1
|
Ivanov SM, Huber RG, Alibay I, Warwicker J, Bond PJ. Energetic Fingerprinting of Ligand Binding to Paralogous Proteins: The Case of the Apoptotic Pathway. J Chem Inf Model 2018; 59:245-261. [DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan M. Ivanov
- Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, School of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, U.K
- Bioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Matrix 07-01, 30 Biopolis Street, Singapore 138671, Singapore
| | - Roland G. Huber
- Bioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Matrix 07-01, 30 Biopolis Street, Singapore 138671, Singapore
| | - Irfan Alibay
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, U.K
| | - Jim Warwicker
- Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, School of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, U.K
| | - Peter J. Bond
- Bioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Matrix 07-01, 30 Biopolis Street, Singapore 138671, Singapore
- Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen Y, Wang J, Zhang J, Wang W. Binding modes of Bcl-2 homology 3 (BH3) peptides with anti-apoptotic protein A1 and redesign of peptide inhibitors: a computational study. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2017; 36:3967-3977. [DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2017.1404933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yantao Chen
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecological Remediation, College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
- National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructure, Department of Physics, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
| | - Jun Wang
- National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructure, Department of Physics, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
| | - Jian Zhang
- National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructure, Department of Physics, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
| | - Wei Wang
- National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructure, Department of Physics, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ivanov SM, Cawley A, Huber RG, Bond PJ, Warwicker J. Protein-protein interactions in paralogues: Electrostatics modulates specificity on a conserved steric scaffold. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0185928. [PMID: 29016650 PMCID: PMC5634604 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2017] [Accepted: 09/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
An improved knowledge of protein-protein interactions is essential for better understanding of metabolic and signaling networks, and cellular function. Progress tends to be based on structure determination and predictions using known structures, along with computational methods based on evolutionary information or detailed atomistic descriptions. We hypothesized that for the case of interactions across a common interface, between proteins from a pair of paralogue families or within a family of paralogues, a relatively simple interface description could distinguish between binding and non-binding pairs. Using binding data for several systems, and large-scale comparative modeling based on known template complex structures, it is found that charge-charge interactions (for groups bearing net charge) are generally a better discriminant than buried non-polar surface. This is particularly the case for paralogue families that are less divergent, with more reliable comparative modeling. We suggest that electrostatic interactions are major determinants of specificity in such systems, an observation that could be used to predict binding partners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan M. Ivanov
- Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, School of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Cawley
- Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, School of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Roland G. Huber
- Bioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Matrix, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Peter J. Bond
- Bioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Matrix, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jim Warwicker
- Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, School of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ivanov S, Huber R, Warwicker J, Bond P. Energetics and Dynamics Across the Bcl-2-Regulated Apoptotic Pathway Reveal Distinct Evolutionary Determinants of Specificity and Affinity. Structure 2016; 24:2024-2033. [DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2016.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2016] [Revised: 09/05/2016] [Accepted: 09/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
5
|
Ames RM, Talavera D, Williams SG, Robertson DL, Lovell SC. Binding interface change and cryptic variation in the evolution of protein-protein interactions. BMC Evol Biol 2016; 16:40. [PMID: 26892785 PMCID: PMC4758157 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-016-0608-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2015] [Accepted: 02/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Physical interactions between proteins are essential for almost all biological functions and systems. To understand the evolution of function it is therefore important to understand the evolution of molecular interactions. Of key importance is the evolution of binding specificity, the set of interactions made by a protein, since change in specificity can lead to “rewiring” of interaction networks. Unfortunately, the interfaces through which proteins interact are complex, typically containing many amino-acid residues that collectively must contribute to binding specificity as well as binding affinity, structural integrity of the interface and solubility in the unbound state. Results In order to study the relationship between interface composition and binding specificity, we make use of paralogous pairs of yeast proteins. Immediately after duplication these paralogues will have identical sequences and protein products that make an identical set of interactions. As the sequences diverge, we can correlate amino-acid change in the interface with any change in the specificity of binding. We show that change in interface regions correlates only weakly with change in specificity, and many variants in interfaces are functionally equivalent. We show that many of the residue replacements within interfaces are silent with respect to their contribution to binding specificity. Conclusions We conclude that such functionally-equivalent change has the potential to contribute to evolutionary plasticity in interfaces by creating cryptic variation, which in turn may provide the raw material for functional innovation and coevolution. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-016-0608-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan M Ames
- Computational and Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK. .,Current address: Wellcome Trust Centre for Biomedical Modelling and Analysis, University of Exeter, RILD Level 3, Exeter, EX2 5DW, UK.
