Comparative study of therapeutic effects of short- and long-acting loop diuretics in outpatients with chronic heart failure (COLD-CHF)

[The use of diuretics in chronic heart failure. Position paper of the Russian Heart Failure Society]

The document focuses on key issues of diuretic therapy in CHF from the standpoint of current views on the pathogenesis of edema syndrome, its diagnosis, and characteristics of using diuretics in various clinical situations.

Comparative effects of furosemide and other diuretics in the treatment of heart failure: a systematic review and combined meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Diuretics have an essential role in the management of heart failure (HF). However, each drug has its own benefit and side effect. Side effects include fluid, electrolyte abnormalities, and acid-base disturbance. These adverse effects of diuretics predispose patients to serious cardiac arrhythmias and may increase the risk of arrhythmic mortality. Herein, we aim to summarize the relative efficacy and safety of all available diuretics used in the treatment of patients with HF. In June 2017, a systematic electronic database search was conducted in nine databases. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the different diuretics used in HF were included for meta-analysis. The protocol was registered in Prospero with CRD42018084819. Among the included 54 studies (10,740 patients), 34 RCTs were eligible for quantitative network meta-analysis (NMA) and traditional meta-analysis while the other 20 studies were qualitatively analyzed. Our results showed that azosemide and torasemide caused a significant reduction in brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) level. Torasemide also caused a significant decrease in collagen volume fraction (CVF) and edema. No significant difference between the agents concerning glomerular filtration rate (GFR), water extraction, and sodium excretion was demonstrated. Regarding side effects, no significant difference among diuretics was observed in terms of hospital readmission and mortality rates. Diuretics are the main treatment of hypervolemia in HF patients. The choice of appropriate diuretic is essential for successful management and is mainly guided by patient clinical situations and the presence of other co-morbidities.

READY: relative efficacy of loop diuretics in patients with chronic systolic heart failure-a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials

The majority of patients with chronic heart failure (HF) receive long-term treatment with loop diuretics. The comparative effectiveness of different loop diuretics is unknown. We searched PubMed, clinicaltrials.gov , the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the European Union Clinical Trials Register for randomised clinical trials exploring the efficacy of the loop diuretics azosemide, bumetanide, furosemide or torasemide in patients with HF. Comparators included placebo, standard medical care or any other active treatment. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included cardiovascular mortality, HF-related hospitalisation and any combined endpoint thereof. Hypokalaemia and acute renal failure were defined as additional safety endpoints. Evidence was synthesised using network meta-analysis (NMA). Thirty-four trials reporting on 2647 patients were included. The overall quality of evidence was rated as moderate. NMA demonstrated no significant differences between loop diuretics with respect to all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality or hypokalaemia. In contrast, torasemide ranked best in terms of HF hospitalisation, and there was a trend towards benefits with torasemide with regard to occurrence of acute renal failure. Sensitivity analyses excluding trials with a follow-up < 6 months, trials with a cross-over design and those including < 25 patients confirmed the main results. We found no significant superiority of either loop diuretic with respect to mortality and safety endpoints. However, clinicians may prefer torasemide, as it was associated with fewer HF-related hospitalisations.

Comparison of Canagliflozin, Dapagliflozin and Empagliflozin Added to Heart Failure Treatment in Decompensated Heart Failure Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background: Three sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), canagliflozin, dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, successfully reduced hospitalization for heart failure (HF) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). It remains unclear, however, whether the efficacy of the 3 SGLT2i for HF in T2DM patients is similar.

