Evidence for a tyrosine-adenine stacking interaction and for a short-lived open intermediate subsequent to initial binding of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase to promoter DNA

Early intermediates in bacterial RNA polymerase promoter melting visualized by time-resolved cryo-electron microscopy

During formation of the transcription-competent open complex (RPo) by bacterial RNA polymerases (RNAP), transient intermediates pile up before overcoming a rate-limiting step. Structural descriptions of these interconversions in real time are unavailable. To address this gap, time-resolved cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) was used to capture four intermediates populated 120 or 500 milliseconds (ms) after mixing Escherichia coli σ70-RNAP and the λPR promoter. Cryo-EM snapshots revealed the upstream edge of the transcription bubble unpairs rapidly, followed by stepwise insertion of two conserved nontemplate strand (nt-strand) bases into RNAP pockets. As nt-strand "read-out" extends, the RNAP clamp closes, expelling an inhibitory σ70 domain from the active-site cleft. The template strand is fully unpaired by 120 ms but remains dynamic, indicating yet unknown conformational changes load it in subsequent steps. Because these events likely describe DNA opening at many bacterial promoters, this study provides needed insights into how DNA sequence regulates steps of RPo formation.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa SutA wedges RNAP lobe domain open to facilitate promoter DNA unwinding

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pae) SutA adapts bacteria to hypoxia and nutrition-limited environment during chronic infection by increasing transcription activity of an RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme comprising the stress-responsive σ factor σ^S (RNAP-σ^S). SutA shows no homology to previously characterized RNAP-binding proteins. The structure and mode of action of SutA remain unclear. Here we determined cryo-EM structures of Pae RNAP-σ^S holoenzyme, Pae RNAP-σ^S holoenzyme complexed with SutA, and Pae RNAP-σ^S transcription initiation complex comprising SutA. The structures show SutA pinches RNAP-β protrusion and facilitates promoter unwinding by wedging RNAP-β lobe open. Our results demonstrate that SutA clears an energetic barrier to facilitate promoter unwinding of RNAP-σ^S holoenzyme.

SutA is a transcription factor which increases transcription activity of an RNA polymerase (RNAP). Here, authors present cryo-EM structures of SutA-bound RNAP-σ^S holoenzyme and SutA-bound transcription initiation complex, which reveals SutA wedging the RNAP-β lobe open to aid unwinding.

F/YGG-motif is an intrinsically disordered nucleic-acid binding motif

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNP) function in RNA processing, have RNA-recognition motifs (RRMs) and intrinsically disordered, low-complexity domains (LCDs). While RRMs are drivers of RNA binding, there is only limited knowledge about the RNA interaction by the LCD of some hnRNPs. Here, we show that the LCD of hnRNPA2 interacts with RNA via an embedded Tyr/Gly-rich region which is a disordered RNA-binding motif. RNA binding is maintained upon mutating tyrosine residues to phenylalanines, but abrogated by mutating to alanines, thus we term the RNA-binding region ‘F/YGG motif’. The F/YGG motif can bind a broad range of structured (e.g. tRNA) and disordered (e.g. polyA) RNAs, but not rRNA. As the F/YGG otif can also interact with DNA, we consider it a general nucleic acid-binding motif. hnRNPA2 LCD can form dense droplets, by liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS). Their formation is inhibited by RNA binding, which is mitigated by salt and 1,6-hexanediol, suggesting that both electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions feature in the F/YGG motif. The D290V mutant also binds RNA, which interferes with both LLPS and aggregation thereof. We found homologous regions in a broad range of RNA- and DNA-binding proteins in the human proteome, suggesting that the F/YGG motif is a general nucleic acid-interaction motif.

The Context-Dependent Influence of Promoter Sequence Motifs on Transcription Initiation Kinetics and Regulation

The fitness of an individual bacterial cell is highly dependent upon the temporal tuning of gene expression levels when subjected to different environmental cues. Kinetic regulation of transcription initiation is a key step in modulating the levels of transcribed genes to promote bacterial survival. The initiation phase encompasses the binding of RNA polymerase (RNAP) to promoter DNA and a series of coupled protein-DNA conformational changes prior to entry into processive elongation. The time required to complete the initiation phase can vary by orders of magnitude and is ultimately dictated by the DNA sequence of the promoter. In this review, we aim to provide the required background to understand how promoter sequence motifs may affect initiation kinetics during promoter recognition and binding, subsequent conformational changes which lead to DNA opening around the transcription start site, and promoter escape. By calculating the steady-state flux of RNA production as a function of these effects, we illustrate that the presence/absence of a consensus promoter motif cannot be used in isolation to make conclusions regarding promoter strength. Instead, the entire series of linked, sequence-dependent structural transitions must be considered holistically. Finally, we describe how individual transcription factors take advantage of the broad distribution of sequence-dependent basal kinetics to either increase or decrease RNA flux.

