Topoisomerase I-mediated DNA cleavage induced by the minor groove-directed binding of bibenzimidazoles to a distal site

Getting Lost in the Cell-Lysosomal Entrapment of Chemotherapeutics

Despite extensive research, resistance to chemotherapy still poses a major obstacle in clinical oncology. An exciting strategy to circumvent chemoresistance involves the identification and subsequent disruption of cellular processes that are aberrantly altered in oncogenic states. Upon chemotherapeutic challenges, lysosomes are deemed to be essential mediators that enable cellular adaptation to stress conditions. Therefore, lysosomes potentially hold the key to disarming the fundamental mechanisms of chemoresistance. This review explores modes of action of classical chemotherapeutic agents, adaptive response of the lysosomes to cell stress, and presents physiological and pharmacological insights pertaining to drug compartmentalization, sequestration, and extracellular clearance through the lens of lysosomes.

Selective Inhibition of Escherichia coli RNA and DNA Topoisomerase I by Hoechst 33258 Derived Mono- and Bisbenzimidazoles

A series of Hoechst 33258 based mono- and bisbenzimidazoles have been synthesized and their Escherichia coli DNA topoisomerase I inhibition, binding to B-DNA duplex, and antibacterial activity has been evaluated. Bisbenzimidazoles with alkynyl side chains display excellent E. coli DNA topoisomerase I inhibition properties with IC50 values <5.0 μM. Several bisbenzimidazoles (3, 6, 7, 8) also inhibit RNA topoisomerase activity of E. coli DNA topoisomerase I. Bisbenzimidazoles inhibit bacterial growth much better than monobenzimidazoles for Gram-positive strains. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was much lower for Gram positive bacteria (Enterococcus spp. and Staphylococcus spp., including two MRSA strains 0.3-8 μg/mL) than for the majority of Gram negative bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 16-32 μg/mL, Klebsiella pneumoniae > 32 μg/mL). Bisbenzimidazoles showed varied stabilization of B-DNA duplex (1.2-23.4 °C), and cytotoxicity studies show similar variation dependent upon the side chain length. Modeling studies suggest critical interactions between the inhibitor side chain and amino acids of the active site of DNA topoisomerase I.

Gold(III) macrocycles: nucleotide-specific unconventional catalytic inhibitors of human topoisomerase I

Topoisomerase IB (Top1) is a key eukaryotic nuclear enzyme that regulates the topology of DNA during replication and gene transcription. Anticancer drugs that block Top1 are either well-characterized interfacial poisons or lesser-known catalytic inhibitor compounds. Here we describe a new class of cytotoxic redox-stable cationic Au³⁺ macrocycles which, through hierarchical cluster analysis of cytotoxicity data for the lead compound, 3, were identified as either poisons or inhibitors of Top1. Two pivotal enzyme inhibition assays prove that the compounds are true catalytic inhibitors of Top1. Inhibition of human topoisomerase IIα (Top2α) by 3 was 2 orders of magnitude weaker than its inhibition of Top1, confirming that 3 is a type I-specific catalytic inhibitor. Importantly, Au³⁺ is essential for both DNA intercalation and enzyme inhibition. Macromolecular simulations show that 3 intercalates directly at the 5′-TA-3′ dinucleotide sequence targeted by Top1 via crucial electrostatic interactions, which include π–π stacking and an Au···O contact involving a thymine carbonyl group, resolving the ambiguity of conventional (drug binds protein) vs unconventional (drug binds substrate) catalytic inhibition of the enzyme. Surface plasmon resonance studies confirm the molecular mechanism of action elucidated by the simulations.

ABCG2-associated resistance to Hoechst 33342 and topotecan in a murine cell model with constitutive expression of side population characteristics

Drug resistant tumor "side-populations," enriched in cancer stem cells and identified by reduced accumulation of Hoechst 33342 under ABCG2-mediated efflux, may compromise therapeutic outcome. Side-population cells have predicted resistance to minor groove ligands, including the DNA topoisomerase I poison topotecan. We have used a stable Hoechst 33342-resistant murine L cell system (HoeR415) to study resistance patterns, removing the need for SP isolation before microarray analysis of gene expression and the tracking of cell cycle dynamics and cytotoxicity. The majority of HoeR415 cells displayed a side-population phenotype comparable with that of the side-population resident in the ABCG2 over-expressing A549 lung cancer cell line. Photo-crosslinking showed direct protection against minor groove ligand residence on DNA, driven by ABCG2-mediated efflux and not arising from any binding competition with endogenous polyamines. The covalent minor-groove binding properties of the drug FCE24517 (tallimustine) prevented resistance suggesting a mechanism for overcoming SP-related drug resistance. Hoechst 33342-resistant murine cells showed lower but significant crossresistance to topotecan, again attributable to enhanced ABCG2 expression, enabling cells to evade S-phase arrest. Hoechst 33342/TPT-resistant cells showed limited ancillary gene expression changes that could modify cellular capacity to cope with chronic stress including over-expression of Aldh1a1 and Mgst1, but under-expression of Plk2 and Nnt. There was no evidence to link the putative stem cell marker ALDH1A1 with any augmentation of the TPT resistance phenotype. The study has implications for the patterns of drug resistance arising during tumor repopulation and the basal resistance to minor groove-binding drugs of tumor side-populations.

Calothrixins, a new class of human DNA topoisomerase I poisons

Calothrixins A (1) and B (2) were converted to their O- and N-methylated derivatives, respectively. All four compounds were found to act as poisons of DNA topoisomerase I and to do so reversibly. Three of the calothrixins (1-3) were tested for their cytotoxicity toward cultured (p53 proficient) CEM leukemia cells and found to exhibit IC(50) values ranging from 0.20 to 5.13 muM. The cell cycle effects of calothrixins 1-3 were also studied. Calothrixin B (2) produced G(1) arrest at 0.1 muM concentration, while higher concentrations of calothrixins 1 and 3 resulted in cell accumulation in both the S and G(2)/M phases of the cell cycle. The cell cycle effects produced by the calothrixins were more readily reversible upon removal of the compounds than those produced by camptothecin.