1
|
Harris I, Immler S, Chapman T, Maklakov AA. Selection on the epigenome: small RNA inheritance in animal evolution. Trends Genet 2025:S0168-9525(25)00082-4. [PMID: 40379494 DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2025.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2025] [Revised: 04/15/2025] [Accepted: 04/16/2025] [Indexed: 05/19/2025]
Abstract
The inheritance of small RNAs (sRNAs) is taxonomically widespread. Changing environments alter the production and presence of sRNAs in the germline, and this can in theory either increase offspring phenotypic variance as an evolutionary bet-hedging strategy or elicit predictive and adaptive phenotypic responses that increase offspring fitness. Nevertheless, the putative role of sRNA inheritance systems in adaptive evolution is still debated and it is currently unclear how selection acts on sRNAs. We outline two adaptive sRNA inheritance strategies - specialist and generalist - and discuss non-adaptive alternatives and the evolutionary implications of different strategies. Our review suggests that the role of natural selection in sRNA inheritance has been significantly overlooked, potentially leading to misinterpretations of the causal agents and the evolutionary implications of sRNA inheritance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac Harris
- School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
| | - Simone Immler
- School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - Tracey Chapman
- School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - Alexei A Maklakov
- School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gozashti L, Hoekstra HE. Accounting for diverse transposable element landscapes is key to developing and evaluating accurate de novo annotation strategies. Genome Biol 2024; 25:4. [PMID: 38166955 PMCID: PMC10763064 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-023-03118-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Transposable elements (TEs) are important drivers of genome evolution. Nonetheless, TE annotation remains a complex and challenging task. As more genomes from phylogenetically diverse species are published, a comprehensive pipeline for accurate annotation of diverse TEs is increasingly important. Recently, (Ou et al. Genome Biol. 20:275, 2019) developed a new comprehensive pipeline, Extensive De novo Transposable element Annotator (EDTA), and benchmarked its performance on the genomes of three species: maize, wheat, and fruit fly. Because TE landscapes can vary tremendously across species, we tested EDTA's performance on four additional genomes with different TE landscapes: mouse, zebrafish, zebra finch, and chicken. Our analysis reveals that EDTA faces challenges with repeat classification in these genomes and underperforms overall relative to its benchmark dataset. Notably, EDTA consistently misclassifies nonLTR retrotransposons as DNA transposons, resulting in erroneous TE annotations for species with considerable repertoires of nonLTR retrotransposons. Overall, we set expectations for EDTA's performance on genomes spanning additional diversity, urge caution when using EDTA on genomes with divergent TE repertoires from the species on which it was initially benchmarked, and hope to motivate the development of methods that are robust to both the diversity of TEs and TE landscapes observed across species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Landen Gozashti
- Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Comparative Zoology, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
| | - Hopi E Hoekstra
- Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Comparative Zoology, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dionisio JF, Pezenti LF, de Souza RF, Sosa-Gómez DR, da Rosa R. Annotation of transposable elements in the transcriptome of the Neotropical brown stink bug Euschistus heros and its chromosomal distribution. Mol Genet Genomics 2023; 298:1377-1388. [PMID: 37646857 DOI: 10.1007/s00438-023-02063-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
Transposable elements (TEs) are DNA sequences capable of moving within the genome. Their distribution is very dynamic among organisms, and despite advances, there are still gaps in the understanding of the diversity and evolution of TEs in many insect species. In the case of Euschistus heros, considered the main stink bug in the soybean crop in Brazil, little is known about the participation of these elements. Therefore, the objective of the current work was to identify the different groups of transposable elements present in the E. heros transcriptome, evidencing their chromosomal distribution. Through RNA-Seq and de novo assembly, 60,009 transcripts were obtained, which were annotated locally via Blastn against specific databases. Of the 367 transcripts identified as TEs, 202 belong to Class II, with emphasis on the TIR order. Among Class I elements or retrotransposons, most were characterized as LINE. Phylogenetic analyses were performed with the protein domains, evidencing differences between Tc1-mariner sequences, which may be related to possible horizontal transfer events. The transposable elements that stood out in the transcriptome were selected for fluorescent in situ hybridization. DNA transposon probes hAT, Helitron, and Tc1-mariner showed mostly scattered signals, with the presence of some blocks. Retrotransposon probes Copia, Gypsy, Jockey, and RTE showed a more pulverized hybridization pattern, with the presence of small interstitial and/or terminal blocks. Studies like this one, integrating functional genomics and molecular cytogenetic tools, are essential to expanding knowledge about transcriptionally active mobile elements, and their behavior in the chromosomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaqueline Fernanda Dionisio