Structures and mechanism of transcription initiation by bacterial ECF factors

Bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) forms distinct holoenzymes with extra-cytoplasmic function (ECF) σ factors to initiate specific gene expression programs. In this study, we report a cryo-EM structure at 4.0 Å of Escherichia coli transcription initiation complex comprising σE-the most-studied bacterial ECF σ factor (Ec σE-RPo), and a crystal structure at 3.1 Å of Mycobacterium tuberculosis transcription initiation complex with a chimeric σH/E (Mtb σH/E-RPo). The structure of Ec σE-RPo reveals key interactions essential for assembly of E. coli σE-RNAP holoenzyme and for promoter recognition and unwinding by E. coli σE. Moreover, both structures show that the non-conserved linkers (σ2/σ4 linker) of the two ECF σ factors are inserted into the active-center cleft and exit through the RNA-exit channel. We performed secondary-structure prediction of 27,670 ECF σ factors and find that their non-conserved linkers probably reach into and exit from RNAP active-center cleft in a similar manner. Further biochemical results suggest that such σ2/σ4 linker plays an important role in RPo formation, abortive production and promoter escape during ECF σ factors-mediated transcription initiation.

Conformational heterogeneity and bubble dynamics in single bacterial transcription initiation complexes

Transcription initiation is a major step in gene regulation for all organisms. In bacteria, the promoter DNA is first recognized by RNA polymerase (RNAP) to yield an initial closed complex. This complex subsequently undergoes conformational changes resulting in DNA strand separation to form a transcription bubble and an RNAP-promoter open complex; however, the series and sequence of conformational changes, and the factors that influence them are unclear. To address the conformational landscape and transitions in transcription initiation, we applied single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) on immobilized Escherichia coli transcription open complexes. Our results revealed the existence of two stable states within RNAP–DNA complexes in which the promoter DNA appears to adopt closed and partially open conformations, and we observed large-scale transitions in which the transcription bubble fluctuated between open and closed states; these transitions, which occur roughly on the 0.1 s timescale, are distinct from the millisecond-timescale dynamics previously observed within diffusing open complexes. Mutational studies indicated that the σ⁷⁰ region 3.2 of the RNAP significantly affected the bubble dynamics. Our results have implications for many steps of transcription initiation, and support a bend-load-open model for the sequence of transitions leading to bubble opening during open complex formation.

Recent Advances in Understanding σ70-Dependent Transcription Initiation Mechanisms

Prokaryotic transcription is one of the most studied biological systems, with relevance to many fields including the development and use of antibiotics, the construction of synthetic gene networks, and the development of many cutting-edge methodologies. Here, we discuss recent structural, biochemical, and single-molecule biophysical studies targeting the mechanisms of transcription initiation in bacteria, including the formation of the open complex, the reaction of initial transcription, and the promoter escape step that leads to elongation. We specifically focus on the mechanisms employed by the RNA polymerase holoenzyme with the housekeeping sigma factor σ⁷⁰. The recent progress provides answers to long-held questions, identifies intriguing new behaviours, and opens up fresh questions for the field of transcription.

Inter-sigmulon communication through topological promoter coupling

Divergent transcription from within bacterial intergenic regions frequently involves promoters dependent on alternative σ-factors. This is the case for the non-overlapping σ70- and σ54-dependent promoters that control production of the substrate-responsive regulator and enzymes for (methyl)phenol catabolism. Here, using an array of in vivo and in vitro assays, we identify transcription-driven supercoiling arising from the σ54-promoter as the mechanism underlying inter-promoter communication that results in stimulation of the activity of the σ70-promoter. The non-overlapping 'back-to-back' configuration of a powerful σ54-promoter and weak σ70-promoter within this system offers a previously unknown means of inter-sigmulon communication that renders the σ70-promoter subservient to signals that elicit σ54-dependent transcription without it possessing a cognate binding site for the σ54-RNA polymerase holoenzyme. This mode of control has the potential to be a prevalent, but hitherto unappreciated, mechanism by which bacteria adjust promoter activity to gain appropriate transcriptional control.

Structure of a bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme open promoter complex

Initiation of transcription is a primary means for controlling gene expression. In bacteria, the RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme binds and unwinds promoter DNA, forming the transcription bubble of the open promoter complex (RPo). We have determined crystal structures, refined to 4.14 Å-resolution, of RPo containing Thermus aquaticus RNAP holoenzyme and promoter DNA that includes the full transcription bubble. The structures, combined with biochemical analyses, reveal key features supporting the formation and maintenance of the double-strand/single-strand DNA junction at the upstream edge of the −10 element where bubble formation initiates. The results also reveal RNAP interactions with duplex DNA just upstream of the −10 element and potential protein/DNA interactions that direct the DNA template strand into the RNAP active site. Addition of an RNA primer to yield a 4 base-pair post-translocated RNA:DNA hybrid mimics an initially transcribing complex at the point where steric clash initiates abortive initiation and σ^A dissociation.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08504.001

Inside cells, molecules of double-stranded DNA encode the instructions needed to make proteins. To make a protein, the two strands of DNA that make up a gene are separated and one strand acts as a template to make molecules of messenger ribonucleic acid (or mRNA for short). This process is called transcription. The mRNA is then used as a template to assemble the protein. An enzyme called RNA polymerase carries out transcription and is found in all cells ranging from bacteria to humans and other animals.

