Distribution of Legionella species and serogroups in patients with culture-confirmed Legionella pneumonia

Clinical and Environmental Surveillance for the Prevention of Legionellosis

Legionella is a Gram-negative bacterium whose natural hosts are aquatic protozoa, in which the microorganism replicates and is protected from adverse environmental conditions [...].

Sensitivity of Legionella pneumophila to phthalates and their substitutes

Phthalates constitute a family of anthropogenic chemicals developed to be used in the manufacture of plastics, solvents, and personal care products. Their dispersion and accumulation in many environments can occur at all stages of their use (from synthesis to recycling). However, many phthalates together with other accumulated engineered chemicals have been shown to interfere with hormone activities. These compounds are also in close contact with microorganisms that are free-living, in biofilms or in microbiota, within multicellular organisms. Herein, the activity of several phthalates and their substitutes were investigated on the opportunistic pathogen Legionella pneumophila, an aquatic microbe that can infect humans. Beside showing the toxicity of some phthalates, data suggested that Acetyl tributyl citrate (ATBC) and DBP (Di-n-butyl phthalate) at environmental doses (i.e. 10-6 M and 10-8 M) can modulate Legionella behavior in terms of motility, biofilm formation and response to antibiotics. A dose of 10-6 M mostly induced adverse effects for the bacteria, in contrast to a dose of 10-8 M. No perturbation of virulence towards Acanthamoeba castellanii was recorded. These behavioral alterations suggest that L. pneumophila is able to sense ATBC and DBP, in a cross-talk that either mimics the response to a native ligand, or dysregulates its physiology.

Microbial Pathogens in Aquaponics Potentially Hazardous for Human Health

The union of aquaculture and hydroponics is named aquaponics-a system where microorganisms, fish and plants coexist in a water environment. Bacteria are essential in processes which are fundamental for the functioning and equilibrium of aquaponic systems. Such processes are nitrification, extraction of various macro- and micronutrients from the feed leftovers and feces, etc. However, in aquaponics there are not only beneficial, but also potentially hazardous microorganisms of fish, human, and plant origin. It is important to establish the presence of human pathogens, their way of entering the aforementioned systems, and their control in order to assess the risk to human health when consuming plants and fish grown in aquaponics. Literature analysis shows that aquaponic bacteria and yeasts are mainly pathogenic to fish and humans but rarely to plants, while most of the molds are pathogenic to humans, plants, and fish. Since the various human pathogenic bacteria and fungi found in aquaponics enter the water when proper hygiene practices are not applied and followed, if these requirements are met, aquaponic systems are a good choice for growing healthy fish and plants safe for human consumption. However, many of the aquaponic pathogens are listed in the WHO list of drug-resistant bacteria for which new antibiotics are urgently needed, making disease control by antibiotics a real challenge. Because pathogen control by conventional physical methods, chemical methods, and antibiotic treatment is potentially harmful to humans, fish, plants, and beneficial microorganisms, a biological control with antagonistic microorganisms, phytotherapy, bacteriophage therapy, and nanomedicine are potential alternatives to these methods.

A meta-analysis of Legionella pneumophila contamination in hospital water systems

BACKGROUND

Legionella pneumophila is a common cause of community-acquired pneumonia. We aimed to determine the pooled rates of L pneumophila contamination in the water environment of the hospital.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, WangFang and Science Direct, The Cochrane Library, and Science Finder, for relevant studies published until December 2022. Stata 16.0 software was used to determine pooled contamination rates, publication bias, and subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-eight eligible articles with a total of 23,640 samples of water were evaluated, and the prevalence of L pneumophila was 41.6%. The results of the subgroup analysis showed that the pollution rate of L pneumophila in hot water (47.6%) was higher than that in other water bodies. The rates of L pneumophila contamination were higher in developed countries (45.2%), culture methods (42.3%), published between 1985 and 2015 (42.9%), and studies with a sample size of less than 100 (53.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

L pneumophila contamination in medical institutions is still very serious and should be paid attention to, especially in developed countries and hot water tanks.

