Probenecid and food effects on flucloxacillin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy volunteers

Towards pharmacokinetic boosting of phenoxymethylpenicillin (penicillin-V) using probenecid for the treatment of bacterial infections

In the face of increasing antimicrobial tolerance and resistance there is a global obligation to optimise oral antimicrobial dosing strategies including narrow spectrum penicillins, such as penicillin-V. We conducted a randomised, crossover study in healthy volunteers to characterise the influence of probenecid on penicillin-V pharmacokinetics and estimate the pharmacodynamics against Streptococcus pneumoniae. Twenty participants took six doses of penicillin-V (250 mg, 500 mg or 750 mg four times daily) with and without probenecid. Total and free concentrations of penicillin-V and probenecid were measured at two timepoints. A pharmacokinetic model was developed, and the probability of target attainment (PTA) calculated. The mean difference (95% CI) between penicillin-V alone and in combination with probenecid for serum total and free penicillin-V concentrations was significantly different at both timepoints (total: 45 min 4.32 (3.20-5.32) mg/L p < 0.001, 180 min 2.2 (1.58-3.25) mg/L p < 0.001; free: 45 min 1.15 (0.88-1.42) mg/L p < 0.001, 180 min 0.5 (0.35-0.76) mg/L p < 0.001). There was no difference between the timepoints in probenecid concentrations. PTA analysis shows probenecid allows a fourfold increase in MIC cover. Addition of probenecid was safe and well tolerated. The data support further research into improved dosing structures for complex outpatient therapy and might also be used to address penicillin supply shortages.

Do dietary interventions exert clinically important effects on the bioavailability of β-lactam antibiotics? A systematic review with meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

Managing drug-food interactions may help to achieve the optimal action and safety profile of β-lactam antibiotics.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review with meta-analyses in adherence to PRISMA guidelines for 32 β-lactams. We included 166 studies assessing the impact of food, beverages, antacids or mineral supplements on the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters or PK/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices.

RESULTS

Eighteen of 25 β-lactams for which data on food impact were available had clinically important interactions. We observed the highest negative influence of food (AUC or Cmax decreased by >40%) for ampicillin, cefaclor (immediate-release formulations), cefroxadine, cefradine, cloxacillin, oxacillin, penicillin V (liquid formulations and tablets) and sultamicillin, whereas the highest positive influence (AUC or Cmax increased by >45%) for cefditoren pivoxil, cefuroxime and tebipenem pivoxil (extended-release tablets). Significantly lower bioavailability in the presence of antacids or mineral supplements occurred for 4 of 13 analysed β-lactams, with the highest negative impact for cefdinir (with iron salts) and moderate for cefpodoxime proxetil (with antacids). Data on beverage impact were limited to 11 antibiotics. With milk, the extent of absorption was decreased by >40% for cefalexin, cefradine, penicillin G and penicillin V, whereas it was moderately increased for cefuroxime. No significant interaction occurred with cranberry juice for two tested drugs (amoxicillin and cefaclor).

CONCLUSIONS

Factors such as physicochemical features of antibiotics, drug formulation, type of intervention, and patient's health state may influence interactions. Due to the poor actuality and diverse methodology of included studies and unproportionate data availability for individual drugs, we judged the quality of evidence as low.

Oral antimicrobial therapy for cellulitis versus outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: a single-centre audit of cellulitis outcomes

BACKGROUND

Cellulitis is a common acute skin and soft tissue infection that causes substantial morbidity and healthcare costs.

AIMS

To audit the impact on cellulitis management, regimen tolerability and outcomes of switching from outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) using intravenous (i.v.) cefazolin once daily plus probenecid to oral beta-lactam therapy (OBLT) using oral flucloxacillin plus probenecid.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective audit on cellulitis management, regimen tolerability and outcomes at the Dunedin Public Hospital Emergency Department (ED) before and after a change of the local outpatient cellulitis treatment pathway from OPAT using i.v. cefazolin once daily plus probenecid to OBLT using oral flucloxacillin plus probenecid.

RESULTS

OPAT was used in 97/123 (78.9%) patients with cellulitis before compared to 1/70 (1.4%) after the pathway change (odds ratio (OR), 0.04, P < 0.01). OBLT was used in 26/123 (21.1%) patients with cellulitis before and 69/70 (98.6%) after (OR, 218.8, P < 0.01). Antimicrobial change due to intolerance occurred in 4/123 (3.2%) patients with cellulitis before and 4/70 (5.7%) after (OR, 1.8, P, not significant (NS)) the pathway change. Inpatient admission within 28 days occurred in 15/123 (12.2%) cellulitis patients before and 9/70 (12.9%) after (OR, 1.1, P, NS) the pathway change.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a change in outpatient cellulitis treatment pathway resulted in a significant change in prescribing practice. Our findings suggest that OBLT was both tolerable and had similar outcomes to OPAT.