Bacteria have the simplest form of RNA polymerase and provide an excellent system to study how it controls transcription. It is made up of several proteins that work together to make RNA using DNA as a template. However, it requires the help of another protein called sigma factor to direct it to regions of DNA called promoters, which are just before the start of the gene. When RNA polymerase and the sigma factor interact the resulting group of proteins is known as the RNA polymerase ‘holoenzyme’.

Transcription takes place in several stages. To start with, the RNA polymerase holoenzyme locates and binds to promoter DNA. Next, it separates the two strands of DNA and exposes a portion of the template strand. At this point, the DNA and the holoenzyme are said to be in an ‘open promoter complex’ and the section of promoter DNA that is within it is known as a ‘transcription bubble’. However, it is not clear how RNA polymerase holoenzyme interacts with DNA in the open promoter complex.

Bae, Feklistov et al. have now used X-ray crystallography to reveal the three-dimensional structure of the open promoter complex with an entire transcription bubble from a bacterium called Thermus aquaticus. The experiments show that there are several important interactions between RNA polymerase holoenzyme and promoter DNA. In particular, the sigma factor inserts into a region of the DNA at the start of the transcription bubble. This rearranges the DNA in a manner that allows the DNA to be exposed and contact the main part of the RNA polymerase. If the holoenyzyme fails to contact the DNA in this way, the holoenzyme does not bind properly to the promoter and transcription does not start.

These findings build on previous work to provide a detailed structural framework for understanding how the RNA polymerase holoenzyme and DNA interact to form the open promoter complex. Another study by Bae et al.—which involved some of the same researchers as this study—reveals how another protein called CarD also binds to DNA at the start of the transcription bubble to stabilize the open promoter complex.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08504.002

Initial events in bacterial transcription initiation

Transcription initiation is a highly regulated step of gene expression. Here, we discuss the series of large conformational changes set in motion by initial specific binding of bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) to promoter DNA and their relevance for regulation. Bending and wrapping of the upstream duplex facilitates bending of the downstream duplex into the active site cleft, nucleating opening of 13 bp in the cleft. The rate-determining opening step, driven by binding free energy, forms an unstable open complex, probably with the template strand in the active site. At some promoters, this initial open complex is greatly stabilized by rearrangements of the discriminator region between the -10 element and +1 base of the nontemplate strand and of mobile in-cleft and downstream elements of RNAP. The rate of open complex formation is regulated by effects on the rapidly-reversible steps preceding DNA opening, while open complex lifetime is regulated by effects on the stabilization of the initial open complex. Intrinsic DNA opening-closing appears less regulated. This noncovalent mechanism and its regulation exhibit many analogies to mechanisms of enzyme catalysis.

RNA polymerase molecular beacon as tool for studies of RNA polymerase-promoter interactions

The molecular details of formation of transcription initiation complex upon the interaction of bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) with promoters are not completely understood. One way to address this problem is to understand how RNAP interacts with different parts of promoter DNA. A recently developed fluorometric RNAP molecular beacon assay allows one to monitor the RNAP interactions with various unlabeled DNA probes and quantitatively characterize partial RNAP-promoter interactions. This paper focuses on methodological aspects of application of this powerful assay to study the mechanism of transcription initiation complex formation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase σ(70) holoenzyme and its regulation by bacterial and phage encoded factors.

Next Generation Sequencing-based analysis of RNA polymerase functions

Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) that revolutionized genome wide studies allows analysis of complex nucleic acids mixtures containing thousands of sequences. This extraordinary analytical power of NGS can be harnessed for the analysis of in vitro experiments where DNA template sequence dependence of protein activity acting on DNA can be studied in a single reaction for thousands of DNA sequence variants. This allows a rapid accumulation of data on DNA sequence dependence of the process of interest to a depth not accessible by standard experimentation. We use an example of bacterial RNA polymerase promoter melting activity to describe the NGS-based methodology to study DNA template dependence of protein activity.

Base flipping in open complex formation at bacterial promoters

In the process of transcription initiation, the bacterial RNA polymerase binds double-stranded (ds) promoter DNA and subsequently effects strand separation of 12 to 14 base pairs (bp), including the start site of transcription, to form the so-called "open complex" (also referred to as RP(o)). This complex is competent to initiate RNA synthesis. Here we will review the role of σ70 and its homologs in the strand separation process, and evidence that strand separation is initiated at the -11A (the A of the non-template strand that is 11 bp upstream from the transcription start site) of the promoter. By using the fluorescent adenine analog, 2-aminopurine, it was demonstrated that the -11A on the non-template strand flips out of the DNA helix and into a hydrophobic pocket where it stacks with tyrosine 430 of σ70. Open complexes are remarkably stable, even though in vivo, and under most experimental conditions in vitro, dsDNA is much more stable than its strand-separated form. Subsequent structural studies of other researchers have confirmed that in the open complex the -11A has flipped into a hydrophobic pocket of σ70. It was also revealed that RPo was stabilized by three additional bases of the non-template strand being flipped out of the helix and into hydrophobic pockets, further preventing re-annealing of the two complementary DNA strands.