Legionella in drinking water: the detection method matters

Legionella concentrations in drinking water have been regulated for decades and are evaluated with regard to their concentrations in drinking water plumbing systems (DWPS). The respective action levels differ at the international level. In Germany, the Federal Environment Agency (UBA) specifies the application of ISO 11731 for the detection of legionella in drinking water and gives a binding recommendation for the methods to be used for culturing and evaluation. Effective from 01 March 2019, the UBA recommendation was revised. The utilized culture media in the culture approach were altered, consequently affecting the spectrum of legionella colonies detected in drinking water. Using data from a routine legionella monitoring of a large laboratory, over a period of 6 years and 17,270 individual drinking water samples, allowed us to assess the impact of the alteration on the assessment of DWPS. By comparing the amount of action level exceedances before and after the method change, it could be demonstrated that exceedances are reported significantly more often under the new method. Consequently, the corresponding action level for evaluation of legionella contamination and the resulting risk to human health needs to be revised to avoid the misleading impression of increased health risk.

Validation of quantitative real-time PCR for detection of Legionella pneumophila in hospital water networks

BACKGROUND

Rapid monitoring of Legionella pneumophila (Lp) is essential to reduce the risk of Legionnaires' disease in healthcare facilities. However, culture results take at least eight days, delaying the implementation of corrective measures. Here, we assessed the performance of a qPCR method and determined qPCR action thresholds for the detection of Lp in hospital hot water networks (HWNs).

METHODS

Hot water samples (n=459) were collected from a hospital HWNs. Lp were quantified using iQ-Check® Quanti real-time PCR Quantification kits (Bio-Rad) and the results were compared with those of culture. qPCR thresholds corresponding to the culture action thresholds of 10 and 1,000 CFU/L were determined on a training dataset and validated on an independent dataset.

RESULTS

Lp concentrations measured by culture and qPCR were correlated for both the training dataset (Spearman's correlation coefficient ρ = 0.687, p-value < 0.0001) and the validation dataset (ρ = 0.661, p-value < 0.0001). Lp qPCR positivity thresholds corresponding to culture action thresholds of 10 CFU/L was 91 genome units (GU) per liter (sensitivity, 86.4%; negative predictive value - NPV, 93.3%) and that corresponding to culture action thresholds of 1,000 CFU/L was 1,048 GU/L (sensitivity, 100%; NPV, 100%).

CONCLUSION

Detection of Lp by qPCR could be implemented with confidence in hospitals as a complement to culture in the monitoring strategy to speed up the implementation of corrective measures.

Stagnation arising through intermittent usage is associated with increased viable but non culturable Legionella and amoeba hosts in a hospital water system

Hospital water systems are a significant source of Legionella, resulting in the potentially fatal Legionnaires' disease. One of the biggest challenges for Legionella management within these systems is that under unfavorable conditions Legionella transforms itself into a viable but non culturable (VBNC) state that cannot be detected using the standard methods. This study used a novel method (flow cytometry-cell sorting and qPCR [VFC+qPCR] assay) concurrently with the standard detection methods to examine the effect of temporary water stagnation, on Legionella spp. and microbial communities present in a hospital water system. Water samples were also analyzed for amoebae using culture and Vermamoeba vermiformis and Acanthamoeba specific qPCR. The water temperature, number and duration of water flow events for the hand basins and showers sampled was measured using the Enware Smart Flow® monitoring system. qPCR analysis demonstrated that 21.8% samples were positive for Legionella spp., 21% for L. pneumophila, 40.9% for V. vermiformis and 4.2% for Acanthamoeba. All samples that were Legionella spp. positive using qPCR (22%) were also positive for VBNC Legionella spp.; however, only 2.5% of samples were positive for culturable Legionella spp. 18.1% of the samples were positive for free-living amoebae (FLA) using culture. All samples positive for Legionella spp. were also positive for FLA. Samples with a high heterotrophic plate count (HPC ≥ 5 × 103 CFU/L) were also significantly associated with high concentrations of Legionella spp. DNA, VBNC Legionella spp./L. pneumophila (p < 0.01) and V. vermiformis (p < 0.05). Temporary water stagnation arising through intermittent usage (< 2 hours of usage per month) significantly (p < 0.01) increased the amount of Legionella spp. DNA, VBNC Legionella spp./L. pneumophila, and V. vermiformis; however, it did not significantly impact the HPC load. In contrast to stagnation, no relationship was observed between the microbes and water temperature. In conclusion, Legionella spp. (DNA and VBNC) was associated with V. vermiformis, heterotrophic bacteria, and stagnation occurring through intermittent usage. This is the first study to monitor VBNC Legionella spp. within a hospital water system. The high percentage of false negative Legionella spp. results provided by the culture method supports the use of either qPCR or VFC+qPCR to monitor Legionella spp. contamination within hospital water systems.

