Live Birth Rate after Surgical and Expectant Management of Endometriomas after In Vitro Fertilization: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Critical Appraisal of Current Guidelines and Previous Meta-Analyses

Critical appraisal and narrative review of the literature in IVF/ICSI patients with adenomyosis and endometriosis

Endometriosis and adenomyosis are prevalent causes of infertility, often coexisting in a significant proportion of patients. Although endometriosis typically does not negatively impact assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes, the presence of coexisting adenomyosis, mainly non-severe external forms, may slightly influence IVF/ICSI success rates. However, this impact is often minimal and may result in insignificant changes in statistical analyses. Recent studies underscore the critical role of accurate diagnostic techniques, such as ultrasound or MRI, in identifying severe adenomyosis characteristics, including diffuse involvement with junctional zone participation. This precise delineation is reassuring, as it is essential for tailoring assisted reproductive technology (ART) strategies to enhance success rates and reduce the confounding effects of adenomyosis, particularly when it coexists with endometriosis. Strategic approaches, such as ultralong GnRH agonist protocols or freeze-all strategies, may provide advantages in these scenarios. However, the need for extensive research is vital to understanding the complex interactions between endometriosis, adenomyosis, and ART outcomes. This ongoing exploration is particularly important in cases where coexisting adenomyosis might not significantly influence statistical results.

Endometrioma surgery: Hit with your best shot (But know when to stop)

Ovarian endometriomas (OEs) are commonly detected by ultrasound in individuals affected by endometriosis. Although surgery was widely regarded in the past as the gold standard for treating OEs, especially in the case of large cysts, the surgical management of OEs remains debated. Firstly, OEs often represent the "tip of the iceberg" of underlying deep endometriosis, and this should be considered when treating OEs to ameliorate patients' pain for focusing on the surgical objectives and providing better patient counseling. In the context of fertility care, OEs may have a detrimental effect on ovarian reserve through structural alterations, inflammatory responses, and oocyte reserve depletion. Conversely, the surgical approach may exacerbate the decline within the same ovarian reserve. While evidence suggests no improvement in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes following OE surgery, further studies are needed to understand the impact of OE surgery on spontaneous fertility. Therefore, optimal management of OEs is based on individual patient and fertility characteristics such as the woman's age, length of infertility, results of ovarian reserve tests, and surgical background. Among the available surgical approaches, cystectomy appears advantageous in terms of reduced recurrence rates, and traditionally, bipolar coagulation has been used to achieve hemostasis following this approach. Driven by concerns about the negative impact on ovarian reserve, alternative methods to obtain hemostasis include suturing the cyst bed, and novel methodologies such as CO2 laser and plasma energy have emerged as viable surgical options for OEs. In instances where sonographic OE features are non-reassuring, surgery should be contemplated to obtain tissue for histological diagnosis and rule out eventual ovarian malignancy.

Indirect markers of oocyte quality in patients with ovarian endometriosis undergoing IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of ovarian endometriomas (OMA) on indirect markers of oocyte quality in patients undergoing IVF, compared with women without anatomical or functional ovarian abnormalities. The search spanned original randomized controlled trials, case-control studies and cohort studies published in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and the ClinicalTrials.gov database up to October 2023. Thirty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis, showing no significant differences in fertilization (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.94-1.30), blastulation (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.64-1.14) and cancellation (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.78-1.44) rates. However, patients with OMA exhibited significantly lower numbers of total and mature (metaphase II) oocytes retrieved (mean difference -1.59, 95% CI -2.25 to -0.94; mean difference -1.86, 95% CI -2.46 to -1.26, respectively), and lower numbers of top-quality embryos (mean difference -0.49, 95% CI -0.92 to -0.06). The Ovarian Sensitivity Index was similar between the groups (mean difference -1.55, 95% CI -3.27 to 0.18). The lack of data published to date prevented meta-analysis on euploidy rate. In conclusion, although the presence of OMA could decrease the oocyte yield in patients undergoing IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection, it does not appear to have an adverse impact on oocyte quality.