Methods and Results: Eighty-one T2DM patients hospitalized due to decompensated HF were enrolled. After treatment for HF, one of the 3 SGLT2i was non-randomly used, and clinical parameters for HF and T2DM were followed for 7 days. The attending physician was allowed to adjust the dose of furosemide. No differences were observed between the 3 groups in the increase of glycosuria, or in the decreases of body weight and blood pressure 7 days after SGLT2i (interaction P>0.05). Urine volume was similarly increased on day 1, and returned to the baseline on day 7 in each group. Decrease in B-type natriuretic peptide and increase in plasma renin activity were significant in each group. Plasma aldosterone concentration, however, was significantly increased in the empagliflozin and canagliflozin groups (P<0.01, respectively), but not in the dapagliflozin group. Additionally, plasma noradrenaline was significantly increased in the empagliflozin group (P<0.01), but not in the canagliflozin and dapagliflozin groups.

Conclusions: The neurohumoral responses to the 3 SGLT2i are different under similar volume correction in HF patients with T2DM.

Patients With CONgestive Heart Failure Benefit From Long-Term Treatment Effects With Novel Treatment Using Azosemide Compared With Furosemide Derived From Existing Retrospective Study Data: CONTENTED

A long-acting loop diuretic, azosemide, has been shown to improve long-term prognosis in patients with heart failure compared with a short-acting loop diuretic, furosemide. However, the therapeutic advantages of azosemide over furosemide have not been clearly established. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed clinical outcomes and laboratory data in patients with congestive heart failure treated with furosemide or azosemide, and the efficacy of these agents was compared. First, we screened 1900 patients and selected 124 (furosemide group: n = 40; azosemide group: n = 84) as the total study population. From these patients, we next selected 72 patients for the propensity score-matched analysis (furosemide group: n = 36; azosemide group: n = 36). The incidence of all-cause death and rehospitalization due to worsening heart failure during 24 months of follow-up was similar between the furosemide and azosemide groups in both the total study population and the propensity score-matched population. However, in the propensity score-matched analysis, the estimated glomerular filtration rate time-dependently decreased during 36 months of follow-up in the furosemide group (56.5 ± 19.5-43.2 ± 16.3 mL/min/1.73 m), whereas it did not change in the azosemide group (58.6 ± 22.0-50.3 ± 17.8 mL/min/1.73 m) (P = 0.032). Azosemide might have some potential advantage for renal protection over furosemide in patients with congestive heart failure.

Comparison of Long-Acting and Short-Acting Loop Diuretics in the Treatment of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Background: Clinical evidence of the effects of loop diuretics in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is lacking. Thus, we compared the impact of azosemide and furosemide, long- and short-acting loop diuretics, in patients with HFpEF.

Methods and Results: A prospective multicenter cohort study was conducted between July 2014 and July 2018. We enrolled 301 consecutive patients with HFpEF (median age, 84 years; IQR, 79–88 years; 54.8% female). Azosemide was used in 127 patients (azosemide group), and furosemide in 174 (furosemide group). We constructed Cox models for a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and HF hospitalization (primary endpoints). During a median follow-up of 317 days (IQR, 174–734 days), the primary endpoint occurred in 112 patients (37.2%). On multivariate inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) Cox modeling, the azosemide group had a significantly lower incidence of adverse events than the furosemide group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27–0.80; P=0.006). Furthermore, on multivariate IPTW Cox modeling for the secondary endpoints, cardiac death (HR, 0.38; 95% CI: 0.17–0.89; P=0.025) and unplanned hospitalization for decompensated HF (HR, 0.50; 95% CI: 0.28–0.89; P=0.018) were also reduced in the azosemide group.

Conclusions: Azosemide significantly reduced the risk of adverse events compared with furosemide in HFpEF patients.