Persistent contamination of a hospital hot water network by Legionellapneumophila

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the contamination with Legionella pneumophila (Lp) of the hot water network (HWN) of a hospital, mapped the risk of contamination, and evaluated the relatedness of isolates. We further validated phenotypically the biological features that could account for the contamination of the network.

METHODS

We collected 360 water samples from October 2017 to September 2018 in 36 sampling points of a HWN of a building from a hospital in France. Lp were quantified and identified with culture-based methods and serotyping. Lp concentrations were correlated with water temperature, date and location of isolation. Lp isolates were genotyped by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and compared to a collection of isolates retrieved in the same HWN two years later, or in other HWN from the same hospital.

RESULTS

207/360 (57.5%) samples were positive with Lp. In the hot water production system, Lp concentration was negatively associated with water temperature. In the distribution system, the risk of recovering Lp decreased when temperature was >55 °C (p < 10^-3), the proportion of samples with Lp increased with distance from the production network (p < 10^-3), and the risk of finding high loads of Lp increased 7.96 times in summer (p = 0.001). All Lp isolates (n = 135) were of serotype 3, and 134 (99.3%) shared the same pulsotype which is found two years later (Lp G). In vitro competition experiments showed that a 3-day culture of Lp G on agar inhibited the growth of a different pulsotype of Lp (Lp O) contaminating another HWN of the same hospital (p = 0.050). We also found that only Lp G survived to a 24h-incubation in water at 55 °C (p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

We report here a persistent contamination with Lp of a hospital HWN. Lp concentrations were correlated with water temperature, season, and distance from the production system. Such persistent contamination could be due to biotic parameters such as intra-Legionella inhibition and tolerance to high temperature, but also to the non-optimal configuration of the HWN that prevented the maintenance of high temperature and optimal water circulation.

A case of severe pneumonia caused by Legionella longbeachae with positive results by a Legionella urinary antigen detection kit

Legionella longbeachae is a Legionella bacteria often detected in soil, and is known as a rare cause of Legionella infections in Japan. In addition, detection of this Legionella species is often overlooked due to negative results from Legionella urinary antigen tests, which could lead to errors in the therapeutic approach. An 80-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital because of fever and dyspnea. Her blood tests showed elevated white blood cells, increased C-reactive protein and transaminases, and hyponatremia. Chest computed tomography showed dense consolidation in the right lung. We diagnosed Legionella pneumonia because the Legionella urinary antigen test was positive on the day after her admission. The patient was intubated and mechanically ventilated on the third day of hospitalization, because of respiratory failure. However, her condition did not improve and she died on the 10th day after admission. After her death, L. longbeachae was detected from sputum culture from her tracheal tube, and was diagnosed as the causative organism of her pneumonia. L. longbeachae infection reportedly rarely produces positive urinary antigen test results. Our experience suggests that the urinary antigen test using Ribotest Legionella might be able to detect Legionella spp. other than L. pneumophila.

