Lateral joint tightness in flexion following cementless mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty decreases patient-reported outcome measures and postoperative range of motion

Association Between Overhang of the Posterior Femoral Condyle and Restricted Postoperative Knee Flexion Related to Patient-Reported Stiffness in Medial-Pivot Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The primary aim of this study was to investigate the association between the posterior longitudinal overhang in the femoral condyle (PLOF) in medial-pivot total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and a change in knee flexion angle (change in flexion).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 148 knees undergoing medial-pivot TKA for medial knee osteoarthritis. The primary outcome was the change in flexion (c-flexion) preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. The component positions were evaluated using 3-dimensional measurements, where the PLOF was measured for each medial and lateral femoral condyle. The secondary outcome was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores taken preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of c-flexion and risk factors for negative c-flexion (less than 0°). Furthermore, a receiver operating characteristic curve was utilized to determine the threshold for negative c-flexion.

RESULTS

The mean c-flexion was -3.2° ± 8.7, and lateral PLOF was significantly associated with c-flexion (β = -0.52; P < 0.001). Larger preoperative flexion angles (odds ratio, 1.10; P < 0.001) and larger lateral PLOF (odds ratio, 1.69; P = 0.001) were risk factors for negative c-flexion, with thresholds of 129° and 1.1 mm, respectively (sensitivity, 0.79; specificity, 0.72). Additionally, patients who had negative c-flexion (n = 91) demonstrated less improvement in preoperative and 2-year postoperative Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index stiffness subscores than patients who had positive c-flexion (0° or more; n = 57) (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A larger lateral PLOF was associated with decreased and negative c-flexion after medial-pivot TKA. Patients who had negative c-flexion demonstrated less improvement in knee stiffness. Surgical strategies aimed at minimizing lateral PLOF may enhance postoperative knee flexion and overall patient outcomes in medial-pivot TKA.

Large angular correction of arithmetic coronal alignment is associated with residual lateral laxity after total knee arthroplasty in varus knees for Japanese patients

Purpose

One of the most common types of coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) is type I, which is characterised by varus alignment and apex distal joint line obliquity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of changes in arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) with both postoperative joint laxity and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with CPAK type I following mechanical alignment (MA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

Of 111 consecutive knees in 92 patients with osteoarthritis who underwent primary TKA, 80 knees (72.0%) with CPAK type I phenotype preoperatively were evaluated. All TKAs were performed to achieve neutral MA by a medial stabilising gap balancing technique. Pre- to postoperative change in aHKA was defined as ΔaHKA. The 80 CPAK type I knees were divided into a larger ΔaHKA group (>7°) and a smaller ΔaHKA group (≤7°). PROMs, including the Knee Society Score and Forgotten Joint Score-12, were assessed before and 2 years after surgery. Pre- and postoperative joint laxity was assessed using a Telos arthrometer.

Results

Twenty-two knees showed a larger ΔaHKA, and postoperative lateral joint laxity in varus stress was significantly greater in these patients than in those with a smaller ΔaHKA (6.8° vs. 4.5°, p = 0.006). There were no significant differences between the groups in PROMs (p = n.s.).

Conclusions

Postoperative lateral laxity was associated with larger aHKA changes than smaller aHKA changes in CPAK type I knees after TKA. However, no statistically significant differences in PROMs were found according to the amount of change in aHKA.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

Functionally aligned total knee arthroplasty: A lateral flexion laxity up to 6 mm is safe!

PURPOSE

Loose flexion gaps are associated with poor functional outcomes and instability in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The effect of a trapezoidal flexion gap in a functionally aligned TKA remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a larger lateral flexion gap in a robotic-assisted (RA), functionally aligned (FA) and cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Data from 527 TKA in 478 patients from 2018 to 2020 were collected. All patients underwent an RA (MAKO, Stryker), FA and CR TKA. Gap measurements were collected intraoperatively. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), pain Visual analogue score (VAS) and range of motion were collected postoperatively. Patients were also asked about the ease of stair ascent and descent and kneeling on a 5-point scale. The minimum follow-up was 2 years. Patients were stratified into three groups based on lateral flexion laxity.

RESULTS

At 2 years postoperatively, the group with a looser gap (3-6 mm) had higher mean PROMs when compared with the group with a gap of 2-3 mm. There were no differences detected in any other outcomes at 2 years. A total of 70.9% of patients in the group with a 3-6 mm gap reported being able to walk down a flight of stairs 'easily', compared with 56.7% in the 2-3 mm group and 54% in the <2 mm group (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The study shows that a loose lateral flexion gap in functionally aligned CR TKA does not adversely affect outcomes in the short term.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Increased Femoral Component Flexion and No Difference in Slope in Robotic- versus Computer-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty When Targeting Mechanical Alignment

Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is becoming popular due to better precision, when compared with other instrumentation. Although RAS has been validated in comparison with computer-assisted surgery (CAS), data from clinical settings comparing these two techniques are lacking. This is especially the case for sagittal alignment. Whereas pure mechanical alignment (MA) aims for 0 to 3 degrees of flexion of the femoral component and 3° of posterior slope for the tibial component, adjusted MA (aMA) mostly used with RAS allows for flexing of the femoral component for downsizing and increase of slope for an increase of the flexion gap. In the present study, we compared sagittal alignment after TKA using RAS with aMA and CAS targeting MA, which has been the standard in the center for more than 10 years. We analyzed a prospectively collected database of patients undergoing TKA in a single center. Femoral component flexion and tibial slope were compared for both techniques. In 140 patients, 68 CAS and 72 RAS, we found no difference in tibial slope (p = 0.661), 1° median femoral component flexion (p = 0.023), and no difference in outliers (femur, p = 0.276, tibia, p = 0.289). RAS slightly increases femoral component flexion, but has no influence on tibial slope, when compared with CAS in TKA. If MA is the target, RAS provides no benefit over CAS for achieving the targeted sagittal alignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:  Level III retrospective study.