Impact of surgery for endometriosis on the outcomes of in vitro fertilization

This narrative review aims to summarize available evidence on the IVF-associated outcomes after surgery for endometriosis. Only one retrospective study investigated if surgical treatment of superficial/peritoneal endometriosis may modify the outcomes of IVF; therefore, more data are needed to confirm the benefit of surgery for this type of disease for improving ART outcomes, and to be able to support it in routine practice. Solid evidence from several meta-analyses demonstrates that surgical treatment of endometriomas does not enhance the outcomes of IVF. In contrast, surgical treatment of ovarian endometriosis may lead to a reduction in ovarian reserve, especially in cases involving bilateral endometriomas or repeated surgical procedures. Some non-randomized studies have examined if surgical treatment on deep endometriosis may influence IVF outcomes. A systematic review with meta-analysis revealed that patients who underwent surgery before IVF exhibited significantly higher pregnancy rates per patient, pregnancy rates per cycle, and live birth rates per patient compared to those without prior surgery. However, the available data are insufficient to recommend surgical excision of deep endometriosis as the first-line treatment for asymptomatic patients to enhance IVF outcomes.

First live birth before surgical verification of endometriosis-a nationwide register study of 18 324 women

STUDY QUESTION

Do women with endometriosis have lower first live birth rate before surgical diagnosis than women without verified endometriosis?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Compared to reference women, the incidence of first live birth was lower in women prior to surgical verification of endometriosis irrespective of the type of endometriosis.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Endometriosis is associated with pain and reduced fertility. The mechanism of infertility is partly explained by anatomical, endocrinological, and immunological changes. Over the past decades, the treatment of both endometriosis and infertility has evolved. Knowledge of fertility far before surgical diagnosis of endometriosis in large cohorts and of different types of endometriosis has been lacking. The diagnostic delay of endometriosis is long, 6-7 years.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Retrospective population-based cohort study focused on the time period before the surgical verification of endometriosis. All women with surgical verification of endometriosis in 1998-2012 were identified from the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register and the reference cohort from the Central Population Register. Data on deliveries, gynecological care, and sociodemographic factors before the surgical diagnosis were gathered from Finnish national registers maintained by the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, the Digital and Population Data Services Agency, and Statistics Finland.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

All women aged 15-49 years at the time of surgical verification of endometriosis (ICD-10: N80.1-N80.9) in Finland during 1998-2012 were identified (n = 21 620). Of them, we excluded women born in 1980-1999 due to the proximity of the surgical diagnosis (n = 3286) and women left without reference (n = 10) for the final endometriosis cohort of 18 324 women. From the final cohort, we selected sub-cohorts of women with isolated diagnosis of ovarian (n = 6384), peritoneal (n = 5789), and deep (n = 1267) endometriosis. Reference women were matched by age and residence and lacked registered clinical or surgical diagnosis of endometriosis (n = 35 793). The follow-up started at the age of 15 years and ended at the first birth, sterilization, bilateral oophorectomy, hysterectomy, or until the surgical diagnosis of endometriosis or corresponding index day-whichever came first. Incidence rate (IR) and the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of first live birth before the surgical verification of endometriosis with corresponding CIs were calculated. In addition, we reported the fertility rate of parous women (the number of all children divided by the number of parous women in the cohort) until the surgical verification of endometriosis. The trends in first births were analysed according to the women's birth cohort, type of endometriosis, and age.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Surgical diagnosis of endometriosis was set at the median age of 35.0 years (IQR 30.0-41.4). Altogether 7363 women (40.2%) with endometriosis and 23 718 (66.3%) women without endometriosis delivered a live born infant before the index day (surgery). The IRs of the first live birth per 100 person-years were 2.64 (95% CI 2.58-2.70) in the endometriosis cohort and 5.21 (95% CI 5.15-5.28) in the reference cohort. Between the endometriosis sub-cohorts, the IRs were similar. The IRR of the first live birth was 0.51 (95% CI 0.49-0.52) between the endometriosis and reference cohorts. Fertility rate per parous woman before the surgical diagnosis was 1.93 (SD 1.00) and 2.16 (SD 1.15) in the endometriosis and reference cohorts (P < 0.01). The median age at the first live birth was 25.5 (IQR 22.3-28.9) and 25.5 (IQR 22.3-28.6) years (P = 0.01), respectively. Between the endometriosis sub-cohorts, women in the ovarian sub-cohort were the oldest at the time of surgical diagnosis with the median age of 37.2 years (IQR 31.4-43.3), (P < 0.001). Altogether 44.1% (2814) of the women with ovarian, 39.4% (2282) with peritoneal, and 40.8% (517) with deep endometriosis delivered a live born infant before the diagnosis. IRRs between the endometriosis sub-cohorts did not differ. Fertility rate per parous woman was lowest, 1.88 (SD 0.95), in the ovarian sub-cohort compared to 1.98 (SD 1.07) in the peritoneal and 2.04 (SD 0.96) in deep endometriosis (P < 0.001). Women with ovarian endometriosis were oldest at first live birth compared to women in other sub-cohorts with a median age of 25.8 years (IQR 22.6-29.1) (P < 0.001). Cumulative distributions of first live birth were presented according to age at first live birth and birth cohorts of the participants.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The increasing age at first live birth, increasing practice of clinical diagnostics, conservative treatment of endometriosis, a possible effect of coexisting adenomyosis, and use of artificial reproductive treatments should be considered when assessing the results. In addition, the study is limited due to possible confounding effects of socioeconomic factors, such as level of education. It should be noted that, in this study, we assessed parity only during the years preceding the surgical verification of endometriosis.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The need for early diagnosis and relevant treatment of endometriosis appears clear given the impairment of fertility prior to its surgical verification.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The study was funded by the Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa and by Finska Läkaresällskapet. The authors report no conflicts of interest. All authors have completed the ICMJE Disclosure form.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Laser vaporization compared with other surgical techniques in women with ovarian endometrioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes after laparoscopic cystectomy versus laser vaporization in women of reproductive age with ovarian endometrioma.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

