A modified suture technique for laparoscopic myomectomy

Evidence-Based Practice for Minimization of Blood Loss During Laparoscopic Myomectomy: An AAGL Practice Guideline: The Practice Guideline Committee of AAGL

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of pre-operative medical adjuncts and intra-operative interventions for reducing blood loss during laparoscopic (conventional or robotic-assisted) myomectomy.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analyses of the relevant literature were performed to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

SETTING

Published literature.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy.

INTERVENTIONS

Pre-operative medical adjuncts and intra-operative interventions for reducing blood loss.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was surgical blood loss. Secondary outcomes were change in hematocrit or hemoglobin and blood transfusion. Additional outcomes included length of procedure, intra- and post-operative complications, conversion to laparotomy, reoperation, readmission, and length of stay. A total of 75 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and formed the basis for this practice guideline. Evidence-based recommendations were developed regarding the use of pre-operative medical adjuncts including gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and progesterone), as well as intra-operative vasoconstrictors, uterine artery occlusion, electrosurgical devices and barbed suture.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic review and multiple meta-analyses identified moderate evidence supporting the use of 3-month administration of leuprolide acetate prior to myomectomy and intra-operative use of misoprostol, epinephrine, vasopressin, oxytocin, and uterine artery occlusion for reducing blood loss during laparoscopic myomectomy.

Comparison of fertility outcomes after laparoscopic myomectomy for barbed versus nonbarbed sutures

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact on women's reproductive outcomes of barbed sutures to repair uterine breaches during laparoscopic myomectomy compared with traditional smooth sutures.

DESIGN

Retrospective, monocentric cohort study, with information on subsequent pregnancies prospectively acquired for some women.

SETTING

Tertiary-level academic referral center.

PATIENT(S)

Women older than 18 years who had undergone a laparoscopic myomectomy and had sought pregnancy afterward, divided into two groups based on type of suture used to repair the uterine wall: group A (nonbarbed) and group B (barbed).

INTERVENTION(S)

Laparoscopic removal of FIGO types 3, 4, 5, and 6 uterine leiomyomas by use of either only barbed sutures or only traditional smooth sutures to reconstruct the uterine defect.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Pregnancy achievement rates, delivery modes, main pregnancy complications, perioperative complications for both kinds of suture, and the trend of the use of barbed sutures over time at our center.

RESULT(S)

Of 164 patients included, 83 were in group A and 81 in group B. Ninety-one patients (55.5%) experienced at least one postoperative pregnancy, with no differences between the groups (group A 60.5%; group B 50.6%). Of the 103 recorded postoperative pregnancies, 70 (68%) resulted in live births, 29 (28.1%) in first-trimester miscarriages, and 4 (3.9%) were ongoing.

CONCLUSION(S)

Barbed sutures have a similar impact on reproductive outcomes as smooth conventional threads, both in terms of pregnancy and obstetric complication rates, after laparoscopic myomectomy.

Gasless Laparoscopic Myomectomy Using A J-shaped Retractor and Suture Technique

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare gasless single-port access (SPA) laparoscopic myomectomy using a J-shaped retractor and conventional SPA laparoscopic myomectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

The medical records of 60 patients who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy between January 2016 and August 2019 were reviewed. Thirty patients underwent gasless SPA laparoscopic myomectomy using a J-shaped retractor, and 30 patients underwent conventional SPA laparoscopic myomectomy. The 2 groups were compared in terms of surgical outcomes. In gasless laparoscopic myomectomy, closure of the uterine defect after myomectomy was performed using an extracorporeal suture technique with a Kelly clamp and knot pusher.

RESULTS

On comparing gasless SPA and conventional SPA laparoscopic myomectomy, no significant differences were observed in age, body mass index, parity, previous abdominal surgery, and size of the dominant uterine myoma. The median retraction setup time from skin incision was 8 minutes (range, 5 to 15 min) with gasless SPA laparoscopic myomectomy. The median total operation times were 105 minutes (range, 62 to 210 min) with gasless SPA myomectomy and 110 minutes (range, 60 to 270 min) with conventional SPA myomectomy, and there was no significant difference (P=0.251). There was no difference between the groups in terms of estimated blood loss. None of the patients experienced laparotomy conversion in both groups. No major complications, such as urologic, bowel, and vessel injuries, were found in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Gasless SPA laparoscopic myomectomy using a J-shaped retractor is a safe and feasible approach, which allows for easy and convenient suturing of a uterine defect after myomectomy.

