vs. time curve at steady-state (AUC_τ,SS) 397.73 mg × h × L⁻¹. Patient B (19 months of age, 11 kg) with eGFR of 22 mL/min/1.73 m² received 36 mg/kg every 8 h: CL_R = 0.27 L/h; Vd₁ = 1.13 L; Vd₂ = 1.36; t_1/2,β = 6.62 h; AUC_SS 1481.48 mg × h × L⁻¹. Patient C (9 months of age, 5.8 kg), with severe renal impairment undergoing CRRT received 30 mg/kg every 8 h: renal replacement therapy clearance (CL_RRT) 0.39 L/h; Vd_{1 =} 0.74 L; Vd₂₌ 1.17; t _{1/2,β =} 3.51 h; AUC_τ,SS 448.72 mg × h × L⁻¹. No adverse effects attributable to antibiotic treatment were observed. Conclusions: Our results suggest that a dose of 35 mg/kg every 8 h can be appropriate in critically ill septic children with multi-drug resistance Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. A lower dose of 10 mg/kg every 8 h could be considered for children with severe AKI. For patients with CRRT and a high effluent rate, a dose of 30 mg/kg every 8 h can be considered.

A Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamic Approach To Optimize Tazobactam Activity in Critically Ill Patients

The percentage of the time that the free drug concentration remains above a concentration threshold (%fT > concentration threshold) has frequently been identified to be the optimal pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic (PD) target of interest for tazobactam using in vitro infection models. Similar in vitro models suggested that an 85% fT > concentration threshold of 2 μg/ml for tazobactam is required to demonstrate a 2-log10-unit decrease in the number of CFU per milliliter from that at the baseline at 24 h for high-level β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli strains. The objective of this study was to characterize the tazobactam concentrations in a cohort of critically ill patients with Gram-negative bacterial infections, determine if traditional dosing regimens achieve a prespecified PK/PD target of an 80% fT > concentration threshold of 2 μg/ml, and propose alternative dosing regimens. Hospitalized critically ill adult patients receiving piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) for a culture-positive Gram-negative bacterial infection were eligible to consent for study inclusion. Two blood samples were drawn, one during the midpoint of the dosing interval and one at the time of the trough concentration once the patient achieved PK steady state. A population PK model was developed using Phoenix NLME (v8.1) software to characterize the observed concentration-time profile of tazobactam, explore potential covariates to explain the variability in the clearance and volume parameters, and to simulate potential dosing regimens that would achieve the PK/PD target. The PK of tazobactam were adequately described by a one-compartment model with first-order elimination in 18 patients who provided consent. The final model incorporated creatinine clearance as a covariate on clearance. Simulations demonstrated target attainments of less than 50% for tazobactam using traditional dosing regimens (4/0.5 g over 30 min every 6 h). Target attainments of greater than 75% were achieved when using extended infusion times of 4 to 6 h or when administering TZP as a continuous infusion (16/2 g over 24 h). Traditional tazobactam dosing regimens fail to achieve conservative PK/PD targets in critically ill patients. Increases in the tazobactam dose or prolongation of the infusion rate may be warranted to achieve activity against β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Unbound Ceftolozane and Tazobactam in Critically Ill Patients without Renal Dysfunction

Evaluation of dosing regimens for critically ill patients requires pharmacokinetic data in this population. This prospective observational study aimed to describe the population pharmacokinetics of unbound ceftolozane and tazobactam in critically ill patients without renal impairment and to assess the adequacy of recommended dosing regimens for treatment of systemic infections. Patients received 1.5 or 3.0 g ceftolozane-tazobactam according to clinician recommendation.

Evaluation of dosing regimens for critically ill patients requires pharmacokinetic data in this population. This prospective observational study aimed to describe the population pharmacokinetics of unbound ceftolozane and tazobactam in critically ill patients without renal impairment and to assess the adequacy of recommended dosing regimens for treatment of systemic infections. Patients received 1.5 or 3.0 g ceftolozane-tazobactam according to clinician recommendation. Unbound ceftolozane and tazobactam plasma concentrations were assayed, and data were analyzed with Pmetrics with subsequent Monte Carlo simulations. A two-compartment model adequately described the data from twelve patients. Urinary creatinine clearance (CL_CR) and body weight described between-patient variability in clearance and central volume of distribution (V), respectively. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) parameter estimates for unbound ceftolozane and tazobactam, respectively, were CL of 7.2 ± 3.2 and 25.4 ± 9.4 liters/h, V of 20.4 ± 3.7 and 32.4 ± 10 liters, rate constant for distribution of unbound ceftolozane or tazobactam from central to peripheral compartment (Kcp) of 0.46 ± 0.74 and 2.96 ± 8.6 h⁻¹, and rate constant for distribution of unbound ceftolozane or tazobactam from peripheral to central compartment (Kpc) of 0.39 ± 0.37 and 26.5 ± 8.4 h⁻¹. With dosing at 1.5 g and 3.0 g every 8 h (q8h), the fractional target attainment (FTA) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa was ≥85% for directed therapy (MIC ≤ 4 mg/liter). However, for empirical coverage (MIC up to 64 mg/liter), the FTA was 84% with the 1.5-g q8h regimen when creatinine clearance is 180 ml/min/1.73 m², whereas the 3.0-g q8h regimen consistently achieved an FTA of ≥85%. For a target of 40% of time the free drug concentration is above the MIC (40% fT_>MIC), 3g q8h by intermittent infusion is suggested unless a highly susceptible pathogen is present, in which case 1.5-g dosing could be used. If a higher target of 100% fT_>MIC is required, a 1.5-g loading dose plus a 4.5-g continuous infusion may be adequate.