- Laboratório de Citogenética e Entomologia Molecular, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid, PR 445 Km 350, Campus Universitário, Caixa Postal: 10.011, Londrina, PR, CEP:86.057-970, Brazil
| | - Larissa Forim Pezenti
- Laboratório de Citogenética e Entomologia Molecular, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid, PR 445 Km 350, Campus Universitário, Caixa Postal: 10.011, Londrina, PR, CEP:86.057-970, Brazil
- Laboratório de Bioinformática, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Caixa Postal: 10.011, Londrina, PR, CEP:86.057-970, Brazil
| | - Rogério Fernandes de Souza
- Laboratório de Bioinformática, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Caixa Postal: 10.011, Londrina, PR, CEP:86.057-970, Brazil
| | - Daniel Ricardo Sosa-Gómez
- Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária/Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Soja (Embrapa Soja), Caixa Postal: 4006, Londrina, PR, CEP: 86085-981, Brazil
| | - Renata da Rosa
- Laboratório de Citogenética e Entomologia Molecular, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid, PR 445 Km 350, Campus Universitário, Caixa Postal: 10.011, Londrina, PR, CEP:86.057-970, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sproul JS, Hotaling S, Heckenhauer J, Powell A, Marshall D, Larracuente AM, Kelley JL, Pauls SU, Frandsen PB. Analyses of 600+ insect genomes reveal repetitive element dynamics and highlight biodiversity-scale repeat annotation challenges. Genome Res 2023; 33:1708-1717. [PMID: 37739812 PMCID: PMC10691545 DOI: 10.1101/gr.277387.122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
Abstract
Repetitive elements (REs) are integral to the composition, structure, and function of eukaryotic genomes, yet remain understudied in most taxonomic groups. We investigated REs across 601 insect species and report wide variation in RE dynamics across groups. Analysis of associations between REs and protein-coding genes revealed dynamic evolution at the interface between REs and coding regions across insects, including notably elevated RE-gene associations in lineages with abundant long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs). We leveraged this large, empirical data set to quantify impacts of long-read technology on RE detection and investigate fundamental challenges to RE annotation in diverse groups. In long-read assemblies, we detected ∼36% more REs than short-read assemblies, with long terminal repeats (LTRs) showing 162% increased detection, whereas DNA transposons and LINEs showed less respective technology-related bias. In most insect lineages, 25%-85% of repetitive sequences were "unclassified" following automated annotation, compared with only ∼13% in Drosophila species. Although the diversity of available insect genomes has rapidly expanded, we show the rate of community contributions to RE databases has not kept pace, preventing efficient annotation and high-resolution study of REs in most groups. We highlight the tremendous opportunity and need for the biodiversity genomics field to embrace REs and suggest collective steps for making progress toward this goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John S Sproul
- Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, USA;
- Department of Biology, University of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, Nebraska 68182, USA
- Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA
| | - Scott Hotaling
- School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99163, USA
- Department of Watershed Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322, USA
| | - Jacqueline Heckenhauer
- LOEWE Center for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG), 60325 Frankfurt, Germany
- Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, 60325 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Ashlyn Powell
- Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, USA
| | - Dez Marshall
- Department of Biology, University of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, Nebraska 68182, USA
| | | | - Joanna L Kelley
- School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99163, USA
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA
| | - Steffen U Pauls
- LOEWE Center for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG), 60325 Frankfurt, Germany
- Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, 60325 Frankfurt, Germany
- Department of Insect Biotechnology, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, 35392 Gießen, Germany
| | - Paul B Frandsen
- LOEWE Center for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG), 60325 Frankfurt, Germany
- Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, USA
- Data Science Lab, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, District of Columbia 20560, USA
| |
Collapse
|