Increased posterior tibial slope is an independent risk factor of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft rupture irrespective of graft choice

Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft is associated with a higher rate of return to preinjury levels of performance in high-level athletes than anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft

PURPOSE

Return to preinjury levels of performance (RTP) is the main goal after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) for athletes when ACL graft rupture is a career-threatening event. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the associated factors for RTP and subsequent ACL injury after ACL-R using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or hamstring (HT) autograft in high-level athletes with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 24 months.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 157 patients who had preinjury Tegner activity level of 9 and underwent primary ACL-R using BPTB (average age, 16.9 years; 35 males and 36 females) or HT (average age, 17.2 years; 49 males and 37 females). The mean follow-ups were 33.6 months in BPTB and 44.5 months in HT, respectively. The data were obtained based on routine clinical follow-ups and telephone interviews performed by the surgeon. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the association of patient variables with RTP and subsequent ACL injury.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients (63.1%) were able to RTP. The rate of RTP in BPTB (74.6%) was significantly higher than that of HT (53.5%) (p < 0.05). The overall average timing of RTP after ACL-R was 10.0 months while that was significantly earlier in BPTB (9.7 months) than in HT (10.5 months) (p < 0.05). Twenty-three (14.6%) and 21 patients (13.4%) had ACL graft ruptures and ACL injuries in the contralateral knees, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that BPTB (odds ratio [OR], 2.590; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.300-5.160; p = 0.007) was associated with a higher potential for RTP after ACL-R. The incidence of ACL graft rupture after ACL-R decreased with BPTB (OR, 0.861; 95% CI, 0.770-0.962; p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of BPTB autograft was associated with a higher rate of RTP and a lower incidence of ACL graft rupture compared to ACL-R using HT autograft.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Tibial Slope Is Not Associated With Implant Migration Following Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty With a Single Implant Design

BACKGROUND

The influence of tibial slope on tibial component migration following total knee arthroplasty has not been widely studied, although excessive posterior slope has been implicated in some failures. As implant micromotion measured with radiostereometric analysis can indicate successful fixation, the purpose of this study was to determine the associations between tibial slope, tibial component migration, and inducible displacement.

METHODS

Radiostereometric analyses at 6 visits over 2 years quantified implant migration for 200 cemented total knee arthroplasties. Longitudinal data analysis examined the influence of postoperative tibial slope on implant migration (overall maximum total point motion (MTPM) migration and anterior-posterior tilt migration), accounting for age, sex, and body mass index. The correlations of tibial slope with 1-year migration, continuous migration, and inducible displacements were also examined. Additionally, the amount of change in slope was compared to migration.

RESULTS

The mean posterior tibial slope was 8.0° (standard deviation [SD] 3.8°) preoperatively and 3.8° (SD 3.1°) postoperatively, with a mean reduction in slope of 4.2° (SD 4.7°). Postoperative tibial slope (range 14.0° posterior slope to 3.4° anterior slope) was not associated with longitudinal overall migration (P = .671) or anterior-posterior tilt migration (P = .704). There was no association between postoperative tibial slope and migration at 1 year postoperatively (P = .441 for MTPM migration, P = .570 for tilt migration), change in migration from 1 to 2 years (P = .951), or inducible displacement (P = .970 MTPM, P = .730 tilt). The amount of change in tibial slope was also not associated with migration or inducible displacement.

CONCLUSIONS

Residual and change in postoperative tibial slope were not associated with implant migration into tilt or overall migration, or inducible displacement for a single implant design. These findings support positioning tibial implants in a range of slopes, which may support patient-specific approaches to implant alignment.

Correlation of Tibial Tubercle Overgrowth With Increased Posterior Tibial Slope: A Novel Radiographic Assessment

Background

An elevated posterior tibial slope (PTS) is associated with an increased risk for anterior cruciate ligament and meniscal injury. Recent evidence suggests that the PTS is elevated in patients with Osgood-Schlatter disease.