Our systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021281781) and was done according to the PRISMA 2020 checklist. Studies (published until October 2021) were identified by searching PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases (key words "cystectomy", "laser vaporization", and "endometrioma"). The search was conducted independently by two investigators (L.P. and S.I.). Inclusion criteria were: women of reproductive age undergoing surgery for symptomatic endometriomas larger than 30 mm. The exclusion criteria were: women who undergo conservative treatment. Outcomes were: risk ratio for recurrence, ovarian reserve and pregnancy rates. The studies included were randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized clinical trials (prospective controlled, prospective cohort, retrospective studies, and other types of studies) that included a minimum of 10 patients and written in English. Tools recommended by the Cochrane Society achieved risk-of-bias assessment.

RESULTS

Totally, 874 studies were found, 9 studies were included in qualitative synthesis (822 patients). All the authors compared the efficacy and safety of cystectomy or laser vaporization in reproductive-aged women with ovarian endometrioma. The overall risk of bias for the randomized trials was 80% 'some concerns' and 20% 'low', and for the cohort studies, 50% 'some concerns' and 50% 'low'. The primary meta-analysis focused on recurrence rates (4 studies included) with no statistically significant differences found between these two interventions (RR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.21, P = 0.13). The next meta-analysis estimated antral follicle count (3 studies) which was significantly lower in cystectomy group (RR = - 2.56, 95% CI - 3.71 to - 1.42, P < 0.0001). Pregnancy rates were analyzed in 3 studies with no statistically significant difference (RR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.14, P = 0.64).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no statistical difference in the recurrence rate and pregnancy rates, but the antral follicle count was higher in the laser vaporization group. However, we need more clinical trials to make stronger recommendations.

Presence of endometrioma decreased blastocyst formation rate but not impair Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) outcome

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess the impact of endometrioma on patients who undergo ART treatment due to endometriosis.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on women ≤ 40 years of age who underwent ART treatment at an academic medical center between January 2014 and December 2020. Two-hundred-and-eight women had received IVF/ICSI treatment due to endometriosis and there were 89 patients presence of endometrioma. Patients were further divided into primary endometrioma, recurrent endometrioma and those having received cystectomy for endometrioma prior to IVF/ICSI. The control group included 624 infertile women without endometriosis.

RESULTS

In the endometrioma subgroup (B) the blastocyst formation rate was significantly lower when compared with the endometriosis (A) and control groups (C). The cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) (60.5% versus 49.4% versus 56.9%, p = 0.194 in A versus B, p = 0.406 in A versus C, p = 0.878 in B versus C) were comparable. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that female age, total FSH dose and blastocyst formation rate were the significant variables in predicting CLBR (OR 0.89, CI 0.80-0.99, p < 0.025, OR 0.68 CI 0.53-0.88, p = 0.003 and OR 30.04, CI 9.93-90.9, p < 0.001, respectively). The CLBRs were comparable at 47.1%, 60% and 57.9% in the primary endometrioma, s/p cystectomy and recurrent endometrioma group.

CONCLUSION

Although the blastocyst formation rate was lower in the endometrioma group, CLBR was not worse than those who were in the endometriosis or control group. Cystectomy for endometrioma did not alter IVF/ICSI outcomes if the ovarian reserve was comparable. Recurrent endometrioma did not worsen IVF/ICSI outcomes than primary endometrioma.