Concept about the Virulence Factor of Legionella

Pathogenic species of Legionella can infect human alveolar macrophages through Legionella-containing aerosols to cause a disease called Legionellosis, which has two forms: a flu-like Pontiac fever and severe pneumonia named Legionnaires' disease (LD). Legionella is an opportunistic pathogen that frequently presents in aquatic environments as a biofilm or protozoa parasite. Long-term interaction and extensive co-evolution with various genera of amoebae render Legionellae pathogenic to infect humans and also generate virulence differentiation and heterogeneity. Conventionally, the proteins involved in initiating replication processes and human macrophage infections have been regarded as virulence factors and linked to pathogenicity. However, because some of the virulence factors are associated with the infection of protozoa and macrophages, it would be more accurate to classify them as survival factors rather than virulence factors. Given that the molecular basis of virulence variations among non-pathogenic, pathogenic, and highly pathogenic Legionella has not yet been elaborated from the perspective of virulence factors, a comprehensive explanation of how Legionella infects its natural hosts, protozoans, and accidental hosts, humans is essential to show a novel concept regarding the virulence factor of Legionella. In this review, we overviewed the pathogenic development of Legionella from protozoa, the function of conventional virulence factors in the infections of protozoa and macrophages, the host's innate immune system, and factors involved in regulating the host immune response, before discussing a probably new definition for the virulence factors of Legionella.

Molecular screening and characterization of Legionella pneumophila associated free-living amoebae in domestic and hospital water systems

Free-living amoebae are ubiquitous in the environment and cause both opportunistic and non-opportunistic infections in humans. Some genera of amoebae are natural reservoirs of opportunistic plumbing pathogens, such as Legionella pneumophila. In this study, the presence of free-living amoebae and Legionella was investigated in 140 water and biofilm samples collected from Australian domestic (n = 68) and hospital water systems (n = 72). Each sample was screened in parallel using molecular and culture-based methods. Direct quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays showed that 41% samples were positive for Legionella, 33% for L. pneumophila, 11% for Acanthamoeba, and 55% for Vermamoeba vermiformis gene markers. Only 7% of samples contained culturable L. pneumophila serogroup (sg)1, L. pneumophila sg2-14, and non-pneumophila Legionella. In total, 69% of samples were positive for free-living amoebae using any method. Standard culturing found that 41% of the samples were positive for amoeba (either Acanthamoeba, Allovahlkampfia, Stenamoeba, or V. vermiformis). V. vermiformis showed the highest overall frequency of occurrence. Acanthamoeba and V. vermiformis isolates demonstrated high thermotolerance and osmotolerance and strong broad spectrum bacteriogenic activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Importantly, all Legionella positive samples were also positive for amoeba, and this co-occurrence was statistically significant (p < 0.05). According to qPCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization, V. vermiformis and Allovahlkampfia harboured intracellular L. pneumophila. To our knowledge, this is the first time Allovahlkampfia and Stenamoeba have been demonstrated as hosts of L. pneumophila in potable water. These results demonstrate the importance of amoebae in engineered water systems, both as a pathogen and as a reservoir of Legionella. The high frequency of gymnamoebae detected in this study from Australian engineered water systems identifies an issue of significant public health concern. Future water management protocols should incorporate treatments strategies to control amoebae to reduce the risk to end users.

Proteome Exploration of Legionella pneumophila To Identify Novel Therapeutics: a Hierarchical Subtractive Genomics and Reverse Vaccinology Approach

Legionella pneumophila is a human pathogen distributed worldwide, causing Legionnaires’ disease (LD), a severe form of pneumonia and respiratory tract infection. L. pneumophila is emerging as an antibiotic-resistant strain, and controlling LD is now difficult. Hence, developing novel drugs and vaccines against L. pneumophila is a major research priority.