Purpose

To determine whether there is an association between objective measures of anterior tibial tubercle growth and PTS.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A total of 100 radiographs were randomly selected from a sample of patients who had received a lateral knee radiograph that captured at least 15 cm of the tibia distal to the knee joint line at a single institution between December 2020 and March 2022. The PTS was measured, and tibial tubercle growth was quantified with 2 novel measurements. For these measurements, a line was drawn on the radiograph from the most anterosuperior point on the tibia to the point on the anterior cortex of the tibia 10 cm distal from the starting point. The tibial tubercle height (TTH) was measured as the perpendicular distance from this line to the most prominent portion of the anterior tibia. The anterior tibial tubercle angle (TTA) was measured as the angle between the endpoints of the line made previously and the most prominent portion of the tibial tubercle, with a more acute angle indicating a more prominent tibial tubercle. The relationship between TTA, TTH, and PTS was evaluated using a univariate linear regression model.

Results

The mean patient age was 33.1 ± 14.1 years. The mean TTA was 158.6°± 4.7°, the mean TTH was 8.8 ± 2.0 mm, and the mean PTS was 9.7°± 2.6°. A significant correlation was found between PTS and TTA (r = -0.46; β = -0.46; P < .001) as well as TTH (r = 0.43; β = 0.43; P < .001).

Conclusion

Objective measures of anterior tibial tubercle overgrowth correlated with an elevated PTS. Every 2.2° of anterior TTA deviation from the mean and every 2.3 mm in TTH deviation from the mean correlated with a 1° difference in the PTS. This suggests a link between the development of the tibial tubercle and PTS, and it potentially helps to explain why the PTS is elevated in certain patients.

Posterior Tibial Slope in Patients Undergoing Bilateral Versus Unilateral ACL Reconstruction: MRI and Radiographic Analyses

BACKGROUND

An increased posterior tibial slope (PTS) is a risk factor for primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears and graft failure, but the PTS has not been well-defined in those who have experienced bilateral ACL injuries.

PURPOSE

The primary aim was to compare the PTS, as well as the rate of an elevated PTS (>12° on lateral radiography; >7° on magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), between patients who have undergone bilateral ACL reconstruction (ACLR) versus unilateral ACLR. A secondary purpose was to examine whether these associations remained consistent on both plain radiography and MRI.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients who underwent primary ACLR at our institution from the years 2012 to 2020. Patients who underwent nonsimultaneous bilateral ACLR (n = 53) were matched to those who underwent unilateral ACLR (n = 53) by age, sex, and body mass index. Exclusion criteria were rotated lateral radiographs, MRI scans of inadequate quality, and concomitant ligament injuries or fractures. Those who had undergone unilateral ACLR with <5-year follow-up were further excluded. There were 3 blinded readers who measured the PTS on lateral radiographs, while the medial PTS (MPTS) and lateral PTS (LPTS) were measured on MRI scans. Bivariate regression was performed to determine the correlation between radiographic and MRI measurements.

RESULTS

The PTS on radiography (11.26° vs 10.13°, respectively; P = .044) and the LPTS on MRI (7.32° vs 6.08°, respectively; P = .012) in the bilateral ACLR group were significantly greater than those in the unilateral ACLR group but not the MPTS on MRI (4.55° vs 4.17°, respectively; P = .590). The percentage of patients in the bilateral group with a radiographic PTS >12° was 41.0% compared with 13.2% in the unilateral group (P = .012). The bilateral group had a significantly higher rate of an LPTS >7° compared with the unilateral group (53.8% vs 32.1%, respectively; P = .016) but not for an MPTS >7° (P = .190). On MRI, the LPTS (6.90°± 2.73°) was significantly greater than the MPTS (4.41°± 2.92°) (P < .001). There was a weak correlation between MPTS and radiographic PTS measurements (R = 0.24; P = .021), but LPTS and radiographic PTS measurements were not significantly correlated (R = 0.03; P = .810).

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent bilateral ACLR had a significantly greater PTS on radiography and a significantly greater LPTS on MRI compared with those who underwent unilateral ACLR. The rate of a radiographic PTS >12° was 2.4 times greater among patients undergoing bilateral ACLR compared with those undergoing unilateral ACLR. PTS measurements on radiography demonstrated a weak to negligible correlation with PTS measurements on MRI, suggesting that future normative PTS values should be reported specific to the imaging modality.