Molecular Implications of Natriuretic Peptides in the Protection from Hypertension and Target Organ Damage Development

The pathogenesis of hypertension, as a multifactorial trait, is complex. High blood pressure levels, in turn, concur with the development of cardiovascular damage. Abnormalities of several neurohormonal mechanisms controlling blood pressure homeostasis and cardiovascular remodeling can contribute to these pathological conditions. The natriuretic peptide (NP) family (including ANP (atrial natriuretic peptide), BNP (brain natriuretic peptide), and CNP (C-type natriuretic peptide)), the NP receptors (NPRA, NPRB, and NPRC), and the related protease convertases (furin, corin, and PCSK6) constitute the NP system and represent relevant protective mechanisms toward the development of hypertension and associated conditions, such as atherosclerosis, stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and renal injury. Initially, several experimental studies performed in different animal models demonstrated a key role of the NP system in the development of hypertension. Importantly, these studies provided relevant insights for a better comprehension of the pathogenesis of hypertension and related cardiovascular phenotypes in humans. Thus, investigation of the role of NPs in hypertension offers an excellent example in translational medicine. In this review article, we will summarize the most compelling evidence regarding the molecular mechanisms underlying the physiological and pathological impact of NPs on blood pressure regulation and on hypertension development. We will also discuss the protective effect of NPs toward the increased susceptibility to hypertensive target organ damage.

Comparative effectiveness of loop diuretics on mortality in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure - A multicenter propensity score matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Loop diuretics are given to the majority of patients with chronic heart failure (HF). Whether the different pharmacological properties of the three guideline-recommended loop diuretics result in differential effects on survival is unknown.

METHODS

6293 patients with chronic HF using either bumetanide, furosemide or torasemide were identified in three European HF registries. Patients were individually matched on both the respective propensity scores for receipt of the individual drug and dose-equivalents thereof.

RESULTS

During a follow-up of 35,038 patient-years, 652 (53.7%), 2179 (51.9%), and 268 (30.4%) patients died amongst those prescribed bumetanide, furosemide, and torasemide, respectively. In univariable analyses of the general sample, bumetanide and furosemide were both associated with higher mortality as compared with torasemide treatment (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.31-1.73, p < 0.001, and HR 1.34, CI 1.18-1.52, p < 0.001, respectively). Mortality was higher in bumetanide users when compared to furosemide users (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.20, p = 0.01). However, there was no significant association between loop diuretic choice and all-cause mortality in any of the matched samples (bumetanide vs. furosemide, HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.93-1.14, p = 0.53; bumetanide vs. torasemide, HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.78-1.24, p = 0.89; furosemide vs. torasemide, HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.84-1.24, p = 0.82). The results were confirmed in subgroup analyses with respect to age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, NYHA functional class, cause of HF, rhythm, and systolic blood pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with HF, mortality is not affected by the choice of individual loop diuretics.

Diuretic treatment of the patient with diabetes and heart failure. Role of SGLT2 inhibitors and similarities with carbonic anhydrase inhibitors

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors have changed the concept of the effects that hypoglycemic drugs have on hearth failure (HF). For the first time, a therapeutic group has modified the evolution of HF. Its effect goes beyond glycemic control, and different theories have been postulated to justify this benefit. In the article we sent, we analyze the influence of the different pharmacological groups used in type 2 diabetes mellitus on HF, and we present the theory of the mechanism of action associated with the benefit of these drugs. In our opinion, this benefit in HF is secondary to its diuretic effect, specifically an effect very similar to carbon dioxide inhibitors. We think that our theory is novel, explains the mechanism of action and we have not found in the literature any article that explains the mechanism of action in such a precise way.

ANALYSIS OF CHANGE IN NT-proBNP AFTER ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR BLOCKER (ARB) THERAPY IN PATIENT WITH HEART FAILURE