Impact of the Inhibition of Organic Anion Transporter on Tricyclo-DNA-Mediated Exon Skipping in the mdx Mouse Model

Antisense-mediated exon skipping is one of the most promising therapeutic strategies for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and some antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) drugs have already been approved by the U.S. FDA for DMD. The potential of this therapy is still limited by several challenges including the poor distribution of ASOs to target tissues. Indeed, most of them accumulate in the kidney and tend to be rapidly eliminated after systemic delivery. We hypothesized here that preventing renal clearance of ASO using organic anion transporter (OAT) inhibitor could increase the bioavailability of ASOs and thus their distribution to target tissues and ultimately their efficacy in muscles. Mdx mice were, therefore, treated with ASO with or without the OAT inhibitor named probenecid. Our findings indicate that OAT inhibition, or at least using probenecid, does not improve the therapeutic potential of ASO-mediated exon-skipping approaches for the treatment of DMD.

Early oral antibiotic switch in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: The Staphylococcus aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) Trial Early Oral Switch Protocol

BACKGROUND

Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (bacteraemia) is traditionally treated with at least two weeks of IV antibiotics in adults, 3-7 days in children, and often longer for those with complicated disease. The current practice of treating S. aureus bacteraemia (SAB) with prolonged IV antibiotics (rather than oral antibiotics) is based on historical observational research and expert opinion. Prolonged IV antibiotic therapy has significant disadvantages for patients and healthcare systems, and there is growing interest in whether a switch to oral antibiotics following an initial period of IV therapy is a safe alternative for clinically stable patients.

PROTOCOL

The early oral switch (EOS) domain of the S. aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) trial will assess early switch to oral antibiotics compared with continued IV treatment in clinically stable patients with SAB. The primary endpoint is 90-day all-cause mortality. Hospitalised SAB patients are assessed at platform day 7 +/- 2 (uncomplicated SAB) and day 14 +/-2 (complicated SAB) to determine their eligibility for randomisation to EOS (intervention) or continued IV treatment (current standard of care).

DISCUSSION

Recruitment is occurring to the EOS domain of the SNAP trial. As of August 2023, 21% of all SNAP participants had been randomised to the EOS domain, a total of 264 participants across 77 centres, with an aim to recruit at least 1000 participants. We describe challenges and facilitators to enrolment in this domain to aid those planning similar trials.

Differences in in vivo absorption of flavone glycosides, flavone aglycones and terpene lactones under different dosage forms and physiological conditions

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Ginkgo biloba L. extract (GBE) oral preparations have been used for many years in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, and the main active ingredients are flavonoids and terpene lactones. Among them, the oral absorption of the prototype components of flavonoid glycosides into the blood needs to be further clarified, and the differences in the oral absorption of different components in GBE by different dosage forms and physiological conditions are not clear yet.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To clarify the oral absorption of the prototype flavonoid glycosides in vivo, and to further explore the differences in the oral absorption of various active compounds under different oral dosage forms and dietary conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Firstly, the target compounds were selected based on the characteristic chromatogram of GBE and literature. Then, the content differences of three different oral GBE preparations were studied, and their pharmacokinetics (PK) were compared. Finally, the PK differences of the preparations with better oral absorption under different dietary conditions were studied.

RESULTS

Five flavonoid glycosides, three aglycones and four terpene lactones were selected as the research objects. The content determination results of GBE tablets, guttate pills and tinctures showed that the content of several components especially flavonoid glycosides in the tincture was higher than that of the other two preparations. After oral administration of these three preparations, the PK study showed different results from previous studies. The PK behavior of flavonoid glycosides was also determined at the same time as flavonoid glycosides and terpene lactones. and the bioavailability of flavonoid glycosides in the tincture was higher than that of the other two preparations. PK results of fasting and non-fasting showed that taking GBE tincture on an empty stomach increased the absorption of various compounds, especially flavonoid glycosides. However, due to the existence of food residues in the gastrointestinal tract, the oral bioavailability of flavonoid glycosides was significantly improved.

CONCLUSIONS

This study discussed the differences in the content and oral absorption of active compounds in different oral preparations of GBE, clarified the in vivo absorption of flavonoid glycosides prototype, as well as the influence of diet on the PK of active compounds, which has certain guiding significance for the clinical application of GBE oral preparations.