Differential role of base pairs on gal promoters strength

Sequence alignments of promoters in prokaryotes postulated that the frequency of occurrence of a base pair at a given position of promoter elements reflects its contribution to intrinsic promoter strength. We directly assessed the contribution of the four base pairs in each position in the intrinsic promoter strength by keeping the context constant in Escherichia coli cAMP-CRP (cAMP receptor protein) regulated gal promoters by in vitro transcription assays. First, we show that base pair frequency within known consensus elements correlates well with promoter strength. Second, we observe some substitutions upstream of the ex-10 TG motif that are important for promoter function. Although the galP1 and P2 promoters overlap, only three positions where substitutions inactivated both promoters were found. We propose that RNA polymerase binds to the -12T base pair as part of double-stranded DNA while opening base pairs from -11A to +3 to form the single-stranded transcription bubble DNA during isomerization. The cAMP-CRP complex rescued some deleterious substitutions in the promoter region. The base pair roles and their flexibilities reported here for E. coli gal promoters may help construction of synthetic promoters in gene circuitry experiments in which overlapping promoters with differential controls may be warranted.

Antibiotics trapping transcription initiation intermediates: To melt or to bend, what's first?

Promoter DNA melting, culminating in the loading of the single-stranded DNA template into the RNA polymerase active site, is a key step in transcription initiation. Recently, the first transcription inhibitors found to block distinct steps of promoter melting were characterized. Here, the impact of these studies is discussed with respect to the current models of transcription initiation.

Next generation sequencing-based parallel analysis of melting kinetics of 4096 variants of a bacterial promoter

Promoter melting by bacterial RNA polymerase is a key step in transcription initiation. We used a next generation sequencing (NGS) based approach to analyze in parallel promoter melting of all 4096 sequence variants of the 6 bp -10 promoter element. We used NGS read count for each sequence of a promoter library containing a randomized -10 sequence as an observable to determine relative enrichment of -10 element sequence variants at different time points of the promoter melting reaction. The analysis reinforced the dominating role of consensus bases at positions -11 and -7, demonstrated an enhanced preference for A at -11 among sequences exhibiting the fastest melting kinetics, and showed higher overall importance of the T at -7 compared to the A at -11 for efficient promoter melting. Sequences lacking the consensus bases at -7 or -11 could still melt fast if they contained compensatory base patterns at other positions. We observed a significant correlation between the duplex melting energy of -10 element and the kinetics of promoter melting that became more pronounced when the dominating base-specific interactions with RNAP were diminished. These observations indicate that promoter melting kinetics is determined by a combination of base-specific effects/interactions and sequence-dependent stability of DNA duplex with the former playing a dominating role. Our data show that NGS can provide a reliable, quantitative readout for a highly parallel analysis of DNA template sequence dependence of activities of proteins that bind or operate on a DNA template.

Examination of tyrosine/adenine stacking interactions in protein complexes

The π-stacking interactions between tyrosine amino acid side chains and adenine-bearing ligands are examined. Crystalline protein structures from the protein data bank (PDB) exhibiting face-to-face tyrosine/adenine arrangements were used to construct 20 unique 4-methylphenol/N9-methyladenine (p-cresol/9MeA) model systems. Full geometry optimization of the 20 crystal structures with the M06-2X density functional theory method identified 11 unique low-energy conformations. CCSD(T) complete basis set (CBS) limit interaction energies were estimated for all of the structures to determine the magnitude of the interaction between the two ring systems. CCSD(T) computations with double-ζ basis sets (e.g., 6-31G*(0.25) and aug-cc-pVDZ) indicate that the MP2 method overbinds by as much as 3.07 kcal mol(-1) for the crystal structures and 3.90 kcal mol(-1) for the optimized structures. In the 20 crystal structures, the estimated CCSD(T) CBS limit interaction energy ranges from -4.00 to -6.83 kcal mol(-1), with an average interaction energy of -5.47 kcal mol(-1), values remarkably similar to the corresponding data for phenylalanine/adenine stacking interactions. Geometry optimization significantly increases the interaction energies of the p-cresol/9MeA model systems. The average estimated CCSD(T) CBS limit interaction energy of the 11 optimized structures is 3.23 kcal mol(-1) larger than that for the 20 crystal structures.

Indirect read-out of the promoter DNA by RNA polymerase in the closed complex

Transcription is initiated when RNA polymerase recognizes the duplex promoter DNA in the closed complex. Due to its transient nature, the closed complex has not been well characterized. How the initial promoter recognition occurs may offer important clues to regulation of transcription initiation. In this article, we have carried out single-base pair substitution experiments on two Escherichia coli promoters belonging to two different classes, the -35 and the extended -10, under conditions which stabilize the closed complex. Single-base pair substitution experiments indicate modest base-specific effects on the stability of the closed complex of both promoters. Mutations of base pairs in the -10 region affect the closed complexes of two promoters differently, suggesting different modes of interaction of the RNA polymerase and the promoter in the two closed complexes. Two residues on σ(70) which have been suggested to play important role in promoter recognition, Q437 and R436, were mutated and found to have different effects on the closed-complex stability. DNA circular dichroism (CD) and FRET suggest that the promoter DNA in the closed complex is distorted. Modeling suggests two different orientations of the recognition helix of the RNA polymerase in the closed complex. We propose that the RNA polymerase recognizes the sequence dependent conformation of the promoter DNA in the closed complex.