Severe pneumonia caused by Legionella pneumophila detected by a multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay and confirmed by serology

Legionella pneumophila is a rarely diagnosed microorganism in Serbia. It causes legionellosis, usually a mild respiratory infection. However, in some cases it can be severe and even life threatening. In June 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, a patient with symptoms of the aforesaid infection, namely severe pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome, was admitted to the hospital. The multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test (The BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel plus) detected the presence of L. pneumophila in the patient’s bronchial secretions. The specific culture for the detection of that organism, however, remained sterile. The patient’s paired sera had been sent for serology and the results in both of them came back positive for Legionella spp. 1–6, while the assays specific for each one of the 10 serogroups detected more than a fourfold increase of antibody titers in an uncommon serogroup 2 only. The patient was treated with moxifloxacin; he recovered well and was discharged after 26 days of hospitalization. Having being diagnosed with the L. pneumophila infection correctly through the multiplex PCR test, the patient was given the right therapy with moxifloxacin. The serologic assays corroborated this result and revealed the uncommon group 2, thus confirming the necessity of carrying out all the tests available to attain the exact diagnosis of legionellosis.

Legionella pneumophila Subspecies fraseri Infection after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant, China

We describe an immunosuppressed patient with bacteremia and pneumonia caused by Legionella pneumophila subspecies fraseri in China. We confirmed this diagnosis by using nanopore sequencing of positive blood cultures and subsequent recovery from buffered-charcoal yeast extract culture. Nanopore sequencing is an effective tool for early diagnosis of atypical infections.

National survey of physicians in Japan regarding their use of diagnostic tests for legionellosis

INTRODUCTION

Bacterial culture remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of legionellosis. However, past reports indicate that most physicians use the urinary antigen test (UAT) alone. Combining it with other tests is important, especially in patients with negative UAT results. The aim of this study was to investigate the current situation of legionellosis diagnostics and clarify the issues that need to be addressed.

METHODS

Between March 1, 2021 and April 30, 2021, a questionnaire survey was conducted in an anonymous manner among physicians working in Japan. Questionnaires were generated on a website and asked questions in a multiple-choice format.

RESULTS

Valid responses were received from 309 physicians during the study period. Most (92.9%) physicians reported using UAT as the initial test for patients suspected of having legionellosis, and <10% reported using other tests (e.g., culture, nucleic acid amplification test [NAAT], Gimenez staining, and serum antibody titer measurement [ATM]). When the initial test result was negative, 63% of physicians reported not conducting additional tests. Even when they chose to run additional tests, at most 27.8%, 23.6%, 12.3%, and 10.4% of all physicians used NAAT, culture, Gimenez staining, and serum ATM, respectively. The major reasons for not using tests other than UAT were "unavailability in the medical facility," "long turn-around time," and "difficult to collect sputum."

CONCLUSIONS

The present survey revealed that most physicians in Japan used UAT alone for diagnosing legionellosis. Eliminating barriers to creating a reasonable environment and edification of physicians are needed to improve the current situation.

Atypical pneumonia: Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment

Atypical pneumonia is caused by atypical pathogens that are not detectable with Gram stain and cannot be cultured using standard methods. The most common causative organisms of atypical pneumonia are Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Legionella species. The therapeutic approach for atypical pneumonias is different than that for typical pneumonia. Typical bacterial pathogens classically respond to β-lactam antimicrobial therapy because they have a cell wall amenable to β-lactam disruption. On the contrary, most atypical pathogens do not have a bacterial cell wall, some are intracellular (e.g., Legionella), and some are paracellular (e.g., M. pneumoniae). To prevent an increase in the number of antimicrobial-resistant strains, the Japanese pneumonia guidelines have proposed a differential diagnosis for typical bacterial pneumonia and atypical pneumonia to select an appropriate antibiotic for the management of mild-to-moderate pneumonia. The guidelines have set up six parameters and criteria based on the clinical symptoms, physical signs, and laboratory data. However, in the elderly individuals and patients with underlying diseases, the differential diagnosis may be difficult or a mixed infection may be latent. Therefore, in these individuals, the administration of a β-lactam drug plus a macrolide or tetracycline, or only fluoroquinolone should be considered from the beginning to cover bacterial and atypical pneumonia.