Combination with a FtsZ inhibitor potentiates the in vivo efficacy of oxacillin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Oxacillin is a first-line antibiotic for the treatment of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections but is ineffective against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) due to resistance. Here we present results showing that co-administering oxacillin with the FtsZ-targeting prodrug TXA709 renders oxacillin efficacious against MRSA. The combination of oxacillin and the active product of TXA709 (TXA707) is associated with synergistic bactericidal activity against clinical isolates of MRSA that are resistant to current standard-of-care antibiotics. We show that MRSA cells treated with oxacillin in combination with TXA707 exhibit morphological characteristics and PBP2 mislocalization behavior similar to that exhibited by MSSA cells treated with oxacillin alone. Co-administration with TXA709 renders oxacillin efficacious in mouse models of both systemic and tissue infection with MRSA, with this efficacy being observed at human-equivalent doses of oxacillin well below that recommended for daily adult use. Pharmacokinetic evaluations in mice reveal that co-administration with TXA709 also increases total exposure to oxacillin. Viewed as a whole, our results highlight the clinical potential of repurposing oxacillin to treat MRSA infections through combination with a FtsZ inhibitor.

Addition of probenecid to oral β-lactam antibiotics: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To explore the literature comparing the pharmacokinetic and clinical outcomes from adding probenecid to oral β-lactams.

METHODS

Medline and EMBASE were searched from inception to December 2021 for all English language studies comparing the addition of probenecid (intervention) with an oral β-lactam [flucloxacillin, penicillin V, amoxicillin (± clavulanate), cefalexin, cefuroxime axetil] alone (comparator). ROBINS-I and ROB-2 tools were used. Data on antibiotic therapy, infection diagnosis, primary and secondary outcomes relating to pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes, plus adverse events were extracted and reported descriptively. For a subset of studies comparing treatment failure between probenecid and control groups, meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 18/295 (6%) screened abstracts were included. Populations, methodology and outcome data were heterogeneous. Common populations included healthy volunteers (9/18; 50%) and those with gonococcal infection (6/18; 33%). Most studies were crossover trials (11/18; 61%) or parallel-arm randomized trials (4/18; 22%). Where pharmacokinetic analyses were performed, addition of probenecid to oral β-lactams increased total AUC (7/7; 100%), Cmax (5/8; 63%) and serum t½ (6/8; 75%). Probenecid improved PTA (2/2; 100%). Meta-analysis of 3105 (2258 intervention, 847 control) patients treated for gonococcal disease demonstrated a relative risk of treatment failure in the random-effects model of 0.33 (95% CI 0.20-0.55; I2 = 7%), favouring probenecid.

CONCLUSIONS

Probenecid-boosted β-lactam therapy is associated with improved outcomes in gonococcal disease. Pharmacokinetic data suggest that probenecid-boosted oral β-lactam therapy may have a broader application, but appropriately powered mechanistic and efficacy studies are required.

Optimizing antimicrobial use: challenges, advances and opportunities

An optimal antimicrobial dose provides enough drug to achieve a clinical response while minimizing toxicity and development of drug resistance. There can be considerable variability in pharmacokinetics, for example, owing to comorbidities or other medications, which affects antimicrobial pharmacodynamics and, thus, treatment success. Although current approaches to antimicrobial dose optimization address fixed variability, better methods to monitor and rapidly adjust antimicrobial dosing are required to understand and react to residual variability that occurs within and between individuals. We review current challenges to the wider implementation of antimicrobial dose optimization and highlight novel solutions, including biosensor-based, real-time therapeutic drug monitoring and computer-controlled, closed-loop control systems. Precision antimicrobial dosing promises to improve patient outcome and is important for antimicrobial stewardship and the prevention of antimicrobial resistance.

Population pharmacokinetics of free flucloxacillin in patients treated with oral flucloxacillin plus probenecid

Oral flucloxacillin may be coadministered with probenecid to reduce flucloxacillin clearance and increase attainment of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets. The aims of this study were to develop a population PK model of free flucloxacillin when administered orally with probenecid, and to identify optimal dosing regimens for this combination.

METHODS

We performed a prospective observational study of adults (45 participants) treated with oral flucloxacillin 1000 mg and probenecid 500 mg 8-hourly for proven or probable staphylococcal infections. Steady-state mid-dose-interval flucloxacillin measurements (45 concentrations) were combined with existing data from a crossover study of healthy participants receiving flucloxacillin with and without probenecid (11 participants, 363 concentrations). We developed a population pharmacokinetic model of free flucloxacillin concentrations within Monolix, and used Monte Carlo simulation to explore optimal dosing regimens to attain PK/PD targets proposed in the literature (free drug time above minimum inhibitory concentration).

RESULTS

Flucloxacillin disposition was best described by a 1-compartment model with a lag time and first-order absorption. Free flucloxacillin clearance depended on probenecid, allometrically-scaled fat free mass (FFM) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Predicted PK/PD target attainment was suboptimal with standard dosing regimens with flucloxacillin alone, but substantially improved in the presence of probenecid.

CONCLUSION

The simulation results reported can be used to identify dose regimens that optimise flucloxacillin exposure according to eGFR and FFM. Patients with higher FFM and eGFR may require the addition of probenecid and 6-hourly dosing to achieve PK/PD targets. The regimen was well-tolerated, suggesting a potential for further evaluation in controlled clinical trials to establish efficacy.