Distinct functions of regions 1.1 and 1.2 of RNA polymerase σ subunits from Escherichia coli and Thermus aquaticus in transcription initiation

RNA polymerase (RNAP) from thermophilic Thermus aquaticus is characterized by higher temperature of promoter opening, lower promoter complex stability, and higher promoter escape efficiency than RNAP from mesophilic Escherichia coli. We demonstrate that these differences are in part explained by differences in the structures of the N-terminal regions 1.1 and 1.2 of the E. coli σ(70) and T. aquaticus σ(A) subunits. In particular, region 1.1 and, to a lesser extent, region 1.2 of the E. coli σ(70) subunit determine higher promoter complex stability of E. coli RNAP. On the other hand, nonconserved amino acid substitutions in region 1.2, but not region 1.1, contribute to the differences in promoter opening between E. coli and T. aquaticus RNAPs, likely through affecting the σ subunit contacts with DNA nucleotides downstream of the -10 element. At the same time, substitutions in σ regions 1.1 and 1.2 do not affect promoter escape by E. coli and T. aquaticus RNAPs. Thus, evolutionary substitutions in various regions of the σ subunit modulate different steps of the open promoter complex formation pathway, with regions 1.1 and 1.2 affecting promoter complex stability and region 1.2 involved in DNA melting during initiation.

Characteristics of σ-dependent pausing by RNA polymerases from Escherichia coli and Thermus aquaticus

The σ(70) subunit of RNA polymerase (RNAP) is the major transcription initiation factor in Escherichia coli. During transcription initiation, conserved region 2 of the σ(70) subunit interacts with the -10 promoter element and plays a key role in DNA melting around the starting point of transcription. During transcription elongation, the σ(70) subunit can induce pauses in RNA synthesis owing to interactions of region 2 with DNA regions similar to the -10 promoter element. We demonstrated that the major σ subunit from Thermus aquaticus (σ(A)) is also able to induce transcription pausing by T. aquaticus RNAP. However, hybrid RNAP containing the σ(A) subunit and E. coli core RNAP is unable to form pauses during elongation, while being able to recognize promoters and initiate transcription. Inability of the σ(A) subunit to induce pausing by E. coli RNAP is explained by the substitutions of non-conserved amino acids in region 2, in the subregions interacting with the RNAP core enzyme. Thus, changes in the structure of region 2 of the σ(70) subunit have stronger effects on transcription pausing than on promoter recognition, likely by weakening the interactions of the σ subunit with the core RNAP during transcription elongation.

Predicting the strength of UP-elements and full-length E. coli σE promoters

Predicting the location and strength of promoters from genomic sequence requires accurate sequenced-based promoter models. We present the first model of a full-length bacterial promoter, encompassing both upstream sequences (UP-elements) and core promoter modules, based on a set of 60 promoters dependent on σ(E), an alternative ECF-type σ factor. UP-element contribution, best described by the length and frequency of A- and T-tracts, in combination with a PWM-based core promoter model, accurately predicted promoter strength both in vivo and in vitro. This model also distinguished active from weak/inactive promoters. Systematic examination of promoter strength as a function of RNA polymerase (RNAP) concentration revealed that UP-element contribution varied with RNAP availability and that the σ(E) regulon is comprised of two promoter types, one of which is active only at high concentrations of RNAP. Distinct promoter types may be a general mechanism for increasing the regulatory capacity of the ECF group of alternative σ's. Our findings provide important insights into the sequence requirements for the strength and function of full-length promoters and establish guidelines for promoter prediction and for forward engineering promoters of specific strengths.

Fluorescent DNA-based enzyme sensors

Fluorescent sensors that make use of DNA structures have become widely useful in monitoring enzymatic activities. Early studies focused primarily on enzymes that naturally use DNA or RNA as the substrate. However, recent advances in molecular design have enabled the development of nucleic acid sensors for a wider range of functions, including enzymes that do not normally bind DNA or RNA. Nucleic acid sensors present some potential advantages over classical small-molecule sensors, including water solubility and ease of synthesis. An overview of the multiple strategies under recent development is presented in this critical review, and expected future developments in microarrays, single molecule analysis, and in vivo sensing are discussed (160 references).

Structural basis for promoter-10 element recognition by the bacterial RNA polymerase σ subunit

The key step in bacterial promoter opening is recognition of the -10 promoter element (T(-12)A(-11)T(-10)A(-9)A(-8)T(-7) consensus sequence) by the RNA polymerase σ subunit. We determined crystal structures of σ domain 2 bound to single-stranded DNA bearing-10 element sequences. Extensive interactions occur between the protein and the DNA backbone of every -10 element nucleotide. Base-specific interactions occur primarily with A(-11) and T(-7), which are flipped out of the single-stranded DNA base stack and buried deep in protein pockets. The structures, along with biochemical data, support a model where the recognition of the -10 element sequence drives initial promoter opening as the bases of the nontemplate strand are extruded from the DNA double-helix and captured by σ. These results provide a detailed structural basis for the critical roles of A(-11) and T(-7) in promoter melting and reveal important insights into the initiation of transcription bubble formation.