Impact of Ovarian Endometrioma and Surgery on Reproductive Outcomes: A Single-Center Spanish Cohort Study

Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicular count (AFC) decrease in women with ovarian endometrioma (OMA) and in vitro fertilization (IVF). In addition, these parameters drop even further when women with OMA undergo surgery. In this study, the primary aim was to compare the reproductive variables in IVF-treated women with and without endometriosis. The secondary aim was to explore if the reproductive variables were modified by endometrioma surgery. In this retrospective study, 244 women undergoing IVF were enrolled at the Hospital Universitario La Paz (Madrid, Spain). Women were categorized as OMA not surgically treated (OMA; n = 124), OMA with surgery (OMA + S; n = 55), and women with infertility issues not related to OMA (control; n = 65). Demographic and clinical variables, including age, body mass index (BMI), and reproductive (AMH, AFC, number of extracted oocytes, and transferred embryos) and obstetrical data (biochemical pregnancy and fetal heart rate at 6 weeks) were collected. Adjusted logistic regression models were built to evaluate reproductive and pregnancy outcomes. The models showed that women with OMA (with and without surgery) had significantly decreased levels of AMH and AFC and numbers of cycles and C + D embryos. Women with OMA + S had similar rates of pregnancy to women in the control group. However, women with OMA had lower biochemical pregnancy than controls (aOR = 0.08 [0.01; 0.50]; p-value = 0.025). OMA surgery seems to improve pregnancy outcomes, at least until 6 weeks of gestation. However, it is important to counsel the patients about surgery expectations due to the fact that endometrioma itself reduces the quality of oocytes.

Endometriosis-associated infertility: From pathophysiology to tailored treatment

Despite the clinically recognized association between endometriosis and infertility, the mechanisms implicated in endometriosis-associated infertility are not fully understood. Endometriosis is a multifactorial and systemic disease that has pleiotropic direct and indirect effects on reproduction. A complex interaction between endometriosis subtype, pain, inflammation, altered pelvic anatomy, adhesions, disrupted ovarian reserve/function, and compromised endometrial receptivity as well as systemic effects of the disease define endometriosis-associated infertility. The population of infertile women with endometriosis is heterogeneous, and diverse patients' phenotypes can be observed in the clinical setting, thus making difficult to establish a precise diagnosis and a single mechanism of endometriosis related infertility. Moreover, clinical management of infertility associated with endometriosis can be challenging due to this heterogeneity. Innovative non-invasive diagnostic tools are on the horizon that may allow us to target the specific dysfunctional alteration in the reproduction process. Currently the treatment should be individualized according to the clinical situation and to the suspected level of impairment. Here we review the etiology of endometriosis related infertility as well as current treatment options, including the roles of surgery and assisted reproductive technologies.

Infertility workup: identifying endometriosis

Endometriosis was classically diagnosed during diagnostic laparoscopies, which used to be routinely performed up until a decade ago or so. This practice fitted with the long-held belief that surgery was the gold standard for diagnosing endometriosis. Today, the abandon of routine diagnostic laparoscopies-in favor of assisted reproductive technology-first therapeutic approaches-has created a void for diagnosing endometriosis. Modern-day imaging techniques-ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging-when used with a systematic approach have offered a reliable replacement option for diagnosing endometriosis. In infertility, endometriosis should be identified or excluded on the basis of past history or confirmation or exclusion suspicion on the basis of history and/or physical examination.

Endometrioma and assisted reproductive technology: a review

PURPOSE

Endometriomas are a common cause of infertility necessitating assisted reproductive technology (ART). It had been previously thought that surgical removal of the endometriomas prior to ART would improve reproductive outcomes, but recent data suggests that surgical cystectomy might affect the ovarian reserve, decreasing the chances of ART success. The aim of this article is to review the literature on the effects of endometrioma surgery on ART outcomes providing an overview of the current evidence and assessing the need for further studies.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed and MEDLINE databases to identify studies that discuss endometriomas and assisted reproductive technology before versus after surgery.

RESULTS

In women with an endometrioma requiring ART, growing evidence suggests that surgery might result in damage to the ovarian reserve and further decrease chances of fertility. However, pregnancy rates, implantation rates, fertilization rates, and live birth rates seemed to be consistently similar across both groups.

CONCLUSION

The current evidence is inconclusive on whether endometriomas should be surgically removed prior to ART. Further large randomized controlled trials are needed for a definite answer, and until then, management should be individualized.

Effects of ovarian endometrioma aspiration on in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of ovarian endometrioma aspiration on IVF/ICSI outcomes.

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases were searched to identify studies related to the treatment of endometrioma up to October 1, 2020, and the data of 1207 patients from 10 studies were analyzed using STATA.