Application of a 'Baseball' Suture Technique in Uterine Myomectomy Following Laparoscopic Enucleation of Uterine Leiomyoma (Fibroid)

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a ‘baseball’ suture technique for uterine myomectomy incision closure in laparoscopic surgical enucleation of uterine leiomyoma (fibroid).

Material/Methods

The study included 20 patients who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy with a ‘baseball’ suture technique, compared with 20 patients who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy with a standard suture method. Clinical characteristics, perioperative and follow-up data were compared between the two groups.

Results

For the study group, compared with the standard or control group, had a significantly reduced operation time (60.15±9.97 min vs. 71.85±9.74 min) and suturing time (18.05±4.71 min vs. 28.35±3.13 min) (both p<0.05), significantly less intraoperative blood loss (93.25±19.62 ml vs. 121.50±24.87 ml) (p<0.05) and significantly less reduction in postoperative hemoglobin levels (8.9±1.97 g/L vs. 11.15±2.23 g/L) (p<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in duration of the use of the indwelling drainage tube, drainage volume, or time to recovery of gastrointestinal function (all, p>0.05). Following surgery, blood transfusion was given to one patient in the study group and two patients in the control group. One patient from each group had a fever. There was no significant difference in pregnancy outcomes between the two groups.

Conclusions

The ‘baseball’ suture technique for closure of the uterine incision is a safe and effective method for use in laparoscopic myomectomy. However, the long-term recovery outcomes require further study.

Unidirectional barbed suture versus continuous suture with intracorporeal knots in laparoscopic myomectomy: a randomized study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To estimate the effectiveness of unidirectional knotless barbed suture and continuous suture with intracorporeal knots in the repair of uterine wall defects during laparoscopic myomectomy.

DESIGN

Randomized clinical study (Canadian Task Force Classification I).

SETTING

Single-center study in a university hospital.

PATIENTS

This study enrolled 44 women who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy.

INTERVENTIONS

In accord with to the randomization, the uterine wall defects were closed either with a continuous suture with intracorporeal knots (group V) or a unidirectional knotless barbed suture (group L).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The time required to suture the uterine wall defect was significantly lower in group L (11.5 ± 4.1 minutes) than in group V (17.4 ± 3.8 minutes; p <.001). However, no significant difference was observed in the operative time between the 2 study groups. The intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in group L than in group V (p =.004). The degree of surgical difficulty was significantly lower in group L (3.7 ± 1.1) than in group V (6.1 ± 2.1; p <.001).

CONCLUSION

The unidirectional knotless barbed suture may facilitate the suture of uterine wall defects during laparoscopic myomectomy. When compared with continuous suture and intracorporeal knots, the barbed suture reduces the time required to suture the uterine wall defect and the intraoperative blood loss.

[Treatment of surgical wounds on the uterus after laparoscopic myomectomy]

INTRODUCTION

The advantages of laparoscopic removal of a myoma over classical surgical technique are shorter hospital stay, rapid recovery and less pain after surgery, as well as a lower frequency of ileus and thromboembolic complications. The surgical technique of laparoscopic removal of myoma involves four basic stages: incision on the wall of the uterus, separation of the myoma from the healthy uterine tissue, to stop bleeding and removal of the myoma from the abdomen. Apart from these four basic stages, it is also necessary to establish a new integrity of the uterine wall, especially in women planning pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the paper is to present the procedures used in the treatment of uterine wall defect during the laparoscopic removal of the myoma.

METHODS

We analysed 96 patients who were indicated for laparoscopic myomectomy. All patients were divided into four groups according to the type of the technique of haemostasis and treatment of the defect on the uterine wall: electrocoagulation, electrocoagulation with application of argon plasma, a single suture and extended suture.

RESULTS

In order to stop bleeding, we most often used electrocoagulation by monopolar electricity, i.e. in 39.6% of the patients. To stop bleeding and treat the defect of the uterine wall, we used a single suture in 21.9% and in 11.4% patients we used the extended suture. The manner of uterine wall treatment did not have a statistically significant influence on the results of haematological parameters (p > 0.05), consumption of carbon dioxide (p > 0.05) and the duration of surgical procedure (p > 0.05). The increased use of antibiotics (p < 0.05) in the group of patients in whom we treated the defect by sutures on the uterus, the length of postsurgical hospitalisation and absence from work (p < 0.01) was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

To achieve a better reconstruction of the uterus, it is recommended to use sutures with laparoscopic removal of myoma.