NT-proBNP is an inactive fragment of BNP secreted by stretched ventricle as response to wall stress in patients with heart failure. As a specific cardiac marker, elevated NT-proBNP correlates well with heart failure severity. The principle of heart failure therapy is modulation on neurohormonal activation. ARB can modulate neurohormon on RAA system, that result in decreasing NT-proBNP level and favorable outcomes. Reduction in NT-proBNP more than biologic variability (> 25%) shows a therapy response.This study was to analyze change of NT-proBNP after ARB therapy in ambulatory HF patients. This observational prospective study was carried from September to December 2015. Blood sampling was performed on patients who meet the inclusion criteria of the study at first visit and after 2 months therapy. NT-proBNP was measured by IMMULITE® as primary parameter and creatinin as secondary parameter. There are 14 patients met the inclusion criteria of the study (11 males and 3 females). ARB therapy used in patients were Valsartan (64%), Telmisartan (22%) and Candesartan (14%). After 2 months ARB therapy, a decrease in level of NT-proBNP with initial median 3092.5 (216 – 32112) pg/ml to 2135.5 (350 – 16172) pg/ml respectively were statistically significant (p=0.003). And the secondary parameter creatinin serum convert to eGFR shows a change in eGFR with initial median 73.33 (37.05 – 266.68) ml/minute to 81.04 (39.31 – 167.02) ml/minute respectively were statistically not significant (p=0.657). There were 7 patients (50%) have a decrease > 25%. In this study, we found that ARB therapy can change NT-proBNP level significantly after 2 months therapy.

Effects of Long-Acting Loop Diuretics in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Patients With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

There have been no reports evaluating the impact of long-acting loop diuretics (LLD) on the outcome of heart failure (HF) and arrhythmia treatment in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device.This was a prospective, single-blind, randomized crossover study. We allocated 21 consecutive CRT implanted patients into 2 groups. The furosemide group received furosemide as a first treatment and azosemide as a second treatment. The azosemide group received this treatment in the reverse order. The first treatment was given to each group for 6 months and the second treatment continued for an additional 6 months. We combined the data of each medication regimen in each group and analyzed it at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year. The primary endpoints were the variation of fluid index and thoracic impedance measured by CRT at 6 months.The baseline characteristics were similar for both groups. The difference in the primary endpoints was not statistically significant between the 2 medication arms (fluid index: -29.6 ± 64.4 versus 16.2 ± 48.2; P = 0.22, thoracic impedance: -0.49 ± 17.8 versus 2.45 ± 12.5; P = 0.56). Likewise, the clinical outcome of HF and the CRT derived parameters in both arms were comparable.HFrEF patients taking LLD after CRT implantation might be comparable to those taking short-acting loop diuretics in the treatment of HF and HF-associated arrhythmias.

Short-term effects of low-dose tolvaptan on hemodynamic parameters in patients with chronic heart failure

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the short-term effects of low-dose tolvaptan treatment on hemodynamic parameters in patients with chronic heart failure (HF).

METHODS

We studied 22 patients (69 ± 10 years) with chronic HF and excess fluid retention despite receiving appropriate medical therapy, including loop and/or thiazide diuretics. The therapeutic effects of low-dose (7.5mg) once-daily tolvaptan on hemodynamics associated with changes in fluid balance and neurohumoral activations were investigated after a seven day treatment period.

RESULTS

After the treatment period, body weight decreased (-2.7 ± 2.3 kg) associated with increases in daily urine output. Whereas plasma arginine-vasopressin levels, serum aldosterone concentration, and plasma renin activity mildly increased, plasma levels of B-type natriuretic peptide and atrial natriuretic peptide significantly decreased after tolvaptan treatment. Serum electrolytes were not adversely affected by tolvaptan treatment. Although cardiac index and systemic vascular resistance index remained unchanged, mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure (22 ± 7 mmHg vs. 17 ± 7 mmHg, p<0.05), mean right atrial pressure (12 ± 5 mmHg vs. 9 ± 5 mmHg, p<0.05), mean pulmonary artery pressure (32 ± 9 mmHg vs. 25 ± 7 mmHg, p<0.05), and pulmonary vascular resistance index (332 ± 207 dynes/cm(-5)/m(2) vs. 245 ± 110 dynes/cm(-5)/m(2), p<0.05) significantly decreased after tolvaptan treatment. The extent of the reduction in pulmonary vascular resistance index after tolvaptan treatment strongly correlated with baseline values.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term treatment with low-dose tolvaptan improved hemodynamic parameters and correlated with significant fluid removal in patients with chronic HF.