RESULTS

The 10 studies in our analysis included 7 comparing aspiration and surgery and 6 comparing aspiration with no intervention. In the aspiration versus surgery groups, live birth rate [OR 0.97 (95% CI 0.51, 1.85), P = 0.925] and clinical pregnancy rate [OR 1.30 (95% CI 0.95, 1.80), P = 0.105] showed no significant difference between the two groups. Abortion rate [OR 4.26 (95% CI 1.38, 13.08), P = 0.011], the number of oocytes retrieved [mean difference 1.95 (95% CI 0.10, 3.81), P = 0.039], and the estradiol peak on hCG day [mean difference 392.16 (95% CI 230.14, 554.18), P < 0.001] were significantly higher in the aspiration group compared to the surgical group. In the aspiration versus the no intervention group, live birth rate [OR 0.84 (95% CI 0.45, 1.59), P = 0.602] and clinical pregnancy rate [OR 1.25 (95% CI 0.88, 1.77), P = 0.206] were not significantly different between the two groups. The abortion rate [OR 0.31 (95% CI 0.11, 0.88), P = 0.028] and the number of gonadotropin ampoules [mean difference - 3.13 ampoules (95% CI - 4.90, - 1.37), P < 0.001] were significantly lower in the aspiration group compared to the no intervention group.

CONCLUSION

Compared with surgical treatment or no intervention treatment, aspiration has less effect on ovarian response, ovarian reserve, and pregnancy outcomes.

Analysis of 2438 cycles for the impact of endometrioma and its surgery on the IVF outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Management of ovarian endometrioma before IVF treatment is still challenging. We aimed to assess the effect of the pre-cycle surgical removal of endometriomas on IVF outcomes in a large number of cycles in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment. Besides this, we also proposed to compare the cycle outcomes within both normo and poor responder patients to evaluate the impact of endometrioma and its surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a private IVF clinic between September 2014 and December 2018. A total of 2438 IVF/ICSI cycles of 1936 patients were reviewed. Patients who had previous endometrioma surgery (Group 1), patients with non-operated endometrioma (Group 2), and patients without endometriosis, including tubal factor infertility confirmed by laparoscopy and unexplained infertility without endometrioma (Group 3) were analyzed in this study.

RESULTS

Total dose of gonadotropins was significantly higher in group 1 than others (p < 0.05). However, antral follicle counts, estradiol levels on the day of hCG trigger, the number of retrieved and metaphase II oocytes were significantly lower in group 1 than in other groups (p < 0.05). Poor response to gonadotropins was more frequent in group 1 as compared to other groups (47.9%, 34.3%, 35.5%, respectively) (p < 0.05). Cycle cancellation rates were significantly higher in group 1 than in other groups (6.7%, 1.4%, and 2.8%, respectively) (p < 0.05). Clinical pregnancy (CPR) and live birth rates (LBR) per cycle and embryo transfer were not different among groups. However, CPR per cycle and embryo transfer were significantly higher in the operated endometrioma group within unexpected poor responders (p = 0.023, p = 0.010, respectively). CPR and LBR per cycle and per embryo transfer were similar within normo-responder patients. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that female age and poor response to gonadotropins were the significant variables in predicting live birth (OR: 0.946, CI: 0.926-0.966, p < 0.001 and OR: 3.294, CI: 2.336-4.645, p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Pre-cyle removal of endometrioma may have an adverse impact on ovarian reserve, and pregnancy outcomes seem to be similar with or without surgery in patients undergoing IVF treatment. However, endometrioma surgery may be considered in the subsequent IVF cycles of patients with lower than expected ovarian response.

The impact of endometriosis on the outcome of assisted reproductive techniques: role of fertility preservation

Endometriosis is one of the most common diseases associated with infertility. It requires different therapeutic approaches, depending on the type, whether superficial, ovarian or deep endometriotic nodules, clinical presentation, age or origin of infertility. Patients with endometriosis should be considered a group of high-risk for infertility and any intervention should be planned taking this consideration into account. For many years, surgery was the only tool in improving fertility outcomes. Nowadays, it remains the gold standard for the treatment of endometriosis, but it should be carefully used because of its harmful potential, leading to premature ovarian insufficiency and further infertility. With the development of modern assisted reproductive techniques (ART), which can offer better results in terms of fertility, the role of surgery progressively decreased. Nowadays, therapeutic approach is complex and multidisciplinary teams should be guiding individual treatment for each woman. Options include medical treatment, surgery, in vitro fertilization (IVF) or oocytes/embryo/ovarian tissue cryopreservation. There is a constant effort in developing diagnostic scores, in order to predict risk of infertility and create standard of practice, offering a long-term approach in terms of fertility preservation and quality of life.