A hyper-mutant of the unusual sigma70-Pr promoter bypasses synergistic ppGpp/DksA co-stimulation

The activities of promoters can be temporally and conditionally regulated by mechanisms other than classical DNA-binding repressors and activators. One example is the inherently weak σ⁷⁰-dependent Pr promoter that ultimately controls catabolism of phenolic compounds. The activity of Pr is up-regulated through the joint action of ppGpp and DksA that enhance the performance of RNA polymerase at this promoter. Here, we report a mutagenesis analysis that revealed substantial differences between Pr and other ppGpp/DksA co-stimulated promoters. In vitro transcription and RNA polymerase binding assays show that it is the T at the −11 position of the extremely suboptimal −10 element of Pr that underlies both poor binding of σ⁷⁰-RNAP and a slow rate of open complex formation—the process that is accelerated by ppGpp and DksA. Our findings support the idea that collaborative action of ppGpp and DksA lowers the rate-limiting transition energy required for conversion between intermediates on the road to open complex formation.

Mechanism of bacterial transcription initiation: RNA polymerase - promoter binding, isomerization to initiation-competent open complexes, and initiation of RNA synthesis

Initiation of RNA synthesis from DNA templates by RNA polymerase (RNAP) is a multi-step process, in which initial recognition of promoter DNA by RNAP triggers a series of conformational changes in both RNAP and promoter DNA. The bacterial RNAP functions as a molecular isomerization machine, using binding free energy to remodel the initial recognition complex, placing downstream duplex DNA in the active site cleft and then separating the nontemplate and template strands in the region surrounding the start site of RNA synthesis. In this initial unstable "open" complex the template strand appears correctly positioned in the active site. Subsequently, the nontemplate strand is repositioned and a clamp is assembled on duplex DNA downstream of the open region to form the highly stable open complex, RP(o). The transcription initiation factor, σ(70), plays critical roles in promoter recognition and RP(o) formation as well as in early steps of RNA synthesis.

Interaction of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase σ70 subunit with promoter elements in the context of free σ70, RNA polymerase holoenzyme, and the β'-σ70 complex

Promoter recognition by RNA polymerase is a key point in gene expression and a target of regulation. Bacterial RNA polymerase binds promoters in the form of the holoenzyme, with the σ specificity subunit being primarily responsible for promoter recognition. Free σ, however, does not recognize promoter DNA, and it has been proposed that the intrinsic DNA binding ability is masked in free σ but becomes unmasked in the holoenzyme. Here, we use a newly developed fluorescent assay to quantitatively study the interactions of free σ(70) from Escherichia coli, the β'-σ complex, and the σ(70) RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme with non-template strand of the open promoter complex transcription bubble in the context of model non-template oligonucleotides and fork junction templates. We show that σ(70), free or in the context of the holoenzyme, recognizes the -10 promoter element with the same efficiency and specificity. The result implies that there is no need to invoke a conformational change in σ for recognition of the -10 element in the single-stranded form. In the holoenzyme, weak but specific interactions of σ are increased by contacts with DNA downstream of the -10 element. We further show that region 1 of σ(70) is required for stronger interaction with non-template oligonucleotides in the holoenzyme but not in free σ. Finally, we show that binding of the β' RNAP subunit is sufficient to allow specific recognition of the TG motif of the extended -10 promoter element by σ(70). The new fluorescent assay, which we call a protein beacon assay, will be instrumental in quantitative dissection of fine details of RNAP interactions with promoters.

Promoter melting triggered by bacterial RNA polymerase occurs in three steps

RNA synthesis, carried out by DNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RNAP) in a process called transcription, involves several stages. In bacteria, transcription initiation starts with promoter recognition and binding of RNAP holoenzyme, resulting in the formation of the closed (R.P(c)) RNAP-promoter DNA complex. Subsequently, a transition to the open R.P(o) complex occurs, characterized by separation of the promoter DNA strands in an approximately 12 base-pair region to form the transcription bubble. Using coarse-grained self-organized polymer models of Thermus aquatics RNAP holoenzyme and promoter DNA complexes, we performed Brownian dynamics simulations of the R.P(c) --> R.P(o) transition. In the fast trajectories, unwinding of the promoter DNA begins by local melting around the -10 element, which is followed by sequential unzipping of DNA till the +2 site. The R.P(c) --> R.P(o) transition occurs in three steps. In step I, dsDNA melts and the nontemplate strand makes stable interactions with RNAP. In step II, DNA scrunches into RNA polymerase and the downstream base pairs sequentially open to form the transcription bubble, which results in strain build up. Subsequently, downstream dsDNA bending relieves the strain as R.P(o) forms. Entry of the dsDNA into the active-site channel of RNAP requires widening of the channel, which occurs by a swing mechanism involving transient movements of a subdomain of the beta subunit caused by steric repulsion with the DNA template strand. If premature local melting away from the -10 element occurs first then the transcription bubble formation is slow involving reformation of the opened base pairs and subsequent sequential unzipping as in the fast trajectories.

