Characteristics of dormant pulmonary vein conduction induced by adenosine triphosphate in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cryoballoon ablation

Comparison of Radiofrequency and Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Ablation for the Early and Late Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation

Objective Early recurrence (ER) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is expected to resolve within the recommended 3-month blanking period, irrespective of the ablation device used. To compare the occurrence and relationship of AF within the blanking period and subsequent late recurrence (LR) with radiofrequency (RF) and cryoballoon (CB) ablation. Methods A retrospective analysis of 294 patients (mean age=62±9, 70.0% male) undergoing PVI for drug-refractory paroxysmal AF was done. After categorizing the patients into the RF group (n=152) and the CB group (n=142), a group-wise comparison was done to investigate the impact of ER on LR throughout a 2-year follow-up. Results The groups were similar regarding the occurrence of ER (RF=22.4%, CB=24.6%, p=0.62), while LR was significantly higher in the RF group (p=0.003). ER was associated with LR in the RF group (p<0.01) but not in the CB group (p=0.08), while a significant independent association with an increased LR risk was observed [hazard ratio (HR) 6.12; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.56-10.51, p<0.01]. RF ablation also significantly increased the risk of LR (HR=2.93; 95% CI=1.64-5.23, p<0.01). Conclusion A recurrence of atrial arrhythmia is more frequent with RF-PVI than with CB-PVI for patients with paroxysmal AF. ER and RF-ablation are strong predictors for LR after the 3-month blanking period.

Effect of Extensive Ablation on Recurrence in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Pulmonary Vein Isolation (EARNEST-PVI) trial: Design and rationale

BACKGROUND

Although extensive substrate modification in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has been recommended in catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), recent randomized controlled trials have not demonstrated efficacy of such additional ablations.

METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN

The Osaka Cardiovascular Conference will conduct a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial aiming to examine whether PVI alone is non-inferior to PVI plus additional ablation such as linear ablation and/or complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation in patients with persistent AF. The primary outcome is recurrence of AF documented by scheduled or symptom-driven electrocardiogram tests during a 1-year follow-up period after the index ablation. The key secondary endpoints include all-cause death, occurrence of symptomatic stroke, complications related to the procedure, and quality of life assessment using the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey. The clinical impact of the presence or absence of AF trigger foci, and their origins in cases with them, on the results of catheter ablation will also be investigated as an exploratory endpoint. A total of 512 patients will be enrolled and followed up to 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

The EARNEST-PVI trial is a randomized controlled trial designed to assess whether PVI alone is non-inferior to extended substrate ablation for patients with persistent AF undergoing a first catheter ablation.

Pace capture and adenosine triphosphate provocation are complementary rather than mutually exclusive methods to ensure durable pulmonary vein isolation

INTRODUCTION

Adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-provoked dormant conduction (DC) and pacing for unexcitability are used to identify conduction gaps along the ablation lines after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI). We aim to determine whether ATP provocation and pacing are interchangeable as endpoints for ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 107 patients with PAF were randomly divided into two groups after completion of CPVI. In group I (A-P group, n = 53), ATP was administered first. If DC was uncovered, additional ablation was performed until ATP tests were negative. Bipolar pacing along the ablation line was performed subsequently. In group II (P-A group, n = 54), the same protocol was used, but the pacing and the ATP tests were performed in the opposite sequence. The 12-month ablation outcomes of all patients were compared with those of a historical control group of 107 patients with PAF in whom only ATP test was performed. Regardless of which test was performed first, the other modality still identified conduction gaps. In group I, pacing maneuvers identified gaps in 49% (n = 26) of patients who had negative ATP tests. In group II, ATP tests uncovered DC in 18.5% (n = 10) of patients in whom pacing identified no gaps. After 12 months, a higher proportion of patients (91.6%) were free from atrial tachyarrhythmias compared with the historical control group (81.3%; P = 0.031).

CONCLUSION

Pacing along the ablation lines and ATP provocation are complementary tests for evaluating the durability of CPVI and can lead to better long-term outcomes when used in combination.