Factors Influencing the Live Birth Rate Following Fresh Embryo Transfer Cycles in Infertile Women After Endometrioma Cystectomy

Background: Reproductive outcomes after fresh in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET) cycles are diverse in infertile women with a history of ovarian cystectomy for endometriomas. We aimed to develop a logistic regression model based on patients' characteristics including number of embryos transferred and stimulation protocols to predict the live birth rate in fresh IVF/ICSI-ET cycles for such patients. Methods: We recruited 513 infertile women with a history of ovarian cystectomy for endometriomas who underwent their first fresh ET with different stimulation protocols following IVF/ICSI cycles in our unit from January 2014 to December 2018. One or two embryo are implanted. Clinical and laboratory parameters potentially affecting the live birth rate following fresh ET cycles were analyzed. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to assess the relationship between predictive factors and live birth rate. Results: The overall live birth rate was 240/513 (46.8%). Multivariable modified Poisson regression models showed that two factors were significantly lowers the probability of live birth: female age ≥ 5 years (aOR 0.603; 95% CI 0.389-0.933; P = 0.023); BMI range 21-24.99 kg/m² compared with BMI <21 kg/m² (aOR 0.572; 95% CI 0.372-0.881, P = 0.011). And two factors significantly increased the probability of live birth: AFC >7 (aOR 1.591; 95% CI 1.075-2.353; P = 0.020); two embryos transferred (aOR 1.607; 95% CI 1.089-2.372; P = 0.017). Conclusions: For these infertile women who had undergone ovarian cystectomy for endometriosis, female age <35 years, AFC > 7, and two embryos transferred might achieve better clinical fresh IVF/ICSI-ET outcomes. BMI <21 kg/m² or ≥25 kg/m² might also have positive effects on the live birth rate, but different ovarian stimulation protocols had no significant effects. However, a larger sample size may be needed for further study.

Impact of Surgery for Deep Infiltrative Endometriosis before In Vitro Fertilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to compare reproductive outcomes in patients who underwent surgery for deep infiltrative endometriosis (DIE) before in vitro fertilization (IVF) with those in patients who underwent IVF without a previous surgery for DIE, to analyze data according to different types of surgery (complete or incomplete) or subgroups of patients (DIE with or without bowel involvement), and to assess surgical and IVF complications and data regarding safety concerns.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic literature search from January 1980 to November 2019 with no language restriction was performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. The search strategy used the following Medical Subject Headings terms: "in vitro," "fertilization," "IVF," "assisted reproduction," "colorectal," "endometriosis," "deep," "infiltrating," "deep infiltrative endometriosis," "intestinal," "bowel," "rectovaginal," "uterosacral," "vaginal," and "bladder."

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

We included studies that compared reproductive outcomes in women with infertility with DIE who received IVF with or without a previous surgery for DIE lesions. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan v.5.3; Cochrane Training, London, United Kingdom). The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the method recommended by Cochrane Collaboration.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

The systematic search retrieved 150 articles; 98 studies were potentially eligible, and their full texts were reviewed. Of these, 12 studies met our inclusion criteria, and 5 presented data suitable for inclusion in a meta-analysis; however, 2 of the studies provided overlapping data, and only the larger study was finally included. No randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were found. The pregnancy rate per patient was 1.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-2.64), the pregnancy rate per cycle was 1.84 (95% CI, 1.26-2.70), and the live birth rate per patient was 2.22 (95% CI, 1.42-3.46) times more likely for operated patients than for nonoperated ones. The addition of data from the incomplete surgery groups also showed a higher pregnancy rate per patient for surgery before IVF (odds ratio [OR] 1.63; 95% CI, 1.16-2.28). The results favor previous surgery in DIE with digestive involvement (OR 2.43; 95% CI, 1.13-5.22) and also in DIE without digestive involvement (OR 1.55; 95% CI, 0.61-3.95). A qualitative analysis of the complications of surgery and IVF showed a partial or complete lack of information on these issues as well as high heterogeneity in the reported data. None of these studies is an RCT; therefore, all have a high risk of selection and allocation bias, except for 1 study that statistically controlled the latter risk by using propensity scores. Funnel plots showed no asymmetry.

CONCLUSION

The results were very consistent for all the studied outcomes, showing a statistically significant benefit for surgery before IVF, although they should be confirmed with RCTs. In addition to the reproductive outcomes, safety data should also be reported to obtain a complete assessment of the risks and benefits.