The transcription inhibitor lipiarmycin blocks DNA fitting into the RNA polymerase catalytic site

Worldwide spreading of drug-resistant pathogens makes mechanistic understanding of antibiotic action an urgent task. The macrocyclic antibiotic lipiarmycin (Lpm), which is under development for clinical use, inhibits bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) by an unknown mechanism. Using genetic and biochemical approaches, we show that Lpm targets the sigma(70) subunit region 3.2 and the RNAP beta' subunit switch-2 element, which controls the clamping of promoter DNA in the RNAP active-site cleft. Lpm abolishes isomerization of the 'closed'-promoter complex to the transcriptionally competent 'open' complex and blocks sigma(70)-stimulated RNA synthesis on promoter-less DNA templates. Lpm activity decreases when the template DNA strand is stabilized at the active site through the interaction of RNAP with the nascent RNA chain. Template DNA-strand fitting into the RNAP active-site cleft directed by the beta' subunit switch-2 element and the sigma(70) subunit region 3.2 is essential for promoter melting and for de novo initiation of RNA synthesis, and our results suggest that Lpm impedes this process.

Mechanisms for activating bacterial RNA polymerase

Gene transcription is a fundamental cellular process carried out by RNA polymerase (RNAP) enzymes and is highly regulated through the action of gene regulatory complexes. Important mechanistic insights have been gained from structural studies on multisubunit RNAP from bacteria, yeast and archaea, although the initiation process that involves the conversion of the inactive transcription complex to an active one has yet to be fully understood. RNAPs are unambiguously closely related in structure and function across all kingdoms of life and have conserved mechanisms. In bacteria, sigma (sigma) factors direct RNAP to specific promoter sites and the RNAP/sigma holoenzyme can either form a stable closed complex that is incompetent for transcription (as in the case of sigma(54)) or can spontaneously proceed to an open complex that is competent for transcription (as in the case of sigma(70)). The conversion of the RNAP/sigma(54) closed complex to an open complex requires ATP hydrolysis by enhancer-binding proteins, hence providing an ideal model system for studying the initiation process biochemically and structurally. In this review, we present recent structural studies of the two major bacterial RNAP holoenzymes and focus on mechanistic advances in the transcription initiation process via enhancer-binding proteins.

Probing DNA binding, DNA opening, and assembly of a downstream clamp/jaw in Escherichia coli RNA polymerase-lambdaP(R) promoter complexes using salt and the physiological anion glutamate

Transcription by all RNA polymerases (RNAPs) requires a series of large-scale conformational changes to form the transcriptionally competent open complex RP(o). At the lambdaP(R) promoter, Escherichia coli sigma(70) RNAP first forms a wrapped, closed 100 bp complex I(1). The subsequent step opens the entire DNA bubble, creating the relatively unstable (open) complex I(2). Additional conformational changes convert I(2) to the stable RP(o). Here we probe these events by dissecting the effects of Na(+) salts of Glu(-), F(-), and Cl(-) on each step in this critical process. Rapid mixing and nitrocellulose filter binding reveal that the binding constant for I(1) at 25 degrees C is approximately 30-fold larger in Glu(-) than in Cl(-) at the same Na(+) concentration, with the same log-log salt concentration dependence for both anions. In contrast, both the rate constant and equilibrium constant for DNA opening (I(1) to I(2)) are only weakly dependent on salt concentration, and the opening rate constant is insensitive to replacement of Cl(-) with Glu(-). These very small effects of salt concentration on a process (DNA opening) that is strongly dependent on salt concentration in solution may indicate that the backbones of both DNA strands interact with polymerase throughout the process and/or that compensation is present between ion uptake and release. Replacement of Cl(-) with Glu(-) or F(-) at 25 degrees C greatly increases the lifetime of RP(o) and greatly reduces its salt concentration dependence. By analogy to Hofmeister salt effects on protein folding, we propose that the excluded anions Glu(-) and F(-) drive the folding and assembly of the RNAP clamp/jaw domains in the conversion of I(2) to RP(o), while Cl(-) does not. Because the Hofmeister effect of Glu(-) or F(-) largely compensates for the destabilizing Coulombic effect of any salt on the binding of this assembly to downstream promoter DNA, RP(o) remains long-lived even at 0.5 M Na(+) in Glu(-) or F(-) salts. The observation that Esigma(70) RP(o) complexes are exceedingly long-lived at moderate to high Glu(-) concentrations argues that Esigma(70) RNAP does not dissociate from strong promoters in vivo when the cytoplasmic glutamate concentration increases during osmotic stress.

One-step DNA melting in the RNA polymerase cleft opens the initiation bubble to form an unstable open complex

Though opening of the start site (+1) region of promoter DNA is required for transcription by RNA polymerase (RNAP), surprisingly little is known about how and when this occurs in the mechanism. Early events at the lambdaP(R) promoter load this region of duplex DNA into the active site cleft of Escherichia coli RNAP, forming the closed, permanganate-unreactive intermediate I(1). Conversion to the subsequent intermediate I(2) overcomes a large enthalpic barrier. Is I(2) open? Here we create a burst of I(2) by rapidly destabilizing open complexes (RP(o)) with 1.1 M NaCl. Fast footprinting reveals that thymines at positions from -11 to +2 in I(2) are permanganate-reactive, demonstrating that RNAP opens the entire initiation bubble in the cleft in a single step. Rates of decay of all observed thymine reactivities are the same as the I(2) to I(1) conversion rate determined by filter binding. In I(2), permanganate reactivity of the +1 thymine on the template (t) strand is the same as the RP(o) control, whereas nontemplate (nt) thymines are significantly less reactive than in RP(o). We propose that: (i) the +1(t) thymine is in the active site in I(2); (ii) conversion of I(2) to RP(o) repositions the nt strand in the cleft; and (iii) movements of the nt strand are coupled to the assembly and DNA binding of the downstream clamp and jaw that occurs after DNA opening and stabilizes RP(o). We hypothesize that unstable open intermediates at the lambdaP(R) promoter resemble the unstable, transcriptionally competent open complexes formed at ribosomal promoters.