Co-infection with Legionella and SARS-CoV-2: a case report

INTRODUCTION

We report a case of COVID-19 with Legionella co-infection that was treated successfully.

CASE REPORT

A 73-year-old man presented to the hospital with symptoms of fatigue that continued for the next 5 days. The patient was receiving docetaxel and prednisolone chemotherapy for prostate cancer. Laboratory findings on admission showed positive urine Legionella antigen test and SARS-CoV-2 test. He was administered antiviral and antibacterial agents, and a corticosteroid. Pneumonia exacerbated on day 2 of hospitalization. The patient underwent tracheal intubation and began receiving multidisciplinary care. On day 8 of hospitalization, his oxygenation improved, and the patient was extubated. He discharged on day 27 of hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

The patient had a favorable outcome with early diagnosis and early treatment of both diseases. Patients with severe COVID-19 disease need to be evaluated for co-infection. Further, early diagnosis and early treatment of the microbial bacteria causing the co-infection are important.

Bacteremia Caused by Both Legionella pneumophila Serogroup 2 and Helicobacter cinaedi

A 74-year-old woman with a history of pure red cell aplasia and hypogammaglobulinemia developed pneumonia. A urine antigen test and sputum subculture on buffered charcoal yeast extract (BCYE)α agar were positive for Legionella pneumophila. Serological testing identified L. pneumophila serogroup 2. An aerobic blood culture also became positive on day 5; its subculture on BCYEα agar revealed the same pathogen, but that on blood agar revealed Helicobacter cinaedi. We thus diagnosed her with bacteremia caused by both pathogens. Hence, in cases of H. cinaedi bacteremia along with pneumonia, the screening of other pathogens including L. pneumophila is needed.

Evaluation of five Legionella urinary antigen detection kits including new Ribotest Legionella for simultaneous detection of ribosomal protein L7/L12

Urinary antigen tests are a widely used rapid diagnostic method for Legionella pneumonia. However, conventional urinary antigen tests are unable to detect anything other than Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1. The Ribotest Legionella (Ribotest) can detect all serogroups by using antibodies recognizing L. pneumophila ribosomal protein L7/L12 in addition to the conventional L. pneumophila serogroup 1 lipopolysaccharide. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of Ribotest against conventional urinary antigen tests, including the detection of Legionellaceae other than L. pneumophila. We investigated the detection sensitivity of various kits using in-vitro culture-soluble antigen extracts of ATCC strains and 22 clinical isolates collected from multiple medical facilities in the Kinki region of Japan. For L. pneumophila serogroup 1, four kits, including Ribotest, had a detection sensitivity of 10⁵ CFU/mL, with only Check Legionella having a sensitivity of 10⁶ CFU/mL. L. pneumophila non-serogroup 1 and Legionellaceae of other species were undetectable by the four conventional kits, whereas Ribotest could detect them with a sensitivity of 10⁵-10⁸ CFU/mL. The Ribotest was also able to detect other species such as Legionella hackeliae, Legionella feeleii, Legionella anisa, Fluoribacter bozemanae, and Fluoribacter dumoffii, but the detection sensitivity of L. hackeliae and L. feeleii was 10⁸ CFU/mL, which was much lower than that of the other strains. The Ribotest has high potential to be applied as a rapid diagnostic method for pneumonia caused by other species of Legionella and Fluoribacter.

Legionellosis Caused by Non-Legionella pneumophila Species, with a Focus on Legionella longbeachae

