Evaluation of the Console in Acquiring Laparoscopic Skills through Video Gaming

Just five more minutes, mom: why video games could make you a better endoscopist

BACKGROUND

Gaming is a growing industry, having met an exponential growth amid the pandemic context. Video games improve the allocation and speed of attention and provide better spatial orientation in visual processing. These same qualities are sought after in GI endoscopists. This study aimed to investigate whether individuals with a gaming history have superior fine motor and visual skills on a virtual reality (VR) endoscopy simulator and if gaming consoles could be added as a proficiency tool in acquiring endoscopic skills.

METHODS

Firstly, subjects' baseline psychomotor skills and hand-eye coordination were tested using a VR simulator. Secondly, subjects were assigned to either group C and asked to refrain from any gaming for 14 days, or group T, who were asked to play on a console for 14 days. All subjects were then retested.

RESULTS

81 students were included in the study. Baseline VR simulator testing showed better scores in those with a higher number of previous gaming hours (0 h-1598, 0 to 30 h-1970, 30 to 50 h-2150, 50 to 100 h-2395, > 100 h-2519; p < 0.05), with males outperforming females (p < 0.01). After spending an average of 19 h gaming, all parameters showed noteworthy improvement for those in group T (p < 0.01). No improvement was seen in group C.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects who engage in console gaming have superior psychomotor skills and perform better on VR simulators. Approximately 20 h of console gaming can improve one's simulator skills. With consoles being accessible, entertaining, and cheap, they could be used as an additional training platform for GI endoscopy residents.

Video gaming improves robotic surgery simulator success: a multi-clinic study on robotic skills

We aimed to investigate the effects of video game habits, duration of experience, and training in different surgical clinics on the success of robotic surgery simulators. In this prospective, observational, comparative, and multi-clinical study, all participants played Temple Run and Piano Tiles 2™ mobile games for 1 month, after answering a questionnaire including their sociodemographic characteristics, surgical experience, and past and current video game experience. At the end of the period, participants experienced four different robotic surgery simulator tasks (Camera Targeting 1, Energy Switching 1, Ring and Rail 2, Vertical Defect Suturing) in da Vinci® Skills Simulator™. Additionally, sociodemographic data were statistically analyzed with mobile game scores and 13 different performance scores obtained from the simulator. All robotic surgery simulator skill applications were carried out at Ege University Hospital in Izmir. All surgical residents in the general surgery, urology, and pediatric surgery clinics were included in the study. Sixty of the sixty-four participants in total completed all the processes. Four participants were excluded from the study. When clinical performances were compared, it was seen that the general surgery clinic performed better than other clinics in two parameters (overall score, time to complete) of the 'Camera Targeting' task (p = 0.01 and p = 0.006). Participants with mobile phone games experience were successful in the 'Energy Switching' task with less misapplied energy time (p = 0.039). Participants with high scores in Piano Tiles 2™ were more successful in the 'Energy Switching' task and completed the 'Ring Rail' task with fewer movements (p < 0.05). Participants with more surgical and laparoscopic surgery experience scored higher in the 'Camera Targeting' and 'Energy Switching' tasks and completed the assignments with less movement. Again, these participants completed the 'Vertical Defect Suturing' task faster and the 'Ring Rail' task with less movement. In addition, participants with more laparoscopy experience scored higher in the 'Ring Rail' task (p < 0.05). In this study, we showed the effect of recent gaming experience on robotic surgery abilities along with previous video game experience. For surgeons and surgeon candidates in robotic surgery training, the importance of video game-based learning techniques will increase when combined with rapidly developing simulation technologies.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05510960.

Can video games enhance surgical skills acquisition for medical students? A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically assess literature examining the impact of being a gamer or participating in video-game-based training on surgical skills acquisition amongst medical students.

BACKGROUND

Video games and surgical procedures share similar skills such as visuospatial abilities and hand-eye coordination; therefore, video games can be a valuable tool for surgical training amongst medical students. However, comprehensive, up-to-date systematic reviews are necessary to confirm.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE was performed in April 2020 with no limits set on the date of publication. Observational and randomized controlled studies were included. Quality and bias were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for nonrandomized studies and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system for randomized studies.

RESULTS

A total of 575 participants from 16 studies were included. The most common surgical skills tested were laparoscopy (n = 283, from 8 studies) and robotic surgery (n = 199, from 5 studies). A history of gaming and video-game-based training were associated with improved metrics in robotic surgery and laparoscopy, respectively. Neither was beneficial in arthroscopy or bronchoscopy. Studies using the Wii U and Underground reported significant improvement in overall laparoscopic performance.

CONCLUSION

Video games demonstrate potential as adjunctive training in surgical skill education, with a history of gaming and video-game-based training being beneficial in robotic surgery and laparoscopy, respectively. Methodological heterogeneity amongst included studies limit the ability to make conclusive decisions; thus, future studies with long-term follow-up, larger sample sizes, outcomes stratified by video-game characteristics, and up-to-date technology are necessary.

Learning curve of surgical novices using the single-port platform SymphonX: minimizing OR trauma to only one 15-mm incision

Background

Minimally invasive single-port surgery is always associated with large incisions up to 2–3 cm, complicated handling due to the lack of triangulation, and instrument crossing. The aim of this prospective study was to report how medical students without any laparoscopic experience perform several laparoscopic tasks (rope pass, paper cut, peg transfer, recapping, and needle threading) with the new SymphonX single-port platform and to examine the learning curves in comparison to the laparoscopic multi-port technique.

Methods

A set of 5 laparoscopic skill tests (Rope Pass, Paper cut, Peg Transfer, Recapping, Needle Thread) were performed with 3 repetitions. Medical students performed all tests with both standard laparoscopic instruments and the new platform. Time and errors were recorded.

Results

A total of 114 medical students (61 females) with a median age of 23 years completed the study. All subjects were able to perform the skill tests with both standard laparoscopic multi-port and the single-port laparoscopic system and were able to significantly improve their performance over the three trials for all five tasks—rope pass (p < 0.001), paper cut (p < 0.001), peg transfer (p < 0.001), needle threading (p < 0.001), and recapping (p < 0.001). In 3 out of 5 tasks, medical students performed the tasks faster using the standard multi-port system—rope pass (p < 0.001), paper cut (p < 0.001), and peg transfer (p < 0.001). In the task recapping, medical students performed the task faster using the new single-port system (p = 0.003). In the task needle threading, there was no significant difference between the standard multi-port system and the new single-port system (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

This is the first study analyzing learning curves of the commercially available SymphonX platform for abdominal laparoscopic surgery when used by novices. The learning curve and the error rate are promising.