| | - David Talavera
- Computational and Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK. .,Current address: Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
| | - Simon G Williams
- Computational and Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK. .,Current address: Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
| | - David L Robertson
- Computational and Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
| | - Simon C Lovell
- Computational and Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Antibody Binding Selectivity: Alternative Sets of Antigen Residues Entail High-Affinity Recognition. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0143374. [PMID: 26629896 PMCID: PMC4667898 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2015] [Accepted: 11/04/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Understanding the relationship between protein sequence and molecular recognition selectivity remains a major challenge. The antibody fragment scFv1F4 recognizes with sub nM affinity a decapeptide (sequence 6TAMFQDPQER15) derived from the N-terminal end of human papilloma virus E6 oncoprotein. Using this decapeptide as antigen, we had previously shown that only the wild type amino-acid or conservative replacements were allowed at positions 9 to 12 and 15 of the peptide, indicating a strong binding selectivity. Nevertheless phenylalanine (F) was equally well tolerated as the wild type glutamine (Q) at position 13, while all other amino acids led to weaker scFv binding. The interfaces of complexes involving either Q or F are expected to diverge, due to the different physico-chemistry of these residues. This would imply that high-affinity binding can be achieved through distinct interfacial geometries. In order to investigate this point, we disrupted the scFv-peptide interface by modifying one or several peptide positions. We then analyzed the effect on binding of amino acid changes at the remaining positions, an altered susceptibility being indicative of an altered role in complex formation. The 23 starting variants analyzed contained replacements whose effects on scFv1F4 binding ranged from minor to drastic. A permutation analysis (effect of replacing each peptide position by all other amino acids except cysteine) was carried out on the 23 variants using the PEPperCHIP® Platform technology. A comparison of their permutation patterns with that of the wild type peptide indicated that starting replacements at position 11, 12 or 13 modified the tolerance to amino-acid changes at the other two positions. The interdependence between the three positions was confirmed by SPR (Biacore® technology). Our data demonstrate that binding selectivity does not preclude the existence of alternative high-affinity recognition modes.
Collapse
|
7
|
Sudha G, Singh P, Swapna LS, Srinivasan N. Weak conservation of structural features in the interfaces of homologous transient protein-protein complexes. Protein Sci 2015; 24:1856-73. [PMID: 26311309 DOI: 10.1002/pro.2792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2015] [Revised: 08/13/2015] [Accepted: 08/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Residue types at the interface of protein-protein complexes (PPCs) are known to be reasonably well conserved. However, we show, using a dataset of known 3-D structures of homologous transient PPCs, that the 3-D location of interfacial residues and their interaction patterns are only moderately and poorly conserved, respectively. Another surprising observation is that a residue at the interface that is conserved is not necessarily in the interface in the homolog. Such differences in homologous complexes are manifested by substitution of the residues that are spatially proximal to the conserved residue and structural differences at the interfaces as well as differences in spatial orientations of the interacting proteins. Conservation of interface location and the interaction pattern at the core of the interfaces is higher than at the periphery of the interface patch. Extents of variability of various structural features reported here for homologous transient PPCs are higher than the variation in homologous permanent homomers. Our findings suggest that straightforward extrapolation of interfacial nature and inter-residue interaction patterns from template to target could lead to serious errors in the modeled complex structure. Understanding the evolution of interfaces provides insights to improve comparative modeling of PPC structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Govindarajan Sudha
- Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, Karnataka, India
| | - Prashant Singh
- Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, Karnataka, India
| | - Lakshmipuram S Swapna
- Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, Karnataka, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sudha G, Nussinov R, Srinivasan N. An overview of recent advances in structural bioinformatics of protein-protein interactions and a guide to their principles. PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2014; 116:141-50. [PMID: 25077409 DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2014.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2014] [Accepted: 07/13/2014] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Rich data bearing on the structural and evolutionary principles of protein-protein interactions are paving the way to a better understanding of the regulation of function in the cell. This is particularly the case when these interactions are considered in the framework of key pathways. Knowledge of the interactions may provide insights into the mechanisms of crucial 'driver' mutations in oncogenesis. They also provide the foundation toward the design of protein-protein interfaces and inhibitors that can abrogate their formation or enhance them. The main features to learn from known 3-D structures of protein-protein complexes and the extensive literature which analyzes them computationally and experimentally include the interaction details which permit undertaking structure-based drug discovery, the evolution of complexes and their interactions, the consequences of alterations such as post-translational modifications, ligand binding, disease causing mutations, host pathogen interactions, oligomerization, aggregation and the roles of disorder, dynamics, allostery and more to the protein and the cell. This review highlights some of the recent advances in these areas, including design, inhibition and prediction of protein-protein complexes. The field is broad, and much work has been carried out in these areas, making it challenging to cover it in its entirety. Much of this is due to the fast increase in the number of molecules whose structures have been determined experimentally and the vast increase in computational power. Here we provide a concise overview.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Govindarajan Sudha
- Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.
| | - Ruth Nussinov
- Cancer and Inflammation Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA; Sackler Institute of Molecular Medicine, Department of Human Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Enhanced evolution by stochastically variable modification of epigenetic marks in the early embryo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111:6353-8. [PMID: 24733912 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1402585111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Evolution by gene duplication is generally accepted as one of the crucial driving forces for the gain of new complexity and functions, but the formation of pseudogenes remains a problem for this mechanism. Here we expand on earlier ideas that epigenetic modifications can drive neo- and subfunctionalization in evolution by gene duplication. We explore the effects of stochastic epigenetic modifications on the evolution (and thus development) of complex organisms in a constant environment. Modeling is done both using a modified genetic drift analytical treatment and computer simulations, which were found to agree. A transposon silencing model is also explored. Some key assumptions made include (i) stochastic, incomplete removal (or addition) of repressive epigenetic marks takes place during a window(s) of opportunity in the zygote and early embryo; (ii) there is no statistical variation of the marks after the window closes; and (iii) the genes affected are sensitive to dosage. Our genetic drift treatment takes into account that after gene duplication the prevailing case upon which selection operates is a duplicate/singlet heterozygote; to the best of our knowledge, this has not been considered in previous treatments. We conclude from our modeling that stochastic epigenetic modifications, with rates consistent with experimental observation, can both increase the rate of gene fixation and decrease pseudogenization, thus dramatically improving the efficacy of evolution by gene duplication. We also find that a transposon silencing model is advantageous for fixation of recessive genes in diploid organisms, especially with large effective population sizes.
Collapse
|