Cryoablation for paroxysmal and persistent AF in patients with structural heart disease and preserved ejection fraction: Clinical outcomes from 1STOP, a multicenter observational project

Results of a 4-Year Follow Up of Patients with Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation after Cryoablation

Background and Objectives: Cryoablation is an established treatment method for atrial fibrillation (AF). We present the long-term results of cryoablation in 94 patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF treated in our center. Materials and Methods: This was an observational, retrospective study of 94 patients who underwent a cryoablation procedure for paroxysmal or persistent AF from 2015 to 2017. The follow up was 51 ± 3 months. The absence of arrhythmia was checked at 6, 12, 24, and 48 months after the procedure with 24 h Holter monitoring. We evaluated echocardiography parameters before and 48 months after cryoablation. The quality of life was assessed by calculating EHRA scores at each visit. Results: The mean history of pre-procedural AF duration was 55.3 ± 8.6 months. Paroxysmal AF was present in 42% of patients and persistent AF in 58%. Comparing the EHRA classes, a statistically significant difference was observed between the score assessed before the procedure and the score after one year, as well as when comparing the rates before the procedure and four years after the procedure (p < 0.000). The recurrence of AF was observed in 22.3% of patients 1 year after the procedure, in 26.6% of patients 2 years after the procedure, and in 34% of patients 4 years after the procedure; 9.3% of them were left in permanent AF. During the observation period, 28% of patients underwent a repeated pulmonary vein isolation procedure, and 6% of patients had a permanent pacemaker implanted. Five hematomas (5%) and one instance of phrenic nerve palsy (1%) were observed during the procedure. Conclusions: The rate of arrhythmia recurrence increased every year after cryoablation. Quality of life improved after the procedure, despite the recurrence of AF. A quarter of patients had to undergo a repeat pulmonary vein isolation procedure.

Identifying patients with atrial fibrillation recurrences after two pulmonary vein isolation procedures

Introduction

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an important treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, many patients need more than one procedure to maintain long-term sinus rhythm. Even after two PVIs some may suffer from AF recurrences. We aimed to identify characteristics of patients who fail after two PVI procedures.

Methods and results

We included 557 consecutive patients undergoing a first PVI procedure with a second-generation 28 mm cryoballoon. Follow-up procedures were performed using radiofrequency ablation targeting reconnected PVs only. Recurrent AF was defined as any episode of AF lasting >30 s on ECG or 24 hour Holter monitoring performed at 3, 6 and 12 months post procedure. Mean age was 59.1±10.2 years, 383 (68.8%) were male, 448 (80.4%) had paroxysmal AF and the most common underlying condition was hypertension (36.6%). A total of 140/557 (25.1%) patients underwent redo procedure with PVI only. Of these patients 45 (32.4%) had recurrence of AF. These patients were comparable regarding age and sex to those in sinus rhythm after one or two procedures. Multivariate logistic regression showed that non-paroxysmal AF (OR 1.08 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.15), estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94 to 0.99), bundle branch block (OR 4.17, 95% CI 1.38 to 12.58), heart failure (OR 4.17, 95% CI 1.38 to 12.58) and Left Atrium Volume Index (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.08) were associated with AF recurrence after two PVIs. The area under the curve for the identified risk factors was 0.74.

Conclusions

Using a PVI-only approach, recurrence of AF after two AF ablation procedures is associated with more advanced underlying disease and persistent types of AF.

Transcatheter cryo-ablation of septal accessory pathways, multicenter observational study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Ablation using radiofrequency energy has to be carefully performed when the arrhythmia substrate is located in close proximity to the atrioventricular (AV) node due to the risk of inadvertent permanent AV block. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of catheter-based cryo-therapy for septal accessory pathways (APs).

METHODS

A total of eleven patients (median = 56.3 years, range 13-74 years) with septal APs underwent cryoablation. Ice-mapping was performed during sinus rhythm and an AV reciprocating tachycardia utilizing the APs as a requisite limb with cooling of the catheter tip temperature to a maximum of -30℃ for less than 45 s. Cryo-ablation was performed for 4 min at a temperature of -80℃ only if ice-mapping abolished the pre-excitation or retrograde conduction over the AP without injury to the AV nodal conduction.

RESULTS

Cryo-ablation was acutely successful in all eleven patients. No permanent cryo-related complications or adverse outcomes were reported. During the follow-up (range 14-26 months), no patients experienced any arrhythmia recurrences.

CONCLUSION

Ice-mapping was a feasible and reliable method to determine the exact location of the APs owing to the possibility of validating the ablation site. Cryo-ablation of APs located near the AV junction is a safe and efficacious technique with a high success rate over the long term.

IRB INFORMATION

Ethical Committee of Japan Red Cross Yokohama City Bay Hospital #2018-19.

Clinical significance of left ventricular reverse remodeling after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling (LVRR) after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AFCA) has not been fully described. This study investigated the predictors and clinical outcomes of LVRR after AFCA in patients with LV systolic dysfunction.

