A systematic review and meta-analysis of myelosuppression in pediatric patients treated with linezolid for Gram-positive bacterial infections

Evaluation of pharmacokinetic target attainment and hematological toxicity of linezolid in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Linezolid is commonly used to treat severe and/or resistant Gram-positive infections. Few studies have assessed its pharmacokinetic (PK) target attainment in pediatrics.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the percentage of pediatrics achieving the PK targets of linezolid with standard dosing regimens and to assess the incidence and risk factors associated with its hematologic toxicity.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included pediatric patients aged 0-14 who received linezolid for suspected or proven Gram-positive infections. Linezolid trough concentrations and the 24-h area under the curve (AUC24) were estimated, and hematologic toxicity was assessed.

RESULTS

Seventeen pediatric patients (5 neonates and 12 older pediatrics) were included. A wide variability was observed in linezolid's trough and AUC24 (ranging from 0.5 to 14.4 mg/L and from 86 to 700 mg.h/L, respectively). The median AUC24 was significantly higher in neonates than older pediatrics (436 [350-574] vs. 200 [134-272] mg,h/L, P = 0.01). Out of all patients, only 41% achieved adequate drug exposure (AUC24 160-300 mg.h/L and trough 2-7 mg/L), with 24% having subtherapeutic, and 35% having higher-than-optimal exposures. Hematological toxicity was observed in 53% of cases. Identified risk factors include treatment duration over 7 days, baseline platelet counts below 150 × 109/L, sepsis/septic shock, and concomitant use of meropenem.

CONCLUSIONS

Linezolid's standard dosing failed to achieve its PK targets in approximately half of our pediatric cohort. Our findings highlight the complex interplay between the risk factors of linezolid-associated hematological toxicity and underscore the importance of its vigilant use and monitoring, particularly in pediatrics with concomitant multiple risk factors.

In silico drug design strategies for discovering novel tuberculosis therapeutics

INTRODUCTION

Tuberculosis remains a significant concern in global public health due to its intricate biology and propensity for developing antibiotic resistance. Discovering new drugs is a protracted and expensive endeavor, often spanning over a decade and incurring costs in the billions. However, computer-aided drug design (CADD) has surfaced as a nimbler and more cost-effective alternative. CADD tools enable us to decipher the interactions between therapeutic targets and novel drugs, making them invaluable in the quest for new tuberculosis treatments.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors explore recent advancements in tuberculosis drug discovery enabled by in silico tools. The main objectives of this review article are to highlight emerging drug candidates identified through in silico methods and to provide an update on the therapeutic targets associated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

EXPERT OPINION

These in silico methods have not only streamlined the drug discovery process but also opened up new horizons for finding novel drug candidates and repositioning existing ones. The continued advancements in these fields hold great promise for more efficient, ethical, and successful drug development in the future.

Prevalence and risk factors for severe linezolid-associated thrombocytopenia in pediatric patients: An analysis of a public database

Linezolid is widely used in various clinical settings. Studies have revealed that it may cause thrombocytopenia in adults. However, the correlation between the use of linezolid and thrombocytopenia in pediatric patients is still unclear. This study aimed to identify the impact of Linezolid on the occurrence of thrombocytopenia in children. A retrospective observational study was conducted using data on patients treated with linezolid from the Pediatric Intensive Care clinical database. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors of linezolid-related severe thrombocytopenia. A total of 134 patients were included. The prevalence of severe thrombocytopenia was 8.96% (12/134). Univariate analysis indicated that the severe thrombocytopenia group showed significantly higher proportion of concomitant carbapenem (75% vs 44.3%; P < .05) and piperacillin/tazobactam (25% vs 6.6%; P < .05) than that of the non-severe thrombocytopenia group. Multivariate analysis also revealed that the occurrence of severe thrombocytopenia was significantly associated with concurrent use of carbapenem (odd ratio = 4.058; 95% confidence interval: 1.012-16.274; P = .048) and piperacillin/tazobactam (odd ratio = 5.335; 95% confidence interval: 1.117-25.478; P = .036). 75% of patients (9/12) developed severe thrombocytopenia within the first 7 days of linezolid use. The concomitant use of carbapenem and piperacillin/tazobactam was associated with an increased probability of severe thrombocytopenia in pediatric patients undergoing linezolid treatment. Further prospective clinical studies are required, and more detailed mechanisms of blood toxicity in pediatric patients must be investigated.

Safety and clinical efficacy of linezolid in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of linezolid in children for treating suspected and diagnosed Gram-positive bacterial infections.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted up to April 23, 2021, using linezolid and its synonyms as search terms. Two reviewers independently identified and extracted relevant randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies. The extracted studies were included in a single-rate meta-analysis of adverse events and clinical outcomes using random-effects models.