Multiple roles of the RNA polymerase {beta}' SW2 region in transcription initiation, promoter escape, and RNA elongation

Interactions of RNA polymerase (RNAP) with nucleic acids must be tightly controlled to ensure precise and processive RNA synthesis. The RNAP β'-subunit Switch-2 (SW2) region is part of a protein network that connects the clamp domain with the RNAP body and mediates opening and closing of the active center cleft. SW2 interacts with the template DNA near the RNAP active center and is a target for antibiotics that block DNA melting during initiation. Here, we show that substitutions of a conserved Arg339 residue in the Escherichia coli RNAP SW2 confer diverse effects on transcription that include defects in DNA melting in promoter complexes, decreased stability of RNAP/promoter complexes, increased apparent K(M) for initiating nucleotide substrates (2- to 13-fold for different substitutions), decreased efficiency of promoter escape, and decreased stability of elongation complexes. We propose that interactions of Arg339 with DNA directly stabilize transcription complexes to promote stable closure of the clamp domain around nucleic acids. During initiation, SW2 may cooperate with the σ(3.2) region to stabilize the template DNA strand in the RNAP active site. Together, our data suggest that SW2 may serve as a key regulatory element that affects transcription initiation and RNAP processivity through controlling RNAP/DNA template interactions.

Promoter recognition by bacterial alternative sigma factors: the price of high selectivity?

A key step in bacterial transcription initiation is melting of the double-stranded promoter DNA by the RNA polymerase holoenzyme. Primary sigma factors mediate the melting of thousands of promoters through a conserved set of aromatic amino acids. Alternative sigmas, which direct transcription of restricted regulons, lack the full set of melting residues. In this issue of Genes & Development, Koo and colleagues (pp. 2426-2436) show that introducing the primary sigma melting residues into alternative sigmas relaxes their promoter specificity, pointing to a trade-off of reduced promoter melting capacity for increased promoter stringency.

Reduced capacity of alternative sigmas to melt promoters ensures stringent promoter recognition

In bacteria, multiple sigmas direct RNA polymerase to distinct sets of promoters. Housekeeping sigmas direct transcription from thousands of promoters, whereas most alternative sigmas are more selective, recognizing more highly conserved promoter motifs. For sigma(32) and sigma(28), two Escherichia coli Group 3 sigmas, altering a few residues in Region 2.3, the portion of sigma implicated in promoter melting, to those universally conserved in housekeeping sigmas relaxed their stringent promoter requirements and significantly enhanced melting of suboptimal promoters. All Group 3 sigmas and the more divergent Group 4 sigmas have nonconserved amino acids at these positions and rarely transcribe >100 promoters. We suggest that the balance of "melting" and "recognition" functions of sigmas is critical to setting the stringency of promoter recognition. Divergent sigmas may generally use a nonoptimal Region 2.3 to increase promoter stringency, enabling them to mount a focused response to altered conditions.

Archaeal RNA polymerase

The recently solved X-ray crystal structures of archaeal RNA polymerase (RNAP) allow a structural comparison of the transcription machinery among all three domains of life. Archaeal transcription is very simple and all components, including the structures of general transcription factors and RNAP, are highly conserved in eukaryotes. Therefore, it could be a new model for the dissection of the eukaryotic transcription apparatus. The archaeal RNAP structure also provides a framework for addressing the functional role that Fe-S clusters play within the transcription machinery of archaea and eukaryotes. A comparison between bacterial and archaeal open complex models reveals likely key motifs of archaeal RNAP for DNA unwinding during the open complex formation.

DNA melting by RNA polymerase at the T7A1 promoter precedes the rate-limiting step at 37 degrees C and results in the accumulation of an off-pathway intermediate

The formation of a transcriptionally active complex by RNA polymerase involves a series of short-lived structural intermediates where protein conformational changes are coupled to DNA wrapping and melting. We have used time-resolved KMnO₄ and hydroxyl-radical X-ray footprinting to directly probe conformational signatures of these complexes at the T7A1 promoter. Here we demonstrate that DNA melting from m12 to m4 precedes the rate-limiting step in the pathway and takes place prior to the formation of full downstream contacts. In addition, on the wild-type promoter, we can detect the accumulation of a stable off-pathway intermediate that results from the absence of sequence-specific contacts with the melted non-consensus –10 region. Finally, the comparison of the results obtained at 37°C with those at 20°C reveals significant differences in the structure of the intermediates resulting in a different pathway for the formation of a transcriptionally active complex.