METHODS

Of 3319 consecutive patients who underwent first-time AFCA between January 2012 and October 2019, 376 with a baseline LV ejection fraction of <50% were retrospectively evaluated. They were subjected to 256-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scanning at baseline and 3 months after AFCA. The LVRR was defined as a decrease in the LV end-systolic volume of ≥15%.

RESULTS

The prevalence of LVRR was 83% (n = 306). Multivariate logistic regression analysis including age, body mass index, diabetic status, beta-blocker use, and LV diastolic diameter revealed that the predictors of LVRR were non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) (odds ratio, 2.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-5.05; p = 0.002) and absence of apparent underlying structural heart disease (4.81; 2.31-10.0; p <0.001). The prevalence of LVRR differed depending on AF recurrence pattern prior to the post-MDCT [no episode vs. paroxysmal episode (lasting <7 days) vs. persistent episode (lasting ≥7 days), 84% vs. 81% vs. 63%, respectively, p = 0.023]. During a median follow-up of 32 months, the incidence of paroxysmal form of AF recurrence was similar, whereas persistent form of AF recurrence was less frequent in patients with LVRR (10.5% vs. 18.6%, p = 0.018). Heart failure hospitalizations (2.3% vs. 15.7%, p <0.001), cardiovascular deaths (0.7% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.015), and all-cause deaths (1.3% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.018) were similarly less frequent in those with LVRR.

CONCLUSIONS

LVRR after AFCA, which was predicted by non-paroxysmal AF without any apparent structural heart disease at baseline, was associated with persistent form of AF recurrence prior to the evaluation. LVRR was associated with favorable clinical outcomes.

Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation? Alternating technique for repeat procedures in patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Which technique is better for repeat ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. The aim of the study was to compare long-term efficacy of repeat ablation using the alternative technique for the first redo ablation procedure: (a) cryoballoon (CB) re-ablation after a failed index pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency (RF) ablation, RF-then-CB group or (b) RF repeat ablation following a failed CB ablation, CB-then-RF group.

METHODS

Within the 1STOP Italian Project, consecutive patients undergoing repeat ablation with a different technique from the index procedure were included.

RESULTS

We studied 474 patients, 349 in RF-then-CB and 125 in CB-then-RF group. Less women (21% vs 30%; P = .041), more persistent AF (33% vs 22%; P = .015), longer duration of AF (60 vs 31 months; P < .001), and more hypertension (50% vs 36%; P = .007) were observed in the RF-then-CB cohort as compared with the CB-then-RF group. The number of reconnected PVs was 3.7 ± 0.7 and 1.4 + 1.3 in RF-then-CB and CB-then-RF group, respectively (P < .001). During the follow-up, significantly less AF recurrence occurred in the CB-then-RF group (22% vs 8%, HR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.24-0.92; P = .025). Cohort designation was the only independent predictor of AF recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Alternation of energy source for repeat ablation was safe and effective, regardless the energy used first. However, patients initially treated with CB PVI undergoing repeat ablation with RF current had less AF recurrence at long-term follow-up as compared with those originally treated by RF ablation receiving a CB repeat ablation.

Analysis of the driving mechanism in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: comparison of the activation sequence between the left atrial body and pulmonary vein

BACKGROUND

It has been shown that most paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) can be terminated by pulmonary vein (PV) isolation alone, suggesting that rapid discharges from PV drive AF. To define the driving mechanism of AF, we compared the activation sequence in the body of left atrium (LA) to that within PV.

METHODS

Endocardial noncontact mapping of LA body (LA group; n = 16) and selective endocardial mapping of left superior PV (LSPV) (PV group; n = 13) were performed in 29 paroxysmal AF patients. The frequency of pivoting activation, wave breakup, and wave fusion observed in LA were compared to those in LSPV to define the driving mechanism of AF. Circumferential ablation lesion around left PV was performed after right PV isolation to examine the effect of linear lesion around PV on AF termination both in LA and PV groups.

RESULTS

The frequency of pivoting activation, wave breakup, and wave fusion in PV group were significantly higher than those in LA group (36.5 ± 17.7 vs 5.0 ± 2.2 times/seconds, p < 0.001, 10.1 ± 4.3 vs 5.0 ± 2.2 times/seconds, p = 0.004, 18.1 ± 5.7 vs 11.0 ± 5.2, p = 0.002). Especially in the PV group, the frequency of pivoting activation was significantly higher than that of wave breakup and wave fusion (36.5 ± 17.7 vs 10.1 ± 4.3 times/seconds, p < 0.001, 36.5 ± 17.7 vs 18.1 ± 5.7 times/seconds, p < 0.001). These disorganized activations in LSPV were eliminated by the circumferential ablation lesion around left PV (pivoting activation; 36.5 ± 17.7 vs 9.3 ± 2.3 times/seconds, p < 0.001, wave breakup; 10.1±1.3 times/seconds, p = 0.003, wave fusion; 18.1 ± 5.7 vs 5.7 ± 1.8, p < 0.001), resulted in AF termination in all patients in both LA and PV groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Activation sequence within PV was more disorganized than that in LA body. Frequent episodes of pivoting activation rather than wave breakup and fusion observed within PV acted as the driving sources of paroxysmal AF.