RESULTS

A total of 1082 articles were identified, and nine studies involving 758 children were included in the meta-analysis. The overall proportion of adverse events was 8.91% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.64%-36.52%], with diarrhea (2.24%), vomiting (2.05%), and rash (1.72%) being the most common. The incidences of thrombocytopenia and anemia were 0.68% and 0.16%, respectively. Some specific adverse events, including rash and gastrointestinal events, were more frequent in the oral administration subgroup. In terms of efficacy, the overall proportion of clinical improvement was 88.80% (95% CI = 81.31%-93.52%). Children with a history of specific bacteriological diagnosis or concomitant antibiotic therapy had a 1.13-fold higher clinical improvement than children without such histories. The proportion of microbial eradication was 92.68% (95% CI = 84.66%-96.68%). The proportion of all-cause mortality was 0.16% (95% CI = 0.00%-7.75%).

CONCLUSIONS

Linezolid was well-tolerated in pediatric patients and was associated with a low frequency of adverse events, such as anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. Moreover, linezolid was effective in children with diagnosed and suspected Gram-positive infections.

Linezolid in the treatment of severe intraabdominal infection: A STROBE-compliant retrospective study

Safety concerns over bone marrow suppression and thrombocytopenia may inhibit the use of linezolid to treat intraabdominal infection (IAI). To evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and prognosis of linezolid in the treatment of severe IAI (SIAI). Patients were divided into a linezolid group and nonlinezolid group according to whether linezolid was prescribed. Subgroup analysis (thrombocytopenia treated with linezolid group (I), and thrombocytopenia treated with nonlinezolid group (II) also was performed. We evaluated the effectiveness of linezolid by analyzing the changes in white blood cells (WBC) and procalcitonin, evaluated safety by analyzing the changes in platelet counts, and evaluated patient outcomes by analyzing the length of hospital stay, the length of ICU stay, and the rates of clinical improvement. Sixty-six adult SIAI patients were treated with anti-gram-positive (G+) bacteria drugs for more than 7 days from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2020. The length of hospital stay, the length of ICU stay, and the rates of clinical improvement were not significantly different between the linezolid group and nonlinezolid group. On the 15th day after anti-G + bacteria treatment, the WBC of the linezolid group was significantly lower than in the nonlinezolid group (9.00 ± 4.30 vs 13.1 ± 6.19, P < .05). The time for a statistical difference in the decrease of procalcitonin in the linezolid group was earlier than in the nonlinezolid group (day 6 vs day 7, P < .05). There was no statistically significant difference in the changes of platelet counts in the subgroup I (P > .05), but compared with the baseline data (day 0), the time for the statistical difference in the increase of platelets in thrombocytopenia treated with linezolid group was earlier (day 5 vs day 6, P < .05). There was no statistical difference in the changes of platelets in subgroup II (P > .05). In the treatment of severe intraabdominal infection in a single-center, retrospective study, linezolid was not inferior to other antibiotics in patient clinical outcomes or seral WBC and procalcitonin values. Linezolid also induced no evident bone marrow suppression or thrombocytopenia. Linezolid is a good choice for treatment of SIAI.

A Novel UPLC-MS/MS Assay for the Measurement of Linezolid and its Metabolite PNU-142300 in Human Serum and its Application to Patients With Renal Insufficiency

The contribution of the metabolites of linezolid to the associated myelosuppression is unknown in patients who are renal impairment. In this research, the purpose of our experiment was to explore and develop a quick and robust ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) assay for the determination of linezolid and its metabolite PNU-142300 in human serum simultaneously. The analytes were prepared using a simple and convenient approach with acetonitrile for protein crash, and then separated from the matrix on a Waters Acquity Ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) BEH C18 (2.1 mm × 50 mm, 1.7 μm) column in a program of gradient elution, where the mobile phase was consisted of water with 0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile, and was placed at 0.40 ml/min flow rate. Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) was employed and conducted for UPLC-MS/MS detection with ion transitions at m/z 338.01 → 296.03 for linezolid, m/z 369.96 → 327.98 for PNU-142300 and m/z 370.98 → 342.99 for tedizolid (Internal standard, IS), respectively. This method had good linearity respectively in the calibration range of 0.01–20 μg/ml for linezolid, and 0.05–100 μg/ml for PNU-142300. In the intra- and inter-day, the precision of linezolid and PNU-142300 was below 14.2%, and the accuracy in this method was determined to be from −9.7 to 12.8%. In addition, recovery and matrix effect of the analytes were all found to be acceptable, and the analytes during the assay and storage in serum samples were observed to be stable. The novel optimized UPLC-MS/MS assay was also successfully employed to determine the concentration levels of linezolid and PNU-142300 in human serum. The results showed that linezolid-associated myelosuppression occurs more frequently in patients with renal insufficiency, and the metabolite-to-parent concentration ratio of PNU-142300 is predicted to reduce this toxicity of myelosuppression.