The Significance of Planned Fertility Preservation for Women With Endometrioma Before an Expected Ovarian Cystectomy

Endometrioma is known to reduce the ovarian reserve and the extent of the decrease is more severe when ovarian surgery is performed. Therefore, to prevent this decline in fertility, patients with endometrioma are considered candidates for preoperative fertility preservation (FP). In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of FP in women with endometrioma before planned ovarian surgery. A total of 95 cycles in 62 patients with endometrioma, undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for FP using a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol before an expected ovarian surgery, were enrolled retrospectively. COS outcomes were compared according to endometrioma laterality. Additionally, first COS cycle outcomes in patients with endometrioma were compared with those in infertile patients, or in patients with a benign ovarian cyst using propensity score matching. When multiple COS cycles were performed, the results of cumulative cycles were analyzed. Embryo quality was worse in the bilateral endometrioma group. Compared with the infertile patient group, the patients with endometrioma had significantly lower Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) and fewer numbers of oocytes retrieved (median, 3.3 vs. 1.2, p<0.001; 7.0 vs. 4.0, p=0.009, respectively). Compared with mature oocytes in infertile patients or patients with a benign cyst, mature oocytes were fewer in patients with endometrioma, but this was not statistically significant (median, 4.0 vs. 3.0, p=0.085; 5.5 vs. 3.0, p=0.052, respectively). The median value of the cumulative number of cryopreserved oocytes or embryos was 14.5 up to the fourth cycle compared to 3 up to the first cycle, with cumulative effect. Women with endometrioma should be counseled for FP before planned ovarian cystectomy. The number of cryopreserved oocytes or embryos can be increased by repeated cycles.

Miscarriage on Endometriosis and Adenomyosis in Women by Assisted Reproductive Technology or with Spontaneous Conception: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

In the past several years, there has been an increasing concern on miscarriage caused by endometriosis or adenomyosis. However, the results reported by different studies remain controversial. The present study is aimed at assessing the impact of endometriosis and adenomyosis on miscarriage.

Materials and Methods

Searches were carried out in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library for studies published from inception until February 29, 2020. The investigators included studies that evaluated miscarriage risk in pregnant women with endometriosis or adenomyosis by assisted reproductive technology (ART), or with spontaneous conception (SC). Miscarriage (<28 weeks) was the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were antepartum hemorrhage (APH), postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), preterm birth, low birthweight, placenta praevia, placental abruption, ectopic pregnancy, stillbirth, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Endnote was used for the study collection, and the data analyses were carried out by two authors using Review Manager version 5.2.

Results

Thirty-nine studies, which is comprised of 697,984 women, were included in the present study. Miscarriage risk increased in women with endometriosis in SC (OR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.44-2.28, I² = 96%) compared with those without endometriosis, while women with endometriosis who underwent ART had a similar miscarriage risk, when compared to those with tubal infertility (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.92-1.14, I² = 0%). Compared with those without adenomyosis, women with adenomyosis had an augmented miscarriage risk in ART (OR: 2.81, 95% CI: 1.44-5.47, I² = 64%). Compared with those without endometriosis, women with endometriosis had higher odds of APH, PPH, preterm birth, stillbirth, and placenta praevia. No difference was observed in the incidence of ectopic pregnancy, placental abruption, pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, low birthweight, and IUGR.

Conclusion

Women with endometriosis had an augmented miscarriage risk in SC and a similar miscarriage risk during ART. Adenomyosis was associated with miscarriage in pregnant women using ART.

Effect of endometrioma and its surgical excision on fertility (Review)

Endometrioma is the cystic lesion of ovaries originating from endometrial glands and stroma; it is identified in 17-44% of patients with endometriosis. Numerous existing studies have reported the association between endometrioma and infertility. However, an absolute cause-effect association requires further confirmation. Available evidence has suggested that ovarian reserve may be impaired by spatial occupation influences, local reaction or both, affecting the reproductive health of females. Given the increased focus on the pathophysiological mechanisms of endometrioma, surgical excision has commonly been considered to avoid further ovarian damage. However, the potential adverse effect of this surgery on the ovarian reserve has recently become a focal point. Whether or not surgical excision can facilitate subsequent conception in young females planning to be pregnant is controversial. As shown in the present review on the effects of endometrioma and its removal in females requiring assisted reproductive technology, prior surgery for endometrioma may not improve assisted fertility results and may further decrease the number of oocytes retrieved in the affected females. Subsequent studies are needed to ascertain the optimal management of infertility in the setting of endometriomas.