Although known as causes of community-acquired pneumonia and Pontiac fever, the global burden of infection caused by Legionella species other than Legionella pneumophila is under-recognised. Non-L. pneumophila legionellae have a worldwide distribution, although common testing strategies for legionellosis favour detection of L. pneumophila over other Legionella species, leading to an inherent diagnostic bias and under-detection of cases. When systematically tested for in Australia and New Zealand, L. longbeachae was shown to be a leading cause of community-acquired pneumonia. Exposure to potting soils and compost is a particular risk for infection from L. longbeachae, and L. longbeachae may be better adapted to soil and composting plant material than other Legionella species. It is possible that the high rate of L. longbeachae reported in Australia and New Zealand is related to the composition of commercial potting soils which, unlike European products, contain pine bark and sawdust. Genetic studies have demonstrated that the Legionella genomes are highly plastic, with areas of the chromosome showing high levels of recombination as well as horizontal gene transfer both within and between species via plasmids. This, combined with various secretion systems and extensive effector repertoires that enable the bacterium to hijack host cell functions and resources, is instrumental in shaping its pathogenesis, survival and growth. Prevention of legionellosis is hampered by surveillance systems that are compromised by ascertainment bias, which limits commitment to an effective public health response. Current prevention strategies in Australia and New Zealand are directed at individual gardeners who use potting soils and compost. This consists of advice to avoid aerosols generated by the use of potting soils and use masks and gloves, but there is little evidence that this is effective. There is a need to better understand the epidemiology of L. longbeachae and other Legionella species in order to develop effective treatment and preventative strategies globally.

Legionella longbeachae pneumonia: A case report and literature review in Japan

Herein, we report the case of a 74-year-old man diagnosed with Legionella pneumonia detected by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) method, which was suspected to have been transmitted from the potting soil. Legionella longbeachae was identified in the sputum culture. The patient was intubated and maintained on mechanical ventilation. Antimicrobial therapy with azithromycin was also administered. His symptoms were resolved and he was discharged after 26 days of hospitalization. Legionella longbeachae pneumonia rarely occurs in Japan, and published literature of Legionella longbeachae pneumonia cases in Japan was reviewed. Patients with severe pneumonia exposed to potting soils, but with negative urinary antigen test results, should be examined by LAMP method.

The Impact of Storms on Legionella pneumophila in Cooling Tower Water, Implications for Human Health

At the U.S. Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site (SRS) in Aiken, SC, cooling tower water is routinely monitored for Legionella pneumophila concentrations using a direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) technique. Historically, 25–30 operating SRS cooling towers have varying concentrations of Legionella in all seasons of the year, with patterns that are unpredictable. Legionellosis, or Legionnaires’ disease (LD), is a pneumonia caused by Legionella bacteria that thrive both in man-made water distribution systems and natural surface waters including lakes, streams, and wet soil. Legionnaires’ disease is typically contracted by inhaling L. pneumophila, most often in aerosolized mists that contain the bacteria. At the SRS, L. pneumophila is typically found in cooling towers ranging from non-detectable up to 10⁸ cells/L in cooling tower water systems. Extreme weather conditions contributed to elevations in L. pneumophila to 10⁷–10⁸ cells/L in SRS cooling tower water systems in July–August 2017. L. pneumophila concentrations in Cooling Tower 785-A/2A located in SRS A-Area, stayed in the 10⁸ cells/L range despite biocide addition. During this time, other SRS cooling towers did not demonstrate this L. pneumophila increase. No significant difference was observed in the mean L. pneumophila mean concentrations for the towers (p < 0.05). There was a significant variance observed in the 285-2A/A Tower L. pneumophila results (p < 0.05). Looking to see if we could find “effects” led to model development by analyzing 13 months of water chemistry and microbial data for the main factors influencing the L. pneumophila concentrations in five cooling towers for this year. It indicated chlorine and dissolved oxygen had a significant impact (p < 0.0002) on cooling tower 785A/2A. Thus, while the variation in the log count data for the A-area tower is statistically greater than that of the other four towers, the average of the log count data for the A-Area tower was in line with that of the other towers. It was also observed that the location of 785A/2A and basin resulted in more debris entering the system during storm events. Our results suggest that future analyses should evaluate the impact of environmental conditions and cooling tower design on L. pneumophila water concentrations and human health.

