Oocyte Retrieval during Laparoscopic Vaginoplasty to Reduce Invasiveness in the Treatment of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome

Laparoscopic Davydov vs. laparoscopic Vecchietti neovaginoplasty in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome; a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the available evidence on the laparoscopic Davydov and Vecchietti methods to create a neovagina and to compare these techniques with a focus on neovaginal length, sexual function, operative time, and complications.

DESIGN

A systematic electronic search up to August 2022 using PubMed and Embase is performed.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENTS

Women with Mayer-Rokistansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.

INTERVENTIONS

All published clinical studies concerning the laparoscopic Davydov and laparoscopic Vecchietti procedures as a surgical technique to create a neovagina in women with Mayer-Rokistansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome were obtained. The guidelines for the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis were followed. The following data were extracted: operative time, hospital stay, major early complications (within 3 months postsurgery), dilation therapy, neovaginal length, vaginal discharge, vaginal stenosis, time to sexual activity, sexual satisfaction, penetrative sexual activity, dyspareunia, score on the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and duration of follow-up. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of articles.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Neovaginal length, FSFI scores, operative time, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 1,163 articles were identified, of which 31 studies were included in this systematic review. Of these, 12 studies (380 patients) are related to the Davydov method, 17 studies (804 patients) to the Vecchietti method, and 2 articles concern both. There is clinical heterogeneity and variety in the quality of the studies. Nineteen studies were included in the meta-analyses. The mean neovaginal length 12 months after the Davydov method is 8.3 cm (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.1-8.6), vs. 8.7 cm (95% CI 7.2-10.3) after the Vecchietti method. The mean FSFI score after the Davydov method is 28.9 (95% CI 26.8-31.1), compared with 27.5 (95% CI 25.0-30.1) after the Vecchietti method. The operative time of the Davydov method is 126 minutes (95% CI 109-143), compared with 40 minutes (95% CI 35-45) of the Vecchietti method.

CONCLUSIONS

The operations yield comparable neovaginal length, sexual function, and complication rates. The mean FSFI scores indicate no sexual dysfunction in either group. The operative time of the Davydov method is significantly longer. There is no superiority shown for one of the surgical techniques in functional terms.

Comparison of Sheares vaginoplasty, vaginoplasty using acellular porcine small intestinal submucosa graft and laparoscopic peritoneal vaginoplasty in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study is to compare the perioperative, anatomical and functional outcomes of patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome (MRKHS), undergoing Sheares vaginoplasty, vaginoplasty using acellular porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) graft or laparoscopic peritoneal (Davydov) vaginoplasty.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, a total of 117 patients with MRKHS undergoing creation of a neovagina from 2017 to 2020 were retrospectively investigated. Comparisons between continuous variables were performed using Student's t-test and between qualitative variables using chi-squared tests.

RESULTS

The operative time, return of bowel activity and return to work were the longest in the laparoscopic Davydov group (P < 0.001). The total cost was the highest in the SIS graft group (P < 0.001). The length of the neovagina was 7.9 ± 1.2 cm in the Sheares group, 7.1 ± 0.8 cm in the SIS graft group and 8.1 ± 1.1 cm in the laparoscopic Davydov group. The difference in the length of the neovagina was significant (P < 0.001). There was significant difference in the duration of continuous mould wearing (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the total female sexual function index (FSFI) scores or in the satisfaction scores of the male partner among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Sheares vaginoplasty and the vaginoplasty using SIS graft caused less trauma and provided similar functional results to laparoscopic peritoneal vaginoplasty. However, the patients in the Sheares group and SIS graft group needed to wear the mould for a longer duration post-surgery. Sheares vaginoplasty can provide a valuable and economic alternative method for the creation of a neovagina in patients with MRKHS.