Comprehensive characterization of endometrial competing endogenous RNA network in infertile women of childbearing age

Endometriosis is widely associated with infertility in women of childbearing age, for which there have been no effective treatments. Recent studies suggest that the dysregulation of RNAs contributes to the pathogenesis of endometriosis, so we conduct the case-control genetic analysis to characterize the expression and interaction of different subtypes of RNAs in infertile women with endometriosis. The ectopic and eutopic endometrium of patients undergoing infertility treatment were collected and subjected to high throughput sequencing, and bioinformatics analysis was conducted to construct the competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network. As a result, the RNA interactive network was constructed in endometriosis, and a set of mRNAs such as cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) along with their corresponding miRNAs and lncRNAs were found to promote the growth and death of endometrial stromal cells, which was essential for the pathogenesis of endometriosis. These data suggest that RNA crosstalk is a crucial segment in the development of endometriosis, where CDK1 and PCNA may serve as emerging targets for the treatment of endometriosis-related infertility in women of childbearing age.

Topical Hemostatic Agents in Gynecologic Surgery for Benign Indications

Since a variety of procoagulant products, collectively called hemostatic agents, became available to surgeons in the mid-20th century, their use has increased across multiple specialties, including gynecology. Congruent with past research on the causes of regional variation in the practice of medicine, available evidence suggests that a central predictor for use of these products is physician preference rather than documented clinical necessity. Use of these products adds risks and avoidable cost. This article seeks to highlight specific gynecologic circumstances in which evidence and surgical judgment supports hemostatic agent use and other settings in which use should be reconsidered.

Influence of surgical evacuation on pregnancy outcomes of subsequent embryo transfer cycle following miscarriage in an initial IVF cycle: a retrospective cohort study

Background

It is still uncertain whether surgical evacuation adversely affects subsequent embryo transfer. The present study aims to assess the influence of surgical evacuation on the pregnancy outcomes of subsequent embryo transfer cycle following first trimester miscarriage in an initial in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycle.

Methods

A total of 645 patients who underwent their first trimester miscarriage in an initial IVF cycle between January 2013 and May 2016 in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital were enrolled. Surgical evacuation was performed when the products of conception were retained more than 8 h after medical evacuation. Characteristics and pregnancy outcomes were compared between surgical evacuation patients and no surgical evacuation patients. The pregnancy outcomes following surgical evacuation were further compared between patients with ≥ 8 mm or < 8 mm endometrial thickness (EMT), and with the different EMT changes.

Results

The EMT in the subsequent embryo transfer cycle of surgical evacuation group was much thinner when compared with that in the no surgical evacuation group (9.0 ± 1.6 mm vs. 9.4 ± 1.9 mm, P = 0.01). There was no significant difference in implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate or miscarriage rate between surgical evacuation group and no surgical evacuation group (P > 0.05). The live birth rate was higher in EMT ≥ 8 mm group when compared to < 8 mm group in surgical evacuation patients (43.0% vs. 17.4%, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

There was no significant difference in the pregnancy outcomes of subsequent embryo transfer cycle between surgical evacuation patients and no surgical evacuation patients. Surgical evacuation led to the decrease of EMT, especially when the EMT < 8 mm was association with a lower live birth rate.

Current Resources for Evidence-Based Practice, November 2019

A review of new resources to support the provision of evidence-based care for women and infants.

The Role of Fertility Preservation in Women with Endometriosis: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the available evidence concerning fertility preservation techniques in the context of women with endometriosis.

DATA SOURCES

We searched for studies published between 1984 and 2019 on endometriosis and Assisted Reproductive Technology outcomes. We searched MEDLINE and PubMed and performed a manual search of reference lists within identified studies.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

A total of 426 articles were identified, and 7 studies were eligible to be included for the systematic review. We included all published studies, excluding reviews, case reports, and animal studies.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Despite a significant increase in the number of studies addressing fertility preservation over the study period, we found a relative lack of evidence addressing the use of fertility preservation techniques in women with endometriosis. The studies identified included 2 case reports, 1 histological science study, and 4 retrospective cohort studies.

CONCLUSION

Women with endometriosis may benefit from fertility preservation techniques. However, there currently is a paucity of data in this population, especially when compared with other indications for fertility preservation. Although much knowledge can be translated from the oncofertility discipline, we have identified and discussed endometriosis-related changes to ovarian reserve and oocyte health that justify further well-designed research to confirm that fertility preservation outcomes are similar for women with endometriosis.