Clinical and computed tomographic features of Legionella pneumonia with negative urine antigen test results

BACKGROUND

Legionella spp. can cause severe pneumonia and most Legionella pneumonia (LP) cases are diagnosed using the urine antigen test (UAT). However, diagnosis of LP with negative UAT results (LPNUAT) is challenging. We investigated the clinical and radiological features of LPNUAT.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected LP cases with positive UAT (LPPUAT) and cases of suspected LP with negative UAT that were examined by Legionella culture between July 2014 and March 2020. We investigated the clinical and CT findings for LP that showed negative UAT results and was diagnosed by culture and compared these findings with those for other pneumonias suspicious for LP with negative results in UAT and Legionella culture (OPSLP).

RESULTS

Eight LPNUAT, 20 LPPUAT, and 19 OPSLP cases were included in this study. There were no significant differences in the clinical and CT findings between LPPUAT and LPNUAT when examined by UAT. In LPNUAT, dyspnea, renal dysfunction, liver dysfunction, and bilateral lesions were more commonly observed and inflammatory changes and the number of affected lobes were significantly higher when examined by culture than when examined by UAT. Comparison to OPSLP, LPNUAT did not show such differences, but rather showed disturbances in consciousness, hyponatremia and rhabdomyolysis. Furthermore, lobar consolidation was observed more frequently and bronchial wall thickening and centrilobular nodules were observed less frequently in LPNUAT.

CONCLUSIONS

LP characteristics such as disturbance of consciousness, hyponatremia, rhabdomyolysis, lobar consolidation, and less bronchial wall thickening and centrilobular nodule contribute to the diagnosis of LP in patients with negative UAT results.

Required water temperature in hotel plumbing to control Legionella growth

Legionella spp. occurring in hotel hot water systems, in particular Legionella pneumophila, are causing serious pneumonic infections, and water temperature is a key factor to control their occurrence in plumbing systems. We performed a systematic review and meta-analyses of the available evidence on the association between water temperature and Legionella colonization to identify the water temperature in hotel hot water systems required for control of Legionella. Qualitative synthesis and quantitative analysis were performed on 13 studies that met our inclusion criteria to identify the effect of temperature. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve identified 55 °C as a cutoff point for hotel hot water temperature with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) value of 0.914. The odds ratios (OR) for detecting Legionella at temperatures >55 °C compared to lower temperatures from a meta-analysis of three studies was 0.17 [95% CI: 0.11, 0.25], which indicates a strong negative association between temperature and Legionella colonization. A logistic regression on results from multiple studies using both molecular and culture methods found a temperature of 59 °C associated with an 8% probability of detectable Legionella. Only two studies reported sufficiently detailed data to allow a model of concentration vs. temperature to be fit, and this model was not statistically significant. Additional research or more detailed reporting of existing datasets is required to assess if Legionella growth can be limited below particular concentration targets at different temperatures.

Legionella pneumophila and Protozoan Hosts: Implications for the Control of Hospital and Potable Water Systems

Legionella pneumophila is an opportunistic waterborne pathogen of public health concern. It is the causative agent of Legionnaires’ disease (LD) and Pontiac fever and is ubiquitous in manufactured water systems, where protozoan hosts and complex microbial communities provide protection from disinfection procedures. This review collates the literature describing interactions between L. pneumophila and protozoan hosts in hospital and municipal potable water distribution systems. The effectiveness of currently available water disinfection protocols to control L. pneumophila and its protozoan hosts is explored. The studies identified in this systematic literature review demonstrated the failure of common disinfection procedures to achieve long term elimination of L. pneumophila and protozoan hosts from potable water. It has been demonstrated that protozoan hosts facilitate the intracellular replication and packaging of viable L. pneumophila in infectious vesicles; whereas, cyst-forming protozoans provide protection from prolonged environmental stress. Disinfection procedures and protozoan hosts also facilitate biogenesis of viable but non-culturable (VBNC) L. pneumophila which have been shown to be highly resistant to many water disinfection protocols. In conclusion, a better understanding of L. pneumophila-protozoan interactions and the structure of complex microbial biofilms is required for the improved management of L. pneumophila and the prevention of LD.